Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
Online Users |
There are currently 952 online users. » 0 Member(s) | 950 Guest(s) Bing, Google
|
Latest Threads |
The Catholic Trumpet: Ann...
Forum: Catholic Prophecy
Last Post: Stone
Yesterday, 03:34 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 67
|
Asylum seeker from Afghan...
Forum: Anti-Catholic Violence
Last Post: Stone
Yesterday, 03:22 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 36
|
Great-grandson of Archduk...
Forum: General Commentary
Last Post: Stone
Yesterday, 07:08 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 71
|
LFSPN - At the March For ...
Forum: LFSPN
Last Post: Stone
Yesterday, 06:52 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 59
|
Purgatory Explained by th...
Forum: Resources Online
Last Post: Stone
Yesterday, 06:49 AM
» Replies: 30
» Views: 2,531
|
Fr. Ruiz: Renewal of the ...
Forum: Rev. Father Hugo Ruiz Vallejo
Last Post: Stone
Yesterday, 06:42 AM
» Replies: 10
» Views: 694
|
Fr. Hewko's Sermons: Feas...
Forum: November 2024
Last Post: Stone
11-19-2024, 12:44 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 67
|
Fr. Ruiz Sermons: 2024 1...
Forum: Fr. Ruiz's Sermons November 2024
Last Post: Deus Vult
11-18-2024, 10:18 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 92
|
Outlines of New Testament...
Forum: Church Doctrine & Teaching
Last Post: Stone
11-18-2024, 07:52 AM
» Replies: 5
» Views: 1,077
|
Fr. Hewko: Cathedrals Pro...
Forum: Fr. Hewko's Sermons, Catechisms, & Conferences
Last Post: Stone
11-18-2024, 07:46 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 81
|
|
|
Transcription: Fr. Hekwo's Sermon for the 24th Sunday after Pentecost |
Posted by: Stone - 11-11-2024, 08:42 AM - Forum: Rev. Father David Hewko
- No Replies
|
|
Fr. Hewko: 24th Sunday after Pentecost
☩PRAEDICATIO☩ from THE☩TRUMPET | November 5, 2024
Today is the Epistle and Gospel from the 4th Sunday after Epiphany. For today, the 24th Sunday after Pentecost. Here in Tannersville, Pocono Mountains, Pennsylvania.
The Epistle is taken from St. Paul's letter to the Romans, Chapter 13: “Brethren, owe no man anything but to love one another. For he that loveth his neighbor has fulfilled the law. For thou shalt not commit adultery. Thou shalt not kill. Thou shalt not steal. Thou shalt not bear false witness. Thou shalt not covet. And if there be any other commandment it is comprised in this word, Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself. The love of our neighbor worketh no evil. Love, therefore, is the fulfilling of the law.”
The Holy Gospel, taken from St. Matthew, chapter 8: “At that time when Jesus entered into the ship, his disciples followed him. And behold, a great tempest arose in the sea, so that the ship was covered with waves. But he was asleep, and they came to him and awaked him, saying, Lord, save us, we perish. And Jesus saith to them, Why are ye fearful, O ye of little faith? Then rising up he commanded the winds in the sea, and there came a great calm. But the men wondered, saying, What manner of man is this? For the winds in the sea obey him.”
Thus are the words of the Holy Gospel.
Listen to the words of Pope Leo XIII: He says, “If the natural law enjoins upon us to love devotedly and to defend the country that gave us birth, very much more is it the urgent duty of Christians to be ever animated by like sentiments towards the Church. For the Church is the holy city of the living God, born of God himself, and by him built up and established. Therefore we are bound to love dearly the country once we have received the means of enjoyment this mortal life affords. But we have a much more urgent obligation to love with ardent love the Church to which we owe the life of the soul, a soul that will endure forever.”
That's Pope Leo XIII, Sapiensa Christiane. And then Pope Pius XI, in his Encyclical Caritate Christi Compulsi, he says, “To create this atmosphere of lasting peace, neither peace treaties, nor the most solemn pacts, nor international meetings or conferences, nor even the noblest and most disinterested efforts of any statesman will be enough, unless in the first place are recognized the sacred rights of natural and divine law.” Pius XI.
So in other words, if the natural law, which is the very bottom of morality, the very basis of morality, if that is violated, you cannot have lasting peace. And we just heard in the Epistle the basics of the natural law.
You shall not commit adultery. When a man is married to another woman, he cannot even think of another woman, nor a woman of another man in their marriage. They cannot even think of that, nor commit adultery, either in thought or actions.
It's against the natural law. It's also against the natural law to kill. Now, there's a legitimate self-defense. There's a legitimate self-defense of one's country. When it's being unjustly attacked, soldiers may rise up to defend their country. These are obvious duties of justice.
But outside of those extraordinary measures, we cannot kill. And abortion, as you know as well as I, I don't need to convince you, abortion is horrible murder. It is against the natural law.
And at any time, the moment there's conception, God infuses the soul. That's a living human being. And God showed this when St. John the Baptist danced in the womb of his mother, St. Elizabeth, when our Lord approached him in the womb of his mother, the Virgin Mary, the new tabernacle of the New Testament.
And St. John the Baptist, in his mother's womb, at about seven or eight months, was jumping with joy. So at any time, from conception to birth, after birth, until old age even, to kill anyone is murder and is against the natural law.
Listen to Pope Leo XIII on his encyclical, Immortale Dei, paragraph 46.
“In these are days as well to revive the examples of our forefathers. First and foremost, it is the duty of all Catholics, worthy of the name, and wishful to be known as most loving children of the Church, to reject without swerving whatever is inconsistent with so fair a title, to make use of popular institutions so far as can honestly be done for the advancement of truth and righteousness. To strive that liberty of action should not transgress the bounds marked out by nature and the law of God. To endeavor to bring back all civil society to the pattern and form of Christianity which we have described.”
So Pope Leo XIII had been describing in this encyclical the urgent necessity that the Church and State work together and that the State cannot be indifferent on religion. The State must profess the true religion.
Otherwise it will be a disaster for the country. So that is our goal as Catholics and not just as Catholics, it's just part of the natural law that we adore the true God and render to Him adoration and obedience and respect His law. And there's law that's His divine law that He revealed through His Holy Catholic Church the one true Church.
And then there is the human law of the civil law which is in accordance with reason, it's supposed to be anyway. Any laws that go against the laws of God are not laws at all. Such as euthanasia, abortion, sodomite parades and all that.
And then there's what's called the natural law and that's what's most attacked today. All the other laws of God are already out the window. The enemies of Christ are now attacking the very natural law.
And that's why we got this perversity, “oh I want to be a girl when I'm a boy, I'm a boy and I want to be a girl”, it's just sick, absolutely perverse. And all the body piercing and tattooing and all this just shows the revival of pagan practices because we've become pagans again. And when you look at history, what did all the pagans do? The Chaldeans, the Mayans, the Aztecs, the Assyrians, the Carthaginians, there was always child sacrifice, always.
Always the murder of children because Satan is bloodthirsty he wants blood and he wants the blood especially of children because he hates their innocence; he hates the fact that they can go to heaven; he hates the fact that our Lord loves children so much. Suffer the little children to come to me for of such is the kingdom of heaven, these little ones, so let's consider the little ones that the church defends. Pope Leo XIII is saying: I continue, “It is barely possible to lay down any fixed method by which such purposes are to be attained because the means adopted must suit places and times widely differing from one another nevertheless, above all things unity of aim must be preserved and similarity must be sought after in all plans of action both these objects will be carried into effect without fail if all will follow the guidance of the apostolic see of tradition of course as the rule of life and obey the bishops of tradition of course whom the Holy Ghost has placed to rule the church of God the defense of Catholicism indeed necessarily demands that in the profession of doctrines taught by the church all shall be of one mind and all steadfast in believing and care must be taken never to connive which is to work with evil in any way at false opinions never to withstand them less strenuously than truth allows, in mere matters of opinion it is permissible to discuss things with moderation but the desire of searching into the truth without unjust suspicion are angry recriminations” and so forth
Pope Leo XIII also stresses that he always stresses over and over again the importance of the state to recognize the natural law, to not violate the natural law to not violate the moral law and again and again and again the most basic moral law is you don't kill your baby in the womb or out of the womb you don't kill them and you don't kill them when they're old age either this is just again as Saint Paul says “the law of God is written in our hearts” nobody needs to be told you don't kill your neighbor everyone knows this is wrong and every woman that aborts her baby she hears the screams of that baby the rest of her life. It will always haunt her although God in his mercy he will always forgive such a crime of a repentant sinner he always will.
But I think we're at the point now where we Catholics we have to make reparation very much reparation to the Sacred Heart of Jesus and Mary because we're on the verge of elections and either candidate either one of them is going to continue the slaughter of the innocents. It's frightening that we have come to this in our country, in any modern country that the only way to be elected is that you want more blood of children. It's frightening that we have come to such a state of degradation and all this blood cries to heaven for vengeance so what do we Catholics do? we must make reparation we must make reparation to the Sacred Heart of Jesus to the Immaculate Heart of Mary and be prepared to do more and more because whoever gets in and that's decided, as we all know that's decided by the synagogue of Satan they decide who will run this country and we've already seen stolen elections not just in the United States, but in many other countries that's how the communists take over a country they steal elections they rig them, they lie, they cheat that's their method.
But we have come down to a time now where show me any candidate that's pro-life I mean this is just the basic natural law, where is any candidate running for presidency that's pro-life that will at least defend the most basic natural law the right to live as a human being which happens, you're a human being the moment the soul is infused into the mother by the miracle of this conception so in vitro fertilization involves at least for each child that's conceived in the test tube which is already against the natural law and condemned by the Catholic church and even, believe it or not, Pope Francis of all people condemned this because it's such a violent attack against the order that God established. But every IVF victim and child that survives there's always at least 40 to 50 and more abortions involved direct abortions the pill, which both candidates now fully endorse will go on with the bloodshed and the murder into millions and millions and millions.
As one politician told me, he said that with the pill now they're going to end up closing down the buildings to do abortions because the pills will do it early right through the mail and he made the point that these women who take these pills you're going to have some psychotic, crazy women more and more crazy women come down the road because they're going to see the little baby, which the pill has flushed out, they're going to see that little baby and that will always haunt them the rest of their life and into eternity. And if they're repentant, they're going to thank God for His mercy who is all loving and good and will forgive a repentant sinner there's no doubt about that and that goes for the doctors and nurses who are directly involved with abortions if they are sorry and repentant, God will forgive them.
Look at Abby Johnson she did over 20,000 abortions, poor thing but now she's doing everything to make reparations she's gone to confession, she's converted she's become Catholic, she's abandoned this, pray that she comes fully to Catholic tradition but at least she sees this horrendous crime and she's doing everything she can to stop it. Same with Dr. Bernard Nathanson he was the one that many years put out the film called, The Silent Scream, and now we know that the babies in the mother's womb when they're attacked by abortion and pulls off their legs and arms and rips them to shreds the babies are fighting for their life and some of them scream and now it's visible on the ultrasound. That's what converted Abby Johnson when she saw the horror of what she saw happening on the video of the ultrasound scan she was horrified and it changed her.
So again these are just questions of the natural law and we have fallen this low where the sins against the natural law have become the norm so we Catholics must make reparations because either candidate that is picked by the synagogue of Satan either one of them is going to continue the horrible massacre genocide so what do we do? We want to offer the Sacred Heart of Jesus in reparation, we want to pray the rosary every day in reparation and sometimes do extra prayers, extra penance in reparation. When you have the blessed sacrament, go and adore our Lord to make reparation and in this month of November. Go to the cemeteries, pray for the souls in Purgatory, because you can gain a plenary indulgence up until November 8th. You can gain a plenary indulgence for the souls in Purgatory by going to the cemetery and praying 6 Our Father, 6 Hail Mary, 6 Glory Be's for the souls in Purgatory and then add a 7th Our Father, Hail Mary, Glory Be for the Pope to gain the plenary indulgence. You can do that every day and families should go. In Mexico and in many good Catholic countries that used to be very Catholic this was the month many families just went to go pray the rosary at the cemeteries for the souls in Purgatory.
So that's something we can also do is make reparation because this country as Cardinal Pierre Poitier said once: “You don't want Christ the King and you reject his kingship you reject his laws over the government laws”, that now endorse even at the state level which is horrifying, abortion and all these horrible crimes and full rights for the sodomites and full rights for satanism and any false religion. This means the ruination and the collapse of any country, says Cardinal Pierre. If you will not have the blessings and the prosperity that comes with the social kingship of Jesus Christ you will have to endure the collapse the ruin, the devastation, the catastrophic disaster of rejecting him and that's where we're headed that's where we're headed there's a saying that if God doesn't punish us, the modern world, he owes an apology to Sodom and Gomorra. And our age has fallen worse now than the age of Sodom and Gomorrah. It's plunging fast so we must make reparation to the Heart of Jesus, live in the state of grace, keep the commandments.
And we know there are hundreds and hundreds of prophecies from the Blessed Virgin Mary to many, many saints and mystics who foretell a terrible chastisement on this world which will be one of the worst ever recorded in history, maybe even worse than the flood of Noah maybe even worse worse because one, it won't be by water it'll be by fire and at least by water, you know, when you start drowning you can make an act of contrition before you drown, but with fire, it'll be fast and many will die in mortal sin and that's a tragedy of tragedies. Sister Lucia saw the coming chastisement and she just shuddered in horror but she said that even the worst disaster, she said is that so many souls of children, of married people of boys, girls, men, women priests, bishops, popes go to hell, will go to hell many will be lost, she said and that's the worst disaster is the loss of so many souls.
So we Catholics, we have got to realize we live in Sodom and Gomorrah. It's on the verge of being punished and now we're at the point where there's no more pro-life candidates. There used to always be a pro-life candidate always and the bishops, even Novus Ordo ones and priests, even Novus Ordo ones used to preach you cannot vote pro-abortion you have to vote pro-life, always choose the one pro-life, always, that was always the Catholic position, even by Novus Ordos, and now, where are they? It's frightening that we have come to this, that to get anywhere in politics now, you have to be pro-abortion, which means continue the bloodshed continue the sacrifice of children like they did in the Old Testament giving full grown little babies to Moloch and burn them alive, give them to Satan to burn them alive. And they had to play the drums as Jeremiah shouts out at these people, God will destroy you for killing your young. These sins cry to heaven for vengeance, and then he used to preach to them in the valley of Jopheth. They would pound the drums to hide their conscience and to hide and cover the screams of the dying children which were done very frequently.
So by abortion we have passed it's 4,000 a day at least by abortion and when the pill comes more approved by state level the numbers will just skyrocket into the billions so there's a point when God says enough and we don't know when that is because God, His mercy far outweighs his justice. And we know that from the time he told Noah I'm going to destroy the earth, build the ark here's the instructions, here's the blueprint how many years was it from when he told Noah start building the ark to the actual flood it was 100 years, a whole century, so God is not in a rush to punish.
So while he does not punish us we must make reparation to Him and realize that we don't belong in this world, we should not pick up the spirit of this world and pick up it's fashions, pick up it's ways of thinking, pick up it's ways of speaking pick up it's whole worldly ways of living without prayer, without God, without self sacrifice without ordering our whole life to obedience to God's commandments. The best reparation we can do is to seek God with all our hearts love Him with all our hearts and love His commandments, keep His commandments and the modern world is trying to destroy what's left of God's commandments and make it seem normal to live in mortal sin and Pope Francis, he's added to this he's stacking souls in hell by the hundreds because he now permits giving communion to Catholics who've divorced their husband and wife and remarried and living in adultery and mortal sin and he has no problem giving them communion and approving their lifestyle, same with the rainbow lifestyle so he's just stacking more souls to hell this poor, poor unfortunate man poor unfortunate man so we Catholics, what do we do?
This is the age we must console the Heart of Jesus and Mary and make reparation that is what our lady asked “make reparation to my Immaculate Heart”, pull some thorns out, please and we do this by the daily rosary, keeping the commandments, sanctifying our life devotion to the Immaculate Heart of Mary, doing our duties of state the best we can. We have to make reparation because maybe you're praying the rosary every day and carrying the cross every day when the chastisement does finally hit when it does hit, you might save many souls, you might win for them the grace of conversion and repentance before they die.
On a much happier note today we have the joy of first communion, little Marcella, she will make her first communion and she has a beautiful white dress on she has beautiful white gloves and a beautiful white veil God bless you, Marcella, but what our Lord really wants is your whiteness of soul the purity of our soul that's what He wants that we with all our heart want to love God and all of us with all our heart receive Him in communion asking a burning love of our Lord Jesus Christ and Jesus Christ crucified Jesus Christ showing His heart surrounded by thorns and dripping with blood that's the devotion praised by the Virgin Mary, praised by so many saints praised by the angels who adore the Heart of Jesus the loving Heart of Jesus.
And that's why that vision of Sister Faustina and that painting of the so-called Divine Mercy image, it was condemned by the church and partly because there's no Sacred Heart, there's rays of light from Christ's chest but there's no Sacred Heart and the devil has an immense hatred for devotion to the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the church had to defend the devotion to the Sacred Heart of Jesus against the attacks of the Jansenists of the Synod of Pistoia and all the modern liberals who called it ‘excessive or too sentimental’. And it was Pius XII who wrote a great encyclical defending devotion to the Heart of Jesus.
But that image of the Christ without the Sacred Heart that cannot be pleasing to God at all and this was recently promoted as you'll read in The Recusant, Bishop Williamson has been promoting recently some apparition in Texas where they're all about the Divine Mercy and all about Novus Ordo Mass so why is he doing this? I have no explanation, but don't listen to it because it's nonsense and it's deceitful. He knows better, you can read about it in The Recusant. I don't know why he's doing this. Archbishop Lefebvre would never approve of that, that's for sure.
So I remind you little flock here in Pennsylvania and those following the Mass, we have come to the time where we have to expect a terrible chastisement, for sure it's foretold, it's going to happen but we must make reparation because we come to a new dimension of evil where any candidate that gets in is pro-abortion and this is unbelievable that we have come to this. That means we have reached a new depth of depravity which will provoke the anger of God and there's a time when God just says “Enough”, as He's done many times in the history of the world and punished a nation and people. And the Virgin Mary gave us a little glimpse of how serious the Chastisement will be, whatever form it takes: world war, a comet, I don't know but she says “whole nations will be annihilated”. Whole nations blown off the face of the earth.
So Marcella, when you receive our Lord today, ask Him a great love for Him and ask Him to love Him with all your heart and your whole soul and your whole mind, and we must do the same. And ask always to be white, to be pure in your thoughts to be pure in what you see and permit yourself to see, ask yourself always “am I doing my actions alone or in public to please God?”, because our guardian angels always see us when we're alone or when we're in public it doesn't matter, our guardian angels always are with us. So it's always, St. John Bosco's advice was always, behave like you're in the presence of someone else, our guardian angel always, even in our thinking, in our words always so ask this purity of heart, this purity of soul. It is a grace in such an impure world that glories in its shame whose God is its belly and sins below the belly and glories in murdering children for the sake of convenience and pleasure and economic stability, but even that will be taken away
And in this month, in this month, Marcella, think of the souls in Purgatory you're receiving your First Communion in this month of November so maybe that's a little sign of God that you should have a great devotion to the souls in Purgatory, to pray for them also how many are in Purgatory and they can't help themselves but they can help us.
Let me just close with a few examples about Purgatory to inspire you all to pray for the souls in Purgatory this month and go frequently to the cemetery, especially these next eight days and then throughout November pray for the souls and don't forget them. This is taken from the book on Purgatory, a very good book and here's a few examples the angelic doctor St. Thomas Aquinas offered his prayers and sacrifices to God for his sister who had just died when he was professor of theology at the University of Paris. His sister who had just died in Capua at the convent of St. Mary of which she was the abbess, so his sister was a nun, as soon as he heard of her deceased he recommended her soul to God with great fervor. Some days later she appeared to St. Thomas asking him to have pity on her soul and to redouble his prayers because she suffered cruelly in the flames of Purgatory. St. Thomas hastened to offer for her all the satisfaction of his power and solicited also the suffrages of several of his friends so among his friends was St. Albert the Great, St. Bonaventure so he got the monks and the fellow Dominicans to pray and the nuns to pray and thus attained the deliverance of his sister who came herself to announce the happy news of her entering heaven.
Also sometime after this having been sent to Rome by his superiors the soul of this sister appeared to him in all the glory of triumphant joy she told St. Thomas Aquinas that his prayers had been heard that she was freed from suffering and was going to enjoy eternal rest in the bosom of God. Familiarized with these supernatural communications St. Thomas feared not to interrogate the apparition and asked what had become of his two brothers Arnold and Landolph who had died sometime previous. Arnold is in Heaven, replied his sister and there enjoys a high degree of glory for having defended the church and the sovereign Pontiff against the aggressions of the Emperor Frederick. As for Landolph he is still in Purgatory for he suffers much and is greatly in need of assistance. As regards yourself, my dear brother, she added, a magnificent place awaits you in paradise in recompense for all you have done for the Church. Hasten to put the last stroke of the different works which you have undertaken, for you will soon join us.
So St. Thomas at that time was working on the treatise of the Holy Eucharist. History tells us that in fact he lived but a short time after this event. On another occasion the same saint being in prayer at the church of St. Dominic at Naples, saw approaching him brother Romano who had succeeded him at Paris in the chair of theology teaching theology. St. Thomas Aquinas thought at first that he had just arrived from Paris for he was ignorant of his death. He therefore arose and went to meet him, saluted him and asked him about his health and the motive for his journey and brother Romano answered, I am no longer of this world, the religious said with a smile, and by the mercy of God I am already in the enjoyment of eternal beatitude. I come by the command of God to encourage you in your labors and then St. Thomas Aquinas asked immediately, Am I in the state of grace? He answered, Yes dear brother and your works are very agreeable to God. And you, had you to suffer any Purgatory, said St. Thomas. Yes, for 14 days on account of little infidelities which I had not sufficiently expiated on earth. Then St. Thomas whose mind was constantly occupied with questions of theology profited by the opportunity to penetrate the mystery of the beatific vision, but he was answered with this verse of psalm 47 “as we have learned by faith we have seen with our eyes in the city of our God”, saying these words the apparition of brother Romano vanished leaving St. Thomas Aquinas inflamed with the desire of eternal good.
And then so many other stories of saints seeing the souls in Purgatory burning, some of them in ice and encouraging others to pray for them and then many times the souls in Purgatory answer prayers, and they will protect those who pray for them on earth. They will visibly even intercede to protect them so there is one thing we must imbibe in this month of November, that spirit of the church which is to have pity and compassion on the souls in Purgatory.
“What you have done to the least of these”, our Lord says, “you have done to Me”. So remember always the souls in Purgatory and as the Holy Catholic Church enters into this, we are in a storm that has never been seen before and like the Apostles in the boat when Our Lord was sleeping, they came to Him and said, Lord wake up do something because we are drowning the boat is going to flip it is going to be the end of everything what does Our Lord do? He says very calmly, “Oh ye of little faith” and then Our Lord stands up and He commands the winds and the sea and they instantly obeyed His command, and the sailors who were in the ship who were used to reading the clouds, reading the ocean, reading the sea the waves, they never saw anything like this a sudden calm in the storm and this is what our Lord promises through the Immaculate Heart of Mary. We are in the worst storm in the history of the Church ever but through the Immaculate Heart of Mary, He will bring the great calm, the great triumph of the Immaculate Heart and that is what we want, that is what we are praying for, that is the candidate we are going to elect for, The Immaculate Heart of Mary to reign over us because only she can help us at this point.
So let's turn to her in the Heart of Jesus with all our heart, all our strength, to come to our assistance, have pity on us, have pity on this nation, have pity on the western world, on the verge of one of the greatest chastisements, and let's console the heart of Jesus and Mary. Help them rescue as many souls as possible from the eternal flames of hell. “O my Jesus, forgive us our sins. Save us from the fires of hell, lead all souls to heaven especially those most in need of thy mercy.” Amen.
In the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost. Amen.
|
|
|
Latin Mass at cathedral in Bishop Strickland’s former diocese to be canceled |
Posted by: Stone - 11-11-2024, 07:47 AM - Forum: Vatican II and the Fruits of Modernism
- No Replies
|
|
Latin Mass at cathedral in Bishop Strickland’s former diocese to be canceled
According to a letter written by the current head of Tyler, Texas, Joseph Vásquez, celebration of the TLM
at the Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception will cease on November 30 following direction from the Vatican.
Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception in Tyler, Texas
Google Maps
Nov 9, 2024
(LifeSiteNews) — Celebration of the traditional Latin Mass at the Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception in Tyler, Texas, the diocese formerly headed by Bishop Joseph Strickland, is ending effective November 30.
According to a letter written by the current head of Tyler, Texas, Joseph Vásquez, celebration of the traditional Latin Mass at the Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception will cease on November 30 following direction from the Vatican.
According to the letter, which has been shared widely on social media, the decision came directly from the Vatican’s Congregation (now Dicastery) for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments.
According to the letter, Vásquez, after becoming Apostolic Administrator of the diocese following Francis’ removal of Strickland last November, inquired with Rome about how to implement the demands of Francis’ 2021 motu proprio Traditionis custodes, which ended universal permission for the traditional liturgy.
“Following the guidance of the Holy See, the celebrations according to the 1962 Missal at the Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception will come to an end on November 30, 2024,” explained Vásquez.
Vásquez did add that celebrations according to the 1962 Missal will still continue in the diocese at the parish of St. Joseph the Worker, which is headed up by the Priestly Fraternity of St. Peter.
Vásquez also acknowledged that the “transition” resulting from the decision may be “difficult” for some parishioners, assuring those in his diocese of his “pastoral concern” for them.
The news of the canceled liturgy in Tyler comes almost exactly one year after Strickland was removed as head of the diocese on November 11, 2023. Prior to his ouster by Francis, Strickland had expressed support for the Latin Mass and criticized Francis for suppressing its celebration.
Strickland has maintained an active public profile since being unceremoniously dismissed from his post. In fact, next week he will be leading a Rosary Rally outside the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops’ annual meeting, which will be covered live by LifeSiteNews.
|
|
|
Spain: Attacker Kills One Franciscan, Wounds Six |
Posted by: Stone - 11-11-2024, 07:44 AM - Forum: Anti-Catholic Violence
- No Replies
|
|
Spain: Attacker Kills One Franciscan, Wounds Six
gloria.tv | November 10, 2024
A man broke into the Franciscan monastery of Santo Espíritu del Monte in Gilet (3300 inhabitants), Valencia, Spain.
The police were alerted on Saturday 9 November, at 10:00 in the morning.
The assailant jumped the fence of the monastery, reached the cells of several monks on an upper floor, entered the rooms and attacked them with sticks and a bottle, shouting 'I am Jesus Christ and I will kill the monks'.
One of the victims was taken to hospital in a critical condition where he died, another is in a serious condition and five others were injured to varying degrees.
The Franciscan killed was 76 years old. He suffered a severe traumatic brain injury and was taken to the Clinical Hospital of Valencia, where he later died.
Another friar remains in critical condition. Three friars, aged 57, 66 and 95, who were injured in the attack, suffered bruises and trauma of varying severity and were treated at the scene.
On Sunday morning, Spanish media reported that police had arrested a 46-year-old man of Spanish origin in connection with the crime.
|
|
|
Opinion: Synod Issues Anti-Monarchical Blueprint |
Posted by: Stone - 11-10-2024, 08:51 AM - Forum: General Commentary
- No Replies
|
|
SYNOD ISSUES AN ANTI-MONARCHICAL BLUEPRINT
TIA | November 8, 2024
The four-year process of the bombastically announced Synod on Synodality ended on October 27, 2024. Convened in 2021, it had a two-year preparation phase and then met at the Vatican in two sessions – one in October 2023 and another in October 2024 – bringing together 368 voting members of which 272 were Bishops. According to the media, these two sessions were meant “to change the face of the Church.”
Given that the Bishops issued a practically empty document in 2023 – perhaps sabotaging Bergoglio’s expectations – the latter took his revenge and emptied the second session by creating 10 commissions alongside the Synod to address the hot topics. These commissions, created in March 2024, will outlive the Synod and continue their work until at least June 2025. Depending on a papal stroke of the pen they may last much longer.
But for the 2024 session of the Synod, Francis determined that it should deal only with the very generic theme: “How to Be a Synodal Church in Mission.”
The Bishops obediently issued their final document: For a Synodal Church: Communion, Participation, Mission. I plan to say a word about it here.
But before I begin the analysis, let me set out some presuppositions.
- The word synodality as well as collegiality, communion and co-responsibility are code words in Conciliar Church parlance for the democratization of the Church. Fr. Karl Rahner spelled it out straightforwardly: “We could hope for a true democratization of the Church. … Democratization … should be understood as a key for integrating the Church into the temporal and pluralist society, the existential and permanent substractum for the formation of the Church.” (1)
At right, Karl Rahner: ‘Democratization is key to integrate the Church into society’
- It is ironic that while the Bishops preach democracy in the Church and demand that inferiors should have all types of liberty and participation in decisions, they nonetheless obey the strict commands of the dictator Pope. They are not free to speak for themselves. The democratic liberty they preach is the opposite of the reality in which they live.
- As democracy is dying all over the world in the civil sphere and people are looking for a way to replace it, the Conciliar Church arrives on the scene breathless and boasting that it is democratic, trying to appear in style… It is a bit late; democracy is yesterday’s trend that has almost completely lost its appeal.
- Finally, let us not forget that the Catholic Church is essentially monarchical by divine institution. It is a Monarchy composed of the Sovereign Pontiff, the Hierarchy and the faithful. Pope St. Pius X in his letter Ex quo of December 26, 1910, condemned those who deny that the Catholic Church has been a Monarchy from her inception (DR 2147a, cf. 1822, 1825, 1827, 1831). When someone tries to destroy this order, he falls into either schism or heresy.
Bergoglio’s Synodal Church
The final document of the 2024 Synod is quite encompassing. It is one of the best syntheses I have read on the topic of democratizing the Church.
It establishes not only how the institutions of the Church should adapt to “synodality,” but also pledges to engender new styles of behaving, progressing spiritually, exerting authority, forming priests, being bishops and even being pope.
Some examples follow: (2)
- It is an extensive reform: “We ask all the local Churches to continue their daily journey with a synodal method of consultation and discernment, specifying concrete methods and formative ways to achieve a tangible synodal conversion in the various ecclesial realities (parishes, institutes of consecrated life, societies of apostolic life, groups of the faithful, dioceses, bishops’ conferences, regrouping of Churches etc.).” (§ 9)
- Synodality is a constitutive dimension of the Church: “With this document the Assembly recognizes and testifies that synodality, a constitutive dimension of the Church, is already part of the experience of many of our communities. At the same time, it suggests roads to walk, practices to enforce and horizons to explore.” (§ 11)
- It has multiple liturgies: “Deepening the understanding of the link between liturgy and synodality will help all Christian communities, in the plurality of their cultures and traditions, to adopt styles of celebration that manifest the face of the synodal Church.” (§ 27)
- It has an obligatory method: “Synodality is the walk together of Christians with Christ toward the Kingdom of God, united with all mankind; oriented toward the mission it includes gathering in assemblies at the different levels of the Church’s life, mutual listening, dialogue, community discernment, the formation of consensus as an expression of Christ’s presence in the Spirit, and the adoption of a decision in a differentiated co-responsibility.” (§ 28)
- “The synodal perspective, while touching the rich spiritual patrimony of Tradition, contributes to renewing its forms: a prayer open to participation, a discernment lived together, a missionary energy that is born from sharing and radiates as service.” (§ 44)
- It has a changeable theology: “Church synodality requires theologians to make theology in a synodal way, promoting among themselves the ability to listen, dialogue, discern and integrate the multiplicity and variety of requests and contributions.” (§ 67)
- It is a Church of the people for the people: “The synodal Assembly wants the People of God to have a greater voice in the choice of bishops.” (§70)
A session of the Synod 2024
- “In particular, some concrete demands emerge from the synodal process that need to be responded to in an adequate way in different contexts: a) greater participation of lay men and women in all phases of decision-making processes; b) broader access of lay men and women to positions of responsibility in dioceses and church institutions …; d) an increase in the number of qualified lay men and women who perform the role of judge in canonical processes …” (§ 77)
- It moves toward including all religions: “On this road a synodal Church commits itself to walk, in the various places where it lives, with believers of other religions and with persons of other convictions, sharing freely the joy of the Gospel and gratefully welcoming their respective gifts: to build together as brothers and sisters in a spirit of mutual exchange and help, justice, fraternity, peace and inter-religious dialogue.” (§ 123)
Here the reader has some highlights of the “synodal” Church - or democratic Church - that Progressivism is planning to establish in the Church.
The document gives still other suggestions to change the Papacy based on the document The Bishop of Rome, which we have already studied. At the end it suggests that an Ecumenical Synod of all “Christian” religions be held in 2025 on the occasion of the 1700th anniversary of the Council of Nicaea (cf. §§ 138, 139)
We see that the Synod 2024 did not “change the face of the Church” in the field of institutions, as some had emotionally predicted. However, in the realm of ideas and plans it released a road map that intends to finish the work of destroying every residuum of the monarchical character of the Catholic Church that still stands after 60 years of continuous attack by the Conciliar Revolution.
1. K. Rahner, ”Theological reflections on the problem of secularizatiom,” in Theology of Renewal, Montreal: Palm Publishers, 1968, vol. 1, p. 175.
2. Since the Synod's Final Document is only available in Italian, I am offering the reader my translation of it.
|
|
|
Fr. Coleridge [1884]: The Parable of the Cockle amid the Wheat |
Posted by: Stone - 11-10-2024, 08:38 AM - Forum: Church Doctrine & Teaching
- No Replies
|
|
The Parable of the Cockle amid the Wheat
From The Training of the Apostles Vol. III
Fr Henry James Coleridge, 1884, Ch. IX, pp 148-159
St. Matt. xiii. 24–28, 36–53
Story of the Gospels, § 59-62
Sung at the Fifth Sunday after Epiphany and in one of the “spare” Sundays before Advent.
[Taken from here and here.]
The second sowing parable
Of the series of parables of which we are now speaking, there are two only which have been explained for us at length by our Lord Himself. These are the two first in order, and, as we may fairly conclude, those which He thus explained may have been considered by Him as of the very highest importance.
Taken together, and with the rest, they present a very complete view of the conditions under which the Gospel teaching has to be carried on in the world, and they explain the principles of the Divine government in that teaching in a manner which it would have been difficult to ascertain so clearly if we had not this distinct interpretation of the figures by our Lord Himself. It is well, therefore, to subjoin at once this parable, with its explanation, to the Parable of the Sower, and the interpretation of that parable given by our Lord.
Quote:‘Another parable He proposed to them, saying, The Kingdom of Heaven is likened to a man that sowed good seed in his field. But while men were asleep, his enemy came and oversowed cockle among the wheat, and went his way. And when the blade was sprung up, and had brought forth fruit, then appeared also the cockle.
‘And the servants of the good man of the house coming said to him, Sir, didst thou not sow good seed in thy field? whence then hath it cockle? And he said to them, an enemy hath done this. And the servants said to him, Wilt thou that we go and gather it up?
‘And he said, No, lest perhaps gathering up the cockle, you root up the wheat also together with it. Suffer both to grow until the harvest, and in the time of the harvest I will say to the reapers, Gather up first the cockle, and bind it into bundles to burn, but the wheat gather ye into my barn.’
Explained to the disciples
This parable, then, was delivered to the multitudes, as well as to the disciples, and afterwards explained to the latter alone.
Quote:‘Then having sent away the multitudes, He came to the house, and His disciples came to Him, saying, Expound to us the parable of the cockle of the field.
‘Who made answer, and said to them, He that soweth the good seed is the Son of Man. And the field is the world, and the good seed are the children of the Kingdom, and the cockle are the children of the wicked one. And the enemy that soweth them is the devil. But the harvest is the end of the world, and the reapers are the angels. Even as cockle therefore is gathered up and burned with fire, so shall it be at the end of the world.
‘The Son of Man shall send His angels, and they shall gather out of His Kingdom all scandals and them that work iniquity, and shall cast them into the furnace, there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth. Then shall the just shine as the sun in the Kingdom of their Father. He that hath ears to hear, let him hear.’
In the Parable of the Sower, our Lord had described Himself as content with a good deal of failure in the beneficent work which He had undertaken for mankind.
He had intimated that He knew that much of the good seed which He came to sow would be wasted, and He had described the various manners in which that waste would be brought about. In some cases the seed was to be snatched away by the devil, as the seed by the pathside is snatched up by the birds.
In other cases, the seed was to fall as it were on stony ground, and wither away, the hearts in which it had been sown being too shallow and weak to give it strength enough to withstand temptation and trial.
In other cases the souls in which the seed was sown would be engrossed by worldly cares and ambitions, by the love of riches and other temporal things, unsatisfying in themselves and unable to supply the soul with true happiness, but still attractive and deceitful enough to occupy the mind and heart to the exclusion of the true goods.
In these cases the good seed would be stifled and made unfruitful. On the other hand, He was to find His reward and the recompense of His labours in the good seed which would spring up and return Him thirty for one, or sixty for one, or even a hundred for one.
The action of the evil one
Here, then, our Lord had said but little of the action of the evil one on the world.
It is true He had given a most important lesson as to that action, for He had pointed out that the utter forgetfulness and inattention with which so many careless persons come to lose their opportunities, and to be as if they had never heard the good word, were due, not simply to their own recklessness, but to the direct action of the devil, taking the seed out of their hearts, whether by direct action on their memories, or by filling their minds with other thoughts and affections which were sufficient to exclude the thoughts of faith and religion and the work of grace.
But for the remainder of the mishaps which were to prevent the fruitfulness of the seed, our Lord said nothing which could hint at the positive activity of the spirit of evil in the field which was sown by the word of God. There remained, therefore, these two great features in the description to be added by a new parable.
The first of these was the further action of the evil one which our Lord would permit, according to the general laws on which the universe is now governed, and the second was the manner in which God acts with regard to this action of His enemy. These two great features, then, form the special subject of this second parable.
Transfer of the image
In the Parable of the Sower, it will have been remarked that there is a transition from one point to another, in the use of the image, from the seed sown, to the persons in whose souls the seed is sown with so many diversities of issue, as to fruitfulness or the reverse.
The seed is the word of God, and yet the seed sown or dropped by the wayside are the heedless hearers, the seed sown among the thorns or on the stony ground are those who fail in this or that way to profit by the grace of God. So in the parable now before us, the seed is said to be the children of the kingdom and the children of the wicked one respectively, while the Son of Man sows the first and the evil one sows the other.
This transfer of the image is necessary in this second parable, for in this there is question of the manner in which God will treat those who are occasions of evil and scandal in His Kingdom. The parable deals with persons rather than with things.
But for the strict interpretation of the parable according to the lines of theological truth, we must remember the language of the Parable of the Sower, in which the seed is in the first instance the word of God, and in the second instance the persons in whom the word of God is sown.
The devil has no power to create evil, and our Lord in His dealings with the world gives or offers graces to all. He does not create good souls, and leave evil souls to be created by His enemy.
The parable speaks of the result of the action of our Lord on the one hand and of the action of Satan on the other, as being good and evil men, but in the truth to which the parable corresponds the evil are not purely and originally evil, nor so absolutely corrupted as to be beyond hope of recovery, and the good are not so good as to be preserved from the possibility of becoming evil, although wheat cannot become cockle nor cockle wheat. What is permitted to the devil is to ape and imitate, as well as to thwart as far as lies in his power, the action of God.
Phenomenon represented by the cockle
Our Lord looked forward prophetically to the history of the Church—nor had He far to look, when He knew already that among His own chosen disciples there was one who would turn out a true child of the wicked one—and He saw that which would always be the marvel of His saints and the special cross of His dearest friends, that the field in which the Gospel seed was to be sown would, when the time came for the fruits of the sowing to become manifest to the outward eye, be found to be full of a growth which certainly was not of the Gospel.
This is a phenomenon for which no account was furnished, as has been said, in the former parable, and our Lord represents it as a matter of surprise and complaint to the servants of the good master of the field. Who these servants are we are not distinctly told by our Lord, but the fact that the angels are said in the end of the parable to be the reapers is hardly sufficient to make us conclude that the angels are not also these good and zealous friends of their Master, Who would fain purge His field at once of the weeds which had so suddenly appeared.
The unfolding of the Divine plan of the government of the world, and especially of the Church, is spoken of in Scripture as the great study of the angels, who have not by nature the knowledge of the future, and to whom the beautiful wisdom of God reveals itself gradually in the course of events.
Angels and saints
And besides the angels, God has always among His servants on earth many who spend their days and nights in the prayerful contemplation of the progress of events in the world and in the Church, and to such also, far more even than to the angels, the phenomena of human history, and especially of that part of it which concerns the fortunes of the Catholic Church, are the subject and occasion of continual amazement and wondering surprise.
The angels, no doubt, would willingly, if it were the will of God, exert their wonderful power in the destruction and removal at once of all scandals in the Church. And the chosen saints and servants of God yet upon earth, must burn with zeal at the sight of so much evil and so much mischief, and would gladly call down fire from Heaven, as Elias did, and as the two Apostles, the sons of Zebedee, would have done on an occasion mentioned in the Gospel history itself.
For the desolation and ruin produced in the fair field of the Church by the evils of which our Lord speaks, are certainly enough to make the hearts of the friends of God boil over with indignation, and with desire for redress.
Satan using men
It is remarkable that in the parable itself the answer which our Lord puts into the mouth of the good householder is not simply, as might be supposed from the common version, ‘an enemy hath done this,’ but ‘a man who is an enemy hath done this.’
And when our Lord comes to explain the figure which He has used, He says simply the enemy is the devil. It may be that we are meant to understand, even from the language used by our Lord, that though the arch enemy and the principal agent in the attempted ruin of the fair harvest is the devil, still he acts mainly through the instrumentality of men.
Heresy, and oversowing what has already been sown
Another truth which may be conveyed by this language is, that the evil agencies are always posterior in date to the good agencies. The devil sows over the ground which has already been sown by the Son of Man, he follows the lines and works over the work of God.
The Fathers are very fond of understanding this parable, in a particular manner, of heresies, rather than of other evils, which proceed, like heresies, from the evil spirit and his subordinates, and according to this interpretation, it is very easy to see the force of this remark about the manner in which the evil one acts in spoiling the work of God.
For all heresies are perversions of the truth, they require the truth of the Catholic doctrine as their foundation, they have no originality in themselves, and the devil their author has no creative power, he can but mar and distort and pull to pieces.
But it is not necessary to confine the meaning of this great parable, in which the agency of the devil is described, to that single department of his work which issues in the production of heresies, and what is so plainly true of his procedure in this one part of his work, is also true of his work in other ways. He is essentially a copyist, a mimic of God, as if his insane thought that he would be as God was always repeating and forcing itself upon him, as the poor animals who ape man in his ways, are never quiet or happy, while they see him do anything, without attempting themselves to mimic him.
The intense malignity of the character of Satan must not make us forget this feature in the same character—the feature of the most insane and foolish vanity, a feature very remarkable in those who have sold themselves to do his work in the world.
One of the surest tests of the heretical spirit is the unwillingness to acknowledge mistakes and misrepresentations, when they are pointed out, and this unwillingness is founded on personal vanity.
It may safely be said that a writer on the side of heresy or schism who shows any eagerness to acknowledge and correct the errors in statement into which he has fallen, is already half converted.
And yet the want of this simple honesty is one of the commonest characteristics of heretical controversialists, and it shows most clearly the spirit by which they are guided.
The sleep of the servants of God
Another point may here be noticed. As God in His dealings with mankind acts according to His own infinite wisdom and knowledge of human nature, and so of all that it requires and of all that is adapted to influence it, and to supply its wants and cravings, the plan which He has followed in His Kingdom must of necessity cover the whole ground and penetrate every department of humanity.
It is the plan of the enemy, therefore, to proceed on his own work of mischief wherever God has extended His own beneficent operations, and thus the work of the evil one is aptly described as the sowing of bad seed over the good seed which God has sown.
This is said in the parable to have been done while men slept, and if this particular also is to have its counterpart in the truth, we must understand that our Lord refers to the necessity of the utmost vigilance on the part of those who are responsible for the good estate of the field sown by Him, and to the truth that the beginning of the activity of the evil influences is to be traced, more or less, to the want of watchfulness on the part of the rulers of the Church.
This, however, may perhaps be pressing the figure too far, for nothing is said in the explanation of the parable by our Lord of this want of vigilance. It may be that He means us to understand that there is always a great deal going on in the unseen world around us, and with direct reference to ourselves and to the welfare or ruin of our souls, of which we can have no more perception than men can have of what goes on in the hours in which they are naturally wrapt up in sleep.
Satan befouling everything
These few words, then, of our Lord, ‘an enemy hath done this,’ contain the whole of what He tells us here of the ever-active and most malicious exertions of the evil one and his emissaries for the purpose of destroying the good work which God has begun in the world.
As the enemy passes over the field in which the footsteps of the sower of the good seed have gone before him, and leaves no part of that field unvisited and, as far as lies in him, unspoiled by the seeds of evil, such we must suppose our Lord means us to consider is the activity of the enemy in scattering his evil influences wherever our Lord has left behind Him the principles of good.
Alas! it is but too true that there is no part of the field to which Satan is forbidden to penetrate. Nothing is too sacred for him to befoul. It is natural enough to expect his work in those regions of society which are more especially under his influence, which we call, by pre-eminence, ‘the world,’ the mass of those who worship temporal goods and aims, and regulate their conduct by the maxims of time and not by those of eternity.
But the work of the enemy is not only here. It is to be found in the sanctuary itself.
The hierarchy, religious life, the home
The Church of God is provided by the care of its Founder with an admirably organized hierarchy, a complete army of selected souls, vowed especially to the service of the altar, to the life of prayer, to the ministration of the sacraments, to the government of the general body, to the defence of the true doctrine, and to the preaching of the Word of God.
It is Satan’s chiefest joy and greatest triumph when he can sow seeds of evil in the sanctuary and around the altar of God, and though he has never been allowed for long together, or to any overwhelming extent, to corrupt the ruling body and fill the sees of Christendom with prelates who might be described as legitimate successors rather of Annas and Caiaphas, than of the Twelve Apostles, still he has not been altogether without his successes in this most vital assault on the good work of God. Incalculable as have been the services to the Church of God of the great majority of her chief rulers, her history would be different indeed from what it is if the world had never been able to intrude its own children into their ranks.
Pride, vanity, worldliness, personal ambition, jealousy, avarice, nepotism, an indolent and a luxurious life—if such scandals as these had never been in the sanctuary of the Church, she might not at this moment have to lament the falling away of so many fair kingdoms which once owned her gentle sway. As a matter of fact, the greater number of heresies and schisms in the Church have had their origin in the clerical order itself, and in many cases they have arisen among ecclesiastics of the highest rank.
If Satan has been allowed to see the evil shoots manifest themselves in the very highest orders of the hierarchy, it is not wonderful that in other parts of the field of the good householder the same miserable enjoyment should not have been denied to him. The enclosed garden of religious life, the cultivated retreat in which evangelical counsels are made the rule of daily practice under the sanction of vows, this also has been invaded by the malignity of the evil one, and the souls most immediately consecrated to God have sometimes been the occasions of the greatest triumphs to His enemy.
As the ecclesiastical state has its own peculiar temptations, such as those which have been enumerated, so also are there found, among the religious communities, the seeds of evil particularly fatal in their case.
So again it has been in that other garden of beauty and fruitfulness in virtue, the holy domestic life of the Christian family, formed on the model of the holy home at Nazareth, and the cares of a household and the lawful worldly callings to which the members of such families are naturally devoted have been the occasion of a thousand seductions and of a thousand instances of forgetfulness of God.
Not a calling, not a profession, not a pursuit, from the most laborious scientific investigations to the simplest relaxations and recreations, into which some evil seed has not been cast, as it were, to occupy the ground. The whole of society may be looked on as a field sown by the hand of God and intended to return to Him the fair fruit of obedience to His law and glorification of His bounties and benefits to man.
And yet every department has its evil traditions and examples and principles asserted against those of God and of our Lord, nor can there be any truer picture either of the natural society of man or of the supernatural kingdom of the Church, than that which our Lord here gives, the picture of a field covered with two growths of seed side by side, the one good, the other evil.
‘An enemy hath done this’
This, then, is the chief part, so to say, of the parable, the declaration on the part of our Lord as to what was to be expected in the field in which the evangelical labourers were to spend their work—a picture true indeed of the history of the world before He came and before the foundation of the Gospel kingdom, but far more true prophetically, as a forecast, for the benefit and warning of the Apostles and those who were to come after them in their work for God.
For the true picture of the state of the world before the times of redemption might perhaps have more properly been said to be that of a field in which there was but, here and there, a faint trace of the Divine culture, a few shoots of good wheat among a forest of shoots of cockle.
But it was all the more surprising, after the work of our Lord and after the establishment of His Church, that even in that chosen field so carefully cultivated and fenced round, there were still to be these many shoots of the evil seed in every department and in every corner.
Our Lord knew what was in man, as it is said of Him by St. John. He did not need the experience, even of His own reception at the hands of the chosen nation, to show Him what was to be expected by His Church at the hands of the world.
But He knew also what was in Satan, and He knew how intense would be the fresh activity into which the enemy of God and man would be roused by his defeat and by the destruction of his kingdom and power in the world. He knew how he would fasten on all the weak points in man, and work all the lower influences of his nature against his own good, all the more zealously because he would see, in the new creation of the Church, a world capable of giving far more glory to God than that former natural world which he had been allowed to deface and to turn into a dominion of his own. And the whole process of the efforts of Satan in the Church and their issue is summed up in these few words of our Lord, ‘an enemy hath done this.’
Evil and the Kingdom of God
The enemy of God and man will not be excluded from making his malignant attempts on the fair field of the Church, as he was not prevented from assailing the beautiful and innocent creation of God when man was first made.
The evil which sin has introduced into man remains in the Kingdom of God as long as the time of probation lasts, that is, the conflict of the flesh and the spirit is to go on even in regenerate man, although immense forces of grace have been supplied to him for his easy victory in the conflict. And so neither is the activity of the evil spirits fettered or put an end to, though men are wonderfully stronger for resistance against these deadly enemies than they were before the coming of our Lord.
As a consequence of these two truths, the field of the world in which the good seed has been sown is to be still what it always was, a field in which good and evil grow up side by side, nor is there to be any part of it in which the work of the evil one is not to be rewarded by a kind of miserable success of its own.
How will God deal with it?
But then, the question rises up—it must certainly have risen up in the minds of the angels as they watched the progress of the Gospel Kingdom—how will God deal with the evil shoots which have covered so large a space on this field which He has sown and is to be continually sowing?
When evil sprang up in Heaven, God did not tolerate it. The evil shoots were uprooted at once and cast away. Even in the history of His dealings with man, the principle of swift vengeance and extermination has not unfrequently been followed.
Once the whole race of man was destroyed, except eight persons, and there had been other instances of summary chastisements, only less signal than that.
What is to be the law of God’s action in the government of His Church, or of the world into which He has sent forth His Church?
From Fr Henry James Coleridge, The Training of the Apostles Vol. III
|
|
|
Fr. Ruiz: Renewal of the Consecration to the Virgin of Guadalupe - December 12th |
Posted by: Stone - 11-09-2024, 08:06 PM - Forum: Rev. Father Hugo Ruiz Vallejo
- Replies (10)
|
|
From an email dated November 9, 2024 [machine translated from the original Spanish]:
RENEWAL OF THE CONSECRATION TO THE VIRGIN OF GUADALUPE
NEXT DECEMBER 12
ACCORDING TO THE METHOD OF SAINT LOUIS DE MONFORT
To those who have made with us the Consecration to the Virgin Mary according to the method of St. Louis Marie Griñon de Monfort, but also to those who have not yet made this consecration and who wish to do it for the first time with us this year.
The preparation for this consecration for the first time, or for its renewal, begins this November 12 and culminates with the day of consecration on December 12, the Feast of Our Lady of Guadalupe.
It is necessary to read the book of St. Louis de Monfort before beginning the days of preparation. Here I put at your disposal the PDF of this book as well as the same book in audio which is quite comfortable to listen to on Youtube (its duration is 4 hours and 50 minutes). Here is the link:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eumfKGRx...z9&index=1
The video that explains how to carry out the preparation for this consecration is ideal to listen to it before starting this preparation, it can be for example today, but in any case before November 12. Here is the link:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hhhZFk5u...z9&index=2
Each day begins with a meditation, which can be listened to a second time during the day, or even a third time. From November 12 to December 12 each day has its own meditation, starting with the next meditation and following in this list successively:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ohaV18Hy...z9&index=3
Attached is also the text of the consecration to be done on the final day, in front of an image of Our Lady of Guadalupe. This PDF must be printed on paper, on a single sheet of paper on both sides and must be signed together with the date and year on the day of the consecration. This document can be signed again each year when this consecration is renewed. It is not obligatory to renew this consecration every year but it is highly recommended.
It is also possible to make this consecration, if desired, at another time of the year or on the occasion of another feast of the Virgin Mary, but in that case the same procedure should also be followed.
May the Holy Spirit enlighten you and may Our Lady of Guadalupe guide you through her Holy intercession,
Father Hugo Ruiz Vallejo
Tratado-de-la-verdadera-devoción-a-la-Ssma-virgen.pdf
TRATADO DE LA VERDADERA DEVOCIÓN (S. Luis de Monfort) TEXTO CONSAGRACIÓN A MARÍA.pdf
|
|
|
US doctors pushback over massive new federal data collection rules |
Posted by: Stone - 11-09-2024, 08:37 AM - Forum: Socialism & Communism
- No Replies
|
|
US doctors pushback over massive new federal data collection rules
The AAPS is challenging a federal mandate requiring small entity managers to report personal data, arguing it violates constitutional rights and threatens privacy. The case is pending in Amarillo, Texas.
Shutterstock
AAPS
Nov 9, 2024
(AAPS) — The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (“AAPS”) filed a Motion for a Preliminary Injunction against the new mandate requiring tens of millions of Americans to report personal information to the federal government.
By January 1, 2025, Americans who participate in managing small entities – even some political ones – must report their home addresses, birthdates, and other information such as driver’s license numbers to the federal government.
The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) is creating a massive new database of personal information about ordinary, law-abiding Americans, to share widely with other agencies and even internationally to facilitate federal investigations and prosecutions. FinCEN will assign a “FinCEN identifier” to everyone about whom it receives this information, the brief notes.
While there are some exemptions, most small medical practices are subjected to this regulatory burden and possible investigatory harassment, as are non-profit groups not officially qualified under Section 501©(3), AAPS notes.
The Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) imposes up to two years imprisonment for failure to report this information to the federal government or failing to update home addresses. Fines can be up to $10,000 for violations.
“This is a vast expansion in federal police power, with its political bias that has worsened,” said AAPS General Counsel Andrew Schlafly. “Fortunately, multiple provisions of the U.S. Constitution stand firmly against this federal overreach.”
AAPS asks the federal court in Amarillo, Texas, to grant a preliminary injunction against this unconstitutional law based on the First, Fourth, Fifth, and Tenth Amendments. Other district courts have rendered decisions on both sides of this issue.
“Particularly alarming is how this new disclosure requirement will have the effect of taking away the right to own guns by those found to be in violation of the CTA,” Schlafly points out. “The two-year imprisonment under the CTA triggers revocation of the Second Amendment right under a federal gun control statute,” he adds.
This AAPS lawsuit is pending in U.S. District Court in Amarillo, Texas, No. 2:24-cv-210-Z.
Reprinted with permission from Association of American Physicians and Surgeons.
|
|
|
Attack on the Internet archive could memory-hole information globalists don’t want you to know |
Posted by: Stone - 11-09-2024, 08:34 AM - Forum: General Commentary
- No Replies
|
|
Attack on the Internet archive could memory-hole information globalists don’t want you to know
The Internet was founded to be free and democratic. It will require herculean efforts at this point to restore that vision as escalating censorship efforts are quickly suppressing that ideal.
Postmodern Studio/Shutterstock
Jeffrey A. Tucker and Debbie Lerman
Fri Nov 8, 2024
(Brownstone Institute) — Instances of censorship are growing to the point of normalization. Despite ongoing litigation and more public attention, mainstream social media has been more ferocious in recent months than ever before. Podcasters know for sure what will be instantly deleted and debate among themselves over content in grey areas. Some like Brownstone have given up on YouTube in favor of Rumble, sacrificing vast audiences if only to see their content survive to see the light of day.
It’s not always about being censored or not. Today’s algorithms include a range of tools that affect searchability and findability. For example, the Joe Rogan interview with Donald Trump racked up an astonishing 34 million views before YouTube and Google tweaked their search engines to make it hard to discover, while even presiding over a technical malfunction that disabled viewing for many people. Faced with this, Rogan went to the platform X to post all three hours.
Navigating this thicket of censorship and quasi-censorship has become part of the business model of alternative media.
Those are just the headline cases. Beneath the headlines, there are technical events taking place that are fundamentally affecting the ability of any historian even to look back and tell what is happening. Incredibly, the service Archive.org, which has been around since 1994, has stopped taking images of content on all platforms. For the first time in 30 years, we have gone a long swath of time – since October 8-10 – since this service has chronicled the life of the Internet in real time.
As of this writing, we have no way to verify content that has been posted for three weeks of October leading to the days of the most contentious and consequential election of our lifetimes. Crucially, this is not about partisanship or ideological discrimination. No websites on the Internet are being archived in ways that are available to users. In effect, the whole memory of our main information system is just a big black hole right now.
The trouble on Archive.org began on October 8, 2024, when the service was suddenly hit with a massive Denial of Service attack (DDOS) that not only took down the service but introduced a level of failure that nearly took it out completely. Working around the clock, Archive.org came back as a read-only service where it stands today. However, you can only read content that was posted before the attack. The service has yet to resume any public display of mirroring of any sites on the Internet.
In other words, the only source on the entire World Wide Web that mirrors content in real time has been disabled. For the first time since the invention of the web browser itself, researchers have been robbed of the ability to compare past with future content, an action that is a staple of researchers looking into government and corporate actions.
It was using this service, for example, that enabled Brownstone researchers to discover precisely what the CDC had said about Plexiglas, filtration systems, mail-in ballots, and rental moratoriums. That content was all later scrubbed off the live Internet, so accessing archive copies was the only way we could know and verify what was true. It was the same with the World Health Organization and its disparagement of natural immunity which was later changed. We were able to document the shifting definitions thanks only to this tool which is now disabled.
What this means is the following: any website can post anything today and take it down tomorrow and leave no record of what they posted unless some user somewhere happened to take a screenshot. Even then there is no way to verify its authenticity. The standard approach to know who said what and when is now gone. That is to say that the whole Internet is already being censored in real time so that during these crucial weeks, when vast swaths of the public fully expect foul play, anyone in the information industry can get away with anything and not get caught.
We know what you are thinking. Surely this DDOS attack was not a coincidence. The timing was just too perfect. And maybe that is right. We just do not know. Does Archive.org suspect something along those lines? Here is what they say:
Quote:Last week, along with a DDOS attack and exposure of patron email addresses and encrypted passwords, the Internet Archive’s website javascript was defaced, leading us to bring the site down to access and improve our security. The stored data of the Internet Archive is safe and we are working on resuming services safely. This new reality requires heightened attention to cyber security and we are responding. We apologize for the impact of these library services being unavailable.
Deep state? As with all these things, there is no way to know, but the effort to blast away the ability of the Internet to have a verified history fits neatly into the stakeholder model of information distribution that has clearly been prioritized on a global level. The Declaration of the Future of the Internet makes that very clear: the Internet should be “governed through the multi-stakeholder approach, whereby governments and relevant authorities partner with academics, civil society, the private sector, technical community and others.” All of these stakeholders benefit from the ability to act online without leaving a trace.
To be sure, a librarian at Archive.org has written that “While the Wayback Machine has been in read-only mode, web crawling and archiving have continued. Those materials will be available via the Wayback Machine as services are secured.”
When? We do not know. Before the election? In five years? There might be some technical reasons, but it might seem that if web crawling is continuing behind the scenes, as the note suggests, that too could be available in read-only mode now. It is not.
Disturbingly, this erasure of Internet memory is happening in more than one place. For many years, Google offered a cached version of the link you were seeking just below the live version. They have plenty of server space to enable that now, but no: that service is now completely gone. In fact, the Google cache service officially ended just a week or two before the Archive.org crash, at the end of September 2024.
Thus, the two available tools for searching cached pages on the Internet disappeared within weeks of each other and within weeks of the November 5 election.
Other disturbing trends are also turning Internet search results increasingly into AI-controlled lists of establishment-approved narratives. The web standard used to be for search result rankings to be governed by user behavior, links, citations, and so forth. These were more or less organic metrics, based on an aggregation of data indicating how useful a search result was to Internet users.
Put very simply, the more people found a search result useful, the higher it would rank. Google now uses very different metrics to rank search results, including what it considers “trusted sources” and other opaque, subjective determinations.
Furthermore, the most widely used service that once ranked websites based on traffic is now gone. That service was called Alexa. The company that created it was independent. Then one day in 1999, it was bought by Amazon. That seemed encouraging because Amazon was well-heeled. The acquisition seemed to codify the tool that everyone was using as a kind of metric of status on the web. It was common back in the day to take note of an article somewhere on the web and then look it up on Alexa to see its reach. If it was important, one would take notice, but if it was not, no one particularly cared.
This is how an entire generation of web technicians functioned. The system worked as well as one could possibly expect.
Then, in 2014, years after acquiring the ranking service Alexa, Amazon did a strange thing. It released its home assistant (and surveillance device) with the same name. Suddenly, everyone had them in their homes and would find out anything by saying “Hey, Alexa.” Something seemed strange about Amazon naming its new product after an unrelated business it had acquired years earlier. No doubt there was some confusion caused by the naming overlap.
Here’s what happened next. In 2022, Amazon actively took down the web ranking tool. It didn’t sell it. It didn’t raise the prices. It didn’t do anything with it. It suddenly made it go completely dark.
No one could figure out why. It was the industry standard, and suddenly it was gone. Not sold, just blasted away. No longer could anyone figure out the traffic-based website rankings of anything without paying very high prices for hard-to-use proprietary products.
All of these data points that might seem unrelated when considered individually, are actually part of a long trajectory that has shifted our information landscape into unrecognizable territory. The COVID events of 2020-2023, with massive global censorship and propaganda efforts, greatly accelerated these trends.
One wonders if anyone will remember what it was once like. The hacking and hobbling of Archive.org underscores the point: there will be no more memory.
As of this writing, fully three weeks of web content have not been archived. What we are missing and what has changed is anyone’s guess. And we have no idea when the service will come back. It is entirely possible that it will not come back, that the only real history to which we can take recourse will be pre-October 8, 2024, the date on which everything changed.
The Internet was founded to be free and democratic. It will require herculean efforts at this point to restore that vision, because something else is quickly replacing it.
Reprinted with permission from the Brownstone Institute.
|
|
|
Solange Hertz: Apocalypse Now! Global Democracy & the Rise of the Antichrist |
Posted by: Stone - 11-09-2024, 08:10 AM - Forum: Articles by Catholic authors
- No Replies
|
|
A portion of this 2006 article written for The Remnant Newspaper was reprinted on that site November 5, 2024.
The entire article is presented below in its entirety.
APOCALYPSE NOW! Global Democracy & the Rise of the Antichrist
by Solange Hertz
Editor’s Introduction: Perhaps the following article will not be easy to read for some. It’s an analysis of the philosophical and theological errors that were long ago insinuated into the root system of modern political thought. Born of the Protestant Revolution, these errors would ultimately bring the great tree of Christendom crashing to the ground. Included within this analysis is a penetrating look at how some of these fundamentally Protestant ideas made their way into the founding documents of our own country.
It is never easy to see faults in ourselves or in those we love, and it is no less difficult to recognize them in the land of our birth and childhood, hearth and home. Patriotism is a Christian virtue. Love of country is part of what builds integrity and honor in decent men. But love of country is not always synonymous with love of government, especially when governments deviate from Catholic principles as egregiously as has ours.
Just as we traditional Catholics must sometimes distinguish between the Church we revere above all else and the modern-day Vatican apparatus, so, too, Catholic Americans must recognize a distinction between the America we revere—the land of our birth, claimed as her own by Our Lady of Guadalupe, Empress of the Americas, discovered by the Catholic Columbus, colonized by the Catholic Spanish, Portuguese and French, generous beyond description in modern times, independent, resourceful, spirited—and the federal, centralized government which was founded by revolution-minded Protestants, who, while having some good and noble ideas, were nevertheless opposed to the Catholic Church and the social reign of Christ the King. (To admit this is not to insult or serve up calumny against our Founding Fathers; it is a mere statement of the historic reality, over which no serious historian would quibble. Our Founders were not Catholic and theirs was a “novus ordo seculorum” which was to replace the aging Catholic order of Christendom.)
And now, almost 230 years later, we American Catholics, living in the post-Christian era, must somehow sort out where we stand and how we are to reconcile the love and patriotism we all feel in our hearts for a land that has sustained us in bountiful plenty, with the dark side of our man-made government which has never shared our Faith and which is trying to impose secular democracy as a religion on the rest of the world.
Mrs. Hertz—a patriot, a Catholic American whose family goes back many generations in this country, a woman whose husband, a U.S. official, was among the first of the civilian hostages taken by the enemy in Vietnam and, in fact, died there in a Communist prison camp—has attempted in the present article to face the hard facts and contradictions that exist between scripture/Catholic teaching and the religion of global democracy, which, like it or not, spent its childhood in the wonderful, utopian, almost enchanted world we Americans call home.
America is not beyond hope. Her soil has run red with the blood of martyrs many times. But Christ the King is the only threat the King of Darkness recognizes, even here in America. Unless we get back to our Catholic roots, America—the great city on the hill—will first be placed in a position where she will do more to welcome the Antichrist and his New World Order than drive it back into the sea; and then she will be destroyed.
I encourage the reader to proceed with an open mind. The myths and fairy tales for adults that we’ve all been spoon fed for two hundred plus years are nearly impossible to overcome for many sincere and good Catholic Americans. But if we wish to know what’s really going on in the world today and what our children are really up against, then we must begin to look beyond the history written by Protestant victors to see what forces have long been at work even here in the land we love. If you’re ready to do that and perhaps even suffer some painful abrasions as the blindfold is removed, then read on . . . MJM
The true source of the godless democracy now overrunning the world and the Church is not hard to discover, for it is revealed in a vivid tableau which unfolds before the eyes of any reader of Chapter 9 of St. John’s Apocalypse: After the Fifth Angel sounds the trumpet ushering in the great age of heresy now coming to full climax at the dawn of our twenty-first century, the Apostle sees him given a key to hell’s “bottomless pit.” When the Angel opens it, ”the smoke of the pit ascended as the smoke of a great furnace: and the sun was darkened, and the air,” by the smothering fumes. We may take this to signify a worldwide darkness in which certainties can no longer be clearly discerned, the divine light having been obscured, and stifling error disseminated in the very air we breathe. In 1971 Pope Paul VI declared that this “smoke of Satan” had somehow or other penetrated the Temple of God.
The spectacle relates directly to the prophecy made by our Lord foretelling the tribulations of the days prior to His second coming, when He “shall send his Angels with a trumpet” and “the sun shall be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light” (Matt. 24:29,31). The whole human environment being charged and penetrated by a miasma generated in hell, the Church, represented by the moon, is hobbled in her ministry and no longer able to reflect God’s truth clearly to the nations. At the close of her own little apocalypse confided to Mélanie Calvat at La Salette, our Lady declared that this was already happening way back in 1846: “It is time. The sun is darkening. . . The time is at hand. The abyss is opening,” and she predicted, “Only the faith will survive.”
But the blinding smoke of the pit isn’t the worst of the infestation, for the vision in the Apocalypse tells us that out of its billows there streamed hordes of “locusts upon the earth, and power was given to them, as the scorpions of the earth have power” to torment “the men who have not the sign of God on their foreheads.” The shapes of these locusts, which the Church Fathers generally believed represented violent heretics, are described as “like to horses prepared for battle; and on their heads as it were crowns of gold: and their faces as the faces of men. And they had hair as the hair of women, and their teeth were as the teeth of lions: and they had breastplates of iron, and the sound of their wings was as the sound of chariots of many horses running to battle. And they had tails like scorpions, and stings were in their tails: and their power was to hurt men five months.”
In other words these creatures, like earthly scorpions, possessed only natural means of doing harm. Wielding no supernatural power from heaven, they were not only prevented from doing injury to the elect who bore God’s sign, but even where their legitimate victims were concerned, their power was limited, for “it was given to them that they should not kill them; but that they should torment them five months: and their torment was as the torment of a scorpion when he striketh a man.” Whatever period of time these five months signify, it will be fearsome while it lasts, for the text goes on to say that “in those days men shall seek death and shall not find it: and they shall desire to die, and death shall fly from them.”
Again, our Lady echoed these words at La Salette when she said, “Men will beat their heads against the walls; they will call on death, yet death will constitute their torment; blood will flow on all sides. Who could overcome, if God doesn’t shorten the time of trial?” And our Lord himself had already predicted, “Unless those days had been shortened, no flesh should be saved: but for the sake of the elect, those days shall be shortened” (Matt. 24:22). Although merely temporal and confined to the natural order, the pain and havoc caused by the locusts will be nearly unendurable.
As historical events unfold on the world stage, the symbolism of St. John’s vision becomes ever clearer. One detail leaps out starkly above all the rest, and that is the golden crowns on the heads of the locusts. They are not like the ones worn by the twenty-four ancients pictured elsewhere in the Apocalypse who cast them down before God’s throne acknowledging, “Thou art worthy, O Lord our God, to receive glory and honor and power: because thou hast created all things!” (4:10-11). Those worn by the locusts remain firmly fixed to their heads and are furthermore described only “as it were” of gold. In other words they are made of something that passes for gold but really isn’t. It would seem therefore that the locusts’ crowns are, for all their glitter, counterfeit. They are spurious symbols of the true authority which crowns are meant to represent and which can only be bestowed from above. As St. Paul says, “there is no power but from God” (Rom. 13:1).
A more graphic portrayal of the onslaught of the unbridled lust for self-government now ravaging the earth, can hardly be imagined than these troops of unisex crowned locusts “with the faces of men,” and “hair as the hair of women,” every one like another, yet each one a mini-king in its own right. Yet, despite their individual crowns and their appearance of autonomy, Scripture is careful to inform us that “they had over them a king.” And this king, we are told, is none other than “the Angel of the bottomless pit, whose name in Hebrew is Abaddon; and in Greek Apollyon; in Latin Exterminans.” That the sacred text declares the name of this leader in the same three liturgical languages in which Jesus of Nazareth’s title as King of the Judeans was inscribed on the Cross cannot be happenstance. It would seem specifically to designate our Lord’s satanic counterpart the Antichrist, whose name in all languages is “Destroyer,” his essential mission being the destruction of Christ’s kingdom on earth.
His advent will have been well prepared by militant Democracy, the systematic revolt against God which began when the Fifth Trumpet announced the first stirrings of Protestantism and modern man began claiming the right to worship as he pleased and interpret Scripture for himself by the light of his own intellect. The same independent spirit gradually pervaded all fields of learning, which one by one separated themselves from the beneficent light of revelation and began operating on their own, spawning major scientific and social errors of every kind in the process. Gradually the new liberated man undertook the creation of a whole new reality for himself, hatched in his own mind apart from and presumably better than the reality created for him by God. He displaced the Earth as the center of the universe, replacing it first by the sun, and soon by nothing at all. Matter began moving of itself according to its own attractions without outside spiritual propulsion, and was soon credited with the power of producing life. Absolutes became relative almost overnight, not only in the material sphere, but in the moral as well.
After the discovery of electricity a whole new man-made world based on these novel ideas and operated by a completely new power source came into being. Natural substances created by God for man’s use on earth being now everywhere replaced by “better” artificial substitutes contrived by human means, the mechanical began replacing the organic everywhere at an accelerated pace. In ordinary common life automobiles were substituted for horses and mechanical appliances for domestic servants. Astounded at the marvels of his own progress in providing for himself, man found less and less reason to have recourse to divine Providence. The whole realm of the supernatural, become redundant at best, is now regarded by many as non-existent, to such a point that the New York Times for October 12, 2003 can feature an article by a correspondent from the Holy City of Rome declaring to the world, “Faith Fades Where It Once Burned Strong.”
+
This being the state of affairs, it was only to be expected that human lust for freedom would find political expression. As Auguste Comte pointed out, revolutionary ideas are nothing more than the social application of the principle of religious liberty. The religious subjectivism of Protestantism automatically prevented the imposition of any transcendent order on politics, so that the people soon became their own sovereign source of authority. Preaching a gospel of freedom and human rights apart from God and the Church He instituted, a new artificial form of government devoid of any outside moral restraints was soon invented by men inspired by the locust hordes from hell.
Formally inaugurated as the United States of America, it proved to be a veritable abomi-Nation, a social incarnation of the primordial Non serviam by which Lucifer first declared independence from God in heaven. Infecting nation after nation with the new satanic democracy, it has by now succeeded in subtracting nearly all organized human society from the dominion of Christ the King and the Church He founded. One of its Presidents, Woodrow Wilson, who fathered the first international League of Nations patterned in its image, summed up its apostolate thus: “America has a spiritual energy in her which no other nation can contribute to the liberation of mankind. Democracy is a religion. Americans are now missionaries to the world, its President a priest!”
[Editor’s Note: This is the same President who ignored Pope Benedict XV’s calls for peace and who rejected the brilliant peace plan of the great Catholic Emperor Charles I of Austria-Hungary just as World War I was underway. (Emperor Charles I was recently canonized a saint). At the time, the Emperor had thwarted the Kaiser’s will by insisting on trying to deal with the United States to establish peace in Europe. This last of the great Holy Roman Emperors was one who truly wanted peace; had he been listened to, he would have saved Europe. And why did President Wilson reject the Emperor’s peace plan? Because, as Wilson put it, Emperor Charles was not an “elected leader”…Austria was not a democracy. Charles was defeated, Europe fell into chaos, the Soviet Union was off to the races, the seeds of brutal, Godless Nazism were planted, and millions and millions lost their lives. The Holy Roman Empire gasped its last trying to prevent the Great War that assisted so diligently at the birthing table of the New World Order. MJM]
The spread of a universal godless republic whose sole Gospel is freedom was predicted four centuries ago by Our Lady of Good Success to a Conceptionist nun in Quito, Ecuador. She told her that during the 19th and 20th centuries it would gradually “extinguish the precious light of Faith in souls by the almost total corruption of customs.” Later at La Salette she would point out to Mélanie Calvat some of the results to be expected: “With God’s holy Faith forgotten, each individual will want to direct himself and rise above his peers. Civil and ecclesiastical authority will be abolished, all order and justice will be trampled underfoot. Only murders, hatred, jealousy, lying and discord will be seen, with no love of country or family. . . . Civil governments will all have the same objective, which will be to abolish and make every religious principle disappear, to make way for materialism, atheism, spiritism and vices of all kinds.”
Let us hasten to say at this juncture that modern satanic democracy is far from the kind of democracy which held sway in classical times as, for example in ancient Greece, where it rested upon a huge slave base and was restricted to a relatively small number of privileged citizens subscribing to a common state religion. It is even farther from the limited democracy which was always practiced in Christendom at all levels of society in smaller components of government within the greater hierarchical framework dictated by natural law. Monks in their monasteries, for instance, were often free to elect their superiors, but once they had designated them, they had no power to depose them, that being the sole prerogative of higher authority. For underlings to control their superiors once they have been elected, and especially to remove them from office – as Democracy empowers the people to do – would have spelled rebellion pure and simple and was not tolerated.
Until modern times, man labored under no illusions that authority might originate from below. All the governments of the world, even among pagans, were originally patterned on, and were indeed derived from the human family as created by God. Their structure was strictly hierarchical, with a father-figure at the top who exercised the final authority as king or supreme leader over his subjects in much the same way a father ruled his wife and children. This did not mean that authority could be exercised arbitrarily, according to personal whim, for from the king on down everyone was subject (at least theoretically) to the same moral laws and national customs.
The basic cell of government was never the individual, but the family, which operated on the lowest level of society as a political unit in its own right. Under his immediate political superiors, the father was legally responsible for the behavior of his household, in Roman times even possessing the right to put his children to death. The principle of subsidiarity played a major role throughout the body politic, which means that no higher authority was supposed to do what a lower authority could accomplish for itself. God created the human body on this principle, as He did the family, where each member is responsible for tasks in accordance with his ability to perform them, and good government is built along similar lines.
In the history of the US, the gradual usurpation of states’ rights by an increasingly centralized authority supplies a clear and flagrant example of how the disregard of subsidiarity inevitably leads from the qualitative to the quantitative into totalitarianism. The Constitution attempted to obviate this possibility by the last Article in the Bill of Rights, which reads, “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people,” but over the years, especially after the bloody Civil War fought over this very question, more and more power has been concentrated in the federal authority at the expense of states’ autonomy, not to mention the rights of individuals.
Where government is firmly anchored in natural law, regard for individual and local differences is more easily maintained, for a nation is nothing less than a family of families, and an empire is a family of national families. All live, breathe and grow as living organisms under laws resting on the Fourth Commandment, which orders us to honor not only our parents, but any other representatives of the divine authority which governs the universe and to which all citizens are ultimately responsible. In the vast majority of cases the supreme human authority was hereditary, passing from father to son as it does in the family, permitting leaders to implement long-term policies without concern for periodic reelections or radical changes of administration.
Alliances between nations were cemented not so much by legal agreements as by marriages between ruling families, chief among whom would figure those of the Davidic dynasty designated by God to head Christian nations. Furthermore, most of the heirs to royal thrones were subjected from the cradle to a rigorous education designed to prepare them for rule. There was little if any government by amateurs such as we have today in the do-it-yourself society where “you can be anything you want to be,” and public entertainers can be elected to the highest offices.
Historically hereditary monarchy has produced so high a degree of stability, continuity, cohesion and prosperity throughout human society as a whole that St. Thomas Aquinas was led to declare it “the best of governments.” Because it was human it was not perfect, but it worked very well. The French Davidic monarchy, on which all the other Christian monarchies depended, was founded in the Faith in the fifth century by King Clovis of the Franks and perdured in unbroken salic succession for nearly fourteen hundred years. Had it not been for the swarm of crowned locusts pouring out of hell, it would presumably have remained in power till now.
+
The immediate source of the change proved to be England, where modern, satanic democracy was hatched. It broke out violently in England with the regicide of Charles I. The crowned locusts apparently had found the readiest tools for their purpose among the English, the empire which to this day does not consider itself part of old Catholic Europe, and which as a nation has yet to repent of the criminal execution of Joan of Arc, the saint sent by God to save the pivotal French monarchy from English usurpation. Foreseeing little more than a limited success for democracy under the “constitutional” monarchy with a state religion which the English had agreed upon after the fall of Cromwell and the Restoration under Charles II, the astute locusts shifted their center of operations to the heretical English colonies wedged strategically (and illegally according to the international law then in force) between the French and Spanish territories in Catholic America.
There democratic ideology soon took root, transplanted from the mother country by a handful of radical English Freemasons who hoped to achieve, on new terrain far removed from the political centers of Christendom, what had so far proved impractical at home. Back in England under Henry VIII the locusts had already effected one nation’s independence from the Catholic Church, but in America, under cover of rebellion against the vestigial monarch George III – a God-fearing, upright Anglican who hated Freemasonry – they would sting their victims into concocting out of whole cloth a new man-made nation which would be independent of any religion at all, and whose written constitution would provide the blueprint countless others would follow.
Goaded by the scorpion-stings of their tormentors from the pit, representatives from the thirteen British colonies on July 4, 1776 “in general congress assembled” and acting solely “by authority of the good people of these Colonies,” began emancipating themselves from the God of revelation by promulgating a formal Declaration of Independence from the British Crown. Carefully eschewing any references to Jesus Christ or the Blessed Trinity, they were content to request a nameless deity designated as “the Supreme Judge of the World” to ratify “the rectitude of our intentions” in their momentous undertaking.
Although it opens with an appeal to “the Laws of Nature” and “Nature’s God,” the document proceeds to enunciate false principles which are in fact diametrically contrary to natural law: that all men are equal and the source of authority over themselves. Scorning supporting proof of any kind, the signers of the Declaration deemed it sufficient to state that “we hold these truths to be self-evident,” and to enumerate them, beginning with three propositions: that “all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights,” and “that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.”
We might note here that the first draft of the Declaration read “the pursuit of property.” According to John Locke, one of Democracy’s foremost architects, the state is not an organic institution geared to natural human necessities deriving its authority from God, but a civil contract set up between men by their common consent. In his Second Treatise on Government, he states furthermore that its “great and chief end. . . is the preservation of their property.” Elsewhere he says, “The commonwealth seems to me to be a society of men constituted only for the procuring, preserving and advancing of their own civil interests. Civil interests I call life, liberty, health and indolency of body; and the possession of outward things such as money, lands, houses, furniture and the like.”
In other words, men are rational animals, all equal by nature and possessing an “inalienable” innate right to govern themselves as they please without looking for any higher validation. They have furthermore a right and duty to rebel against any regime of which they do not approve or which they find unduly onerous. The Declaration canonizes revolution in the following terms: “That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.” Against despotism it is in fact “their duty to throw off such government.”
This is quintessential democracy, a whole new political system built on a purely rational construction existing entirely in men’s minds without reference to the way things really are. In a universe created by God on hierarchy as principle, where “star differeth from star in glory” (1 Cor. 15:41) and there is an “up” and “down” to everything, where big fish eat little and no two creatures, from snowflakes to canonized saints, have ever been found to be alike, all men were suddenly and summarily declared equal. In the democratic scheme of things, any woman could have been the Mother of God, and her husband St. Joseph was like every other man.
The rest is history. With hierarchy leveled, verticals were horizontalized. Authority being no longer bestowed from above, it was, like its satanic inspiration, drawn from below. The colonies in question quickly morphed into autonomous States and proclaimed themselves the United States of America, a nation dedicated and built on the false principles proclaimed in the Declaration. By the very nature of its flawed Constitution, it carries within itself the seeds of its own disintegration and demise. Before a century had elapsed it began seriously coming apart, its unity being preserved only at the price of a bloody conflict which forced one half of the nation to submit to the other at gun point. That the political monster has lasted as long as it has – albeit not in its original form – can only be attributed to the remains of the Christian heritage perseverating in the body politic and still giving it some semblance of life.
+
The function of government being to promote the common good, Christian governments were designed to order man’s temporal life on earth in view of his eternal destiny in heaven. Democracy, on the other hand, would totally absolve itself of this responsibility by rigorously separating Church and state and devoting itself exclusively to his material well-being. Truth is not government’s concern. As Locke noted, “The business of the laws is not to provide for the truth of opinions, but for the safety and security of the commonwealth and of every particular man’s goods and person.”
According to the apocalyptic vision, the stings of the scorpion-like locusts were located “in their tails,” indicating that Democracy’s real power for evil would manifest itself not so much on first contact as in its long term, delayed results. And so it proved. As an ideology based solely on human reason, it has only natural means at its disposal wherewith to accomplish its objectives, but nothing more is necessary to create a whole new climate from which God and the things of God are ruthlessly excluded. Confined by law to the private sector, religion was not openly denied, but rendered politically irrelevant in the everyday public life of every individual.
Subjecting itself on principle to no outside moral arbiter, Democracy actually created its own Magisterium by empowering a supreme court composed of judges appointed by itself to determine the rectitude and proper application of its laws. Right and wrong being reduced merely to what it deemed “constitutional” or “unconstitutional,” gross vices such as usury, divorce, contraception, abortion and sodomy have one by one been cleared of moral censure by simple legal approval. The only “sin” possible in such a framework is infraction of the Constitution as interpreted by this judiciary body. As the Constitution’s own Article VI baldly states, “This Constitution . . . shall be the supreme law of the land.” Not even the Ten Commandments may supersede it. As a matter of fact to display them on any courthouse premises is viewed as an infringement of the Constitution.
As structuring principles of man’s social life, a nation’s civil laws are powerful factors in forming his thinking and behavior. They can in fact change the whole organization of his environment. Laws rooted in the Gospels have the power to raise the level of public morality and promote all the Christian virtues, whereas laws enacted without reference to revealed truth are bound to do the exact opposite. Morality’s downward plunge with the advent of Democracy is recorded fact, and as Democracy continues to gain ground over the world, the level of morality falls to ever lower levels. Clergy and other moral leaders can remonstrate and threaten all they please on the sidelines, but they have no legal power whatever to rectify matters in a society where Church and state enjoy no working relationship with each other.
It was not without reason that Bl. Pius IX solemnly condemned in his Syllabus of Errors the proposition that “The Church ought to be separated from the State and the State from the Church.” Their separation has removed all possibility of effectively correcting the deadly errors on which Democracy rests, one of the deadliest of them being the myth that given a level playing field, truth will automatically win out over error. Pius IX’s successor Leo XIII, viewing the freedom which the Church enjoyed to preach the Faith in the United States, was unfortunately led to believe this.
Although he never faltered in traditional doctrine, he erred in practical judgment by directing the French bishops to face facts and rally to democracy as a political system, expecting that under its rule Catholic candidates could be elected who in due time would restore Catholic society by enacting laws based on Catholic principles. The results of this policy soon became abundantly clear. The Catholic parties gradually disintegrated under the force of their compromises they had to make with the enemy in order to gain office, and eventually disappeared from the political scene altogether.
As for the Faith in the U.S., almost from the beginning it fell into Americanism, led into a fatal collusion with the revolutionary objectives of Democracy by prelates following the lead of its first Bishop John Carroll, friend of Benjamin Franklin. A later Primate, Cardinal Gibbons, would eventually lay down in a Pastoral Letter to the Third Plenary Council of Baltimore that “there is no antagonism between the laws, institutions and spirit of our country,” and “that our country’s heroes were instruments of the God of Nations in establishing this home of freedom,” denying that “there is aught in the free spirit of our American institutions incompatible with perfect docility to the Church of Christ.” In other words, the Faith that thrived for a while so gloriously in the U.S. was not the integral Catholic Faith of the Apostles, but one diluted by the false principles of democracy.
The hard reality is that truth must be protected in order to survive in its integrity in this world. If it is not, it is trampled to death by the same forces which crucified Christ. A Catholic Church demands a Catholic state to safeguard it and apply its doctrines to temporal society. Their cooperation is what produced the glories of Christendom, which would still be ours today if Christ’s enemies had not succeeded in dismantling the Catholic state. Once that was accomplished, they had easy access to the Church’s spiritual treasures, indeed to the deposit of Faith itself which was the mainspring of Christendom. Cardinal Suenens spoke truly when he declared that the Second Vatican Council was “1789 in the Church.” He might just as easily have said “1776.”
One of the most deplorable results of declaring all men equal is the extinction of the family as God created it to be. Not only was it replaced by the individual as the basic political unit of society, denying the divinely ordained political role of fathers of families, but it destroyed the family’s internal unity by leveling its hierarchical structure, making of marriage a partnership where the sexes are also equal, and one no longer exercises authority over the other. Furthermore, under democratic law marriage is not recognized as a Sacrament between a man and a woman, but merely a civil contract between individuals who wish to cohabit. It can be legally dissolved like any other such commitment. So why be surprised that same-sex unions are now seeking recognition as legal marriages and claiming the same social benefits?
Didn’t our Lady declare at Quito that “Masonry... will enact iniquitous laws with the objective of doing away with this Sacrament, making it easy for everyone to live in sin, encouraging the procreation of illegitimate children born without being incorporated into the Church?” Needless to say, as she also pointed out at Quito, in order to achieve generalized corruption, the new political system “will focus particularly on the children. . . . Woe to the children of these times! It will be difficult to receive the Sacrament of Baptism and also that of Confirmation. Making use of persons in authority, the devil will assiduously try to destroy the Sacrament of Confession. . . The same will happen with Holy Communion. ”
As we know, by force of the egalitarian principles they professed, democratic governments were drawn to establish public school systems geared to providing equal educational opportunities to all children indiscriminately, and this in schools from which religious teaching is rigorously excluded, where any semblance of moral training must be limited to a hard fisted imposition of so-called “social” values. The noxious results need not be enumerated. They can be summed up in simply noting that today a police presence is necessary to keep order among the young in these alleged halls of learning.
Another long term effect of declaring all men equal which deserves mention, and which is generally overlooked, is the blanket enfranchisement of pagans and atheists, who until the rise of democracy and the abolition of Christian oaths of office, were quite properly denied an active role in the government of Christian nations. How indeed could people who denied Christ be expected to frame, let alone conscientiously enforce laws which were essentially rooted in the spirit of the Gospels? By according them equality with Christian citizens, Democracy not only let loose profoundly anti-Christian forces into the very veins of society, but actually empowered them to legislate for Christians, in many cases wielding legal authority over them. Is it any wonder that entire Catholic nations have suffered progressive de-Christianization, with the substitution of judaized, pagan ethics for the supernatural Catholic values on which these nations had been founded?
+
Usurping the place of God the Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost by arrogating to itself on its own authority the executive, legislative and judicial powers proper to divinity, Democracy has made a mockery of the Fourth Commandment on which all real government rests, and Scripture teaches us that the specific punishment for infringing this Commandment is nothing less than slavery. For showing disrespect to his father Noah by laughing at his drunken nakedness, Cham and all his posterity incurred the paternal curse which declared him “A servant of servants . . . to his brethren” (Gen. 9:25). As slavery is the proper consequence of belittling the authority of God the Father even in His earthly representatives, it is a foregone conclusion that Democracy will lead the whole world into enforced servitude of a kind never seen before.
The United States, the much vaunted “Land of the free” which has appointed itself to preach freedom to the whole world and has risen to world leadership by the demonic power of democracy’s crowned locusts, is visibly becoming the “Home of the slave.” All the while extolling the blessings of self-government, its citizens are forging for themselves legal and economic shackles which eventually will trammel not only their every move but their very thoughts, where even now they are learning to live their lives under constant electronic surveillance. How many Americans manage to earn a living today without indenturing their bodies, if not their souls, to the “company store?”
Despite all the flashy successes of the democratic process, natural law nonetheless is bound to reassert itself, because natural law is true reality and there is no gainsaying it. Operating invisibly through all channels of the electorate, it is not elected legislatures, but dynasties of wealthy families who already head the powerful oligarchies which actually dictate national and international policies, guiding the course of governments behind the scenes. Historically democracies have inevitably ended in dictatorship, for like any other living body the body politic cannot be governed by its feet and remain functioning for long. It must have a head to direct its operations, and the great one world Democracy now taking shape can be no exception.
Craving by natural instinct a monarch in whom leadership can be concentrated and exercised over whatever lies below it, it should very soon acclaim by democratic vote the rule of the supreme Slavemaster, the “son of perdition” prophesied in Scripture who is Antichrist the King. At La Salette our Lady characterized him as “the devil incarnate” and even then declared his arrival imminent, telling the young shepherdess Mélanie: “Here is the king of the kings of darkness. Here is the beast with its subjects, calling itself the savior of the world!” The next age, looming just ahead and soon to be announced by the blast of the Sixth Trumpet, can therefore be expected to witness a formal declaration of independence from the Creator on the part of all mankind under the rule of the Antichrist, the triple-titled king of the hellish locusts, the “Angel of the bottomless pit.”
He will sum up democracy in his person much as one of his prototypes, Napoleon Bonaparte, summed up the French Revolution by declaring “La Revolution, c’est moi!” Being “lifted up above all that is called God or that is worshipped. . . showing himself as if he were God ”(2 Thess. 2:4), he will personify that same arrogant spirit of Democracy which during our Lord’s Passion voted to reprieve the robber Barabbas rather the innocent Christ the Redeemer.
The evangelists tell us that when Pontius Pilate, sitting on the judgment seat in the governor’s hall, asked the constituency assembled before him, “What shall I do then with Jesus that is called Christ?” they all replied unanimously, “Let him be crucified!” When Pilate, finding “no cause of death in him,” tried to remonstrate with them, “they were instant with loud voices, requiring that he might be crucified: and their voices prevailed . . . Away with him, away with him. Crucify him!” (Matt. 27:22; Luke 23:23; John 19:15). Now, that was democracy in action, openly pursuing the objective for which it was forged to begin with: to get rid of God!
|
|
|
|