| Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
| Online Users |
There are currently 226 online users.
» 0 Member(s) | 223 Guest(s)
Applebot, Bing, Google
|
|
|
| Pope Leo XIV celebrates Francis’ ‘birth into heaven.’ |
|
Posted by: Stone - 8 hours ago - Forum: Pope Leo XIV
- Replies (1)
|
 |
They themselves always cite Vatican II upon which they stand, as the foundation of their words and actions...
Pope Leo XIV celebrates Francis’ ‘birth into heaven.’ Will he canonize him?
Marking the first anniversary of Pope Francis' death, Leo XIV praised his predecessor as a ‘devoted shepherd’ who upheld the ‘legacy of the Second Vatican Council.’
![[Image: pf-canada-e1745486788544.jpg]](https://www.lifesitenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/pf-canada-e1745486788544.jpg)
Pope Francis arrives at Commonwealth Stadium to give an open-air mass on July 26, 2022 in Edmonton, Canada.
Cole Burston/Getty Images
Apr 22, 2026
(LifeSiteNews [emphasis mine]) — While celebrating Pope Francis’ “birth into heaven” on the first-year anniversary of his death, Pope Leo XIV said his predecessor took up the legacy of the Second Vatican Council.
In a message delivered by Cardinal Giovanni Battista Re at the Papal Basilica of St. Mary Major, Leo honored Francis yesterday as a “devoted shepherd,” saying that he, “in continuity with his predecessors, took up the legacy of the Second Vatican Council,” Vatican News reported.
Leo’s remarks were given on the first year anniversary of Francis’ death, a day which Leo called Francis’ “birth into heaven,” in the assumption not only that Francis was headed toward heaven, but that he went straight there as a saint. This assumption contradicts Catholic tradition by which, for the good of the deceased, one prays for their souls in the hope of salvation and for deliverance from purgatory.
The assumption that Pope Francis was immediately welcomed into heaven as a saint is also at odds with his legacy of sowing confusion and error by making statements and issuing documents that contradicted perennial Catholic Church teaching, as has been documented in a recently published book.
In his commemoration of Francis, Leo suggested, remarkably, that his pontificate marked a turning point in the Church.
He said Francis recognized that he acted as pope “at a time that has marked – and continues to mark – a change of era, a change of which he was fully aware, offering all of us a courageous witness that represents a significant patrimony for the Church.”
By all indications, Leo appears to embrace the “change of era” marked by Francis’ pontificate. He has praised one of his most controversial – and heterodox – documents, Amoris Laetitia, which suggested Holy Communion may be given to divorced and “remarried” Catholics who are living in grave sin, itself a grave offense that violates Catholic teaching.
Leo has also endorsed Francis’ idea that there is an “infinite human dignity,” when he authorized a study by the International Theological Commission published in February.
Various clerics, and Leo’s own brother, have affirmed that he desires to continue that path of Francis. Vatican Cardinal Víctor Manuel Fernández, prefect of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, has said that “Pope Leo has expressed in various ways the need to continue to receive the magisterium of Francis.”
Leo himself has explicitly and repeatedly positioned himself as the inheritor of Francis’s program, stressing continuity on synodality, women’s roles in the Church, ecumenism, curial reform, and liturgical disputes. He stated in a September interview, “I hope to continue in the footsteps of Francis, including in appointing women to some leadership roles at different levels in the Church’s life.”
Leo has also actively championed the Second Vatican Council, sharing his affinity for it with Francis, who said his spirituality comes directly from Vatican II. Leo announced in January that he would be beginning a catechesis series to “closely” study Vatican II, which many priests and scholars have affirmed to be in need of correction.
|
|
|
| Jean Madiran [1980]: Interesting Revelation Concerning John XXIII |
|
Posted by: Stone - 8 hours ago - Forum: In Defense of Tradition
- No Replies
|
|
Interesting Revelation Concerning John XXIII, Jean Madiran – ITINÉRAIRES November 1980
La Porte Latine [Machine translated from the French - emphasis mine]
Despite a few contrary appearances he had generously cultivated, notably when he was nuncio in Paris, John XXIII was in reality an admirer of Marc Sangnier and a disciple of the Sillon.
A revelation? Yes. As Henri Rambaud used to say, the true "unpublished" is… the printed word — that which went unnoticed at the time of its publication.
The letter from Nuncio Roncalli reproduced below had already been published in 1965 in Ernest Pezet's book: Chrétiens au service de la cité, de Léon XIII au Sillon et au MRP (NEL). It had passed unnoticed, at least by us. It has now been republished in L'âme populaire, the still-living organ of the "Catholic Sillon" founded by Robert Pigelet in 1920, in its 60th year, issue 571, August–September 1980.
This letter was addressed by Nuncio Roncalli to Mme Marc Sangnier on June 6, 1950, on the occasion of Marc Sangnier's death. Its content and significance far exceed a simple message of condolence, as will be seen:
Quote:"Paris, June 6, 1950
Madame,
I had heard Marc Sangnier speak for the first time in Rome around 1903 or 1904, at a meeting of Catholic Youth. The powerful fascination of his words, of his soul, had enchanted me, and I keep of his person and his political and social activity the most vivid memory of my entire priestly youth.
His noble and great humility in accepting later, in 1910, the admonition — moreover quite affectionate and benevolent — of the Holy Pope Pius X, gives in my eyes the measure of his true greatness.
Souls capable of remaining as faithful and respectful as his of the Gospel and of the Holy Church are made for the highest ascents that secure earthly glory before contemporaries and posterity, to whom the example of Marc Sangnier will remain as a teaching and an encouragement.
On the occasion of his death, my spirit was greatly comforted to see that the most authoritative voices to speak in the name of official France came together, unanimously, to wrap Marc Sangnier as in a mantle of honor, in the Sermon on the Mount. No more eloquent tribute and praise could be rendered to the memory of this distinguished Frenchman, whose contemporaries knew how to appreciate the clarity of a profoundly Christian soul and the noble sincerity of his heart."
By the magical effect of a kind of implicit "reinterpretation" of texts — which foreshadows the marvels that the conciliar evolution would achieve in this domain — Marc Sangnier and his Sillon thus received from the "holy Pope Pius X" nothing other than a "quite affectionate and benevolent admonition"; no memory remains of any error that had been condemned, of any teaching that had been formulated against the Sillon. The only "teaching" that the future John XXIII recalls in this connection is that of… Marc Sangnier himself!
No doubt Saint Pius X recognized in the leaders of the Sillon "elevated souls, superior to vulgar passions and animated by the noblest enthusiasm for the good"; but he also declared: "We have had the sorrow of seeing our warnings and reproaches glide off their elusive souls." The people of the Sillon are "swept along a path as false as it is dangerous." The Sillon "builds its city on a theory contrary to Catholic truth and distorts the essential and fundamental notions that govern social relations"; it "sows erroneous and pernicious ideas"; it has "a false idea of human dignity"; "its spirit is dangerous and its education harmful"; and henceforth "it forms nothing more than a miserable tributary of the great movement of apostasy organized in all countries."
Who would suspect this, reading Roncalli's soothing reinterpretation? Who could suppose that in reality, in his Letter on the Sillon, Saint Pius X had doctrinally defined and denounced that RELIGIOUS DEMOCRACY which, half a century later, through the so-called CONCILIAR EVOLUTION, would draw ecclesiastical society into IMMANENT APOSTASY?
Moreover, in 1950 Nuncio Roncalli enjoyed recalling that he had been "fascinated" and "enchanted" by Marc Sangnier: a memory that remains "the most vivid of his entire priestly youth."
The same Nuncio Roncalli, with other interlocutors, managed to pass himself off rather as an admirer and disciple of Cardinal Pie — we have precise testimony of this. Unhappy John XXIII, of whom Abbé Berto had said that terrible thing: "He is a skeptic."
A skeptic, yes; but not, for that reason, impartial between doctrines, or indifferent before them. Like all skeptics by temperament, he actively inclined toward the anti-dogmatic; the modernists; the Sillonists. His admiration for Cardinal Pie was a pretense — or let us say: a protocolar respect, which he played skillfully. His heart was with the Sillon.
Most striking is the calm audacity with which Nuncio Roncalli allowed himself to speak of Saint Pius X's letter on the Sillon, "reinterpreting" it in such a way as to strip it of all its moral and doctrinal significance. Let one reread that letter Notre charge apostolique of August 25, 1910, and one will immediately perceive to what extent the manner in which Nuncio Roncalli speaks of it manifests a total effrontery.
In 1950, the substitute Jean-Baptiste Montini treated the encyclical Humani generis of Pius XII in exactly the same way: an account of this is found in one and the other of the two books Jean Guitton devoted to Paul VI. I had analyzed this phenomenon in detail on the occasion of the first volume: in issue 128 of ITINÉRAIRES, December 1968, pages 154 to 159. I did not name Montini; I examined his remarks and characterized them by understatement as "inattention to texts" and "gratuitous reverie," judging that my commentary "would currently change nothing at all and would find its natural place in its own time, with hindsight and in an already historical perspective."
Since Montini's name did not appear, my analysis attracted little attention. One may refer to it today, after Jean Guitton's second work on Paul VI, which has confirmed the authentic tenor and brazen audacity of Montini's remarks from 1950.
That was September 8. Roncalli, June 6 of the same year. The occasion of the one and the other text was different. The substance, the intellectual method, was identical. Such, then, were the hands into which the Church Militant had fallen.
|
|
|
|
| Vatican plans October conference on Amoris Laetitia as synodal implementation advances |
|
Posted by: Stone - Yesterday, 09:13 AM - Forum: Vatican II and the Fruits of Modernism
- No Replies
|
|
Vatican plans October conference on Amoris Laetitia as synodal implementation advances
The General Secretariat of the Synod approved an implementation roadmap for 2026,
with June and October gatherings set to advance the controversial synodal process worldwide.
![[Image: synod-on-synodality.jpg]](https://www.lifesitenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/synod-on-synodality.jpg)
Synod on Synodality members during the 2023 season, in the Paul VI Hall, Vatican City
Michael Haynes
Apr 22, 2026
VATICAN CITY (LifeSiteNews) — The Vatican has approved plans for two major gatherings tied to the Synod on Synodality’s implementation, including a conference on the family in light of Amoris laetitia – Pope Francis’ 2016 controversial document challenging the teaching on Communion for the divorced and “remarried.”
On April 17, the General Secretariat of the Synod convened online and approved the general structure of a draft document for the implementation phase of the Synod on Synodality, while also announcing two forthcoming meetings – one from June 23-25 and another from October 7-14 – intended to prepare “continental evaluation assemblies” planned for early 2028 and to facilitate future consultation with bishops worldwide “on the theme of the family in the light of the Post-Synodal Apostolic Exhortation Amoris laetitia.”
Details of the program were officially announced by the General Secretariat of the Synod and the Vatican’s official press organ, L’Osservatore Romano, only three days after the meeting, on April 20.
The online meeting was opened with a moment of prayer led by Sister Nathalie Becquart, undersecretary of the General Secretariat of the Synod, rather than by Secretary General Cardinal Mario Grech, who was present at the event.
Soon after, Grech outlined the next steps in the synodal process. First, Grech announced a meeting from June 23 to 25 “to prepare the continental evaluation assemblies scheduled for the first quarter of 2028.”
Pope Leo XIV will take part in one session of the proceedings.
The participants will include a representative of the Council of the Patriarchs of the Eastern Churches, the presidents of the continental episcopal conferences, and the presidents of two national episcopal conferences, namely those of the United States and Canada.
These “continental evaluation assemblies” are expected to be meetings in which participants will assess whether and how the synodal process has been implemented in their respective regions of the world, in order to understand how to correct or further develop what has been done so far.
These meetings will take place almost simultaneously with the extraordinary consistory that Pope Leo XIV has planned in Rome for June 26-27, during which the cardinals are expected to discuss issues of particular interest to the Pontiff, including the liturgy, the governance of local Churches, evangelization, and the Church’s “synodal conversion.”
Grech then announced the next step in the program of synodal implementation. As Pope Leo XIV had already announced on March 19, a conference will be held in the Vatican from October 7 to 14 with the presidents of the bishops’ conferences from around the world to determine how to implement family pastoral care in the light of Amoris laetitia.
Preparations for the event have been entrusted by the Pope to the Dicastery for the Laity, Family and Life, with a request for “organizational and methodological support” from the General Secretariat of the Synod. The dicastery is led by Cardinal Kevin Joseph Farrell, one of the most active exponents of Bergoglianism, and known – among other things – for having publicly praised Father James Martin’s 2017 book calling for the building of bridges with LGBT communities.
It is not clear whether the presidents of regional, national, and/or continental episcopal conferences will take part.
Amoris laetitia, one of the most controversial documents of the Francis pontificate, represents a rupture within Church teaching by initiating a doctrinal shift in the way the moral standing of so-called “irregular” couples is assessed – couples cohabiting more uxorio, divorced and civilly “remarried,” and same‑sex “couples.”
As stated in L’Osservatore Romano, “the note [from the General Secretariat of the Synod] specifies that this is not a synodal assembly, but a consultation meeting of the Bishop of Rome with the presidents of the episcopal conferences.”
The third point of the meeting concerned the presentation and the approval “in its general structure” of a document drafted by the Jesuit Giacomo Costa, a consultant of the General Secretariat and special secretary of the XVI Assembly of the Synod, regarding the “path of implementation of the Synod.” The document will be published, after revision by the Ordinary Council, “by the beginning of the summer.”
|
|
|
|
| Trump DOJ charges far-left Southern Poverty Law Center that targets traditional Catholics |
|
Posted by: Stone - Yesterday, 09:05 AM - Forum: General Commentary
- No Replies
|
|
Trump DOJ charges far-left Southern Poverty Law Center that targets traditional Catholics
The Southern Poverty Law Center, which was cited in an infamous Biden administration memo targeting Latin Mass Catholics,
faces a federal indictment for bank fraud and other crimes.
![[Image: GettyImages-2272459587.jpg]](https://www.lifesitenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/GettyImages-2272459587.jpg)
Acting U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche speaks alongside FBI Director Kash Patel at a news conference at the Robert F. Kennedy Department of Justice building on April 21, 2026, in Washington, D.C.
Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images
Apr 21, 2026
MONTGOMERY, Alabama (LifeSiteNews [slightly adapted, not all hyperlinks included from original') — The Department of Justice (DOJ) announced an indictment against the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), one of the most powerful left-wing activist groups in the U.S., on 11 counts of bank fraud and other crimes.
The infamous nonprofit “secretly funneled more than $3 million in donated funds” to members of the Ku Klux Klan, the National Socialist Party of America, and other extremist organizations as part of investigations into the groups, the DOJ said on Tuesday. The SPLC failed to tell donors that it was using their money “to fund the leaders and organizers of racist groups at the same time that the SPLC was denouncing the same groups on its website,” according to the agency.
The DOJ said that the SPLC “opened bank accounts connected to a series of fictitious entities” to cover up the scheme and “made a series of false statements related to the operation of the accounts.”
“The SPLC is manufacturing racism to justify its existence,” Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche said. “Using donor money to allegedly profit off Klansmen cannot go unchecked. This Department of Justice will hold the SPLC and every other fraudulent organization operating with the same deceptive playbook accountable. No entity is above the law.”
“The SPLC allegedly engaged in a massive fraud operation to deceive their donors, enrich themselves, and hide their deceptive operations from the public,” FBI Director Kash Patel said. “They lied to their donors, vowing to dismantle violent extremist groups, and actually turned around and paid the leaders of these very extremist groups – even utilizing the funds to have these groups facilitate the commission of state and federal crimes. That is illegal – and this is an ongoing investigation against all individuals involved.”
Democrats criticized the indictment, with far-left U.S. Rep. Pramila Jayapal saying that the “Southern Poverty Law Center does incredibly important work” and that she “will continue to stand with them.”
The group is one of the largest public advocacy organizations in America, with an $822 million endowment and a $129 million revenue as of 2024 and financial backing from liberal mega-donors. The SPLC has long faced criticism for lavish salaries, allegations of sexual harassment and mistreatment of staff, and transferring hundreds of millions of dollars to offshore accounts.
Southern Poverty Law Center targets traditional Catholics, other conservatives
Founded in 1971 as a civil rights legal firm, the Southern Poverty Law Center has become known in recent decades for its radical leftist activism and for smearing mainstream conservative, Catholic, and other Christian organizations as “hate groups” for opposing homosexuality and transgenderism.
The SPLC’s “hate map” features prominent pro-family organizations such as Family Research Council, Alliance Defending Freedom, and Liberty Counsel alongside terroristic white supremacist groups like the Ku Klux Klan.
The notorious January 2023 FBI memo targeting “Radical Traditional Catholic ideology” and proposing “threat mitigation” of traditionalist Catholics notably cited the SPLC and its designation of nine Catholic organizations as “hate groups.”
The SPLC lists “anti-LGBTQ+” beliefs as one of the “extremist ideologies” that it tracks, along with “Racist Skinhead,” “Neo-Nazi,” and “Holocaust Denial” movements. The group associates “anti-LGBTQ+ hate” with the ideas that heterosexuality “is the only ‘normal’ sexuality” or that “gender can only be understood as either ‘male’ or ‘female’,” both of which Catholic teaching and the Bible uphold.
The SPLC also tracks “Radical Traditionalist Catholicism,” faulting so-called “radical traditional Catholics” for opposing “liberalizing reforms” after the Second Vatican II that “placed more power in the hands of laypeople” and claiming that “antisemitism is an inextricable part of their theology.”
Other organizations targeted by the SPLC include the Center for Family and Human Rights (C-Fam), the American Family Association, Focus on the Family, the American College of Pediatricians, the Ruth Institute, now-defunct Catholic media outlet Church Militant, and Do No Harm, which opposes underage “gender transitions.” The group absurdly lists pro-parent organizations like Moms for Liberty as extremist “antigovernment groups.”
The Southern Poverty Law Center still denounces Turning Point USA as a “hate group” as well, even after a left-wing assassin murdered its founder, Charlie Kirk, in 2025.
Homosexual activist who tried to massacre Family Research Council cited SPLC
The SPLC’s propaganda has led to violence against conservatives, including a near-massacre in 2012, when homosexual activist Floyd Lee Corkins II entered the headquarters of Family Research Council with a semi-automatic pistol and nearly 100 rounds of ammunition, seeking to “kill as many people as I could” and smear Chick-fil-A sandwiches on their faces.
Corkins, who previously considered bombing FRC’s headquarters, told FRC guard Leo Johnson “I don’t like your politics” and then shot him in the arm, though Johnson managed to disarm him and force him to the ground.
Corkins had identified FRC as a “hate group” through Southern Poverty Law Center’s website and planned to attack other pro-family groups condemned by the SPLC.
“Southern Poverty Law lists anti-gay groups,” he admitted. “I found them online, did a little research, went to the website – stuff like that.”
The LGBT activist said he hoped the shooting would “make a statement against the people who work in that building … and with their stance against gay rights.” Indeed, Corkins “would have almost certainly succeeded in committing a massacre of epic portions” had Johnson not stopped him, prosecutors said.
Corkins was later convicted of terrorism and sentenced to 25 years in prison, but the Southern Poverty Law Center has continued to brand Family Research Council as a “hate group” due to its faith-based rejection of homosexuality and gender ideology.
James Hodgkinson, the leftist who shot then-House Republican Whip Steve Scalise and sought to kill dozens of GOP congressmen at a baseball practice in 2017, had also liked the Southern Poverty Law Center on Facebook.
The SPLC has nevertheless enjoyed a close relationship with the federal government under Democratic administrations. The DOJ invited the SPLC’s co-founder – who was later fired for “inappropriate conduct” – as a speaker, and the FBI listed it as a “resource” during part of the Obama administration. The Biden DOJ listed the SPLC as an “extremism” consultant in 2021.
However, Trump’s FBI severed all ties with the group last fall, saying it had become “a partisan smear machine.”
Numerous Christian conservatives persecuted due to SPLC
Big Tech companies, including Facebook, Twitter, Google, and Amazon, have partnered with the SPLC as well, using it to flag so-called “hate groups” and remove or restrict them on their platforms.
The SPLC’s designation of Alliance Defending Freedom – one of the world’s largest conservative legal organizations – as a “hate group” led to its removal as an AmazonSmile charity in 2018. “We rely on the Southern Poverty Law Center to determine which charities are in certain ineligible categories,” Amazon said at the time.
Southern Poverty Law Center similarly prompted GuideStar to label 46 conservative organizations, including FRC, as “hate groups” and led financial companies like Mastercard, Visa, GoFundMe, Patreon, and Vanco to cut off donations to pro-family organizations and critics of Islam, as LifeSiteNews has reported.
Hyatt Hotels, Eventbrite, and video platform Vimeo have additionally blacklisted groups denounced by the SPLC.
|
|
|
|
| SSPX Announcement of New Bishops Confirmed for June |
|
Posted by: Stone - 04-21-2026, 09:53 AM - Forum: The New-Conciliar SSPX
- No Replies
|
|
BREAKING: SSPX Announcement of New Bishops Confirmed for June
![[Image: AVvXsEiCFHUF2JmVSiY4D4fpPFy_QDUTY-pvOFOe...Mu5RNCcmgg]](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEiCFHUF2JmVSiY4D4fpPFy_QDUTY-pvOFOewRu2vqNzi0_AvfB2kD7gdj1tALQBWwKfbHFmu4LCqKRP0L3Q1UUT5PSCKjHVTmlTwpVM5EQ8fYCHsGUwM9yg2TZf8UzePhq3ZqplA30hlMZSDF2AJuwRKDWzIn8SslbouC_SCNg7_0PdMu5RNCcmgg)
Don Davide Pagliarani, (Source: The Fatima Center)
Rorate Caeli | April 21, 2026
Via the most reliable of sources, confirming agreement by both Don Davide Pagliarani, Superior General of the Priestly Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX), and Father Fullerton, District Superior for the US, the names of the new bishops to be consecrated for the Society on July 1st at Econe will be announced in June.
|
|
|
|
| Is This a Leaked List of the SSPX Bishops to be Consecrated? |
|
Posted by: Stone - 04-21-2026, 09:51 AM - Forum: The New-Conciliar SSPX
- No Replies
|
|
Is This a Leaked List of the SSPX Bishops to be Consecrated, or a Hoax?
The date seems to be suspicious.
Radical Fidelity | Apr 10, 2026
![[Image: https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.ama...x1031.jpeg]](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/%24s_!nqGM!,w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F07e3bf6c-0a57-43db-8ff4-1c7f4c5ec997_720x1031.jpeg)
About four hours ago an image appeared online, that is claimied to be an official list of the SSPX priests who will be consecrated as bishops on June 1.
The French document at first glance seems to have an air of officialdom, but the date in the bottom corner suggests it might have been a hoax.
Here is an AI translation of the document:
Quote:“Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X
FSSPX
COMMUNIQUÉ
FROM THE GENERAL HOUSE
Following the information already communicated concerning the holding of episcopal consecrations within the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X on July 1st, the Superior General now wishes to make known the names of the priests called to receive episcopal consecration.
After careful reflection and consultation with his Council, Father Davide Pagliarani, Superior General of the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X, has designated the following priests to be consecrated bishops in the service of the Fraternity and the souls entrusted to its apostolate:
Father Daniel Themann
Father Bernard de Lacoste Lareymondie
Father Gabriele d’Avino
Father Christophe Legrier
These consecrations are intended to ensure the continuity of the apostolate of the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X and the transmission of the Catholic priesthood according to the Tradition of the Church, for the good of souls and in the service of the Holy Church.
The Superior General entrusts these future bishops to the prayers of priests, religious, and the faithful. He earnestly asks that the rosary and sacrifices be offered for these priests called to a particularly grave responsibility in the Church, as well as for the Holy Father and for the good of the whole Church.
Menzingen, April 1st, 2026”
[...]
This is a developing story.
NB: This has yet to be confirmed or verified. At this point this is just an internet rumor. - The Catacombs
|
|
|
|
| 1983 photo shows future Pope Leo marching in communist-organized peace rally in Rome |
|
Posted by: Stone - 04-21-2026, 09:39 AM - Forum: Pope Leo XIV
- No Replies
|
|
1983 photo shows future Pope Leo marching in communist-organized peace rally in Rome
Italian left-wing activist Luca Casarini posted the 1983 image of then-Fr. Prevost at a communist-backed rally,
suggesting the new Pope has not ideologically ‘changed direction.’
![[Image: Untitled-20.png]](https://www.lifesitenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Untitled-20.png)
Fr. Robert Prevost (right) joins a 1983 communist party-led peace protest in Rome, Italy
Apr 20, 2026
(LifeSiteNews) — A newly unearthed photograph taken in Rome in 1983 shows a young Robert Francis Prevost, now Pope Leo XIV, participating in a left-leaning mass demonstration against NATO missile deployment.
On April 14 Luca Casarini, an Italian left-wing activist known for his role in the “no-global” movement and, more recently, for his work in migrant rescue operations in the Mediterranean, posted an image on his Facebook profile showing a young Father Robert Prevost during a peace march. Several news outlets have since picked up the story.
“You’ve come a long way, brother Robert. But you haven’t changed direction,” Casarini commented in his post.
On October 22, 1983, during a large march for peace held in Rome against the installation of NATO Cruise missiles in Comiso, Sicily, and across Europe, a young Prevost – not long ordained and engaged in studies in canon law – was photographed among a group of members of the Augustinian order carrying a sign reading, “Giovani agostiniani per la pace” (“Young Augustinians for Peace”).
The protest, which drew close to a million participants, took place amid heightened Cold War tensions and widespread mobilization for nuclear disarmament, and was organized by a broad coalition of pacifist groups and political organizations, including the Italian Communist Party (PCI), the Italian Communist Youth Federation (FGCI), and peace committees active at NATO bases.
The black-and-white image, which has recently circulated widely on social media platforms, shows Prevost in the front row of demonstrators. According to sources, the photograph was taken by Gianni Novelli, a Stigmatine priest known for his involvement in the Base Christian Communities and for his leadership within Cipax, the Interconfessional Center for Peace.
Novelli played a prominent role in ecclesial networks associated with non-violence and peace activism, and became a leading figure of the so‑called “Catholic dissent” initiative after the Second Vatican Council. After leaving his religious order, he devoted himself to pacifism in an ecumenical sense.
The Base Christian Communities (in Spanish: comunidades de base), which had emerged in the 1960s and 1970s in Italy and Latin America, played a role in fostering grassroots engagement on left-leaning social and political issues. These communities were later viewed with particular interest by Pope Francis.
The unearthed image was first published a decade later, in 1993, in the Italian magazine Mosaico di pace, within a feature dedicated to Christian commitment to non-violence. At that time, the photograph was presented as part of a broader reflection on the involvement of Catholic groups in peace movements during the Cold War period.
Decades after it was taken, the photograph gained public attention again. According to the same sources, in November 2025, Archbishop Giovanni Ricchiuti, national president of Pax Christi, presented a copy of the image to Pope Leo XIV during an official meeting.
The demonstration in which Prevost participated formed part of a wider movement opposing the deployment of Euromissiles in Europe in the late 1970s and ‘80s. The installation of Cruise missiles at Italy’s Comiso air base had become a focal point for international protest, drawing activists, religious figures, and political groups into coordinated action. The Rome rally represented one of the largest such mobilizations in Italy and in the world during that period.
However, the global mobilization against the missiles was part of a broader international landscape of opposition to the Cold War – often encouraged by the USSR, which included pro‑peace propaganda aimed at undermining the U.S. nuclear strategy directed against Russia.
It is perfectly possible Prevost may have taken part more for peace and nuclear disarmament rather than for the organizer – the communists. However, it still appears naïve on his part largely because the organizers were part of the Italian Communist Party (notoriously a cell of the USSR, directly financed with Kremlin funds).
In particular, the Italian Communist Party operated – as historians now widely acknowledge – as a Soviet propaganda outpost. The pacifism promoted by the Russians also served the purpose of internal disruption and of slowing the deterrence efforts of the NATO bloc.
The photo can also be found among the images preserved in the historical archive of the Italian Communist Party. Alongside the Augustinians (see here), members of several other religious orders – such as Franciscans and Jesuits – also took part in the event. The demonstration, held in those days also in other important European cities such as London, Paris, Amsterdam, and Bonn, brought together people of all religions and political orientations, though it was clearly oriented in an anti‑NATO direction.
The Magisterium of the Catholic Church teaches that socialism in all its forms, including communism, is infallibly condemned. As Pope Pius XI stated in his 1937 encyclical Divini Redemptoris: “Communism is intrinsically wrong, and no one who would save Christian civilization may collaborate with it in any undertaking whatsoever. Those who permit themselves to be deceived into lending their aid towards the triumph of Communism in their own country will be the first to fall victims of their error.”
Luca Casarini was personally invited by Pope Francis to take part in the Synod on Synodality held at the Vatican from October 4 to 29, 2023, as one of the lay guests with the right to speak but not to vote. His presence was both highly symbolic and controversial.
|
|
|
|
| Opinion: Abp. Vigano accuses Clinton of Benedict XVI resignation trigger |
|
Posted by: Stone - 04-20-2026, 12:20 PM - Forum: Archbishop Viganò
- No Replies
|
|
Abp. Vigano accuses Clinton of Benedict XVI resignation trigger – Vatican banking shutdown
Archbishop Viganò stated that Hillary Clinton and John Podesta caused the shutdown of the Vatican banking ATMs
that were thought to have pressured Benedict XVI to resign.
![[Image: Untitled-2.png]](https://www.lifesitenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Untitled-2.png)
Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò
Exsurge Domine
Apr 18, 2026
Editor’s note: The following text is taken from Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò’s X account, first published on April 18, 2026, and republished here in full.
(LifeSiteNews) — It is understandable that many Catholics feel offended and scandalized by the statements made by the President of the United States regarding Leo, even if one certainly cannot claim that Jorge Bergoglio refrained during his “reign” from launching attacks and provocations against Donald Trump.
Moreover, the latter’s intervention is contextualized by the statements orchestrated against him this week on the CBS, propaganda program 60 Minutes by three utterly corrupt cardinals: Cupich, McElroy, and Tobin, three prelates who are notoriously ultra-Bergoglian and ultra-progressive, part of the network of the serial abuser Theodore McCarrick, inextricably linked to the radical “woke” Left, and key electors and closest collaborators of Robert Prevost.
When asked by journalists about Donald Trump’s post, Leo replied: “I am not afraid of the Trump administration, nor of boldly proclaiming the message of the Gospel, which is what I believe I am called to do, and what the Church is called to do.” These words, apparently indisputable coming from Prevost, can however shift sharply in meaning depending on how they are interpreted. They may simply mean, “I have no fear of civil power,” thereby asserting the superiority of the Catholic Church’s spiritual authority over any earthly authority. Or, in a diametrically opposite sense, they may mean, “I have no fear of this administration” – implying that, in other instances, he deems it legitimate to feel fear and to refrain from “boldly proclaiming the message of the Gospel.” And immediately, one is reminded of how often we have seen the Vatican “fear” other administrations, both in Washington – especially when the interference of Hillary Clinton and John Podesta went so far as to block in the Vatican banking transactions via the SWIFT network – and in Beijing, where the Holy See is officially involved with the communist dictatorship, through a secret Agreement, not to “forcefully proclaim the message of the Gospel,” rubber-stamping the episcopal appointments of the Chinese Patriotic Association without them being deemed a schismatic act, unlike the Consecrations at Ecône.
In numerous other instances, Prevost, and before him Bergoglio, have seen fit to remain silent of their own accord, perhaps because their acquiescence, if not outright enthusiastic cooperation, was precisely what the Powers That Be expected from the Conciliar and Synodal Church. Indeed, no sooner had the Trump Administration cut off the stream of funds that USAID was channeling to the USCCB and various bodies of the American Catholic Church to facilitate immigration, than an open war erupted on the part of all those cardinals and bishops whom Clinton, Obama, and Biden had, until that moment, showered with money. During those years of plenty, Bergoglio and the entire American Episcopate took great care not to disrupt their idyll with the White House, thanks, in part, to the good offices of then-Cardinal McCarrick, and paid scant heed to the pro-abortion, LGBTQ+, and gender-related policies promoted by “Catholic” Democrats. The mere suggestion of excommunicating “pro-choice” politicians was deemed an intolerable intrusion by a Hierarchy that had itself made it abundantly clear it had no intention whatsoever of taking such a step.
Thus, a single phrase, extrapolated from its context – “I am not afraid of the Trump administration, nor of boldly proclaiming the message of the Gospel” – might appear entirely unobjectionable. Yet, when viewed within a broader, more coherent framework, it leaves one utterly perplexed, for it directly contradicts the very words Leo uttered on that same occasion: “We are not politicians. (…) I do not believe that the message of the Gospel should be instrumentalized, as some are currently doing.” And while there are undoubtedly those who instrumentalize “the message of the Gospel” through the pseudo-messianic delusions typical of American televangelists, there are also most certainly those the within the Vatican who do not hesitate to instrumentalize that very same Gospel to lend a veneer of legitimacy and morality to the agenda of ethnic replacement and the Islamization of the West: an agenda doggedly pursued by the globalist elite through the Agenda 2030. This is an Agenda that Trump detests entirely, but which the Holy See, Leo, the USCCB, and a host of pseudo-Catholic charities have elevated to the status of a new globalist totem within their own synodal program. Nor should we forget the doctrinal ratification that Bergoglio bestowed upon the pandemic farce and mass vaccination, just as he did for climate fraud and “sustainable development goals” with his pseudo-encyclical Laudato Si’, or the blessing that Prevost imparted to a block of ice specially shipped from Antarctica during a truly cringeworthy ceremony at Castel Gandolfo.
Despite his insistence that he is not a politician, Leo had no qualms about granting a private audience on April 9 to David Axelrod, Barack Obama’s chief strategist and former senior adviser at the White House. One question is more than legitimate: Did Axelrod perhaps come to the Vatican to dictate a specific political strategy to Leo, much as Hillary Clinton and John Podesta had previously interfered to pressure Benedict XVI into abdicating and then facilitate the election of Bergoglio?
The paradox is made manifest by Trump himself: “Leo should get his act together as Pope, use Common Sense, stop catering to the Radical left, and focus on being a Great Pope, not a politician. It’s hurting him very badly and, more importantly, it’s hurting the Catholic Church!” Which is absolutely true, more so than President Trump could possibly imagine.
While the Democratic administrations have repeatedly and improperly interfered in the governance of the Church of Rome, untimely and inappropriate interventions by the Vatican regarding Washington have hardly been lacking either. And while nobody was surprised by the invective of the Jesuit from Buenos Aires, who labeled Trump “unchristian” for declaring his intention to repatriate hordes of illegal immigrants, the pronouncements of the Augustinian from Chicago regarding immigration, and more recently concerning the war, have certainly left observers bewildered: “God blesses no conflict. Anyone who is a disciple of Christ, the Prince of Peace, never sides with those who yesterday wielded the sword and today drop bombs,” Leo said. Surely he could have elaborated, as Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger did in 2003: “Given the new weapons that make possible a destruction extending far beyond groups of combatants, today we must ask ourselves whether it is still licit to admit the very existence of a just war.” Or, better yet, Leo could have recalled the words of Pius XII: “A people threatened by, or already the victim of, unjust aggression, if it wishes to act in a Christian manner, cannot remain in a state of passive indifference; moreover, the solidarity of the family of nations forbids others from behaving as mere spectators, adopting an attitude of impassive neutrality.” (Pius XII, Radio Message for Christmas, 24 December 1948)
But Prevost – and herein lies the true problem – does not speak with the voice of the Church: his words of condemnation against any war whatsoever ultimately serve to legitimize even unjust wars, thereby depriving the victim of aggression of the right to self-defense, given that even a defensive war would be deemed unjust. This error is akin to asserting that all religions are equivalent, that moral precepts must be adapted to contingent circumstances (see Amoris Lætitia and Fiducia Supplicans), or that capital punishment is contrary to the Gospel. For in these instances, too, the one who ought to serve as a point of reference in discerning Good from Evil betrays his own mandate by granting equal rights to error and to Truth, rather than assuming his moral responsibility to condemn the former and defend the latter.
Of course, if Leo ever dared to speak with the authoritative voice of the Catholic Church, he would find himself opposed not only by the pacifist Left (in whose ranks Prevost has served since the 1980s, joining the Young Augustinians movement (The resonance with the Young Turks movement, of clear Masonic aspiration (albeit perhaps unintentional), will not escape notice.), or Augustinians for Peace which was sponsored by the Italian Communist Party), but also by the “theo-con” Right, with which quite a few Catholic conservatives are dangerously aligned. The tolerance that the Conciliar Hierarchy currently enjoys is, in fact, conditional upon its acceptance and promotion not only of the globalist agenda of the U.N., the World Economic Forum in Davos, and the Council for Inclusive Capitalism With the Vatican founded by Bergoglio in collaboration with Lynn Forester de Rothschild, but also of the liberal agenda of the Anglo-Zionist lobby. In other words, it depends on two supranational powers operating on seemingly opposing fronts yet pursuing a common objective: the establishment of a New World Order, in which, regardless of which side ultimately prevails in the conflict, the sole victim of persecution will invariably be Catholicism – specifically, that Traditional Catholicism which Rome is striving by every means to destroy or subsume by “conciliarizing” and “synodalizing” it.
According to Trump’s admonition, “Leo should get his act together as Pope (…) and focus on being a Great Pope, not a Politician.” Indeed, the election of an American “pope” from Chicago, steeped in heretical doctrines acquired during his years of ministry in Latin America, devoted to the cult of Pachamama, and ideologically aligned – by his own admission – with the worst progressivism of the infamous Cardinals Bernardin and Cupich, appears to have been deliberately orchestrated to serve as a counterweight to the President of the United States. If his role was intended to be – as has indeed become evident in recent months – that of continuing the conciliar and synodal revolution, it comes as no surprise that Bergoglio meticulously paved the way for his ecclesiastical ascent, ensuring that he would succeed him and not undo the twelve years of systematic dismantling of the Catholic edifice and total subservience to the globalist establishment carried out by the Argentine Jesuit. In the face of these concrete demonstrations of continuity between Bergoglio and Prevost, the silence of the sparse, moderately conservative minority within the College of Cardinals confirms their complicity and inadequacy.
The unanimous chorus of the mainstream media and the neo-papists serves as proof that Leo is not speaking as a pope but rather as a standard-bearer for anti-Trumpism, so to speak. This is because the accolades come from figures – both within and outside the ecclesial body – who possess nothing of the Catholic spirit, and who would be the very first to crucify Prevost were he to dare express even the slightest doubt regarding the untouchable “dogmas” of the radical Left. Furthermore, this defense of Prevost is motivated precisely by the fact that the “pope” has chosen to play the politician, thereby demonstrating a partisanship that discredits both the Papacy and the Catholic Church in the eyes of the world. For this reason, Leo truly ought to “get his act together as Pope” – a task that is, however, exceedingly difficult for someone like him, who was chosen precisely because his support for the globalist agenda would be not merely coerced, but spontaneous and convinced; and because Leo is being kept under close watch by the emissaries of those Powers who have absolutely no intention of relinquishing the positions they have secured within the Catholic Church, now that they stand so tantalizingly close to the finish line.
When Our Lord Jesus Christ is recognized as King of the Nations, no Antichrist will dare to claim the title of Messiah. And when He is recognized as King and High Priest within the Church, no Vicar of His will dare to subvert His teaching or demolish His Church. If this is happening today, before our very eyes, it is because we are living in eschatological times in which Our Lord has been dethroned from His Divine Kingship by the Nations, and from His Eternal Priesthood by His own Ministers. Therefore, in judging present events, let us not allow ourselves to be beguiled by abstract speculations, nor let us attempt to alter reality to suit our own illusions. Let us view all that is unfolding through a supernatural lens, for this is the only way to preserve, amidst our present tribulations, that peace of soul which the world neither knows how to give, nor can give (Jn 14:27).
+ Carlo Maria Viganò, Archbishop
former Apostolic Nuncio to the United States of America
Viterbo, 17 April MMXXVI
S.cti Aniceti Papæ et Martyris
|
|
|
|
|
![[Image: ?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.davidprince.com%2Fw...401b9b53d6]](https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.davidprince.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2015%2F02%2Fpreach-christ.jpg&f=1&nofb=1&ipt=c3b22a67c481a0e349e8902d4e2b374e21e38d2c07bb834aacb8e5401b9b53d6)
