Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
Forum Statistics |
» Members: 292
» Latest member: Racdar
» Forum threads: 6,826
» Forum posts: 12,748
Full Statistics
|
Online Users |
There are currently 308 online users. » 1 Member(s) | 303 Guest(s) Applebot, Bing, Google, Yandex, Jules
|
Latest Threads |
Apologia pro Marcel Lefeb...
Forum: Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre
Last Post: Stone
3 hours ago
» Replies: 12
» Views: 1,176
|
Fr. Michael Müller: The C...
Forum: Resources Online
Last Post: Stone
3 hours ago
» Replies: 0
» Views: 35
|
The Most Anti-Catholic El...
Forum: Articles by Catholic authors
Last Post: Stone
3 hours ago
» Replies: 0
» Views: 27
|
Livestream: Passion Sund...
Forum: Fr. Ruiz's Sermons April 2025
Last Post: Deus Vult
Yesterday, 09:19 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 48
|
Livestream: First Saturda...
Forum: Fr. Ruiz's Sermons April 2025
Last Post: Deus Vult
Yesterday, 09:08 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 57
|
Fr. Ruiz: First Friday -...
Forum: Fr. Ruiz's Sermons April 2025
Last Post: Deus Vult
Yesterday, 09:05 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 51
|
Oratory Conference: St. ...
Forum: Conferences
Last Post: Deus Vult
Yesterday, 02:11 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 61
|
Before Francis, Pope John...
Forum: Pope Francis
Last Post: Stone
Yesterday, 09:33 AM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 103
|
Thursday Night Holy Hour ...
Forum: Appeals for Prayer
Last Post: SAguide
04-03-2025, 09:49 AM
» Replies: 15
» Views: 7,377
|
First Friday Holy Hour
Forum: Appeals for Prayer
Last Post: SAguide
04-03-2025, 09:33 AM
» Replies: 46
» Views: 111,719
|
|
|
Trump administration halts cases against pro-lifers, strongly limits future FACE Act use |
Posted by: Stone - 01-27-2025, 11:17 AM - Forum: Abortion
- No Replies
|
 |
Trump administration halts cases against pro-lifers, strongly limits future FACE Act use
The Department of Justice stopped three pending Biden-era prosecutions of pro-life activists under the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act on Friday, with strict new requirements for future invocations of the law to prevent it from being weaponized in the next four years.
President Donald Trump
Getty Images
Jan 25, 2025
WASHINGTON, D.C. (LifeSiteNews [slightly updated - not all hyperlinks included from original]) — (Updated.) The Trump Department of Justice (DOJ) put a stop to three pending Biden-era prosecutions of pro-life activists under the federal Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act on Friday, with stringent new requirements for future invocations of the law to prevent it from being weaponized again in the next four years.
In response to this development, Dr. Monica Miller of Red Rose Rescue and Citizens for a Pro-Life Society told LifeSiteNews that her organizations are “incredibly grateful”:
Quote:We are incredibly grateful, especially grateful to God, that this pathetic lawsuit is gone. It never should have been brought in the first place. Indeed, Red Rose Rescues do not violate the FACE Act, as Red Rose Rescuers do not physically block or interfere with anyone’s freedom of movement. (Please see redroserescue.com for information on this innovative rescue strategy.) But, under the Garland/Biden DOJ, federal prosecutors were simply bending, twisting, and broadening the language of the FACE Act to make what we did fit their perverted interpretation. If we needed to go to trial our Thomas More Society attorneys felt confident we would prevail against this unjust charge. With the dismissal of this FACE case it is the total icing on the cake, on top of Trump’s pardons of the pro-life prisoners who were convicted of violating the FACE law and the extra charge of Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights, resulting in draconian years-long prison terms. Now all pro-life rescuers are free at all levels in terms of the federal prosecutions.
We look forward to the repeal of the FACE act, the worst pro abortion law next to Roe v Wade.
Enacted in 1994, the FACE Act ostensibly protects access to facilities run by both pro-life and pro-abortion organizations, including abortion facilities, pro-life pregnancy centers, and churches. However, conservatives have argued that the DOJ under the Biden administration weaponized the act to prosecute pro-life activists while only a handful of pro-abortion vandals had been arrested after a string of attacks on churches and pro-life centers in the wake of the Dobbs ruling that overturned Roe v. Wade.
Among the most egregious Biden prosecutions have been 23 pro-lifers prosecuted by the Biden Justice Department for entering abortion centers and refusing to leave, and who received prison time despite several of them being elderly with medical issues. Also concerning was the case of Mark Houck, a Philadelphia pro-lifer whom the DOJ prosecuted under the FACE Act after arresting in a morning FBI raid for a physical altercation with a hostile abortion supporter that local authorities had already dismissed. Houck was acquitted in January 2023; Trump pardoned the 23 others on Thursday.
On Friday, multiple media outlets obtained a copy of a memo from Kathleen Wolfe, a supervisory official at DOJ’s Civil Rights Division (CRD). Citing President Donald Trump’s “promise of ending the weaponization of the federal government,” it directs that “future abortion-related FACE Act prosecutions and civil actions will be permitted only in extraordinary circumstances, or in cases presenting significant aggravating factors, such as death, serious bodily harm, or serious property damage.” In the absence of such factors, incidents will be left to state or local law to adjudicate.
“Additionally, until further notice, no new abortion-related FACE Act actions criminal or civil – will be permitted without authorization from the Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division,” it says.
It also instructs prosecutors to “immediately dismiss, with prejudice,” three pending cases against pro-life activist Cal Zastrow, Matthew Connolly, and Citizens for a Pro-Life Society.
“If needed, further case-specific guidance will follow for cases in which a criminal conviction has already been obtained but in which a sentence has not yet been imposed, or in which the appeals are not yet completed, that did not present significant aggravating factors,” the memo adds.
“In all three of these cases, our attorneys have led the defense of pro-life advocates targeted by Biden’s DOJ – which had sought crushing penalties, fines, and injunctions against them, to stop them from sharing their pro-life message,” Thomas More Society executive vice president and head of litigation Peter Breen responded. “These cases should have never been brought and we are thankful to the Trump administration for righting that wrong.”
“While this handful of cases are now slated for dismissal, there is no shortage of ongoing attacks on life-affirming ministries across the country as pro-abortion states double down on anti-life policies and lawfare,” he added. “As these legal battles multiply in pro-abortion states, we will tirelessly continue to defend the entire pro-life movement.”
The Trump administration’s actions give relief to those already targeted and ensure no new federal cases will arise in the next four years, but the danger remains of a future Democrat administration using the FACE Act just as President Joe Biden did. To solve the issue, Republicans in Congress reintroduced this week a bill to simply repeal the FACE Act.
The FACE Act Repeal Act of 2025 is expected to easily pass the U.S. House of Representatives and be signed by Trump if given a chance, but before reaching the president’s desk, it will still face a challenge in the Senate, which has a Republican majority with 53 seats but requires 60 votes to pass most types of legislation.
[See also: Mike Lee introduces Senate version of House bill to repeal FACE Act]
|
|
|
Dom Guéranger on these Latter Days |
Posted by: Stone - 01-26-2025, 08:11 AM - Forum: Church Doctrine & Teaching
- No Replies
|
 |
Dom Guéranger on these Latter Days
The Liturgical Year, Vol. XI, pp. 426-429
Taken from here. January 25, 2025
Dom Prosper Guéranger, in his commentary on the Epistle of the 20th Sunday after Pentecost, offers a profound description of these times, when there is “an almost universal falling off” from infinite and unchangeable truth. These words can well be applied to our times, where the apostasy has reached the highest cupola of the Church and the sons of darkness seem to be victorious.
We know, however, that after God lets fall a great chastisement on mankind and on the Church representatives responsible for that great apostasy, Our Lady will intervene and we will see a time of peace and holiness, the Reign of Mary promised at Fatima and Ecuador.
Dom Guéranger:
It is then [in the Latter Days] more than at all previous times that the Faithful will have to remember the injunction given to us by the Apostle in today’s Epistle; that is, they will have to comport themselves with that circumspection which he enjoins, taking every possible care to keep their understanding, no less than their heart, pure in those evil days.
Supernatural light will, in those days, not only have to stand the attacks of the children of darkness, who will put forward their false doctrines; it will, moreover, be minimized and falsified by the very children of the light yielding on the question of principles; it will be endangered by the hesitations and trimmings and human prudence of those who are called far-seeing men.
Many will practically ignore the master truth, that the Church never can be overwhelmed by any created power. If they do remember that Our Lord has promised Himself to uphold His Church even to the end of the world, they will still have the impertinence to believe that they do a great service to the good cause by making certain politically clever concessions, which, if they were tried in the balance of the sanctuary, would be found under weight!
Those future worldly-wise people will quite forget that Our Lord will have no need for helping Him to keep His promise of crooked schemes, however shrewd those may be; they will entirely overlook this most elementary consideration - that the cooperation, which Jesus deigns to accept, at the hands of His servants in the defense of the rights of His Church never could consist in the garbling, or in the disguisement of those grant truths which constitute the power and beauty of the Bride.
Is it possible that they will forget the Apostle’s maxim, which he lays down in his Epistle to the Romans - that the conforming oneself to this world - the attempting an impossible adaptation of the Gospel to a world that is un-christianized is not the means for proving what is the good, and acceptable, and the perfect will of God. So that it will be a thing of great and rare merit, in many an occurrence of those unhappy times, to merely understand what is the will of God, as our Epistle expresses it.
Look to yourselves, would St. John say to those men, that ye lose not the things which ye have wrought; make yourselves sure of the full reward, which is only given to the persevering thoroughness of doctrine and faith!
|
|
|
Lutheran women ‘priests’ help lead pilgrimage organized by Pope Francis’ diocese |
Posted by: Stone - 01-26-2025, 08:03 AM - Forum: Vatican II and the Fruits of Modernism
- Replies (1)
|
 |
With frustrating consistency, Pope Francis continues to expand and fructify the errors of Vatican II and his Conciliar papal predecessors:
Lutheran women ‘priests’ help lead pilgrimage organized by Pope Francis’ diocese
Attended by religious leaders of various creeds – including the Catholic Church, the Lutheran church, the Greek Orthodox – an ecumenical pilgrimage took place through Rome on Thursday night, with participants joining in a call for increased unity.
Ecumenical leaders at the Jan 23 pilgrimage in Rome
© Michael Haynes
Jan 24, 2025
ROME (LifeSiteNews) — Male and female clerics of the Lutheran, Greek Orthodox, and Catholic Churches joined in an ecumenical pilgrimage across Rome last night, praying for Christian unity in their respective churches.
Attended by religious leaders of various creeds – including the Catholic Church, the Lutheran church, the Greek Orthodox – an ecumenical pilgrimage took place through the streets of Rome on Thursday night, with participants joining in a call for increased unity between their churches.
“Today, gathered here as a community of Christians, we are gathered from different cultures and denominations to celebrate our common faith,” said Bishop Paolo Ricciardi, an auxiliary bishop of the Diocese of Rome since his appointment by Pope Francis in 2017.
The ecumenical vigil formed part of a week-long series of official events sponsored by the Catholic Diocese of Rome, marking the Week of Prayer for Christian Unity. Concluding the week, and forming the ecumenical highlight, will be the Pontifical Vespers on Saturday, presided over by Pope Francis and joined by a plethora of ecumenical delegates.
The Week of Prayer for Christian Unity, from January 18 through 25, has become an occasion for an increasing variety of ecumenical ventures between Catholics and members of others creeds. While such events take place on a more local level, those in Rome are afforded a particular significance, not least due to the role the Pope plays by virtue of his own participation.
Thursday’s ecumenical pilgrimage began at the Lutheran Evangelical church of Rome, before walking through the streets in a candle-lit procession to the Greek Orthodox church belonging to the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople, before concluding at the Catholic church of St. Camillo de Lellis.
Alongside Ricciardi (who was the leading Catholic prelate in attendance) the event also drew: Dr. Ian Ernest, the outgoing representative of the Anglican Archbishop of Canterbury in Rome; Mirella Manocchio, the female pastor of Rome’s Lutheran church and president of the work of the Evangelical Methodist Church in Italy; Matthew Laferty, the director of the Methodist Ecumenical Office Rome, who has responsibility for the World Methodist Council’s relationship with the Holy See; Archimandrite Simeon Katsinas, of the Greek Orthodox Church.
Bp. Ricciardi reads a message in Rome’s Lutheran Christuskirche. © Michael Haynes
Lutheran pastor Mirella Manocchio preaches in the Lutheran Christuskirche. © Michael Haynes
Each church stop saw ecumenical leaders read a Gospel passage, deliver a brief homily-style reflection, and a series of petitions invoking divine assistance in fostering further unity.
At the Lutheran church, Manocchio delivered her homily to the congregation, marking her out as the lead female religious leader amongst the group.
An oil lamp was also lit inside the Lutheran church, and carried in procession to each church, where it was handed over to the respective religious leaders, followed by the sign of peace between all.
Such gifts represented “light and hope,” said Monsignor Marco Gnavi, who leads the Office for Ecumenism and Religious Dialogue of the Diocese of Rome. “This offering of gifts also represents circularity, sharing and diversity in the same faith,” he added.
Once in the Catholic church, the participants jointly recited the Our Father using the customary Protestant version, which ends with the line “for thine is the kingdom, the power and glory, for ever and ever.” They also recited the ecumenical version of the Nicene Creed.
Scripture readings and prayers were centered on the theme of Christ’s conversion with Martha, which Gnavi said was a “central theme” in the current age.
Explaining why, he said that “not only the Churches but also the people must face many expressions of real death, which also means division, separation, up to conflict and the massacre of the innocents. … The dialogue between Jesus and Martha shows how in every man and every woman there is a question, implicit or explicit, of faith.”
Much attention has also been paid to the 1700th anniversary of the Council of Nicaea which occurs this year. The year 2025 is a rare occurrence in that the See of Rome and those of the East celebrate Easter on the same date, which has in turn given further motivation to the ecumenical bodies of both parties. Gnavi cited the Nicaea anniversary in relation to this year’s Christian Unity Week.
Lutheran pastor Mirella Manocchio preaches in the Catholic church of St. Camillo de Lellis, Rome. © Michael Haynes
Despite the significant anniversary of Nicaea, this year’s events for Christian Unity Week are notably less prominent than in 2024. This is likely due in no small part to the scandal-driven resignation of the Anglican Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby, in recent weeks. Welby was a leading figure in the ecumenical events last year, even receiving Pope Francis’ permission to celebrate and Anglican “Eucharist” in an ancient Catholic basilica in Rome.
Anglican Evensong was also celebrated in St. Peter’s Basilica as part of last year’s proceedings. This year, such events have been noticeably absent. Apart from Thursday’s processional vigil, the official ecumenical proceedings linked to the Diocese of Rome have been largely limited to a nightly ecumenical vespers with various Christian bodies, in the Basilica of St. Paul Outside the Walls.
Contrary to the Vatican’s contemporary approach to ecumenical relations is the Church’s traditional teaching and approach to interreligious relations. Indeed, in Pope Pius XI’s 1928 encyclical Mortalium animos, Catholic participation in Protestant ceremonies or “assemblies” was expressly forbidden. Pius XI wrote:
Quote:… it is clear that the Apostolic See cannot on any terms take part in their assemblies, nor is it anyway lawful for Catholics either to support or to work for such enterprises; for if they do so they will be giving countenance to a false Christianity, quite alien to the one Church of Christ.
He added that the Gospel-style of unity involves return to the Catholic Church:
Quote:The union of Christians can only be promoted by promoting the return to the one true Church of Christ of those who are separated from it, for in the past they have unhappily left it. To the one true Church of Christ, we say, which is visible to all, and which is to remain, according to the will of its Author, exactly the same as He instituted it.
|
|
|
Pope Francis institutes 23 women as Lectors, described as ‘tectonic shift’ in Catholic Tradition |
Posted by: Stone - 01-26-2025, 07:54 AM - Forum: Pope Francis
- No Replies
|
 |
Once again, Pope Francis expands and fructifies the errors in Vatican II.
The following is taken from Vatican II's "Decree on the Apostolate of Lay People," Apostolicam Actuositatem (Nov. 18, 1965):
Quote:The lay apostolate, in all its many aspects, is exercised both in the Church and in the world. In either case different fields of apostolic action are open to the laity. We propose to mention here the chief among them: Church communities, the family, the young, the social environment, national and international spheres. Since in our days women are taking an increasingly active share in the whole life of society, it is very important that their participation in the various sectors of the Church's apostolate should likewise develop (AA §9).
The article by SiSiNoNo on The Errors of Vatican II reminds us with respect to the above quote that:
Quote:The more active participation is provoked, to a great extent, by the false "dogmas" that we have just related, and carried out under their signature, a participation that was condemned by Pius XI as "a grave disorder to eliminate at all cost" in his encyclical, Quadragesima Anno, because it takes "mothers of families" away from their proper duties (AAS23 [1931] 200).
+ + +
Pope Francis institutes 23 women as Lectors, described as ‘tectonic shift’ in Catholic Tradition
Following his Canon Law changes in 2021, Pope Francis has now instituted men and women as Lectors four times, citing the 'common priesthood' in doing so. Liturgical scholars have warned that such actions contradict centuries of Catholic Tradition.
Pope Francis institutes a woman as Lector, Jan 26, 2025
Vatican News Youtube
Jan 26, 2025
VATICAN CITY (LifeSiteNews [Emphasis mine]) — Pope Francis instituted 40 men and women in the ministry of Lector today, marking the fourth time he has done so since his controversial changes to Canon Law in 2021.
During Mass at St. Peter’s Basilica on January 26, Pope Francis formally instituted 23 women and 17 men as Lectors, handing them a copy of the Bible and instructing them to proclaim the faith to young and old:
Quote:As readers and bearers of God’s word, you will assist in this mission, and so take on a special office within the Christian community; you will be given a responsibility in the service of the faith, which is rooted in the word of God, You will proclaim that word in the liturgical assembly, instruct children and adults in the faith, and prepare them to receive the sacraments worthily.
The ceremony is a recently formed event, and takes place in light of the Pope’s two liturgical writings in 2021. These include his motu proprio “Spiritus Domini” – by which he changed Canon Law to open up the male roles of lector and acolyte to women – and his apostolic letter “Antiquum ministerium,” which further drew on texts from Vatican II to establish the lay ministry of catechist for both men and women.
The 40 men and women hailed from Europe, South America and the Philippines, and it is by far the largest group to receive the ministry in the four years that Francis has performed the ceremony.
Pope Francis, Jan 26, 2026. ©Vatican News YouTube
Pope Francis, Jan 26, 2026. ©Vatican News YouTube
Male and female Lectors line up before Pope Francis, Jan 2025. ©Vatican News YouTube
Prior to the Second Vatican Council, the Catholic Church formed seminarians for the priesthood by the series of minor and major orders.
However, in his 1972 motu proprio “Ministeria quaedam,” Pope Paul VI curtailed the “minor orders” of Tonsure, Porter, Lector, Exorcist and Acolyte, as well as the major order of subdeacon, highlighting instead “the universal priesthood of believers.” Paul VI also changed the minor orders from “ordinations” to “institutions.”
The minor orders of Lector and Acolyte are still practiced in seminaries offering the post-conciliar liturgy, but referred to as “ministries” rather than minor orders, due to Ministeria quaedam.
Since Paul VI’s text, the liturgical actions traditionally performed by seminarians holding the respective “minor orders” have been performed by lay men and women in the Novus Ordo liturgy.
By virtue of his 2021 text Spiritus Domini, Francis codified what had become widespread practice whilst also raising what had become the widespread practice of women in the Novus Ordo liturgy to a formal ministry.
To accompany the new motu proprio, Pope Francis penned a letter, addressed to then-prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF), Cardinal Luis Ladaria Ferrer SJ. In his letter, the Pope asserted that there is “an ever greater urgency today to rediscover the co-responsibility of all the baptized in the Church, and especially the mission of the laity.”
Drawing from the Amazon Synod in Spiritus Domini, Francis urged “the need to think about ‘new paths for ecclesial ministeriality.’ Not only for the Amazonian Church, but for the whole Church, in the variety of situations.”
Focusing his attention on the institution of female ministers, Francis quoted again from the Amazon Synod, saying “it is urgent that ministries be promoted and conferred on men and women[.] … It is the Church of baptized men and women that we must consolidate by promoting ministry and, above all, the awareness of baptismal dignity.”
Pope Francis with a new female Lector, Jan 2025. ©Vatican News
However, liturgical scholars have opposed Francis’ move. One such individual is Dr. Peter Kwasniewski – Thomist and liturgical scholar – who has long warned against Francis’ opening of the Church’s orders to women and laymen.
Authoring a book-length response to the question of women as ministers – Ministers of Christ: Recovering the Roles of Clergy and Laity in an Age of Confusion – Kwasniewski defended the traditional Catholic teaching on reserving the liturgical ministries to men only.
Spiritus Domini, he wrote, was “a tectonic shift both in theology and in praxis,” before adding:
Quote:The motu proprio Spiritus Domini therefore commits a double categorical error by conflating the dignity of the baptized with the dignity of active liturgical ministry.
Joining Kwasniewski was Bishop Athanasius Schneider, of Astana, who has written at length on the liturgical history and import of male-only roles at the altar.
Commenting on the role of women in the liturgy, Schneider wrote:
Quote:“The liturgical service of women in the Eucharistic liturgy, as reader and as acolyte and servant at the altar, was altogether excluded in the theological reasoning of the whole Old Testament and New Testament traditions, as well as of the two-thousand-year-old Eastern and Western tradition of the Church (see the cited study by Martimort).”
Instead, he posited the “common priesthood” – the aspect cited by recent popes in expanding liturgical roles to laity – as being exercised by praying from the nave of the church: “the common priesthood, on the other hand, is represented by those persons who, during the liturgy, are gathered in the nave of the church, representing Mary, the ‘handmaid of the Lord,’ who receives the Word and makes it fruitful in the world.”
With files from David McLoone.
|
|
|
Requiescat in pace: Bishop Richard Williamson |
Posted by: Stone - 01-25-2025, 12:03 PM - Forum: Appeals for Prayer
- Replies (4)
|
 |
We have received word that His Excellency Bishop Williamson has suffered a stroke and is unconscious. He has received Last Rites.
The Bishop's Telegram channel, Truth Unchained, implies he is not expected to recover:
PRAYER FOR THE SOULS IN THE AGONY OF DEATH
ETERNAL Father, by the love Thou bearest toward St. Joseph, who was chosen by Thee from among all men to exercise Thy divine fatherhood over the Thy Son made Man, have mercy on us and upon all poor souls who are in their agony.
Our Father . . . Hail Mary . . . Glory Be . . .
ETERNAL Son of God, by the love Thou bearest toward St. Joseph, who was Thy most faithful guardian upon earth, have mercy on us and upon all poor souls who are in their agony.
Our Father . . . Hail Mary . . . Glory Be . . .
ETERNAL Spirit of God, by the love Thou bearest toward St. Joseph, who guarded with such tender care most holy Mary, Thy beloved spouse, have mercy on us and upon all poor souls who are in their agony.
Our Father . . . Hail Mary . . . Glory Be . . .
JESUS, Mary and Joseph, I give Thee my heart and my soul.
Jesus, Mary and Joseph, assist me in my last agony.
Jesus, Mary and Joseph, may I breathe forth my soul in peace with thee.
|
|
|
Trump separates taxpayer dollars and abortions |
Posted by: Stone - 01-25-2025, 09:06 AM - Forum: Abortion
- No Replies
|
 |
Trump reinstates Mexico City Policy, separates taxpayer dollars and abortions
The president on Friday signed an executive order reinstating the policy
Fox News [adapted] | January 24, 2025
An executive order President Donald Trump signed Friday will overturn two Biden memorandums and reinstate the Mexico City Policy, which forbids using taxpayer dollars to fund nongovernmental organizations that perform or promote coercive abortion or involuntary sterilization.
The Mexico City Policy, initiated by the Reagan administration, has been rescinded by every Democratic president and reinstated by every Republican president since its creation.
During the Biden administration, the Pentagon paid for service members to travel over state lines for abortions, and Veterans Affairs medical centers were allowed to offer abortion counseling and abortion procedures for service members and their beneficiaries, Fox News Digital previously reported.
The administration also provided abortion access to migrants detained at the border, offering transport of unaccompanied pregnant children to states without abortion restrictions.
The White House said that, for nearly five decades, Congress annually enacted the Hyde Amendment and similar laws that prevent federal funding of elective abortion, "reflecting a longstanding consensus that American taxpayers should not be forced to pay for that practice."
"However, the previous administration disregarded this established, commonsense policy by embedding forced taxpayer funding of elective abortions in a wide variety of Federal programs," the White House wrote in a statement. "It is the policy of the United States, consistent with the Hyde Amendment, to end the forced use of Federal taxpayer dollars to fund or promote elective abortion."
Biden's Presidential Memorandum, Protecting Women's Health at Home and Abroad, was signed Jan. 28, 2021, and alleged the policy's restrictions negatively affected women’s reproductive health and undermined U.S. partnerships in global health efforts.
Trump's order rescinds two Biden executive actions that promoted access to abortions and included abortion in the definition of "reproductive healthcare."
The language in the new order clarified the memorandum is "not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person."
The Center for Reproductive Rights (CRR) told Fox News Digital the policy "will decrease abortion access in countries around the world."
"This far-reaching policy defunds health organizations in other countries that provide abortion services or information, even for victims of sexual assault," CRR said in a statement provided to Fox News Digital. "Many of these critical organizations will likely shutter as a result or be forced to stop providing or even talking about abortion services."
CRR representatives also referenced the administration's Geneva Consensus Declaration Friday night, which is a joint initiative to "secure meaningful health and development gains for women; to protect life at all stages; to defend the family as the fundamental unit of society; and to work together across the UN system to realize these values," according to a statement from Secretary of State Marco Rubio.
The CRR called the declaration "an anti-reproductive rights and anti-LGBTQ political statement" that "intentionally misrepresents itself as an official international agreement, and attempts to undermine the broad legal basis for reproductive rights as human rights."
"The reinstatement of President Trump’s Global Gag Rule (GGR) and rejoining of the Geneva Consensus are direct assaults on the health and human rights of millions of people around the world," said Rachana Desai Martin, CRR chief government and external relations officer.
"We saw the devastating impact of the GGR during the last Trump administration when contraception and vital reproductive services were cut off," Martin added. "There was a spike in pregnancy-related deaths, reproductive coercion and gender inequality worldwide. Many clinics and health programs shuttered, leaving vulnerable populations with nowhere to get birth control, pregnancy care and other vital health services."
Live Action, a global human rights movement dedicated to ending abortion, posted on X after the order was signed.
"The Mexico City policy which ensures American tax dollars do not fund killing children internationally through abortion has been reinstated by President Trump!" the post said.
Fox News Digital requested comment from Planned Parenthood and Physicians for Reproductive Health but did not immediately receive a response.
|
|
|
Former RFK Jr. running mate warns about mRNA shots, ‘extinction level event’ with AI |
Posted by: Stone - 01-25-2025, 08:03 AM - Forum: Health
- No Replies
|
 |
Former RFK Jr. running mate warns about mRNA shots, ‘extinction level event’ with AI
Nicole Shanahan told Megyn Kelly that '(w)hat we need for the mRNA platform right now is a moratorium. It's not ready for human use.'
Nicole Shanahan
X
Jan 24, 2025
(LifeSiteNews [adapted - not all hyperlinks from the original article included]) — Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s former running mate joined in the chorus of voices expressing grave concerns with personalized mRNA shots to combat cancer after the untested treatment was promoted by tech billionaire Larry Ellison at the White House this week.
“What we need for the mRNA platform right now is a moratorium. It’s not ready for human use,” Nicole Shanahan told Megyn Kelly on her podcast this week.
Shanahan and Kelly were discussing remarks made by Ellison, the chief technology officer at software giant Oracle. He was at the White House touting a controversial new project backed by the Trump administration called Project Stargate. The initiative will invest a reported $500 billion into technology and artificial intelligence.
With Trump standing to his side, Ellison had commented that “you can do early cancer detection with a blood test, and using AI to look at the blood test, you can find the cancers that are actually seriously threatening the person. You can make that vaccine, that mRNA vaccine, you can make that robotically, again using AI, in about 48 hours.”
Ellison’s remarks were nearly universally criticized on social media. Several observers, including generally pro-Trump voices, expressed alarm at the proposal, finding it reminiscent of the first Trump administration’s Operation Warp Speed initiative. Two of the three COVID shots authorized for use in the U.S. under Warp Speed were also mRNA-based.
Dr. Robert Malone, who pioneered mRNA technology decades ago, issued a warning about Ellison’s proposal, stating that he has “no understanding of cancer immunology.”
Shanahan further explained to Kelly, who herself was injured by the COVID shot, that “AI is a computer system. Human health is not.” She then stated that mRNA shots deliver “an inconsistent result in individuals,” pointing to the various reactions people have had to the COVID jab.
To Shanahan’s point, coroners and funeral directors have admitted that there has been an unusual uptick in blood clots found in deceased persons in recent years, with some of them saying that the COVID shot is possibly at fault. What’s more, so-called “turbo cancers” have emerged as well, with Dr. Peter McCullough arguing that they may be the result of the jab.
Without specifying what she was referring to, Shanahan further warned that certain ideas raised at the White House press conference could result in societal collapse.
“There’s so many that could have been shared in yesterday’s conference that are really excellent uses of AI,” she said. “I heard a few that were kind of out there and if deployed too quickly could lead to an extinction event.”
That comment caused Kelly to exclaim, “whoa!”
Shanahan’s cryptic remarks are not the first time she has raised the specter of technology harming human beings. During a talk she gave at a Turning Point USA event in December, Shanahan suggested that corporate and governmental forces are using wireless technologies for nefarious ends.
“People called me a conspiracy theorist for pointing out that the electric field we inhabit on Earth is being polluted through the use of unmitigated wireless products,” she said. “Well, here’s the truth – this is a real truth, and I’m from Silicon Valley, so I’m filling you in on a secret – these technologies can be made safe, but Big Tech is in bed with Big Pharma.”
Implying that human beings are unknowingly being poisoned, Shanahan then said that “we are an electrochemical species, and we are indeed short-circuiting at a cellular level — young people falling over on stage, which we are seeing time and time again on social media, video after video, of a newscaster or a young person literally speaking on stage and falling over.”
“This is not normal,” she stated. “There’s something biological happening … we are being polluted both electrically and chemically on a daily basis.”
Worry has set in among some medical freedom activists regarding Trump’s second term and not simply because of Ellison’s remarks Wednesday. Tech oligarch Bill Gates said that during his recent meeting with Trump, the president-elect was “pretty excited” about the idea of fast-tracking a “vaccine” for HIV, akin to the way COVID shot was accelerated during Operation Warp Speed.
At the same time, many are hopeful that with Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as the Secretary of Health and Human Services he will ensure that dangerous and untested medical treatments will not be approved for human use.
|
|
|
Did Joe Biden join the Freemasons? |
Posted by: Stone - 01-25-2025, 07:38 AM - Forum: General Commentary
- No Replies
|
 |
Did Joe Biden join the Freemasons?
President Joe Biden with Victor C. Major, Worshipful Grandmaster of the Prince Hall Grand Lodge of South Carolina, Jan. 19, 2025. Image via Conference of Grand Masters of Prince Hall Masons.
Ed. Condon, The Pillar [adapted - not all hyperlinks included from original article] | January 24, 2025
An announcement surfaced online Friday, issued the Conference of Grand Masters of Prince Hall Lodge Freemasonry, and stating that the Grand Lodge of South Carolina had conferred membership on President Joe Biden.
According to the announcement, dated Jan. 19 — the day before Biden left office — the president was granted a “resolution of membership” by the lodge in recognition of his “exceptional dedication and service to the United States” which “reflects the core values of the Most Worshipful Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Free and Accepted Masons of the State of South Carolina, including brotherly love, relief, and truth.”
It is not uncommon for outgoing presidents to be honored by groups and organizations.
But as the second Catholic to hold the office, Biden’s new “membership” of the lodge presents a particular issue: Catholics have been banned from joining masonic lodges and organizations since 1738, and are subject to canonical penalties for doing so.
So, is Joe Biden now a Freemason? And if so, what canonical penalties does he face? Based on the facts available, the situation is more complicated than you might think.
A little Masonic history
While many lodges like to pretend to have links back to ancient, or even biblical times, the real beginning of Freemasonry, as people think of it now, was in 1717, when the first Grand Lodge was founded in the back room of a London pub.
In the first years after they emerged, some Catholics, even prominent ones, joined the lodges, which became a hub for free-thinkers, religious non-conformists, political dissidents, people interested in pseudo-sciences like alchemy, and peddlers of Gnostic philosophies and Christian heresies.
Before long, Pope Clement XII banned Catholics from joining because, while Freemasonry was religiously tolerant, allowing people of any denomination to join, the pope found that it actually promoted religious indifferentism — the belief that it doesn’t matter what religious creed a person believes because everyone in the lodge understood themselves to be serving a higher notion of natural virtue.
As Masonry spread across Europe, the papal condemnations kept coming, and eight popes issued encyclicals or papal bulls imposing a penalty of automatic excommunication on any Catholic who joined the Freemasons, until the promulgation of the first Code of Canon Law in 1917, which also included the ban on membership and the penalty.
During those centuries, a lot changed between the Church and the Freemasons, though a lot of what the Church said about why Catholics couldn’t join stayed the same.
But the Church has always condemned the idea of Freemasonry because, the Church said, it removed Catholics from legitimate ecclesiastical oversight while they were being, effectively, catechised into a new philosophy — a different way of looking at the world.
Some Catholics, though, thought the Church had changed its mind about Freemasonry after the Second Vatican Council because, when the new Code of Canon Law was promulgated in 1983, the explicit mention of Freemasonry was removed from the penal code.
Instead, the new law banned Catholics who join societies which “plot against the Church,” and said they should be punished with “a just penalty.”
But before the new law came into force, the then-prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, issued a public clarification stating that “the Church’s negative judgment in regard to Masonic association remains unchanged,” because the “principles [of Freemasonry] have always been considered irreconcilable with the doctrine of the Church and therefore membership in them remains forbidden.”
Ratzinger also clarified that explicit mention of masonry had been removed because the new wording was meant to capture “broader categories” of societies and not be limited to masonic lodges.
“The faithful who enroll in Masonic associations are in a state of grave sin and may not receive Holy Communion,” Ratzinger clarified.
A little more Mason history
The Church has maintained the same position about Freemasonry, what is wrong with it, and that Catholics are absolutely forbidden from joining since the 1700s.
And, while Freemasonic lodges have taken very different roles in different places over the centuries, the Church has remained clear that those distinctions don’t change the underlying fundamentals of why Catholics are banned from joining.
Nevertheless, it is worth noting the different strands of Freemasonry which have emerged over the centuries, because those differences do explain different attitudes to masonry in different times and places.
In Catholic countries, like Spain and the states of the Italian peninsula, the lodges got very political, and were linked to violent revolutionary cells over the centuries. Because of that, Masonic societies were banned by both the Church and civil governments there.
Meanwhile, in the United States, despite professing a philosophy of equality among all men, American Freemasonry, even from before the Revolutionary War, banned Black men from joining, and lodges openly opposed the establishment of Catholic schools, the election of Catholics to public office, and in some cases jointly endorsed candidates and legislation with local branches of the Ku Klux Klan, including into the twentieth century.
As a result, Black Americans founded their own parallel Masonic lodges — descended not from white American lodges but from British lodges — which came to America with the British Army.
Black American Freemasonry — including the lodge that granted Joe Biden membership — is, for this reason, called “Prince Hall” masonry. Prince Hall wasn’t a place but a man, a free Black man living in Massachusetts who was refused membership of the local American lodges and instead was accepted into a lodge of British officers in the army then occupying Boston.
As a result, Prince Hall Lodge Freemasonry has long had a deep association with Black communities in many states, which likely explains President Biden’s visit to a lodge in South Carolina.
But as far as the Church is concerned, Prince Hall masonry has all of the same problems, from a philosophical, theological, and canonical perspective, as any other branch of Freemasonry.
Did Biden ‘join’ the Freemasons?
The ban on Catholics joining the Freemasons is centuries old, and is recognized by the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith as both a crime and a grave sin.
But there are some things we don’t know about Biden’s situation, even after the Prince Hall Grand Lodge of South Carolina has said that on Jan. 19 “at a private event, Master Mason membership with full honors were conferred upon” Joe Biden, who now has and the rank of “Master Mason.”
The lodge announcement says that membership was “conferred” on Biden by the lodge, not that he went through any actual Masonic liturgies. That might seem like a question of formalities, but it could actually make a big canonical difference.
For a start, it is not clear to what extent Biden accepted, formally or informally, membership of the lodge, or if it was merely presented to him as something they did for (and to) him. Pictures of the event show the president shaking hands and embracing the head of the lodge, but not receiving any certificate or physical representation of membership.
That matters, because the actual crime in canon law is not the status of being a member of a masonic lodge but the act of joining.
Simply put, if Biden didn’t actively do anything to join the Freemasons or accept his membership, it’s reasonable to conclude that he did not violate the relevant canon, which — in accord with canonical principles — must be interpreted strictly.
Of course, that doesn’t change the Vatican’s standing decree that any Catholic who is a member of a masonic lodge (even passively) is in a state of grave sin and barred from receiving Communion.
But, again, Biden would have to himself accept, even passively by not rejecting the designation, the conferred membership — the masons don’t have the power to make someone a member without consent, anymore than one person can marry another without their consent.
But is he excommunicated?
One thing a lot of Catholics know, or think they know, is that a Catholic who becomes a Freemason is automatically excommunicated. And for a long while this was a pretty cut and dried issue — a latae sententae penalty of excommunication was attached to any Catholic who joined a masonic society up until the 1983 Code of Canon Law.
But the wording of the 1983 code dropped both the term “masonic” and the penalty of excommunication from the canon on joining forbidden societies.
While the 1983 CDF declaration signed by Ratzinger clarified that all masonic societies were covered by the new wording (and still gravely sinful) it did not explicitly provide a penalty of excommunication.
Instead, the code provides for the competent authority to impose a “just penalty” — and the CDF made the point of saying that it is “not within the competence of local ecclesiastical authorities to give a judgment on the nature of Masonic associations” — in other words, bishops don’t get to decide that this or that masonic lodge isn’t really bad.
However, some canonists argue that since the popes, the CDF, and the drafting committee for the Code of Canon Law have all been clear that Freemasonry is against the faith and doctrine of the Church, joining a lodge is actually a double crime of enrolling in a banned association, which is to be punished with a “just penalty,” and committing an act of heresy, which does have an automatic excommunication attached to it.
To those canonists (including me!), that seems especially true when masonic members go through the various formal masonic liturgies of initiation which, even at the lowest level, include the candidate affirming that he has “long been in darkness and now seeks to be brought to light” which only Freemasonry can provide, and embracing the “principle of Freemasonry that the natural eye cannot perceive of the mysteries of the Order until the heart has embraced the deep spiritual and mystic meanings of those sublime mysteries.”
But even when those rituals have been undergone, automatic penalties need to be declared by a competent authority in order for them to attain full legal effects. Since becoming a member of a secret society isn’t usually a public act, it’s hard for a bishop to impose or declare any kind of penalty.
Given those factors, even in Biden’s case the public announcement of his masonic membership raises a lot of questions about what, exactly, he did, or accepted.
And there is an even bigger complicating factor in Biden’s case: Who is the competent ecclesiastical authority to decide if he has “joined” the masons?
According to the announcement by the South Carolina lodge, Biden received his membership on Jan.19 — the last full day of his presidency.
As such, Biden was still in office and therefore outside of the jurisdiction of either the local bishop in South Carolina or the bishops of his official residences (Washington, DC, and Delaware) at the time.
Instead, canon law states that all cases involving the violation of ecclesiastical law involving “those who hold the highest civil office of a state” are reserved for the Roman Pontiff himself to judge.
In practice, the pope stably delegates cases involving heads of state (usually marriage annulments in recent centuries) to the Tribunal of the Roman Rota, but in any event, it seems vanishingly unlikely that Pope Francis will authorize an examination of the facts of Biden’s masonic membership — still less authorize the imposition of a penalty for one of his final acts as president.
Of course, all of those canonical complications and considerations do not change the Vatican’s clear stance on the morality and grave sinfulness of a Catholic who is “enrolled” in a masonic lodge, however they do it: “they are in a state of grave sin and may not receive Holy Communion.”
But whether Biden actually accepted the masonic membership conferred upon him is a question that only he can answer, and only the pope can judge.
|
|
|
The Most Important Work in 2025 Is to See What Archbishop Lefebvre Saw in 1988 |
Posted by: Stone - 01-24-2025, 09:20 AM - Forum: Articles by Catholic authors
- No Replies
|
 |
The Most Important Work in 2025 Is to See What Archbishop Lefebvre Saw in 1988
![[Image: b993005df322af8bfcea215941e130e6_L.jpg]](https://remnantnewspaper.com/web/media/k2/items/cache/b993005df322af8bfcea215941e130e6_L.jpg)
Robert Morrison, Remnant Columnist [Emphasis mine] | January 23, 2025
If enough Catholics were to wake up and evaluate the current crisis with the immutable Faith that Archbishop Lefebvre defended, then we might find that God will provide us the means to resolve the crisis in the papacy. As the situation stands now, though, far too many who wail that Francis is not the pope would rejoice if we were to have another Paul VI or John Paul II take his place.
The 1989 preface to Abbe Daniel Le Roux’s Peter, Lovest Thou Me? is astounding to read in 2025 because one could apply essentially the same message to the state of the Catholic Church and world today:
Quote:“A reading of ‘Peter, Lovest Thou Me?’ is enough to fill a faithful Catholic with despair, were it not that we have Our Lord’s promise that He will never desert His Church. He will truly be with us all days, but what trials we must endure, only He in His mercy knows. We can watch the world becoming more and more evil by the day, and we can watch the Princes of the Church doing nothing in its defense. More clearly can we see the warnings given by Our Blessed Lady at La Salette, at Lourdes, at Fatima. At La Salette she told us that ‘Rome will lose the truth and become the seat of the Antichrist.’ Our Lady gave to Sr. Lucia a third part to her message at Fatima, which was to be published in 1960. The world still waits, but it almost certainly spoke of a general apostasy. Is that not what we are witnessing today?”
All faithful Catholics today should welcome the reminder of Our Lord’s promise to remain with His Church; but for many Catholics the timing of this preface likely presents some difficulty. Specifically, how could the author have seen “general apostasy” in 1989, during the pontificate of John Paul II? If matters were truly that bad in 1989, how can we imagine that the current crisis in the Church relates primarily to Francis?
To evaluate these questions raised by the preface to Peter, Lovest Thou Me?, we can consider a few of the book’s quotations from John Paul II, as well as Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre’s postface for the book.
Words of John Paul II
Peter, Lovest Thou Me? is not the most comprehensive compendium of heterodox quotations from John Paul II, but Archbishop Lefebvre and other Traditional Catholics still believed that it presented a conclusive argument that the profound crisis in the Church had reached the papacy. Almost certainly, many exemplary Catholics who denounce Francis’s errors today will find little, if any, reason to find fault with the statements from John Paul II that follow. And yet, all of the pre-Vatican II popes would have denounced these statements:
Quote:“The churches and separated communities, although we once believed that they suffered from deficiencies, are not totally deprived of importance and value in the mystery of salvation. The Spirit of Christ does not refuse to use them as means of salvation, through the strength deriving from the fullness of grace and truth which has been conferred on the Catholic Church.” (p. 42)
“Nostalgia for the unity of Christians makes common cause with that of unity of the whole human race. The new concept of a ‘People of God’ has made us revise the old truth about the possibility of redemption outside the limits of the Catholic Church. This gives rise to the attitude of the Church towards the other religions, which is based on the recognition of their spiritual values, humans and Christians together, reaching out to such religions as Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism . . .” (p. 45)
“In celebrating the Redemption we go beyond the historic misunderstandings and contingent controversies to find once more what is common to all Christians, that is to say, like the redeemed.” (p. 111)
“Christians and Moslems, we meet one another in faith in the one God, our creator, our guide, our just and merciful judge. We strive to put into practice in our daily lives the will of God, following the teaching of our respective holy books.” (p. 140)
“Christians and Moslems, we have many things in common as believers and as men . . . We believe in the same God, the only God, the living God. Respect and dialogue require mutual reciprocity in all areas, especially concerning fundamental liberties and more particularly religious liberty. Each man expects to be respected for what he is and what he believes.” (p. 141)
“Jerusalem must become the city of man, in which the believers of the three great monotheistic religions — Christianity, Judaism and Islam — live in full liberty and equality, as do the believers of other religious communities, in the recognized guarantee that this city is the sacred patrimony of all, and is destined for adoration of the One God, of mediation and the work of fraternity.” (p. 200)
Peter, Lovest Thou Me? also includes multiple John Paul II quotations about collegiality and Freemasonry, but these statements related to false ecumenism, universal salvation, and religious liberty suffice to justify the condemnations found both of the book’s preface and Archbishop Lefebvre’s postface, which follows.
Archbishop Lefebvre’s Evaluation
Archbishop Lefebvre began the postface (dated June 7, 1988) with words that may seem extreme for those who know little about what the Church taught prior to Vatican II:
Quote:“To read these lines presenting the true face of John Paul II is a terrifying experience for the faithful Catholic, it fills the soul with sadness and dread.”
John Paul II’s words caused terror and dread because they raised the problems Archbishop Lefebvre proceeded to describe:
Quote:“Also, it raises serious problems of faith for any true Catholic; problems that often have no solution, although they explain the perplexity and confusion which are now troubling even those whose faith is strongest. The Pope is Peter, the rock on which Christ founded His Church. He is the one whose faith must not fail; who is to confirm his brethren; feed his sheep; feed the lambs. It is he who, assisted by the Holy Ghost has, for almost twenty centuries in this manner given the Papacy a moral credibility unique in the history of the world. Is it conceivable that, since the 1960s, the Apostolic See has been occupied by Popes who have been the cause of the ‘auto-demolition of the Church,’ and are spreading within it ‘the smoke of Satan’? Leaving aside the pertinent question of what these Popes are, we are certainly obliged to ask ourselves questions about what they do, and we can observe with alarm and amazement that they are introducing the Revolution of ’89 into the Church, complete with its motto, its charter, which is fundamentally opposed to the principles of the Catholic Faith.”
These are the same problems that we face with Francis today. Archbishop Lefebvre and others saw them decades ago, long before the 1988 episcopal consecrations. But Rome persecuted those who spoke out against the Vatican II revolution (whereas Rome had no problem permitting actual abuses that were spreading like wild fire). Despite this unjust persecution, Archbishop Lefebvre would not bend because he saw the facts and understood their implications:
Quote:“This book is very enlightening on the activities of John Paul II, a true follower of Paul VI. We have the facts before our eyes which, enlightened by the immutable Catholic Faith, are now, with increasing sorrow and grief, seeing the Church threatened with complete ruin.”
Others saw the facts as well but were pressured into imagining that the immutable Catholic Faith could radically change to accommodate the new orientation. So instead of seeing reality as Archbishop Lefebvre did, they adopted the perspective of the revolutionaries. In so doing, they cut the ties with the pre-Vatican II popes who had warned about what would happen if Catholics made peace with error:
Quote:“Echoing the Popes before the 1960s, who foretold the disasters that would come upon the Church if their warnings were not listened to and their condemnations not heeded, and echoing the prophesies of Our Lady of La Salette and Fatima, let us strive to re-establish the Church upon the eternal principles taught by the Magisterium for nearly twenty centuries, rejecting the errors of the Liberal Modernist Revolution, even when these errors may be endorsed by those who occupy the See of Peter.”
Because Archbishop Lefebvre believed the pre-Vatican II popes, he recognized the errors flowing from Vatican II and understood that they threatened the Church with complete ruin. However, he also knew that the Blessed Virgin Mary had warned that these calamities would afflict the Church and that we would need to remain faithful to the immutable Catholic Faith, especially when Satan’s minions occupying Rome would try to convince us otherwise.
Accordingly, Archbishop Lefebvre remained faithful to “eternal Rome” as he distanced himself from “Modernist Rome”:
Quote:“The Declaration we made on November 21, 1974 after the first visit to Rome is still relevant, and we were obliged to reaffirm it after our second visit in 1987. We must reject Modernist Rome as it pursues its course of destroying the Faith and Christianity. It is our daily duty to repudiate it by attaching ourselves to the eternal Rome, proclaiming more than ever the need for the Reign of Our Lord Jesus Christ and His Holy Mother, Mary Our Queen. To bring about the coming of this Reign, we need Bishops, we need priests and religious who have but one name on their lips, and one love in their hearts: that of Our Lord Jesus Christ.”
This remains the solution today, but far too many otherwise faithful Catholics cannot bring themselves to break free from the errors promoted by Francis’s predecessors. So instead of attaching themselves to the “eternal Rome” represented by what the Church unambiguously taught prior to Vatican II, they try to hold to the religion that has been compromised by the errors of Vatican II.
But this comprised set of religious beliefs rooted in false ecumenism is gravely offensive to God and leads souls to Hell. For decades before almost any of us had heard of Jorge Bergoglio, Rome had been promoting the “auto-demolition of the Church” as Paul VI called it. So much blasphemy, sacrilege, apostasy, and scandal flowing from Rome had become accepted as normal, even among conservative Catholics. It was as though the majority of the Catholic world had grown complacent seeing the Mystical Body of Christ undergo a Passion and Crucifixion.
How would our loving God wake us up from this? We can at least ponder the possibility that God has permitted the cartoonishly demonic antics of Francis so that faithful Catholics will finally open their eyes and realize that the entire Vatican II revolution has been a grave offense against God which must be rejected. Of course Francis is far more offensive than his predecessors in various ways — but his evils are simply the ripened and more plentiful fruits of the revolutionary tree that produced the fruits offered by all of the post-conciliar occupants of the papacy.
God wants us to judge (and reject) the entire revolutionary tree rather than merely the fruits from Francis that we find so grotesque. To do so we must learn to see what Archbishop Lefebvre saw in 1988, which is the same as what he saw in 1974, as we know from his famous declaration. And those who have, for various reasons, misled souls into following the Vatican II revolution must find the fortitude to renounce their errors and admit that Archbishop Lefebvre saw matters clearly.
If enough Catholics were to wake up and evaluate the current crisis with the immutable Faith that Archbishop Lefebvre defended, then we might find that God will provide us the means to resolve the crisis in the papacy. As the situation stands now, though, far too many who wail that Francis is not the pope would rejoice if we were to have another Paul VI or John Paul II take his place. Maybe Francis is not the pope . . . but it seems that we would better petition God’s mercy if more Catholics would reject the revolutionary tree that can only yield other unholy fruits like Francis.
Immaculate Heart of Mary, pray for us!
|
|
|
President Trump pardons pro-life prisoners |
Posted by: Stone - 01-24-2025, 09:02 AM - Forum: Abortion
- No Replies
|
 |
President Trump pardons pro-life prisoners
U.S. President Donald Trump has officially pardoned the 23 pro-lifers imprisoned by the Biden DOJ for their attempts to save unborn babies, calling his signing of the pardons a 'great honor.'
President Donald Trump holds a signed executive order pardoning imprisoned pro-lifers.
Screenshot
Jan 23, 2025
Editor’s note: This article was updated once it was confirmed that Trump had indeed pardoned the pro-life prisoners.
(LifeSiteNews) — President Donald Trump has pardoned the pro-lifers imprisoned during Joe Biden’s presidency.
On Thursday afternoon, U.S. President Donald Trump officially pardoned the 23 pro-lifers imprisoned by the Biden DOJ for their attempts to save unborn babies.
Prior to signing the pardons, Trump commented that none of the 23 pro-lifers should have been “prosecuted,” adding that signing the pardons is a “great honor.”
The now-pardoned pro-lifers are: Joan Bell, Coleman Boyd, Joel Curry, Jonathan Darnel, Eva Edl, Chester Gallagher, Rosemary “Herb” Geraghty, William Goodman, Dennis Green, Lauren Handy, Paulette Harlow, John Hinshaw, Heather Idoni, Jean Marshall, Father Fidelis Moscinski, Justin Phillips, Paul Place, Bevelyn Beatty Williams, and Calvin, Eva, and James Zastrow.
After the pardons were signed, LifeSiteNews spoke with imprisoned pro-lifer Joan Andrews’ husband, Chris Bell, who said that he believes his wife is still in federal custody at a prison facility near Philadelphia. He was uncertain when she would be released.
Chris said that during his last phone conversation with Joan earlier in the day that she was pleading for the pro-life movement to maintain unity.
“We shouldn’t complain about each other and our tactics,” said Chris, quoting his wife. “We need to be working together to end the holocaust.”
“IVF is a huge killer and destroyer of human life,” continued Chris, “and we pray fervently that this nation stops promoting conception outside the womb.”
LifeSiteNews also spoke to Robert Dunn, attorney for Heather Idoni, who called today’s pardons “tremendous.”
“I’ve tried hundreds of cases throughout my career,” Dunn told LifeSiteNews, “That trial in Washington, D.C., was the most unfair trial I’ve ever been a part of.”
“We were not allowed to do our job,” he explained.
Dunn said that he has been concerned about the older pro-life women suffering from health problems who were convicted and imprisoned under the FACE Act. He wanted to get them out of prison and back to their homes before their health problems worsened.
“Sometimes you have to wait a long time for justice,” he continued. “The Israelites had to wait forty years.”
“Eventually we all get justice,” said Dunn, adding, “If we don’t get it here, we’re going to get it on Judgement Day.”
Also celebrating was Thomas More Society’s Martin Cannon, attorney for Lauren Handy.
“This is a motley crew of people. These are conservatives and liberals and atheists and Christians. You just can’t believe the mix!” declared Cannon. “These are amazing people!”
“They don’t agree on much, but they all agree on one thing: These are babies we’re talking about,” said Cannon, “and if all of these people can agree on that, it deserves everyone’s attention.”
“They have been willing to be the ones falling on their swords for those babies,” added Cannon, “and for that they all deserve our appreciation.”
Earlier in the day, news was shared that the pardons were forthcoming at the “Law of Life Summit” by lawyers representing the Thomas More Society.
Mary Margaret Olohan and Leif Le Mahieu of the Daily Wire reported that Trump would pardon “pro-life activists imprisoned by the Biden Justice Department within days.”
The journalists had maintained that two unnamed sources assured their outlet that the “plight” of the pro-life prisoners is “an immediate priority to Trump’s team” and they will “likely be pardoned within days.”
The news is certain to galvanize attendees at tomorrow’s March for Life, at which Trump is slated to address rally attendees via video. Vice President JD Vance is also scheduled to speak in-person at the massive event.
Earlier today, Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri mentioned on X (formerly Twitter) that he had spoken to President Trump about the imprisoned pro-lifers:
“I had a great conversation this morning with [Donald Trump] about the pro-life prisoners unjustly persecuted and imprisoned by the corrupt Biden Administration,” he wrote, linking to the President’s X account. “I urged him to pardon them swiftly.”
|
|
|
|