Dr. Carol Byrne: A Series on the History of the Dialogue Mass

[Stone]

Dr. Carol Byrne: A Series on the History of the Dialogue Mass

Undermining the Procession of the Paschal Candle

Taken from here [slightly adapted - emphasis mine].

For many centuries, the process of bringing the fire to the Paschal Candle was part of the complex of features that gave the Easter Vigil its unique and recognizable identity. In the Church’s immemorial tradition, this was accomplished by the deacon carrying in procession a triple-branched candlestick representing the Holy Trinity.

A symbolic act

As the procession of clergy advanced into the church, the three candles were lit successively to honor each Person of the Holy Trinity; at each lighting the deacon sang the three-fold Lumen Christi and the choir responded Deo gratias, whereupon all genuflected.

The final destination of the Procession was the sanctuary where the unlit Paschal Candle was already in place waiting for the deacon to light it from one of the three candles. This tripartite symbolism was calculated to make a lasting theological impact on the faithful. For those who were waiting inside the unlit church, this was a pinnacle moment, the climax to which the procession was leading.

It illustrated in the most visually dramatic way the doctrine that it was the Holy Trinity – represented by the triple-branched candlestick – that effected the Resurrection. It was a statement without words that Christ raised himself from the dead by His own Divine power.


Elimination of the Triple-Branched Candlestick

The Commission eliminated the ceremony of the triple candle with its Trinitarian symbolism and replaced it with a procession involving “active participation” of the laity, leaving it, as we shall see, with only secondary, if not exactly marginal, connections with the Resurrection. What this amounts to in practical terms is an attempt to censor or silence the liturgical expression of the doctrine of the Holy Trinity. It was a pattern that Bugnini replicated not only during the rest of the Holy Week reforms but also in the creation of the New Mass.

The most obvious effect of suppressing this symbolism was to give the impression that belief in the actual physical i.e. bodily Resurrection of Christ – the chief of His miracles as proof of His Divinity – is not something that should be taken too literally. This was the position of the mid-20th century progressivists, successors of the early modernists, (1) who succeeded in spreading doubts about the great supernatural interventions of God in human history. (2)

As we have seen, their influence in the Liturgical Movement was beginning to make itself felt in the Holy Week reforms of Pius XII.

We are, therefore, justified in raising the question: Did those members of the Commission who proposed reforms that accommodated the ideas of the neo-modernists hold the integral Catholic Faith? To ask the question is to answer it.

Here, however, we are less concerned with the presumed intentions of the reformers than with the reforms themselves and their internal logic. Our brief is an objective examination of certain affirmations made by Fr. Antonelli in the “Memo” and the conclusions to which they logically lead.


Returning to the Analogy with an Orchestra

Thinking of the traditional Easter Vigil ceremonies as an orchestra playing a piece of classical music composed of different movements can help us to see how much damage was done by the 1956 reforms.

The Procession itself was a masterpiece of artistry in which the lighting of each candlestick worked in counterpoint to the corresponding genuflections to produce a harmonic progression towards the crescendo, the lighting of the Paschal Candle. It was a fitting climax of honor to God that this should take place at the precise moment during the Exsultet when the text mentions the lighting of the Candle. (3)


Purpose of the Procession Undermined

But, when the reformers re-orchestrated the Procession in 1956, they cut out and added on whatever they pleased.

By suppressing the triple-branched candlestick, they upset the balance and harmony of the “orchestra.” The tripartite candle had acted as a kind of masthead identifying itself as a symbol of the Holy Trinity and displaying the purpose of the Procession, which was to light the Paschal Candle. When it disappeared, the corresponding three-fold Lumen Christi and the three genuflections were left without their intended counterpart.

As the relationship between each instrument in an orchestra is one of complementarity, this fundamentally changed the combination of elements in the symphony. The effect was like trying to play Mozart’s Flute and Harp Concerto without, say, the flute. It would be a lopsided creation, a monument to organizational failure, because the sound would be off-balance and not ring true to the composer’s original intention.

While it is inconceivable that any conductor would commit such a desecration, it transpired that the Commission actually accomplished something similar in the Easter Vigil with Bugnini at the podium.


A People-Centred Rite

What the purpose of the reformed Procession was in relation to the Resurrection is unclear. The Paschal Candle was lit, but without ceremony, before the Procession began – a comparatively poor reception for the fact of the Resurrection and a definite anti-climax to the traditional rite. Then it was carried through the church so that everyone, without distinction of clergy or laity, could light their own individual candle from its flame.

The new ceremony shifts the focus to the people

The whole process was not only an astonishing innovation in the Roman Rite, but also a considerable distraction from the main point of the Vigil, as it diverted attention away from the centrality of Christ to the people. The Paschal Candle, which was supposed to show the Light of Christ coming into the darkness of the world, was outshone by the constellation of candles in the hands of the laity illuminating the darkness far more effectively.

Yet, this was not an oversight by the Commission. The new arrangement was chosen intentionally by the reformers to make the following point. The people, by merely holding a lighted candle, were encouraged to think of themselves as the bearers of the Light they had received at Baptism, as if it could never have been lost since then.

This was confirmed by Fr. Clifford Howell S.J., one of the foremost proponents of the 1956 reform. With reference to “all the clergy and people” at the Vigil, he stated: “Their candles now shine with the flame received this night from the Christ-candle; their souls live with the life received from Christ in Baptism.” (4)

What this reform shows is that the theologically unfounded optimism about human nature, which later surfaced at Vatican II, had entered the liturgy in the mid 1950s. For all the preceding centuries of its existence, the Church had wisely emphasized the frailty of human nature, its propensity to sin and its constant need for the Light.


Continued


1. The theological modernists of the late 19th and early 20th centuries had been working to reinterpret and “demythologize” the Sacred Scriptures by explaining away the miracles and focusing on inner spiritual “experiences” instead of revealed truths. Consequently, their progressivist successors in the Liturgical Movement were determined to suppress the supernatural content of the liturgy and make it as man-centred as possible.
2. These included such miracles as the Incarnation, the Resurrection, the daily acts of Transubstantiation, among many others
3. The text states that the Candle is lit “to the honor of God” (“in honorem Dei”)
4. Fr. Clifford Howell, ‘Understanding the Exultet’, The Way, London, 1961, vol. 1, n. 2, p. 100