10-06-2022, 09:27 PM
Flashback to 2009 . . .
At a meeting of Bishop Fellay and French District Superiors, a Capuchin priest, Fr. Jean de Morgon, was one of the first to publicly accuse Bishop Fellay of plotting to sell out the Society to the Conciliar robbers. He was silenced, removed from the meeting, and ordered to issue a letter of apology to the Bishop. He agreed to apologize for the manner of his protest, but not for the content.
To this letter of apology, Fr. de Morgon attached a startling declaration. He alleged that a network of progressivist priests had infiltrated the SSPX, and that they managed to rise to key-positions in the Society. He stated that the present day accord with Rome, headed by Bishop Fellay, would be the principal goal of their agenda. What was most eye-popping in the priest's letter was his final affirmation where he claimed that Bishop Williamson would be a part of this team.
Some may recall that when this news hit the on-line Trad-Catholic Forums in 2009, nearly all of the soon to be "Resistance" members sited the incident as one of the first alarms that gave solid credence to the eventual sell out. But the accusation of Bishop Williamson's involvement in the plan was simply brushed off as some kind of "mis-translation" and so fantastic that Fr. de Morgon must somehow be "confused." Even to this day, such lame explanations remain among the Bishop's blind defenders; yet, after all these years, there has never been published any kind of retraction or correction to Fr. de Morgon's claims. So, what seemed so crazy then, doesn't seem so far fetched now, does it?
Read Fr. Jean de Morgon's Letter
At a meeting of Bishop Fellay and French District Superiors, a Capuchin priest, Fr. Jean de Morgon, was one of the first to publicly accuse Bishop Fellay of plotting to sell out the Society to the Conciliar robbers. He was silenced, removed from the meeting, and ordered to issue a letter of apology to the Bishop. He agreed to apologize for the manner of his protest, but not for the content.
To this letter of apology, Fr. de Morgon attached a startling declaration. He alleged that a network of progressivist priests had infiltrated the SSPX, and that they managed to rise to key-positions in the Society. He stated that the present day accord with Rome, headed by Bishop Fellay, would be the principal goal of their agenda. What was most eye-popping in the priest's letter was his final affirmation where he claimed that Bishop Williamson would be a part of this team.
Some may recall that when this news hit the on-line Trad-Catholic Forums in 2009, nearly all of the soon to be "Resistance" members sited the incident as one of the first alarms that gave solid credence to the eventual sell out. But the accusation of Bishop Williamson's involvement in the plan was simply brushed off as some kind of "mis-translation" and so fantastic that Fr. de Morgon must somehow be "confused." Even to this day, such lame explanations remain among the Bishop's blind defenders; yet, after all these years, there has never been published any kind of retraction or correction to Fr. de Morgon's claims. So, what seemed so crazy then, doesn't seem so far fetched now, does it?
Quote:I have no trust in Bishop Fellay, who uses his authority to cover this whole operation. Neither do I have any in Bishop Williamson, who was found to be in secret contact with Rome a week after Easter 2008.
Read Fr. Jean de Morgon's Letter