08-04-2022, 04:51 PM
For anyone thinking Bishop Williamson has changed over the past few years, or that he has not continued to spread his errors, one need not look very far to find evidence to the contrary:
https://stmarcelinitiative.com/worldwide-warning/ (Promoting Garabandal)
https://stmarcelinitiative.com/another-testimonial/ (Promoting SSPX Mass attendance without warning of the dangers)
https://stmarcelinitiative.com/four-concerns/ (Praising the Poem of the Man God)
There is plenty of evidence provided in "The Recusant" of Bishop Zendejas and Bishop Thomas Aquinas defending Bishop Williamson and crushing the "opposition" (True Resistance). I'm only providing a couple out of many issues with more than adequate documentation of these sad facts. One need only ask Fr. Cardozo, Fr. Rafael, and those priests who have resisted these errors publicly, for the good of the faithful, what happens to those who do not tow the line of Bishop Williamson.
http://www.ecclesiamilitans.com/The_Recu...ar2017.pdf
http://www.stmaryskssspxmc.com/wp-conten...ant-51.pdf
In an interview with "The Jolly Heretic", Bishop Williamson, when mentioning the current course of the SSPX, downplays the scandal and betrayal of Christ of the SSPX by its seeming desire and push to work inside Rome. He says that it would be great if the SSPX could bring Rome back but that it is unlikely because it usually works the other way around. What would Archbishop Lefebvre have said about remaining silent about the daily blasphemies and heresies of these enemies of the Church and, instead, compromising and working towards an agreement with a doctrinal preamble that betrays the Catholic Faith of all time?
Bishop Williamson also did at least one interview recently wherein he defends that the new rites are "probably valid." This is not what Archbishop Lefebvre taught, and there is ample evidence that, at best, these rites are doubtful. Catholics are forbidden to receive doubtful sacraments. Bishop Tissier de Mallerais came to this same conclusion of doubtful validity. It is convenient that the new SSPX and the fake resistance are now pushing a new and dangerous position on the validity of the new rites. If this is not the position of Bishop Zendejas, let him publicly state his position. I think we would all welcome to hear from him and know what exactly his position is on SSPX, the new rites, etc. It's better to have no bishop and no ordinations than to work with those who compromise the Faith and will, little by little, swallow up any true resistance. The martyrs were killed for refusing to offer even one grain of incense to false gods.
Before Bishop Williamson can be trusted as a shepherd of souls, he must publicly renounce his errors, for the good of souls, and the three Bishops who have been complicit in his errors by their silence and persecution of those who stand for the Truth, must do the same. We, as the faithful did in the time of St. Athanasius, must stand up against these errors. Without a public renouncing of his errors, to work with him would be the same as working with the SSPX before there is a public renunciation of the Doctrinal Preamble of 2012. Why? One may seem a greater error than the other but, as Bishop Williamson used to point out, even the tiniest drop of poison in a glass of water is enough to kill.
https://stmarcelinitiative.com/worldwide-warning/ (Promoting Garabandal)
https://stmarcelinitiative.com/another-testimonial/ (Promoting SSPX Mass attendance without warning of the dangers)
https://stmarcelinitiative.com/four-concerns/ (Praising the Poem of the Man God)
There is plenty of evidence provided in "The Recusant" of Bishop Zendejas and Bishop Thomas Aquinas defending Bishop Williamson and crushing the "opposition" (True Resistance). I'm only providing a couple out of many issues with more than adequate documentation of these sad facts. One need only ask Fr. Cardozo, Fr. Rafael, and those priests who have resisted these errors publicly, for the good of the faithful, what happens to those who do not tow the line of Bishop Williamson.
http://www.ecclesiamilitans.com/The_Recu...ar2017.pdf
http://www.stmaryskssspxmc.com/wp-conten...ant-51.pdf
In an interview with "The Jolly Heretic", Bishop Williamson, when mentioning the current course of the SSPX, downplays the scandal and betrayal of Christ of the SSPX by its seeming desire and push to work inside Rome. He says that it would be great if the SSPX could bring Rome back but that it is unlikely because it usually works the other way around. What would Archbishop Lefebvre have said about remaining silent about the daily blasphemies and heresies of these enemies of the Church and, instead, compromising and working towards an agreement with a doctrinal preamble that betrays the Catholic Faith of all time?
Bishop Williamson also did at least one interview recently wherein he defends that the new rites are "probably valid." This is not what Archbishop Lefebvre taught, and there is ample evidence that, at best, these rites are doubtful. Catholics are forbidden to receive doubtful sacraments. Bishop Tissier de Mallerais came to this same conclusion of doubtful validity. It is convenient that the new SSPX and the fake resistance are now pushing a new and dangerous position on the validity of the new rites. If this is not the position of Bishop Zendejas, let him publicly state his position. I think we would all welcome to hear from him and know what exactly his position is on SSPX, the new rites, etc. It's better to have no bishop and no ordinations than to work with those who compromise the Faith and will, little by little, swallow up any true resistance. The martyrs were killed for refusing to offer even one grain of incense to false gods.
Before Bishop Williamson can be trusted as a shepherd of souls, he must publicly renounce his errors, for the good of souls, and the three Bishops who have been complicit in his errors by their silence and persecution of those who stand for the Truth, must do the same. We, as the faithful did in the time of St. Athanasius, must stand up against these errors. Without a public renouncing of his errors, to work with him would be the same as working with the SSPX before there is a public renunciation of the Doctrinal Preamble of 2012. Why? One may seem a greater error than the other but, as Bishop Williamson used to point out, even the tiniest drop of poison in a glass of water is enough to kill.