SSPX's 2012 Doctrinal Declaration

[Stone]

Reply to the above post on the Archived Catacombs:


Bishop Fellay proved he lied with fake tears at that 2012 General Chapter so as not to have the SSPX General Assembly condemn the contents of his 2012 Doctrinal Declaration so he can still use them in an effort as a continual manifesto with rome in foundation for his neo-sspx acceptance of conciliarism.  The new - "Take us as we are".

The proof is Bishop Fellay prominently displayed for consumption that 2012 Doctrinal Declaration (in full) within his March 2013 Cor Unum!  Fr. Hewko drew this out.

“ONE DOES NOT PLAY WITH THE FAITH!”

www.therecusant.com/dont-play-with-the-faith

(...)

4. COMMON OBJECTION: “But the April 15, 2012 Doctrinal Declaration was ‘withdrawn’! It’s a dead letter!”

REPLY: To “withdraw” (for a time) is not the same thing as to publicly reject, retract and correct. If it is truly withdrawn, in the sense of “withdrawn forever,” then why was it printed in the March, 2013 Cor Unum showing all the priests that it is, indeed, official? Why is Fr. Daniel Themann’s Conference in St. Marys, Kansas on April 16, 2013 that justifies the April 15th 2012 Doctrinal Declaration, still being promoted worldwide? If it is true that “things are back to normal now” then where’s the apologies (or better, gratitude) to the Bishop and priests who were expelled and silenced? At least a home and health insurance can be given back to some of the Resistance priests in their 70’s who warned the Superiors of the SSPX that this is all a danger to the Faith. Where’s the public retraction to the liberal statements in Interviews that continue to be quoted in recent SSPX articles, such as “95% of the Council is acceptable” (on September 3, 2013); or, “Religious Liberty of the Council is limited” (in fact, it’s a heresy condemned many times by the Pre-Council Popes); or “the errors of the Council are not really from the Council but from the general interpretation of it?”