<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[The Catacombs - The New-Conciliar SSPX]]></title>
		<link>https://thecatacombs.org/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The Catacombs - https://thecatacombs.org]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 00:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>MyBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Recusant - Worlds Apart: Forty Years, Two SSPXs]]></title>
			<link>https://thecatacombs.org/showthread.php?tid=8584</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 13:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://thecatacombs.org/member.php?action=profile&uid=1">Stone</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thecatacombs.org/showthread.php?tid=8584</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[The following is taken from <a href="https://thecatacombs.org/showthread.php?tid=8580&amp;pid=15950#pid15950" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">The Recusant - Issue #66</a> [Summer 2026]<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;" class="mycode_u"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">Worlds Apart: Forty Years, Two SSPXs</span></span><br />
<br />
In the late spring of 2026, in the run-up to the SSPX's episcopal consecrations, there appeared on one of the SSPX's youtube channels the first video of three, the second and third appearing during May and June at intervals of a few weeks. We will focus on the first one, entitled: <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Traditio Part 1: Becoming a Priest</span>. It is clearly meant to be a sort of pro-SSPX propaganda effort aimed at outsiders, presenting in as sympathetic a light as possible the SSPX apostolate. As its title suggests, the first video focusses on seminarians and their journey to the priesthood, culminating in the day of their ordination.<br />
<br />
The video as a whole is typical of what we have come to expect from the modern, toothless, inoffensive SSPX. And yet, although its defects are obvious to us, there will no doubt be many who don't remember the old SSPX, for whom they are anything but obvious. In cases such as these, a direct comparison can often be a useful aid. Was the SSPX of yore really so very different to the SSPX of today? Well, as luck would have it, forty years earlier, back in 1986, the SSPX made exactly the same sort of video. It was filmed at the SSPX's USA seminary, in those days located at Ridgefield, Connecticut. The content of each of these two video presentations is superficially very similar: they each focus on seminary life, the seminarians themselves, what it means to become a priest, and so forth. But there the similarity ends. The contrast in both style and content could not be more clear and the reader might just as well pause reading and watch the first five minutes of each video to see for himself:<br />
<br />
The old SSPX: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6TtyDeSYB84&amp;t=13s" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6TtyDeSYB84&amp;t=13s</a><br />
The new SSPX: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V9UQYkXffG0" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V9UQYkXffG0</a><br />
<br />
And what a contrast it is! Behold, the SSPX pre- and post-Archbishop Lefebvre. The most obvious difference between the two, the difference which immediately strikes the viewer, is of course the production quality. The 1986 film looks like it was shot on a primitive VHS camcorder; the sound is fuzzy and wobbly, so is the picture, the colours fade and return, the picture is occasionally unclear. A quality so poor it warms the cockles of the heart! The 2026 production value is, by contrast, like a modern Hollywood film. But that is by the by: perhaps forty years of technology is enough to explain it — what matters most is the content.<br />
<br />
Every word in the 2026 video is there for a reason. The speech of the various interviewees is careful and calculated, there is very obviously a script and there has clearly been a lot of careful editing. The 1986 video, by contrast, seems to have been shot on the hoof, somebody just pitched up with a camera, pointed it at any seminarians who were passing by and recorded whatever happened to come out of each man's mouth!<br />
<br />
In the SSPX's 2026 presentation, everything <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">feels </span>holy, everything is aesthetically pleasing, everything looks comfortable and beautiful and impressive. The 1986 film is a lesson in what the SSPX used to look and feel like, however. Everything is poor, with a make-do-and-mend feel, where material wealth and impressive external appearances are clearly not a priority. For instance, the seminary chapel in Ridgefield has a low ceiling and the altar is almost round the corner from some of the pews: clearly a converted room and the best they could do at that time. The 2026 video is unable to show viewers the seminary chapel because, despite the new seminary having been built a decade or more ago, the chapel is the only part which is still not finished. The viewer is therefore given a view of the seminary buildings with the open fourth side of the cloister, and then later on a shot of the model showing what it will look like when finished.<br />
<br />
And it is not just a question of architecture and nice buildings. The SSPX's 2026 film seems to focus a great deal on the beauty of the liturgy. The premise appears to be that the truth needs to be presented and the Church spoken about as though it were still the 1950s, and the condemnation of error is a mere optional extra. There are lots of shots of priests wearing beautiful vestments, inside beautiful churches. In the 1986 presentation by contrast, everything is a lot more rough-and-ready but the crisis in the Church, the errors of Vatican II and the apostasy of the conciliar modernists is placed front and centre from the very start and is presented as being the reason why the SSPX exists. To give just one very obvious and easy to understand example, let us take a look at the opening words in each video:<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">Opening Lines</span><br />
<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;" class="mycode_u">2026 SSPX</span>: <br />
"Modern man is bombarded constantly with new information…"<br />
<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;" class="mycode_u">1986 SSPX</span>: <br />
"The smoke of Satan has entered the bosom of the Church…"<br />
<br />
Those opening lines provide a pretty good summary of each and the difference between the two. But just in case anyone is not convinced, let us look a little closer.<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">The Content: A New and Inoffensive SSPX</span><br />
<br />
Both films have seminarians speaking to the camera right from the start and at regular intervals throughout, as well as interviews with priests and commentary from a narrator. That is where the similarity ends. What does each one say? Well, the 1986 SSPX video is exactly as it should be, it is what one used to expect. It says that there is a crisis in the Church, that Vatican II itself is to blame due to its errors, that the problem is not merely abuses or interpretations of Vatican II, that there is a war going on and that the SSPX is on the front line sending priests into battle against the evil modern world and its ally, the conciliar church.<br />
<br />
The 2026 SSPX video is very different. Let us break it down. A brief "Introduction" section is followed by four segments each given the title of one of the SSPX's seminaries (in order: "Écône Switzerland," "Dillwyn USA," "La Reja Argentina" and "Zaitskofen Germany") with footage from each of the respective seminaries in the background. The content of the last three is rather boring: "Dillwyn" talks about the seminary academic curriculum, "La Reja" talks about the daily timetable and "Zaitskofen" talks about the minor and major orders which lead to the priesthood.<br />
<br />
The main problem with these three segments (as with the video as a whole) is what they don't say, what they pointedly avoid saying, no matter how badly it needs to be said. It's all so inoffensive that it includes nothing that a Fraternity of St. Peter seminarian couldn't also say. There is no hint of a crisis in the Church, no mention of the New Mass, modernism, etc. The introduction segment is equally inoffensive, and contains this little gem from a seminarian about what led him to Écône:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>[08:20] "...I had always been drawn by the liturgy. Even though I very much liked what I was doing, I felt that something was missing. And it was this love of the liturgy which led me to knock at the door of the seminary."</blockquote>
<br />
It is true that many people were initially drawn to Tradition through the liturgy. But usually they quickly discover that it is about more than just the liturgy. The speaker is about to be ordained after almost six years at Écône, yet he doesn't say anything (or if he did, it was edited out!) about modernism, the errors of Vatican II, or even the crisis in the Church, when explaining his decision to become an SSPX priest. This gives the impression that today's SSPX is not much different to the various "Indult"/"TLM" groups approved by Rome: it's all about the beauty of the liturgy, in other words. This is unfortunate, since it reinforces what many of us have been saying about the SSPX for a while. It would be nice to be proved wrong for once!<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">The problem of Archbishop Lefebvre...</span><br />
<br />
The first segment following the introduction ("Écône, Switzerland") is where they have front-loaded all of the "crisis in the Church" talk, because it is where they talk about Archbishop Lefebvre. Therefore they have, it seems, killed two birds with one stone. They get to tick the box so that no one can claim that they haven't mentioned the crisis or Vatican II at all, and they also get to tie it all to their long-dead founder as though it is all a historical footnote and nothing more, almost a personal issue which he had and which died with him. Then, after spending all of twelve minutes talking mostly about what a nice, spiritual man he was, they can then move on and spend the remaining fifty-odd minutes (out of seventy-five) talking as though there is no crisis in the Church.<br />
<br />
And what they manage to say about Archbishop Lefebvre is without doubt the most insidious and misleading part of the entire video and is worth looking at more closely. What is wrong with it? Several things. So far as we can see:<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">1.</span> By framing it as a historical footnote they mislead the unsuspecting viewer into thinking that this was "then but not now" or possibly "Archbishop Lefebvre but not us." That was a '60s and '70s thing, in other words — there's no hint of the same problems being even worse today!<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">2.</span> They completely misrepresent the Archbishop's attitude regarding modern Rome.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">3.</span> They ignore the many things Archbishop Lefebvre said which condemn their own behaviour today and which show just how unfaithful to him they have been.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">4.</span> They leave the viewer with an overall impression of the Archbishop which is totally misleading and as inoffensive as possible, a caricature in other words. He was just a smiling old man who sat in his rocking chair handing out Werther's Originals to his little grandchildren — not the hard-as-nails Traditionalist who really existed!<br />
<br />
Let us take a look and you can see for yourself.<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>[14:45] "Many had realised in the 1960s and '70s that the Church was entering a period of profound crisis. But no one had, like Archbishop Lefebvre, this particular grace, this supernatural foresight to understand deeply what the causes were and above all, to offer appropriate remedies."</blockquote>
<br />
This is followed immediately by the figures "1969" flashed up on the screen in very large font, as though to signal that this is all a historical issue.<br />
<br />
So the Church was entering a profound crisis in the late-'60s and 1970s? What happened next, did the crisis pass? What did he do in the 1980s? What was the solution which he bequeathed to the SSPX by the time he died in 1991? No mention. And it is all very well saying that the Archbishop knew the answer, etc. — what was or is that answer, exactly? Again, no further details are given. This is just a '60s and '70s thing, clearly.<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>[16:50] "There was never, absolutely never, any idea of separating from the Church."</blockquote>
<br />
This is so misleading and such a misrepresentation of Archbishop Lefebvre that we will allow him to refute it in his own words:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"Such things are easy to say. To stay inside the Church, or to put oneself inside the Church — what does that mean? Firstly, what Church are we talking about? If you mean the conciliar church, then we who have struggled against the Council for twenty years because we want the Catholic Church, we would have to re-enter this conciliar church in order, supposedly, to make it Catholic. That is a complete illusion. It is not the subjects that make the superiors, but the superiors who make the subjects." ('One Year After the Consecrations' — <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Fideliter</span>, July-Aug 1989)</blockquote>
<br />
Look at that! "The conciliar church" — when was the last time you heard that phrase from the SSPX? Here is the Archbishop again:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"Far from us be this miserable thought of separating ourselves from Rome! On the contrary, it is in order to manifest our attachment to Rome that we are performing this ceremony. It is in order to manifest our attachment to the Eternal Rome, to the Pope, and to all those who have preceded these last Popes who, unfortunately since the Second Vatican Council, have thought it their duty to adhere to grievous errors which are demolishing the Church and the Catholic Priesthood." (Consecrations Sermon, 30th June 1988)</blockquote>
<br />
Like the conciliar church, one no longer hears about "Eternal Rome" — again this is because the 2026 SSPX no longer distinguishes. Indeed, even concerning Vatican II, we are told:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>[17:00] "Most certainly there was a reaction, a reaction against modern ideas or rather against errors, errors already condemned by the Church, which were making their way in a little before the Council but which crystalised at the time of the Council and then especially afterwards, much more clearly, in the reforms made in the name of the Council."</blockquote>
<br />
Got it? So there were these unspecified "errors," already there before the Council, which (coincidentally!) became worse during the very time when Vatican II took place and afterwards. Well, well! Might there be some sort of causal link? Don't expect to find an answer to that question in this video! Secondly, why not say what the errors are (or were?) — why this coyness about naming them? Religious Liberty, Ecumenism, Collegiality, the New Mass. There, I just named the main ones — it's not hard.<br />
<br />
Lastly, notice how the errors got worse especially afterwards because of what was done "in the name of the Council." What a loaded phrase that is: it clearly implies that Vatican II was used as an excuse by unscrupulous men who took its name in vain. It wasn't really the Council's fault, in other words. Which, come to think of it, is exactly what indultists and "conservatives" have been claiming for years; Bishop Fellay too, in his infamous May 2012 <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">CNS</span> interview. One need hardly add that this is very much at odds with what Archbishop Lefebvre maintained, and the old SSPX too — as we shall soon see.<br />
<br />
What about the impression of Archbishop Lefebvre which the viewer is left with? Judge for yourself:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>[18:20] "I was ordained by Archbishop Lefebvre and had the great privilege of having had him throughout my seminary years and even having had him as a professor in the first year. The Archbishop taught us the acts of the Magisterium, so the encyclicals of the Popes, and made us love the Church."</blockquote>
<br />
Again, "the Church" — no distinction. I'm pretty sure he would have taught you to hate the conciliar church every bit as much as he taught you to love the Catholic Church of Tradition!<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>[18:45] "He was very fatherlike in the seminary. … [19:40] A man who was an ambassador for the Holy See, he never refused to go to Rome, even in all the difficulties which he undertook."</blockquote>
<br />
That last remark, made by an elderly Fr. Hogan, is factually untrue and the video's editors ought to have been more on the ball. Firstly, Archbishop Lefebvre was an ambassador <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">for </span>the Holy See, not <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">to </span>the Holy See. More importantly, it is not true that "he never refused to go to Rome, even in all the difficulties…" — as though he was at the beck and call of the modernists to the day he died. What a disservice this does to the memory of Archbishop Lefebvre!<br />
<br />
The real Archbishop Lefebvre refutes his own caricature!<br />
<br />
So what in fact was the Archbishop's attitude towards Rome from 1988 onwards? Did he continue to dialogue with them right up to the end of his life? As before, he is so clear that unlike the modern SSPX we can afford to let him speak for himself:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"It's over. The talks between Rome and ourselves are over. The more one thinks about it, the more one realizes their intentions are not good. ... Rome wants everything to go Vatican II, while they leave us a little bit of Tradition. … But there is no point in such meetings. It has all been talked out long ago." (Letter to the four bishops-elect, 12th June 1988)<br />
<br />
"Yesterday evening, a visitor came, sent from the Nunciature in Berne, with an envelope containing an appeal from our Holy Father the Pope, who was putting at my disposal a car which was supposed to take me to Rome… I leave you to judge for yourselves the timeliness and wisdom of such a request." (Consecrations Sermon, 30th June 1988)<br />
<br />
"We do not have the same outlook on a reconciliation. Cardinal Ratzinger sees it as reducing us, bringing us back to Vatican II. We see it as a return of Rome to Tradition. We don't agree; it is a dialogue of the deaf. I can't speak much of the future, mine is behind me, but if I live a little while, supposing that Rome calls for a renewed dialogue, then, I will put conditions. I shall not accept being in the position where I was put during the dialogue. No more. I will place the discussion at the doctrinal level. … If you do not accept the doctrine of your predecessors, it is useless to talk!" (<span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Fideliter </span>66, Nov.-Dec. 1988)<br />
<br />
"Humanly speaking, there is no chance of any agreement between Rome and ourselves at the moment. … However, one day they will be obliged to recognize that the Society represents a spiritual force and a strength of the Faith which is irreplaceable and which they will have, I hope, the joy and the satisfaction to make use of, but when they have come back to their Traditional Faith." (Conference to priests and seminarians, Écône, 6th Sept. 1990)<br />
<br />
"Since the episcopal consecrations there has been no more contact with Rome … It is absolutely impossible in the current climate of Rome which is becoming worse. We must not delude ourselves. The principles which now guide the conciliar church are more and more overtly contrary to Catholic doctrine. … All the false ideas of the Council continue to develop, to be reaffirmed with ever greater clarity. They are hiding less and less. It is absolutely inconceivable that we can agree to work with such a hierarchy. … We are dealing with people who have a different philosophy to ours, a different way of seeing, who are influenced by all modern subjectivist philosophers. For them there is no fixed truth, there is no dogma. Everything is evolving. That is a totally Masonic concept. This is really the destruction of the Faith." (<span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Fideliter </span>79, Jan.-Feb. 1991)</blockquote>
<br />
That was after June 1988 — on the other hand, prior to June 1988, while communications were still open with Rome, what was the reason and the spirit in which he "went to Rome" (to use Fr. Hogan's expression)? Once again, we will let him speak for himself:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"We have done all we could, trying to help Rome to understand that they had to come back to the attitudes of the holy Pius XII and of all his predecessors. Bishop de Castro Mayer and myself have gone to Rome, we have spoken, we have sent letters, several times to Rome. We have tried by these talks, by all these means, to succeed in making Rome understand that, since the Council and since aggiornamento, this change which has occurred in the Church is not Catholic, is not in conformity to the doctrine of all times. This ecumenism and all these errors, this collegiality — all this is contrary to the Faith of the Church and is in the process of destroying the Church… 'And why Archbishop have you stopped these discussions which seemed to have had a certain degree of success?' [Because] it is clear that the only truth that exists today for the Vatican is the conciliar truth, the spirit of the Council, the spirit of Assisi. That is the truth of today. But we will have nothing to do with this for anything in the world! That is why, taking into account the strong will of the present Roman authorities to reduce Tradition to naught, to gather the world to the spirit of Vatican II and the spirit of Assisi, we have preferred to withdraw ourselves and to say that we could not continue. It was not possible. […] I think it is my duty to provide the means of doing that which I shall call 'Operation Survival,' operation survival for Tradition. Today, this day, is Operation Survival. If I had made this deal with Rome, by continuing with the agreements we had signed and putting them into practice, I would have performed 'Operation Suicide.' There was no choice, we must live!" (Consecrations Sermon, 30th June 1988)<br />
<br />
"'For myself, personally,' I said, 'I have no confidence in them. For years and years I have been mixing with these people and for years I have been seeing the way in which they act. I have no further confidence in them. However, I do not wish people within the Society and Traditional circles to be able to say afterwards: You could easily have tried, it would have cost you nothing to enter into discussion and dialogue.' That was the opinion of the Superior General and his assistants. They said, 'You must take into consideration the offer which is being made and not neglect it. It's still worthwhile to talk with them.' … Very soon, however, we realized that we were dealing with people who are not honest. … I nevertheless went to Rome for the conversations, but without any confidence in their success. … I wished to go as far as possible in order to show what good will we had." ('One Year After the Consecrations' <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Fideliter</span>, July-Aug. 1989)<br />
<br />
"For fifteen years we dialogued to try to put Tradition back in its place of honour, in that place in the Church which it has by right. We ran up against a continual refusal. … Our true faithful, those who have understood the problem and who have precisely helped us to continue along the straight and firm path of Tradition and the Faith, were afraid of the approaches I made towards Rome. They told me it was dangerous and that I was wasting my time. Yes, of course, I hoped until the last minute that in Rome we would witness a little bit of loyalty. I cannot be blamed for not having done the maximum." (<span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Fideliter </span>79, Jan.-Feb. 1991)</blockquote>
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">Other Evidence of Softening</span><br />
<br />
There were some other clangers which we spotted — there may be more. For instance, whereas the SSPX used to be an implacable opponent of the evil modern world, the 2026 SSPX seems to treat it with kid gloves. The one and only time that this comes up is when the Superior General, Fr. Davide Pagliarani, says that the problem with the modern world is that it gives people too much information which distracts them.<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>[11:45] "Certainly for a young man of today it is more difficult to perceive this call [to the priesthood] because a young man today is a child of today's society which has immersed him in a world of continual information, stifling, at least in part, his capacity to take a step back, to distance himself and to reflect deeply..."</blockquote>
<br />
And then there is a subtle but telling bit about the formation of priests and what kind of a man the SSPX are looking for. At around 11 minutes (at the start of the "Écône, Switzerland" segment) the rector of Écône, Fr. Bernard de Lacoste, tells us that, in addition to virtue and good health, he considers "SSPX priest material" to be a young man who has:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"...aptitudes which are of a psychological order: to be balanced, to have common sense, because the priest must enlighten people, give them good advice, show them the way to heaven."</blockquote>
<br />
Now obviously there is a sense in which this is true: nobody wants a priest who is a raving lunatic or a paranoid schizophrenic! But "balanced" — really?! The whole world is going to hell in a handcart, the "balance" throughout the whole world is tipped so heavily in favour of Christ's enemies that speaking the truth is progressively being made illegal, it is increasingly difficult for a good man to find and hold onto honest employment and it is almost impossible for parents to protect their children's innocence and shield them from immorality, perversion and degeneracy of all kinds. And you're worried about being "balanced"? Perhaps a little more of the crusader spirit is what's needed, or the spirit of the martyrs (how "balanced" were they?!). Or is it perhaps just me? I leave you to make up your own mind.<br />
<br />
When it comes to the curriculum, the 1986 video says that the seminarians spend two years of philosophy studying St Thomas Aquinas, "<span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">...whom St. Pius X called 'the antidote for modernism'</span>." In the 2026 video, however, (then-) Fr. Goldade describes those two years as: <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">"The study of psychology, cosmology, logic, metaphysics."</span> [27:30] Metaphysics is presumably their study of the <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Summa</span>. Logic, OK, yes, but psychology? And the cosmology will almost certainly be Fr. Robinson's view of how Genesis has misled everyone and creation is really billions of years old. One need hardly add that that too is a serious change since 1986.<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">No Longer Resisting the Conciliar Church?</span><br />
<br />
All this pales into insignificance, however, when compared to the fact that the conciliar church is no longer considered something distinct from the Catholic Church. And yet the Archbishop was consistent in his rejection of the conciliar church:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"I remark, first of all, that the expression 'conciliar church' comes not from me but from Mgr. Benelli who, in an official letter, asked that our priests and seminarians should submit themselves to the 'conciliar church.'" (Conference on 11th Jan., 1979)<br />
<br />
"It is easy to think that whoever opposes the Council and its new Gospel would be considered as excommunicated, as outside communion with the Church. But one may well ask them: communion with what Church? They would answer, no doubt, with the conciliar church." (<span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">I Accuse the Council</span>, p.xiii)<br />
<br />
"This talk about the 'visible Church' on the part of Dom Gerard and Mr. Madiran is childish. It is incredible that anyone can talk of the 'visible Church' meaning the conciliar church as opposed to the Catholic Church which we are trying to represent and continue." ('One Year After the Consecrations' <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Fideliter</span>, July-Aug. 1989)</blockquote>
<br />
In 1990 he wrote to Bishop de Castro Mayer that:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"...the conciliar church, having now reached everywhere, is spreading errors contrary to the Catholic Faith and, as a result of these errors, it has corrupted the sources of grace, which are the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass and the Sacraments. This false church is in an ever-deeper state of rupture with the Catholic Church."</blockquote>
<br />
And in a similar vein, in the preface to his 1990 book <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Spiritual Journey</span>, he declares that:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"It is the strict duty of every priest [and layman! — Ed.] wishing to remain Catholic to separate himself clearly from the conciliar church, for so long as it does not profess the tradition of the Church's Magisterium and of the Catholic Faith."</blockquote>
<br />
One can search the 2026 SSPX in vain for any hint of recognition that the conciliar church even exists. And how can they fight against what they no longer believe exists? They can't.<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">And What About the SSPX of 1986?</span><br />
<br />
We have quoted the man himself at some length — what about the old SSPX? After the 1988 consecrations, the leading SSPX priests wrote to Rome asking to be excommunicated too:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"We have never wished to belong to this system which calls itself the conciliar church, and defines itself with the Novus Ordo Missae, an ecumenism which leads to indifferentism and the secularisation of all society."</blockquote>
<br />
What a difference to the modern SSPX! And yes, in case you were wondering, the 1986 video <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">A Sign of Hope</span> represents that old SSPX fairly accurately. Not only do they say several things which the modern SSPX wouldn't be caught dead saying, but the overall focus is just different. You really need to watch the whole video to see exactly what I mean, but in the meantime here are a few choice extracts to try to illustrate the point:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>[1:40] "The Curé of Ars showed us that it isn't many priests that we need, but just a few good ones, a few faithful, devoted priests. He was told, the Curé of Ars, by the devil when he saw him one time that if there were two other priests like him, the whole world would fall out of the devil's dominion. And there were just twelve Apostles to begin with."<br />
<br />
[3:45] "I came to see more and more that even in Rome the teaching of the Church really isn't taught any more. …well for example, about the Gospels, that the Gospels aren't historical, that there are things there that were written just by the evangelists themselves, putting words into Our Lord's mouth that He didn't really say. … I started to look at the other side of it and see that the real explanation for the confusion, for the crisis in the Church today, is Vatican II itself, it's not abuses of Vatican II. [Narrator:] This is the reason for the founding of the Society of St Pius X…"<br />
<br />
[4:50] [Archbishop Lefebvre:] "We cannot accept this ecumenism, bad ecumenism, false ecumenism, with Jews, with all religions, with Protestants. That is a scandal, a great scandal for our faith, for the faith of the faithful. That is a great mystery, but we cannot accept that. We must remain true Catholics, faithful to Our Lord Jesus Christ."<br />
<br />
[7:20] "Bishop de Castro Mayer, bishop emeritus of Campos Brazil, is the only bishop who dared to speak out with Archbishop Lefebvre in opposition to the errors of Vatican II and its humanistic and ecumenical spirit."<br />
<br />
[11:45] "In the army they call it bootcamp. If you want to make a soldier, you've got to put him through some training. And the priest is a soldier of Christ so he's got to be trained and trained properly. Otherwise he's just not going to be able to take the heat of the action. He's going to get out there at the front and the bullets are going to start flying…"<br />
<br />
[14:50] "[The seminarians study] two years of philosophy…according to the principles of St. Thomas Aquinas, whom St. Pius X called 'the antidote for modernism.'"<br />
<br />
[16:00] "In the name of Ecumenism, Catholics will refuse to honour Our Lady because it's not ecumenical, because it offends the Protestants. In the name of Ecumenism the Catholics will undo the sacrifice of the Mass because the Protestants don't like the notion of a sacrificial Mass, etc, etc. So in the name of Ecumenism you undo everything that's properly and distinctly Catholic and you reduce Catholicism down to the level of a common mish-mash. Which is exactly what all the other religions are doing, preparing the great one-world religion. As which Pope said in which encyclical? … St. Pius X said in his document on the Sillon, that's right."<br />
<br />
[22:30] "The American bishops are going the way of the modern church and the modern church is going the way of the world, it's joined the world and it's abandoned our Lord Jesus Christ. … In the modern seminaries [the priest] is a kind of glorified social worker."<br />
<br />
[24:25] "Archbishop Lefebvre has said that he could not form priests with the New Mass and I can see exactly what he means because…in the New Mass there's no notion really that it's a sacrifice."<br />
<br />
[25:05] "Before I entered St. Thomas Aquinas seminary I spent a year in [a Novus Ordo] seminary, I stayed there for one year and the conduct of the priests and seminarians was totally different than here. Here everything's composed in a Catholic manner. When I was in the seminary the priests mostly were called by their first names by the seminarians. … In the day-to-day life there was no silence … I was told to see a psychiatrist because my religious beliefs weren't according to their standards. They felt we had to just go along with the modern world and the modern way of thinking. My rector told me he tried for a whole year to change my religious beliefs and was not able to ... I was like a Catholic going to a Protestant seminary."<br />
<br />
[31:25] "They may not deny it explicitly but in the teaching that you get [in a Novus Ordo seminary] you're not taught that you're offering sacrifice to God. That's not taught at all, whereas here it is and that's the difference. … In Rome the new priests [often have] bitterness and cynicism because they don't have the sacrifice of the Mass."<br />
<br />
[37:23] "[Families need] firstly to have many children. Large families are the normal seedbed of vocations because in large families the children are usually less selfish than in small families, they have to be. When the three boys are sleeping one on top of the other in bunks, you know, the bottom one can't rock all three or the other two will jump on him … pray the rosary in the home in the family every night. Mothers should pray for vocations and dedicate their children to the Mother of God when they're born."<br />
<br />
[38:45] "[The conciliar church] is rotten, rotten to the core. … They're building their new church on sand and it's falling already it's falling severely. The Church is built on the rock, Christ is the rock and Christ gave us His Church which is Tradition. … If it's not built on that Tradition it'll fall, and it's falling. In America, in Australia, surely in the rest of the world, it's falling."<br />
<br />
[40:25] "I wrote home to someone and said that Ridgefield is like a haven of holiness in a cesspool of sin. Because it's dreadful outside, beyond those walls, those gates, it's dreadful."</blockquote>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The following is taken from <a href="https://thecatacombs.org/showthread.php?tid=8580&amp;pid=15950#pid15950" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">The Recusant - Issue #66</a> [Summer 2026]<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;" class="mycode_u"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">Worlds Apart: Forty Years, Two SSPXs</span></span><br />
<br />
In the late spring of 2026, in the run-up to the SSPX's episcopal consecrations, there appeared on one of the SSPX's youtube channels the first video of three, the second and third appearing during May and June at intervals of a few weeks. We will focus on the first one, entitled: <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Traditio Part 1: Becoming a Priest</span>. It is clearly meant to be a sort of pro-SSPX propaganda effort aimed at outsiders, presenting in as sympathetic a light as possible the SSPX apostolate. As its title suggests, the first video focusses on seminarians and their journey to the priesthood, culminating in the day of their ordination.<br />
<br />
The video as a whole is typical of what we have come to expect from the modern, toothless, inoffensive SSPX. And yet, although its defects are obvious to us, there will no doubt be many who don't remember the old SSPX, for whom they are anything but obvious. In cases such as these, a direct comparison can often be a useful aid. Was the SSPX of yore really so very different to the SSPX of today? Well, as luck would have it, forty years earlier, back in 1986, the SSPX made exactly the same sort of video. It was filmed at the SSPX's USA seminary, in those days located at Ridgefield, Connecticut. The content of each of these two video presentations is superficially very similar: they each focus on seminary life, the seminarians themselves, what it means to become a priest, and so forth. But there the similarity ends. The contrast in both style and content could not be more clear and the reader might just as well pause reading and watch the first five minutes of each video to see for himself:<br />
<br />
The old SSPX: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6TtyDeSYB84&amp;t=13s" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6TtyDeSYB84&amp;t=13s</a><br />
The new SSPX: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V9UQYkXffG0" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V9UQYkXffG0</a><br />
<br />
And what a contrast it is! Behold, the SSPX pre- and post-Archbishop Lefebvre. The most obvious difference between the two, the difference which immediately strikes the viewer, is of course the production quality. The 1986 film looks like it was shot on a primitive VHS camcorder; the sound is fuzzy and wobbly, so is the picture, the colours fade and return, the picture is occasionally unclear. A quality so poor it warms the cockles of the heart! The 2026 production value is, by contrast, like a modern Hollywood film. But that is by the by: perhaps forty years of technology is enough to explain it — what matters most is the content.<br />
<br />
Every word in the 2026 video is there for a reason. The speech of the various interviewees is careful and calculated, there is very obviously a script and there has clearly been a lot of careful editing. The 1986 video, by contrast, seems to have been shot on the hoof, somebody just pitched up with a camera, pointed it at any seminarians who were passing by and recorded whatever happened to come out of each man's mouth!<br />
<br />
In the SSPX's 2026 presentation, everything <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">feels </span>holy, everything is aesthetically pleasing, everything looks comfortable and beautiful and impressive. The 1986 film is a lesson in what the SSPX used to look and feel like, however. Everything is poor, with a make-do-and-mend feel, where material wealth and impressive external appearances are clearly not a priority. For instance, the seminary chapel in Ridgefield has a low ceiling and the altar is almost round the corner from some of the pews: clearly a converted room and the best they could do at that time. The 2026 video is unable to show viewers the seminary chapel because, despite the new seminary having been built a decade or more ago, the chapel is the only part which is still not finished. The viewer is therefore given a view of the seminary buildings with the open fourth side of the cloister, and then later on a shot of the model showing what it will look like when finished.<br />
<br />
And it is not just a question of architecture and nice buildings. The SSPX's 2026 film seems to focus a great deal on the beauty of the liturgy. The premise appears to be that the truth needs to be presented and the Church spoken about as though it were still the 1950s, and the condemnation of error is a mere optional extra. There are lots of shots of priests wearing beautiful vestments, inside beautiful churches. In the 1986 presentation by contrast, everything is a lot more rough-and-ready but the crisis in the Church, the errors of Vatican II and the apostasy of the conciliar modernists is placed front and centre from the very start and is presented as being the reason why the SSPX exists. To give just one very obvious and easy to understand example, let us take a look at the opening words in each video:<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">Opening Lines</span><br />
<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;" class="mycode_u">2026 SSPX</span>: <br />
"Modern man is bombarded constantly with new information…"<br />
<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;" class="mycode_u">1986 SSPX</span>: <br />
"The smoke of Satan has entered the bosom of the Church…"<br />
<br />
Those opening lines provide a pretty good summary of each and the difference between the two. But just in case anyone is not convinced, let us look a little closer.<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">The Content: A New and Inoffensive SSPX</span><br />
<br />
Both films have seminarians speaking to the camera right from the start and at regular intervals throughout, as well as interviews with priests and commentary from a narrator. That is where the similarity ends. What does each one say? Well, the 1986 SSPX video is exactly as it should be, it is what one used to expect. It says that there is a crisis in the Church, that Vatican II itself is to blame due to its errors, that the problem is not merely abuses or interpretations of Vatican II, that there is a war going on and that the SSPX is on the front line sending priests into battle against the evil modern world and its ally, the conciliar church.<br />
<br />
The 2026 SSPX video is very different. Let us break it down. A brief "Introduction" section is followed by four segments each given the title of one of the SSPX's seminaries (in order: "Écône Switzerland," "Dillwyn USA," "La Reja Argentina" and "Zaitskofen Germany") with footage from each of the respective seminaries in the background. The content of the last three is rather boring: "Dillwyn" talks about the seminary academic curriculum, "La Reja" talks about the daily timetable and "Zaitskofen" talks about the minor and major orders which lead to the priesthood.<br />
<br />
The main problem with these three segments (as with the video as a whole) is what they don't say, what they pointedly avoid saying, no matter how badly it needs to be said. It's all so inoffensive that it includes nothing that a Fraternity of St. Peter seminarian couldn't also say. There is no hint of a crisis in the Church, no mention of the New Mass, modernism, etc. The introduction segment is equally inoffensive, and contains this little gem from a seminarian about what led him to Écône:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>[08:20] "...I had always been drawn by the liturgy. Even though I very much liked what I was doing, I felt that something was missing. And it was this love of the liturgy which led me to knock at the door of the seminary."</blockquote>
<br />
It is true that many people were initially drawn to Tradition through the liturgy. But usually they quickly discover that it is about more than just the liturgy. The speaker is about to be ordained after almost six years at Écône, yet he doesn't say anything (or if he did, it was edited out!) about modernism, the errors of Vatican II, or even the crisis in the Church, when explaining his decision to become an SSPX priest. This gives the impression that today's SSPX is not much different to the various "Indult"/"TLM" groups approved by Rome: it's all about the beauty of the liturgy, in other words. This is unfortunate, since it reinforces what many of us have been saying about the SSPX for a while. It would be nice to be proved wrong for once!<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">The problem of Archbishop Lefebvre...</span><br />
<br />
The first segment following the introduction ("Écône, Switzerland") is where they have front-loaded all of the "crisis in the Church" talk, because it is where they talk about Archbishop Lefebvre. Therefore they have, it seems, killed two birds with one stone. They get to tick the box so that no one can claim that they haven't mentioned the crisis or Vatican II at all, and they also get to tie it all to their long-dead founder as though it is all a historical footnote and nothing more, almost a personal issue which he had and which died with him. Then, after spending all of twelve minutes talking mostly about what a nice, spiritual man he was, they can then move on and spend the remaining fifty-odd minutes (out of seventy-five) talking as though there is no crisis in the Church.<br />
<br />
And what they manage to say about Archbishop Lefebvre is without doubt the most insidious and misleading part of the entire video and is worth looking at more closely. What is wrong with it? Several things. So far as we can see:<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">1.</span> By framing it as a historical footnote they mislead the unsuspecting viewer into thinking that this was "then but not now" or possibly "Archbishop Lefebvre but not us." That was a '60s and '70s thing, in other words — there's no hint of the same problems being even worse today!<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">2.</span> They completely misrepresent the Archbishop's attitude regarding modern Rome.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">3.</span> They ignore the many things Archbishop Lefebvre said which condemn their own behaviour today and which show just how unfaithful to him they have been.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">4.</span> They leave the viewer with an overall impression of the Archbishop which is totally misleading and as inoffensive as possible, a caricature in other words. He was just a smiling old man who sat in his rocking chair handing out Werther's Originals to his little grandchildren — not the hard-as-nails Traditionalist who really existed!<br />
<br />
Let us take a look and you can see for yourself.<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>[14:45] "Many had realised in the 1960s and '70s that the Church was entering a period of profound crisis. But no one had, like Archbishop Lefebvre, this particular grace, this supernatural foresight to understand deeply what the causes were and above all, to offer appropriate remedies."</blockquote>
<br />
This is followed immediately by the figures "1969" flashed up on the screen in very large font, as though to signal that this is all a historical issue.<br />
<br />
So the Church was entering a profound crisis in the late-'60s and 1970s? What happened next, did the crisis pass? What did he do in the 1980s? What was the solution which he bequeathed to the SSPX by the time he died in 1991? No mention. And it is all very well saying that the Archbishop knew the answer, etc. — what was or is that answer, exactly? Again, no further details are given. This is just a '60s and '70s thing, clearly.<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>[16:50] "There was never, absolutely never, any idea of separating from the Church."</blockquote>
<br />
This is so misleading and such a misrepresentation of Archbishop Lefebvre that we will allow him to refute it in his own words:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"Such things are easy to say. To stay inside the Church, or to put oneself inside the Church — what does that mean? Firstly, what Church are we talking about? If you mean the conciliar church, then we who have struggled against the Council for twenty years because we want the Catholic Church, we would have to re-enter this conciliar church in order, supposedly, to make it Catholic. That is a complete illusion. It is not the subjects that make the superiors, but the superiors who make the subjects." ('One Year After the Consecrations' — <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Fideliter</span>, July-Aug 1989)</blockquote>
<br />
Look at that! "The conciliar church" — when was the last time you heard that phrase from the SSPX? Here is the Archbishop again:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"Far from us be this miserable thought of separating ourselves from Rome! On the contrary, it is in order to manifest our attachment to Rome that we are performing this ceremony. It is in order to manifest our attachment to the Eternal Rome, to the Pope, and to all those who have preceded these last Popes who, unfortunately since the Second Vatican Council, have thought it their duty to adhere to grievous errors which are demolishing the Church and the Catholic Priesthood." (Consecrations Sermon, 30th June 1988)</blockquote>
<br />
Like the conciliar church, one no longer hears about "Eternal Rome" — again this is because the 2026 SSPX no longer distinguishes. Indeed, even concerning Vatican II, we are told:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>[17:00] "Most certainly there was a reaction, a reaction against modern ideas or rather against errors, errors already condemned by the Church, which were making their way in a little before the Council but which crystalised at the time of the Council and then especially afterwards, much more clearly, in the reforms made in the name of the Council."</blockquote>
<br />
Got it? So there were these unspecified "errors," already there before the Council, which (coincidentally!) became worse during the very time when Vatican II took place and afterwards. Well, well! Might there be some sort of causal link? Don't expect to find an answer to that question in this video! Secondly, why not say what the errors are (or were?) — why this coyness about naming them? Religious Liberty, Ecumenism, Collegiality, the New Mass. There, I just named the main ones — it's not hard.<br />
<br />
Lastly, notice how the errors got worse especially afterwards because of what was done "in the name of the Council." What a loaded phrase that is: it clearly implies that Vatican II was used as an excuse by unscrupulous men who took its name in vain. It wasn't really the Council's fault, in other words. Which, come to think of it, is exactly what indultists and "conservatives" have been claiming for years; Bishop Fellay too, in his infamous May 2012 <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">CNS</span> interview. One need hardly add that this is very much at odds with what Archbishop Lefebvre maintained, and the old SSPX too — as we shall soon see.<br />
<br />
What about the impression of Archbishop Lefebvre which the viewer is left with? Judge for yourself:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>[18:20] "I was ordained by Archbishop Lefebvre and had the great privilege of having had him throughout my seminary years and even having had him as a professor in the first year. The Archbishop taught us the acts of the Magisterium, so the encyclicals of the Popes, and made us love the Church."</blockquote>
<br />
Again, "the Church" — no distinction. I'm pretty sure he would have taught you to hate the conciliar church every bit as much as he taught you to love the Catholic Church of Tradition!<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>[18:45] "He was very fatherlike in the seminary. … [19:40] A man who was an ambassador for the Holy See, he never refused to go to Rome, even in all the difficulties which he undertook."</blockquote>
<br />
That last remark, made by an elderly Fr. Hogan, is factually untrue and the video's editors ought to have been more on the ball. Firstly, Archbishop Lefebvre was an ambassador <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">for </span>the Holy See, not <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">to </span>the Holy See. More importantly, it is not true that "he never refused to go to Rome, even in all the difficulties…" — as though he was at the beck and call of the modernists to the day he died. What a disservice this does to the memory of Archbishop Lefebvre!<br />
<br />
The real Archbishop Lefebvre refutes his own caricature!<br />
<br />
So what in fact was the Archbishop's attitude towards Rome from 1988 onwards? Did he continue to dialogue with them right up to the end of his life? As before, he is so clear that unlike the modern SSPX we can afford to let him speak for himself:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"It's over. The talks between Rome and ourselves are over. The more one thinks about it, the more one realizes their intentions are not good. ... Rome wants everything to go Vatican II, while they leave us a little bit of Tradition. … But there is no point in such meetings. It has all been talked out long ago." (Letter to the four bishops-elect, 12th June 1988)<br />
<br />
"Yesterday evening, a visitor came, sent from the Nunciature in Berne, with an envelope containing an appeal from our Holy Father the Pope, who was putting at my disposal a car which was supposed to take me to Rome… I leave you to judge for yourselves the timeliness and wisdom of such a request." (Consecrations Sermon, 30th June 1988)<br />
<br />
"We do not have the same outlook on a reconciliation. Cardinal Ratzinger sees it as reducing us, bringing us back to Vatican II. We see it as a return of Rome to Tradition. We don't agree; it is a dialogue of the deaf. I can't speak much of the future, mine is behind me, but if I live a little while, supposing that Rome calls for a renewed dialogue, then, I will put conditions. I shall not accept being in the position where I was put during the dialogue. No more. I will place the discussion at the doctrinal level. … If you do not accept the doctrine of your predecessors, it is useless to talk!" (<span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Fideliter </span>66, Nov.-Dec. 1988)<br />
<br />
"Humanly speaking, there is no chance of any agreement between Rome and ourselves at the moment. … However, one day they will be obliged to recognize that the Society represents a spiritual force and a strength of the Faith which is irreplaceable and which they will have, I hope, the joy and the satisfaction to make use of, but when they have come back to their Traditional Faith." (Conference to priests and seminarians, Écône, 6th Sept. 1990)<br />
<br />
"Since the episcopal consecrations there has been no more contact with Rome … It is absolutely impossible in the current climate of Rome which is becoming worse. We must not delude ourselves. The principles which now guide the conciliar church are more and more overtly contrary to Catholic doctrine. … All the false ideas of the Council continue to develop, to be reaffirmed with ever greater clarity. They are hiding less and less. It is absolutely inconceivable that we can agree to work with such a hierarchy. … We are dealing with people who have a different philosophy to ours, a different way of seeing, who are influenced by all modern subjectivist philosophers. For them there is no fixed truth, there is no dogma. Everything is evolving. That is a totally Masonic concept. This is really the destruction of the Faith." (<span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Fideliter </span>79, Jan.-Feb. 1991)</blockquote>
<br />
That was after June 1988 — on the other hand, prior to June 1988, while communications were still open with Rome, what was the reason and the spirit in which he "went to Rome" (to use Fr. Hogan's expression)? Once again, we will let him speak for himself:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"We have done all we could, trying to help Rome to understand that they had to come back to the attitudes of the holy Pius XII and of all his predecessors. Bishop de Castro Mayer and myself have gone to Rome, we have spoken, we have sent letters, several times to Rome. We have tried by these talks, by all these means, to succeed in making Rome understand that, since the Council and since aggiornamento, this change which has occurred in the Church is not Catholic, is not in conformity to the doctrine of all times. This ecumenism and all these errors, this collegiality — all this is contrary to the Faith of the Church and is in the process of destroying the Church… 'And why Archbishop have you stopped these discussions which seemed to have had a certain degree of success?' [Because] it is clear that the only truth that exists today for the Vatican is the conciliar truth, the spirit of the Council, the spirit of Assisi. That is the truth of today. But we will have nothing to do with this for anything in the world! That is why, taking into account the strong will of the present Roman authorities to reduce Tradition to naught, to gather the world to the spirit of Vatican II and the spirit of Assisi, we have preferred to withdraw ourselves and to say that we could not continue. It was not possible. […] I think it is my duty to provide the means of doing that which I shall call 'Operation Survival,' operation survival for Tradition. Today, this day, is Operation Survival. If I had made this deal with Rome, by continuing with the agreements we had signed and putting them into practice, I would have performed 'Operation Suicide.' There was no choice, we must live!" (Consecrations Sermon, 30th June 1988)<br />
<br />
"'For myself, personally,' I said, 'I have no confidence in them. For years and years I have been mixing with these people and for years I have been seeing the way in which they act. I have no further confidence in them. However, I do not wish people within the Society and Traditional circles to be able to say afterwards: You could easily have tried, it would have cost you nothing to enter into discussion and dialogue.' That was the opinion of the Superior General and his assistants. They said, 'You must take into consideration the offer which is being made and not neglect it. It's still worthwhile to talk with them.' … Very soon, however, we realized that we were dealing with people who are not honest. … I nevertheless went to Rome for the conversations, but without any confidence in their success. … I wished to go as far as possible in order to show what good will we had." ('One Year After the Consecrations' <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Fideliter</span>, July-Aug. 1989)<br />
<br />
"For fifteen years we dialogued to try to put Tradition back in its place of honour, in that place in the Church which it has by right. We ran up against a continual refusal. … Our true faithful, those who have understood the problem and who have precisely helped us to continue along the straight and firm path of Tradition and the Faith, were afraid of the approaches I made towards Rome. They told me it was dangerous and that I was wasting my time. Yes, of course, I hoped until the last minute that in Rome we would witness a little bit of loyalty. I cannot be blamed for not having done the maximum." (<span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Fideliter </span>79, Jan.-Feb. 1991)</blockquote>
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">Other Evidence of Softening</span><br />
<br />
There were some other clangers which we spotted — there may be more. For instance, whereas the SSPX used to be an implacable opponent of the evil modern world, the 2026 SSPX seems to treat it with kid gloves. The one and only time that this comes up is when the Superior General, Fr. Davide Pagliarani, says that the problem with the modern world is that it gives people too much information which distracts them.<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>[11:45] "Certainly for a young man of today it is more difficult to perceive this call [to the priesthood] because a young man today is a child of today's society which has immersed him in a world of continual information, stifling, at least in part, his capacity to take a step back, to distance himself and to reflect deeply..."</blockquote>
<br />
And then there is a subtle but telling bit about the formation of priests and what kind of a man the SSPX are looking for. At around 11 minutes (at the start of the "Écône, Switzerland" segment) the rector of Écône, Fr. Bernard de Lacoste, tells us that, in addition to virtue and good health, he considers "SSPX priest material" to be a young man who has:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"...aptitudes which are of a psychological order: to be balanced, to have common sense, because the priest must enlighten people, give them good advice, show them the way to heaven."</blockquote>
<br />
Now obviously there is a sense in which this is true: nobody wants a priest who is a raving lunatic or a paranoid schizophrenic! But "balanced" — really?! The whole world is going to hell in a handcart, the "balance" throughout the whole world is tipped so heavily in favour of Christ's enemies that speaking the truth is progressively being made illegal, it is increasingly difficult for a good man to find and hold onto honest employment and it is almost impossible for parents to protect their children's innocence and shield them from immorality, perversion and degeneracy of all kinds. And you're worried about being "balanced"? Perhaps a little more of the crusader spirit is what's needed, or the spirit of the martyrs (how "balanced" were they?!). Or is it perhaps just me? I leave you to make up your own mind.<br />
<br />
When it comes to the curriculum, the 1986 video says that the seminarians spend two years of philosophy studying St Thomas Aquinas, "<span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">...whom St. Pius X called 'the antidote for modernism'</span>." In the 2026 video, however, (then-) Fr. Goldade describes those two years as: <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">"The study of psychology, cosmology, logic, metaphysics."</span> [27:30] Metaphysics is presumably their study of the <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Summa</span>. Logic, OK, yes, but psychology? And the cosmology will almost certainly be Fr. Robinson's view of how Genesis has misled everyone and creation is really billions of years old. One need hardly add that that too is a serious change since 1986.<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">No Longer Resisting the Conciliar Church?</span><br />
<br />
All this pales into insignificance, however, when compared to the fact that the conciliar church is no longer considered something distinct from the Catholic Church. And yet the Archbishop was consistent in his rejection of the conciliar church:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"I remark, first of all, that the expression 'conciliar church' comes not from me but from Mgr. Benelli who, in an official letter, asked that our priests and seminarians should submit themselves to the 'conciliar church.'" (Conference on 11th Jan., 1979)<br />
<br />
"It is easy to think that whoever opposes the Council and its new Gospel would be considered as excommunicated, as outside communion with the Church. But one may well ask them: communion with what Church? They would answer, no doubt, with the conciliar church." (<span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">I Accuse the Council</span>, p.xiii)<br />
<br />
"This talk about the 'visible Church' on the part of Dom Gerard and Mr. Madiran is childish. It is incredible that anyone can talk of the 'visible Church' meaning the conciliar church as opposed to the Catholic Church which we are trying to represent and continue." ('One Year After the Consecrations' <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Fideliter</span>, July-Aug. 1989)</blockquote>
<br />
In 1990 he wrote to Bishop de Castro Mayer that:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"...the conciliar church, having now reached everywhere, is spreading errors contrary to the Catholic Faith and, as a result of these errors, it has corrupted the sources of grace, which are the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass and the Sacraments. This false church is in an ever-deeper state of rupture with the Catholic Church."</blockquote>
<br />
And in a similar vein, in the preface to his 1990 book <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Spiritual Journey</span>, he declares that:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"It is the strict duty of every priest [and layman! — Ed.] wishing to remain Catholic to separate himself clearly from the conciliar church, for so long as it does not profess the tradition of the Church's Magisterium and of the Catholic Faith."</blockquote>
<br />
One can search the 2026 SSPX in vain for any hint of recognition that the conciliar church even exists. And how can they fight against what they no longer believe exists? They can't.<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">And What About the SSPX of 1986?</span><br />
<br />
We have quoted the man himself at some length — what about the old SSPX? After the 1988 consecrations, the leading SSPX priests wrote to Rome asking to be excommunicated too:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"We have never wished to belong to this system which calls itself the conciliar church, and defines itself with the Novus Ordo Missae, an ecumenism which leads to indifferentism and the secularisation of all society."</blockquote>
<br />
What a difference to the modern SSPX! And yes, in case you were wondering, the 1986 video <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">A Sign of Hope</span> represents that old SSPX fairly accurately. Not only do they say several things which the modern SSPX wouldn't be caught dead saying, but the overall focus is just different. You really need to watch the whole video to see exactly what I mean, but in the meantime here are a few choice extracts to try to illustrate the point:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>[1:40] "The Curé of Ars showed us that it isn't many priests that we need, but just a few good ones, a few faithful, devoted priests. He was told, the Curé of Ars, by the devil when he saw him one time that if there were two other priests like him, the whole world would fall out of the devil's dominion. And there were just twelve Apostles to begin with."<br />
<br />
[3:45] "I came to see more and more that even in Rome the teaching of the Church really isn't taught any more. …well for example, about the Gospels, that the Gospels aren't historical, that there are things there that were written just by the evangelists themselves, putting words into Our Lord's mouth that He didn't really say. … I started to look at the other side of it and see that the real explanation for the confusion, for the crisis in the Church today, is Vatican II itself, it's not abuses of Vatican II. [Narrator:] This is the reason for the founding of the Society of St Pius X…"<br />
<br />
[4:50] [Archbishop Lefebvre:] "We cannot accept this ecumenism, bad ecumenism, false ecumenism, with Jews, with all religions, with Protestants. That is a scandal, a great scandal for our faith, for the faith of the faithful. That is a great mystery, but we cannot accept that. We must remain true Catholics, faithful to Our Lord Jesus Christ."<br />
<br />
[7:20] "Bishop de Castro Mayer, bishop emeritus of Campos Brazil, is the only bishop who dared to speak out with Archbishop Lefebvre in opposition to the errors of Vatican II and its humanistic and ecumenical spirit."<br />
<br />
[11:45] "In the army they call it bootcamp. If you want to make a soldier, you've got to put him through some training. And the priest is a soldier of Christ so he's got to be trained and trained properly. Otherwise he's just not going to be able to take the heat of the action. He's going to get out there at the front and the bullets are going to start flying…"<br />
<br />
[14:50] "[The seminarians study] two years of philosophy…according to the principles of St. Thomas Aquinas, whom St. Pius X called 'the antidote for modernism.'"<br />
<br />
[16:00] "In the name of Ecumenism, Catholics will refuse to honour Our Lady because it's not ecumenical, because it offends the Protestants. In the name of Ecumenism the Catholics will undo the sacrifice of the Mass because the Protestants don't like the notion of a sacrificial Mass, etc, etc. So in the name of Ecumenism you undo everything that's properly and distinctly Catholic and you reduce Catholicism down to the level of a common mish-mash. Which is exactly what all the other religions are doing, preparing the great one-world religion. As which Pope said in which encyclical? … St. Pius X said in his document on the Sillon, that's right."<br />
<br />
[22:30] "The American bishops are going the way of the modern church and the modern church is going the way of the world, it's joined the world and it's abandoned our Lord Jesus Christ. … In the modern seminaries [the priest] is a kind of glorified social worker."<br />
<br />
[24:25] "Archbishop Lefebvre has said that he could not form priests with the New Mass and I can see exactly what he means because…in the New Mass there's no notion really that it's a sacrifice."<br />
<br />
[25:05] "Before I entered St. Thomas Aquinas seminary I spent a year in [a Novus Ordo] seminary, I stayed there for one year and the conduct of the priests and seminarians was totally different than here. Here everything's composed in a Catholic manner. When I was in the seminary the priests mostly were called by their first names by the seminarians. … In the day-to-day life there was no silence … I was told to see a psychiatrist because my religious beliefs weren't according to their standards. They felt we had to just go along with the modern world and the modern way of thinking. My rector told me he tried for a whole year to change my religious beliefs and was not able to ... I was like a Catholic going to a Protestant seminary."<br />
<br />
[31:25] "They may not deny it explicitly but in the teaching that you get [in a Novus Ordo seminary] you're not taught that you're offering sacrifice to God. That's not taught at all, whereas here it is and that's the difference. … In Rome the new priests [often have] bitterness and cynicism because they don't have the sacrifice of the Mass."<br />
<br />
[37:23] "[Families need] firstly to have many children. Large families are the normal seedbed of vocations because in large families the children are usually less selfish than in small families, they have to be. When the three boys are sleeping one on top of the other in bunks, you know, the bottom one can't rock all three or the other two will jump on him … pray the rosary in the home in the family every night. Mothers should pray for vocations and dedicate their children to the Mother of God when they're born."<br />
<br />
[38:45] "[The conciliar church] is rotten, rotten to the core. … They're building their new church on sand and it's falling already it's falling severely. The Church is built on the rock, Christ is the rock and Christ gave us His Church which is Tradition. … If it's not built on that Tradition it'll fall, and it's falling. In America, in Australia, surely in the rest of the world, it's falling."<br />
<br />
[40:25] "I wrote home to someone and said that Ridgefield is like a haven of holiness in a cesspool of sin. Because it's dreadful outside, beyond those walls, those gates, it's dreadful."</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Recusant: Two Very Different Responses to SSPX Communications]]></title>
			<link>https://thecatacombs.org/showthread.php?tid=8583</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 13:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://thecatacombs.org/member.php?action=profile&uid=1">Stone</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thecatacombs.org/showthread.php?tid=8583</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[The following is taken from <a href="https://thecatacombs.org/showthread.php?tid=8580&amp;pid=15950#pid15950" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">The Recusant - Issue 66</a> [Summer 2026]:<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">In 2026, modernist Rome really hasn't changed. They at least are consistent. The day after the SSPX consecrations they issued a decree that everyone is excommunicated and schismatic, just like they did in 1988. The following day Fr. Pagliarani sent an open letter to the Holy Father and the SSPX filed a canonical appeal. They don't want the label of "schism" hung around their neck — but notice that it is, once again, self-preservation and once again purely defensive, without any attack against modernist Rome.<br />
<br />
Below is how the SSPX responded to modernist Rome's fraudulent "excommunication" back in 1988. Read it carefully, and try to imagine any SSPX superiors saying this sort of thing today. Then compare with the wishy-washy, toothless response of 2026. What a contrast!</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;" class="mycode_align"><span style="text-decoration: underline;" class="mycode_u"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">Two Very Different Responses</span></span>:<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">Part 1: How the SSPX Responded to Bogus Excommunication in 1988</span></div>
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">"An Open Letter to Cardinal Gantin, Prefect of the Congregation for Bishops"</span><br />
Ecône, July 6, 1988<br />
<br />
Eminence,<br />
<br />
Gathered around our Superior General, the Superiors of the Districts, Seminaries and autonomous houses of the Priestly Society of Saint Pius X think it good to respectfully express to you the following reflections.<br />
<br />
You thought it good, by your letter of July 1st, to inform Their Excellencies Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, Bishop Antonio de Castro Mayer, and the four Bishops whom they consecrated on June 30, at Écône, of the excommunication latæ sententiæ. We let you judge for yourself the value of such a declaration, coming from an authority who, in its exercise, breaks with all its predecessors down to Pope Pius XII, in worship, teaching and government of the Church.<br />
<br />
As for us, we are in full communion with all the Popes and bishops before the Second Vatican Council, celebrating precisely the Mass which they codified and celebrated, teaching the Catechism which they drew up, standing up against the errors which they have many times condemned in their encyclicals and pastoral letters. We let you judge on which side the rupture is to be found. We are extremely saddened by the blindness of spirit and the hardening of heart of the Roman authorities.<br />
<br />
On the other hand, we have never wished to belong to this system which calls itself the Conciliar Church, and defines itself with the Novus Ordo Missæ, an ecumenism which leads to indifferentism and the secularisation of all society. Yes, we have no part, nullam partem habemus, with the pantheon of the religions of Assisi; our own excommunication by a decree of Your Eminence or of another Roman Congregation would only be the irrefutable proof of this. We ask for nothing better than to be declared out of communion with this adulterous spirit which has been blowing in the Church for the last 25 years; we ask for nothing better than to be declared outside of this impious communion of the ungodly. We believe in the One God, Our Lord Jesus Christ, with the Father and the Holy Ghost, and we will always remain faithful to His unique Spouse, the One Holy Catholic Apostolic and Roman Church.<br />
<br />
To be publicly associated with this sanction which is inflicted upon the six Catholic Bishops, Defenders of the Faith in its integrity and wholeness, would be for us a mark of honour and a sign of orthodoxy before the faithful. They have indeed a strict right to know that the priests who serve them are not in communion with a counterfeit church, promoting evolution, pentecostalism and syncretism. In union with these faithful, we make ours the words of the Prophet: "<span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Præparate corda vestra Domino et servite Illi soli: et liberabit vos de manibus inimicorum vestrorum. Convertimini ad Eum in toto corde vestro, et auferte deos alienos de medio vestri</span> — Open your hearts to the Lord and serve Him only: and He will free you from the hands of your enemies. With all your heart return to Him, and take away from your midst any strange gods" (I Kings 7:3).<br />
<br />
Confident in the protection of Her who has crushed all the heresies in the world, we assure Your Eminence of our dedication to Him Who is the only Way of salvation.<br />
<br />
Fr. Franz Schmidberger, Superior General<br />
Fr. Paul Aulagnier, District Superior, France<br />
Fr. Franz-Josef Maessen, District Superior, Germany<br />
Fr. Edward Black, District Superior, Great Britain<br />
Fr. Anthony Esposito, District Superior of Italy<br />
Fr. François Laisney, District Superior, United States<br />
Fr. Jacques Emily, District Superior of Canada<br />
Fr. Jean Michel Faure, District Superior of Mexico<br />
Fr. Gerard Hogan, District Superior of Australasia<br />
Fr. Alain Lorans, Superior, Seminary of Ecône<br />
Fr. Jean Paul André, Superior, Seminary of France<br />
Fr. Paul Natterer, Superior, Seminary of Germany<br />
Fr. Andrès Morello, Superior, Seminary of Argentina<br />
Fr. William Welsh, Superior, Seminary of Australia<br />
Fr. Michel Simoulin, Rector, St. Pius X University<br />
Fr. Patrice Laroche, Vice-Rector, Seminary of Ecône<br />
Fr. Philippe François, Superior, Belgium<br />
Fr. Roland de Mérode, Superior, Netherlands<br />
Fr. Georg Pflüger, Superior, Austria<br />
Fr. Guillaume Devillers, Superior, Spain<br />
Fr. Philippe Pazat, Superior, Portugal<br />
Fr. Daniel Couture, Superior, Ireland<br />
Fr. Patrick Groche, Superior, Gabon<br />
Fr. Frank Peek, Superior, Southern Africa<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;" class="mycode_align"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">Part 2: How the SSPX Responds to Bogus Excommunication in 2026</span>:</div>
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">"Letter to the Holy Father Regarding the Decree of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith"</span><br />
<br />
The Superior General<br />
To His Holiness Pope Leo XIV<br />
<br />
Écône, 3 July 2026<br />
<br />
<span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">"Among yourselves, if a father is asked by his son for bread, will he give him a stone? Or for a fish, will he give him a snake instead of a fish? Or if he is asked for an egg, will he give him a scorpion? Why then, if you, evil as you are, know well enough how to give your children what is good for them, is not your Father much more ready to give, from heaven, his gracious Spirit to those who ask him?"</span> (Lk XI, 11-13)<br />
<br />
Most Holy Father,<br />
<br />
The notification of the decision taken by the Holy See regarding the Society of Saint Pius X, signed by His Eminence Cardinal Fernández, has reached us and is now a matter of public knowledge.<br />
<br />
It appears to us that this decision once more brings to light the profoundly tragic context in which the universal Church finds herself. What the Society of Saint Pius X has done, and will continue to do, is nothing other than an extraordinary initiative for the salvation of souls, amidst the doctrinal and moral confusion into which the Church is plunged. We in no way claim to substitute ourselves for the Church, and we have no ambition other than to remain faithful to her.<br />
<br />
In conscience, we did not believe we could evade the moral duty we owe to souls, as we have already explained, both privately and publicly, to Your Holiness.<br />
<br />
We had asked for bread, that is to say, a measure of understanding for a sincere case of conscience — an act of fatherhood directed not so much toward the Society of Saint Pius X as toward souls, promising You to form them into true sons of the Roman Church; unfortunately, we received a stone.<br />
<br />
We had asked for a fish, that is to say, the possibility of temporarily obtaining the necessary means to continue forming good priests, so that they might pursue their mission of making Our Lord known to souls; unfortunately, we received a serpent.<br />
<br />
We had asked for an egg, promising to return it as soon as possible. Indeed, the holy Tradition that we preserve within souls belongs to the Church, our Mother — and not to the Society of Saint Pius X — and we are certain that one day a Pope will wish to employ it for the good of the universal Church; unfortunately, we received a scorpion.<br />
<br />
We had asked to be instructed and confirmed in the faith of all time; instead, we have been declared schismatic a second time.<br />
<br />
Despite the sanctions levelled against us, the Society of Saint Pius X sincerely renews the promise it has already expressed to Your Holiness. Allow me, in this regard, to freely reiterate what I have previously stated:<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"The Society promises You […] to devote all its energies to preserving Tradition and placing it at the service of the Church. In doing so, the Society of Saint Pius X does not merely maintain ancient customs; it fosters and preserves priestly vocations, religious vocations, and large, deeply Christian families — in a word, everything that manifests the vitality of the Church, of grace, and of the Catholic faith. Our intention is not to offer the Church a museum of antiquities, but rather the entirety of Tradition: fruitful, a source of spiritual life, embodied and lived out within souls. [...] I am certain that one day You yourself, or one of Your successors, will be able and willing to utilise this service, the offering of which, within the Church and for the Church, constitutes our sole reason for being." (Personal letter addressed to His Holiness on 21 November 2025)</blockquote>
<br />
But above all, the Society of Saint Pius X promises You today that it will not receive these new sanctions — objectively unjust and invalid — with bitterness or revolt.<br />
<br />
These recent condemnations, like those of the past, strike at what we hold most dear: our attachment to our Mother, the Roman Church. Yet, even in this trial, all things must work together for the good of souls and of the Church herself. Therefore, these condemnations compel us to love Holy Church even more, and to provide for her needs with all our strength, now more than ever. For this very reason, the Society of Saint Pius X willingly offers up the suffering caused by these new sanctions for the good of the universal Church and of Your Holiness.<br />
<br />
We are certain that one day You yourself, or one of Your successors, will wish to adopt the program of Saint Pius X: "To restore all things in Christ," Instaurare omnia in Christo. On that day, the Holy Father will discover in the Society of Saint Pius X not a nest of serpents and scorpions, but a small army of loyal sons, ready to do anything to sustain Him in the restoration of all things in Our Lord, and to vindicate before all mankind the imprescriptible rights of Christ the King over all souls and over all nations.<br />
<br />
On that day, the Holy Father will discover, with great joy and profound consolation, authentically Catholic souls whose bond with the Church was never founded upon the shifting sands of an ambiguous dialogue, but upon the rock of the faith of Peter.<br />
<br />
We ask the Most Holy Virgin Mary to hasten the dawning of that day, and we pray, above all, that Your Holiness may experience this joy and consolation as soon as possible.<br />
<br />
In the meantime, if You are able, despite Your recent decision, bless us as Your sons. For us, nothing has changed, and nothing ever will change.<br />
<br />
Trusting in Divine Providence, from which nothing is hidden and which reads into the depths of every man's heart,<br />
<br />
I remain, Most Holy Father, your most devoted son in the Lord.<br />
<br />
Don Davide Pagliarani]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The following is taken from <a href="https://thecatacombs.org/showthread.php?tid=8580&amp;pid=15950#pid15950" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">The Recusant - Issue 66</a> [Summer 2026]:<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">In 2026, modernist Rome really hasn't changed. They at least are consistent. The day after the SSPX consecrations they issued a decree that everyone is excommunicated and schismatic, just like they did in 1988. The following day Fr. Pagliarani sent an open letter to the Holy Father and the SSPX filed a canonical appeal. They don't want the label of "schism" hung around their neck — but notice that it is, once again, self-preservation and once again purely defensive, without any attack against modernist Rome.<br />
<br />
Below is how the SSPX responded to modernist Rome's fraudulent "excommunication" back in 1988. Read it carefully, and try to imagine any SSPX superiors saying this sort of thing today. Then compare with the wishy-washy, toothless response of 2026. What a contrast!</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;" class="mycode_align"><span style="text-decoration: underline;" class="mycode_u"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">Two Very Different Responses</span></span>:<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">Part 1: How the SSPX Responded to Bogus Excommunication in 1988</span></div>
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">"An Open Letter to Cardinal Gantin, Prefect of the Congregation for Bishops"</span><br />
Ecône, July 6, 1988<br />
<br />
Eminence,<br />
<br />
Gathered around our Superior General, the Superiors of the Districts, Seminaries and autonomous houses of the Priestly Society of Saint Pius X think it good to respectfully express to you the following reflections.<br />
<br />
You thought it good, by your letter of July 1st, to inform Their Excellencies Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, Bishop Antonio de Castro Mayer, and the four Bishops whom they consecrated on June 30, at Écône, of the excommunication latæ sententiæ. We let you judge for yourself the value of such a declaration, coming from an authority who, in its exercise, breaks with all its predecessors down to Pope Pius XII, in worship, teaching and government of the Church.<br />
<br />
As for us, we are in full communion with all the Popes and bishops before the Second Vatican Council, celebrating precisely the Mass which they codified and celebrated, teaching the Catechism which they drew up, standing up against the errors which they have many times condemned in their encyclicals and pastoral letters. We let you judge on which side the rupture is to be found. We are extremely saddened by the blindness of spirit and the hardening of heart of the Roman authorities.<br />
<br />
On the other hand, we have never wished to belong to this system which calls itself the Conciliar Church, and defines itself with the Novus Ordo Missæ, an ecumenism which leads to indifferentism and the secularisation of all society. Yes, we have no part, nullam partem habemus, with the pantheon of the religions of Assisi; our own excommunication by a decree of Your Eminence or of another Roman Congregation would only be the irrefutable proof of this. We ask for nothing better than to be declared out of communion with this adulterous spirit which has been blowing in the Church for the last 25 years; we ask for nothing better than to be declared outside of this impious communion of the ungodly. We believe in the One God, Our Lord Jesus Christ, with the Father and the Holy Ghost, and we will always remain faithful to His unique Spouse, the One Holy Catholic Apostolic and Roman Church.<br />
<br />
To be publicly associated with this sanction which is inflicted upon the six Catholic Bishops, Defenders of the Faith in its integrity and wholeness, would be for us a mark of honour and a sign of orthodoxy before the faithful. They have indeed a strict right to know that the priests who serve them are not in communion with a counterfeit church, promoting evolution, pentecostalism and syncretism. In union with these faithful, we make ours the words of the Prophet: "<span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Præparate corda vestra Domino et servite Illi soli: et liberabit vos de manibus inimicorum vestrorum. Convertimini ad Eum in toto corde vestro, et auferte deos alienos de medio vestri</span> — Open your hearts to the Lord and serve Him only: and He will free you from the hands of your enemies. With all your heart return to Him, and take away from your midst any strange gods" (I Kings 7:3).<br />
<br />
Confident in the protection of Her who has crushed all the heresies in the world, we assure Your Eminence of our dedication to Him Who is the only Way of salvation.<br />
<br />
Fr. Franz Schmidberger, Superior General<br />
Fr. Paul Aulagnier, District Superior, France<br />
Fr. Franz-Josef Maessen, District Superior, Germany<br />
Fr. Edward Black, District Superior, Great Britain<br />
Fr. Anthony Esposito, District Superior of Italy<br />
Fr. François Laisney, District Superior, United States<br />
Fr. Jacques Emily, District Superior of Canada<br />
Fr. Jean Michel Faure, District Superior of Mexico<br />
Fr. Gerard Hogan, District Superior of Australasia<br />
Fr. Alain Lorans, Superior, Seminary of Ecône<br />
Fr. Jean Paul André, Superior, Seminary of France<br />
Fr. Paul Natterer, Superior, Seminary of Germany<br />
Fr. Andrès Morello, Superior, Seminary of Argentina<br />
Fr. William Welsh, Superior, Seminary of Australia<br />
Fr. Michel Simoulin, Rector, St. Pius X University<br />
Fr. Patrice Laroche, Vice-Rector, Seminary of Ecône<br />
Fr. Philippe François, Superior, Belgium<br />
Fr. Roland de Mérode, Superior, Netherlands<br />
Fr. Georg Pflüger, Superior, Austria<br />
Fr. Guillaume Devillers, Superior, Spain<br />
Fr. Philippe Pazat, Superior, Portugal<br />
Fr. Daniel Couture, Superior, Ireland<br />
Fr. Patrick Groche, Superior, Gabon<br />
Fr. Frank Peek, Superior, Southern Africa<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;" class="mycode_align"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">Part 2: How the SSPX Responds to Bogus Excommunication in 2026</span>:</div>
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">"Letter to the Holy Father Regarding the Decree of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith"</span><br />
<br />
The Superior General<br />
To His Holiness Pope Leo XIV<br />
<br />
Écône, 3 July 2026<br />
<br />
<span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">"Among yourselves, if a father is asked by his son for bread, will he give him a stone? Or for a fish, will he give him a snake instead of a fish? Or if he is asked for an egg, will he give him a scorpion? Why then, if you, evil as you are, know well enough how to give your children what is good for them, is not your Father much more ready to give, from heaven, his gracious Spirit to those who ask him?"</span> (Lk XI, 11-13)<br />
<br />
Most Holy Father,<br />
<br />
The notification of the decision taken by the Holy See regarding the Society of Saint Pius X, signed by His Eminence Cardinal Fernández, has reached us and is now a matter of public knowledge.<br />
<br />
It appears to us that this decision once more brings to light the profoundly tragic context in which the universal Church finds herself. What the Society of Saint Pius X has done, and will continue to do, is nothing other than an extraordinary initiative for the salvation of souls, amidst the doctrinal and moral confusion into which the Church is plunged. We in no way claim to substitute ourselves for the Church, and we have no ambition other than to remain faithful to her.<br />
<br />
In conscience, we did not believe we could evade the moral duty we owe to souls, as we have already explained, both privately and publicly, to Your Holiness.<br />
<br />
We had asked for bread, that is to say, a measure of understanding for a sincere case of conscience — an act of fatherhood directed not so much toward the Society of Saint Pius X as toward souls, promising You to form them into true sons of the Roman Church; unfortunately, we received a stone.<br />
<br />
We had asked for a fish, that is to say, the possibility of temporarily obtaining the necessary means to continue forming good priests, so that they might pursue their mission of making Our Lord known to souls; unfortunately, we received a serpent.<br />
<br />
We had asked for an egg, promising to return it as soon as possible. Indeed, the holy Tradition that we preserve within souls belongs to the Church, our Mother — and not to the Society of Saint Pius X — and we are certain that one day a Pope will wish to employ it for the good of the universal Church; unfortunately, we received a scorpion.<br />
<br />
We had asked to be instructed and confirmed in the faith of all time; instead, we have been declared schismatic a second time.<br />
<br />
Despite the sanctions levelled against us, the Society of Saint Pius X sincerely renews the promise it has already expressed to Your Holiness. Allow me, in this regard, to freely reiterate what I have previously stated:<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"The Society promises You […] to devote all its energies to preserving Tradition and placing it at the service of the Church. In doing so, the Society of Saint Pius X does not merely maintain ancient customs; it fosters and preserves priestly vocations, religious vocations, and large, deeply Christian families — in a word, everything that manifests the vitality of the Church, of grace, and of the Catholic faith. Our intention is not to offer the Church a museum of antiquities, but rather the entirety of Tradition: fruitful, a source of spiritual life, embodied and lived out within souls. [...] I am certain that one day You yourself, or one of Your successors, will be able and willing to utilise this service, the offering of which, within the Church and for the Church, constitutes our sole reason for being." (Personal letter addressed to His Holiness on 21 November 2025)</blockquote>
<br />
But above all, the Society of Saint Pius X promises You today that it will not receive these new sanctions — objectively unjust and invalid — with bitterness or revolt.<br />
<br />
These recent condemnations, like those of the past, strike at what we hold most dear: our attachment to our Mother, the Roman Church. Yet, even in this trial, all things must work together for the good of souls and of the Church herself. Therefore, these condemnations compel us to love Holy Church even more, and to provide for her needs with all our strength, now more than ever. For this very reason, the Society of Saint Pius X willingly offers up the suffering caused by these new sanctions for the good of the universal Church and of Your Holiness.<br />
<br />
We are certain that one day You yourself, or one of Your successors, will wish to adopt the program of Saint Pius X: "To restore all things in Christ," Instaurare omnia in Christo. On that day, the Holy Father will discover in the Society of Saint Pius X not a nest of serpents and scorpions, but a small army of loyal sons, ready to do anything to sustain Him in the restoration of all things in Our Lord, and to vindicate before all mankind the imprescriptible rights of Christ the King over all souls and over all nations.<br />
<br />
On that day, the Holy Father will discover, with great joy and profound consolation, authentically Catholic souls whose bond with the Church was never founded upon the shifting sands of an ambiguous dialogue, but upon the rock of the faith of Peter.<br />
<br />
We ask the Most Holy Virgin Mary to hasten the dawning of that day, and we pray, above all, that Your Holiness may experience this joy and consolation as soon as possible.<br />
<br />
In the meantime, if You are able, despite Your recent decision, bless us as Your sons. For us, nothing has changed, and nothing ever will change.<br />
<br />
Trusting in Divine Providence, from which nothing is hidden and which reads into the depths of every man's heart,<br />
<br />
I remain, Most Holy Father, your most devoted son in the Lord.<br />
<br />
Don Davide Pagliarani]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Recusant: An Analysis of Fr. Pagliarani's Consecrations Sermon]]></title>
			<link>https://thecatacombs.org/showthread.php?tid=8582</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 11:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://thecatacombs.org/member.php?action=profile&uid=1">Stone</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thecatacombs.org/showthread.php?tid=8582</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[The following are taken from <a href="https://thecatacombs.org/showthread.php?tid=8580&amp;pid=15950#pid15950" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url"><span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">The Recusant</span> - Issue #66 Summer 2026</a>. As found in this issue, the Analysis of Fr. Pagliarani's sermon is preceded by Archbishop Lefebvre's Consecration sermon of 1988:<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Not the first time we have printed this sermon: but it is certainly worth revisiting. Compare it to the spirit of the modern SSPX and the sermon delivered recently at Écône.</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre:<br />
Episcopal Consecrations Sermon <br />
Écône, 30th June 1988</span><br />
<br />
In the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. Amen.<br />
<br />
Your Excellency, dear Bishop de Castro Mayer, my most dear friends, my dear brethren,<br />
<br />
Behold, here we are gathered for a ceremony which is certainly historic. Let me, first of all, give you some information.<br />
<br />
The first might surprise you a little, as it did me. Yesterday evening, a visitor came, sent from the Nunciature in Berne, with an envelope containing an appeal from our Holy Father the Pope, who was putting at my disposal a car which was supposed to take me to Rome yesterday evening, so that I would not be able to perform these consecrations today. I was told neither for what reason, nor where I had to go! I leave you to judge for yourselves the timeliness and wisdom of such a request.<br />
<br />
I went to Rome for many, many days during the past year, even for weeks; the Holy Father did not invite me to come and see him. I would certainly have been glad to see him if some agreement would have been finalized. So here you have the information. I give it to you simply, as I myself came to know it, through the letter from the Nunciature.<br />
<br />
Now, some indications concerning the ceremony and some relevant documents regarding its significance.<br />
<br />
The future bishops have already sworn in my hands the oath which you find in the little booklet on the ceremony of consecration which some of you have. Thus, this oath has already been pronounced, plus the Anti-Modernist Oath, as it was formerly prescribed for the consecration of bishops, plus the Profession of Faith. They have already taken these oaths and this profession in my hands after the retreat which took place at Sierre during these last days. Do not, therefore, be surprised if the ceremony begins with the interrogations on the Faith, the Faith which the Church asks from those who are to be consecrated.<br />
<br />
I also want to let you know that, after the ceremony, you will be able to ask the blessing of the bishops and kiss their rings. It is not the custom in the Church to kiss the hands of a bishop, as one kisses the hands of a newly-ordained priest, as you did yesterday. But the faithful may ask for their blessing and kiss their ring.<br />
<br />
Lastly, you have at your disposal at the bookstall some books and flyers which contain all the elements necessary to help you better understand why this ceremony, which is apparently done against the will of Rome, is in no way a schism. We are not schismatics! If an excommunication was pronounced against the bishops of China, who separated themselves from Rome and put themselves under the Chinese government, one very easily understands why Pope Pius XII excommunicated them. There is no question of us separating ourselves from Rome, nor of putting ourselves under a foreign government, nor of establishing a sort of parallel church as the Bishops of Palmar de Troya have done in Spain. They have even elected a pope, formed a college of cardinals... It is out of the question for us to do such things. Far from us be this miserable thought of separating ourselves from Rome!<br />
<br />
On the contrary, it is in order to manifest our attachment to Rome that we are performing this ceremony. It is in order to manifest our attachment to Eternal Rome, to the Pope, and to all those who have preceded these last Popes who, unfortunately since the Second Vatican Council, have thought it their duty to adhere to grievous errors which are demolishing the Church and the Catholic Priesthood.<br />
<br />
Thus you will find among these flyers which are put at your disposal, an admirable study done by Professor Georg May, President of the Seminary of Canon Law in the University of Mainz in Germany, who marvellously explains why we are in a case of necessity: necessity to come and help your souls, to help you! Your applause a while ago was, I think, not a purely temporal manifestation; it was rather a spiritual manifestation, expressing your joy to have at last Catholic bishops and priests who are dedicated to the salvation of your souls, to giving to your souls the Life of Our Lord Jesus Christ, through good doctrine, through the Sacraments, through the Faith, through the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. You need this Life of Our Lord Jesus Christ to go to heaven. This Life of Our Lord Jesus Christ is disappearing everywhere in the conciliar church. They are following roads which are not Catholic roads: they simply lead to apostasy.<br />
<br />
This is why we do this ceremony. Far be it from me to set myself up as pope! I am simply a bishop of the Catholic Church who is continuing to transmit Catholic doctrine. I think, and this will certainly not be too far off, that you will be able to engrave on my tombstone these words of St. Paul: tradidi quod et accepi — "I have transmitted to you what I have received," nothing else. I am just the postman bringing you a letter. I did not write the letter, the message, this Word of God. God Himself wrote it; Our Lord Jesus Christ Himself gave it to us. As for us, we just handed it down, through these dear priests here present and through all those who have chosen to resist this wave of apostasy in the Church, by keeping the Eternal Faith and giving it to the faithful. We are just carriers of this Good News, of this Gospel which Our Lord Jesus Christ gave to us, as well as of the means of sanctification: the Holy Mass, the true Holy Mass, the true Sacraments which truly give the spiritual life.<br />
<br />
It seems to me, my dear brethren, that I am hearing the voices of all these Popes since Gregory XVI, Pius IX, Leo XIII, St. Pius X, Benedict XV, Pius XI, Pius XII, telling us: "Please, we beseech you, what are you going to do with our teachings, with our preaching, with the Catholic Faith? Are you going to abandon it? Are you going to let it disappear from this earth? Please, please, continue to keep this treasure which we have given you. Do not abandon the faithful, do not abandon the Church! Continue the Church! Indeed, since the Council, what we condemned in the past the present Roman authorities have embraced and are professing. How is it possible? We have condemned them: Liberalism, Communism, Socialism, Modernism, Sillonism. All the errors which we have condemned are now professed, adopted and supported by the authorities of the Church. Is it possible? Unless you do something to continue this Tradition of the Church which we have given to you, all of it shall disappear. Souls shall be lost."<br />
<br />
Thus, we find ourselves in a case of necessity. We have done all we could, trying to help Rome to understand that they had to come back to the attitudes of the holy Pius XII and of all his predecessors. Bishop de Castro Mayer and myself have gone to Rome, we have spoken, we have sent letters, several times to Rome. We have tried by these talks, by all these means, to succeed in making Rome understand that, since the Council and since aggiornamento, this change which has occurred in the Church is not Catholic, is not in conformity to the doctrine of all times. This ecumenism and all these errors, this collegiality — all this is contrary to the Faith of the Church, and is in the process of destroying the Church.<br />
<br />
This is why we are convinced that, by the act of these consecrations today, we are obeying the call of these Popes and as a consequence the call of God, since they represent Our Lord Jesus Christ in the Church.<br />
<br />
"And why, Archbishop, have you stopped these discussions which seemed to have had a certain degree of success?" Well, precisely because, at the same time that I gave my signature to the Protocol, the envoy of Cardinal Ratzinger gave me a note in which I was asked to beg pardon for my errors. But if I am in error, if I teach error, it is clear that I must be brought back to the truth in the minds of those who sent me this note to sign. "That I might recognize my errors" means that, if you recognize your errors we will help you to return to the truth.<br />
<br />
What is this truth for them if not the truth of Vatican II, the truth of the conciliar church? Consequently, it is clear that the only truth that exists today for the Vatican is the conciliar truth, the spirit of the Council, the spirit of Assisi. That is the truth of today. But we will have nothing to do with this for anything in the world!<br />
<br />
That is why, taking into account the strong will of the present Roman authorities to reduce Tradition to naught, to gather the world to the spirit of Vatican II and the spirit of Assisi, we have preferred to withdraw ourselves and to say that we could not continue. It was not possible. We would have evidently been under the authority of Cardinal Ratzinger, President of the Roman Commission, which would have directed us; we were putting ourselves into his hands, and consequently putting ourselves into the hands of those who wish to draw us into the spirit of the Council and the spirit of Assisi. This was simply not possible.<br />
<br />
This is why I sent a letter to the Pope, saying to him very clearly:<br />
<br />
"We simply cannot accept this spirit and proposals, despite all the desires which we have to be in full union with you. Given this new spirit which now rules in Rome and which you wish to communicate to us, we prefer to continue in Tradition; to keep Tradition while waiting for Tradition to regain its place at Rome, while waiting for Tradition to reassume its place in the Roman authorities, in their minds."<br />
<br />
This will last for as long as the Good Lord has foreseen. It is not for me to know when Tradition will regain its rights at Rome, but I think it is my duty to provide the means of doing that which I shall call "Operation Survival," operation survival for Tradition. Today, this day, is Operation Survival. If I had made this deal with Rome, by continuing with the agreements we had signed, and by putting them into practice, I would have performed "Operation Suicide." There was no choice, we must live! That is why today, by consecrating these bishops, I am convinced that I am continuing to keep Tradition alive, that is to say, the Catholic Church.<br />
<br />
You well know, my dear brethren, that there can be no priests without bishops. When God calls me — no doubt this will be before long — from whom would these seminarians receive the Sacrament of Holy Orders? From conciliar bishops, who, due to their doubtful intentions, confer doubtful sacraments? This is not possible. Who are the bishops who have truly kept Tradition and the Sacraments such as the Church has conferred them for twenty centuries until Vatican II? They are Bishop de Castro Mayer and myself. I cannot change that. That is how it is. Hence, many seminarians have entrusted themselves to us, they sensed that here was the continuity of the Church, the continuity of Tradition. And they came to our seminaries, despite all the difficulties that they have encountered, in order to receive a true ordination to the priesthood, to say the true Sacrifice of Calvary, the true Sacrifice of the Mass, and to give you the true Sacraments, true doctrine, the true catechism. This is the goal of these seminaries.<br />
<br />
So I cannot, in good conscience, leave these seminarians orphaned. Neither can I leave you orphans by dying without providing for the future. That is not possible. It would be contrary to my duty.<br />
<br />
This is why we have chosen, with the grace of God, priests from our Society who have seemed to us to be the most apt, whilst being in circumstances and in functions which permit them more easily to fulfil their episcopal ministry, to give Confirmation to your children, and to be able to confer ordinations in our various seminaries. Thus I believe that — with the grace of God, we, Bishop de Castro Mayer and myself, by these consecrations, will have given to Tradition the means to continue, given the means to Catholics who desire to remain within the Church of their parents, their grandparents, of their ancestors. They built churches with beautiful altars, often destroyed and replaced by a table, thus manifesting the radical change which has come about since the Council regarding the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass which is the heart of the Church and the purpose of the priesthood. Thus we wish to thank you for having come in such numbers to support us in the accomplishment of this ceremony.<br />
<br />
We turn to the Blessed Virgin Mary. You well know, my dear brethren, one must have told you of Leo XIII's prophetic vision revealing that one day "the See of Peter would become the seat of iniquity." He said it in one of his exorcisms, called "The Exorcism of Leo XIII." Has it come about today? Is it tomorrow? I do not know. But in any case it has been foretold. Iniquity may quite simply be error. Error is iniquity: to no longer profess the Faith of all time, the Catholic Faith, is a grave error. If ever there was an iniquity, it is this. And I really believe that there has never been a greater iniquity in the Church than Assisi, which is contrary to the First Commandment of God and the First Article of the Creed. It is incredible that something like that could have ever taken place in the Church, in the eyes of the whole Church — how humiliating! We have never undergone such a humiliation! You will be able to find all of this in [Daniel] Le Roux's booklet ["Peter Lovest-Thou Me?"] which has been especially published in order to give you information on the present situation in Rome.<br />
<br />
It was not only the good Pope Leo XIII who said these things, but Our Lady prophesied them as well. Just recently, the priest who takes care of the Society's priory of Bogota, Colombia, brought me a book concerning the apparition of Our Lady of Buon Suceso, of "Good Success," to whom a large church in Quito, Ecuador, was dedicated. They were received by a nun shortly after the Council of Trent, so you see, quite a few centuries ago. This apparition has been thoroughly recognized by Rome and the ecclesiastical authorities; a magnificent church was built for the Blessed Virgin Mary wherein the faithful of Ecuador venerate with great devotion a picture of Our Lady, whose face was made miraculously. The artist was in the process of painting it when he found the face of the Holy Virgin miraculously formed. And Our Lady prophesied for the twentieth century, saying explicitly that during the nineteenth century and most of the twentieth century, errors would become more and more widespread in Holy Church, placing the Church in a catastrophic situation. Morals would become corrupt and the Faith would disappear. It seems impossible not to see it happening today.<br />
<br />
I excuse myself for continuing this account of the apparition but she speaks of a prelate who will absolutely oppose this wave of apostasy and impiety — saving the priesthood by forming good priests. I do not say that prophecy refers to me. You may draw your own conclusions. I was stupefied when reading these lines but I cannot deny them, since they are recorded and deposited in the archives of this apparition.<br />
<br />
Of course, you well know the apparitions of Our Lady at La Salette, where she says that Rome will lose the Faith, that there will be an "eclipse" at Rome; an eclipse, see what Our Lady means by this.<br />
<br />
And finally, more recently, the secret of Fatima. Without a doubt, the Third Secret of Fatima must have made an allusion to this darkness which has invaded Rome, this darkness which has invaded the world since the Council. And surely it is because of this, without a doubt, that John XXIII judged it better not to publish the Secret: it would have been necessary to take measures, such steps as he possibly felt himself incapable of doing, for example completely changing the orientations which he was beginning to take in view of the Council, and for the Council. These are the facts upon which, I think, we can lean.<br />
<br />
We place ourselves in God's providence. We are convinced that God knows what He is doing. Cardinal Gagnon visited us twelve years after the suspension: after twelve years of being spoken of as outside of the communion of Rome, as rebels and dissenters against the Pope, his visit took place. He himself recognized that what we have been doing is just what is necessary for the reconstruction of the Church. The Cardinal even assisted pontifically at the Mass which I celebrated on December 8, 1987, for the renewal of the promises of our seminarians. I was supposedly suspended and, yet, after twelve years, I was practically given a clean slate. They said we have done well. Thus we did well to resist! I am convinced that we are in the same circumstances today. We are performing an act which apparently — and unfortunately the media will not assist us in the good sense, the headlines will, of course, be "Schism!" "Excommunication!" to their heart's content — and, yet, we are convinced that all these accusations of which we are the object, all penalties of which we are the object, are null, absolutely null and void, and we will take no account of them. Just as I took no account of the suspension, and ended up by being congratulated by the Church and by progressive churchmen, so likewise in several years — I do not know how many, only the Good Lord knows how many years it will take for Tradition to find its rights in Rome — we will be embraced by the Roman authorities, who will thank us for having maintained the Faith in our seminaries, in our families, in civil societies, in our countries, and in our monasteries and our religious houses, for the greater glory of God and the salvation of souls.<br />
<br />
In the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. Amen.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;" class="mycode_align"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">☩ ☩ ☩</span></div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;" class="mycode_align"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">An Analysis of Fr. Pagliarani's Consecrations Sermon</span><br />
Écône — 1st July, 2026</div>
<br />
Source: <a href="https://fsspx.news/en/news/econe-2026-fr-pagliaranis-sermon-episcopal-consecrations-59927" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://fsspx.news/en/news/econe-2026-fr...ions-59927</a><br />
and: <a href="https://youtu.be/5EURjpGfKEA?" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://youtu.be/5EURjpGfKEA?</a><br />
<br />
[Emphasis - <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">The Catacombs</span>]<br />
<br />
<br />
Because it is so long and uninspiring, we will forgo our usual habit of reproducing the entire text at length. I have read it thoroughly, more than once, so that you don't have to! The reader who wishes to read the whole thing for himself will find it without difficulty on several SSPX websites, including those linked above.<br />
<br />
Fr. Pagliarani begins his sermon by posing a rhetorical question:<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"What is the significance of this day, precisely? Why are we here? How are we to understand these consecrations? ... What does this mean for us?"</blockquote>
<br />
...to which he then goes on to provide his own answer. He provides a superficial three part answer whose structure is to talk about Faith, Hope and Charity. <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">"First of all, this ceremony must be a manifestation of [the] faith,"</span> he says. Good, that looks promising.<span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i"> "We cannot modify, reinterpret, or reconsider it,"</span> he adds. This looks very promising. All he has to do now is point out where the attack on the Faith is coming from and the justification for the SSPX disobeying modern Rome will become almost self-evident.<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">1. Faith — no mention of the conciliar elephant in the room</span><br />
<br />
Alas, that second shoe never drops. Fr. Pagliarani never gets around to saying why anyone might risk altering or modifying the Faith. Where is the pressure coming from to alter the Faith? Who has been modifying or reinterpreting the Faith in recent years? He does not say.<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"The more the Faith is attacked, the more it disappears, the more this duty becomes urgent, because, without the Faith, it is impossible to please God, it is impossible to live well, it is impossible to be saved. And today we are taking exceptional measures, proportionate to this necessity."</blockquote>
<br />
Attacked by whom, one wonders? Whence does this "necessity" arise?<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"Now, some might consider that we are faced with a dilemma. We are choosing the integral Faith, but we are separating ourselves from the Church. We would be in the process of choosing between the Faith and the Church. In order to preserve the Faith, are we breaking with the Church? This is a false dilemma. We belong to the Church first of all through the Faith, through the integral profession of the Faith, through the integral profession of the Faith of the Church. ... we belong to the Church because we profess the same Faith. It is therefore a false dilemma into which we cannot enter, because we cannot choose between the Faith and the Church; no one can choose. We want the Faith of the Church in order to remain in the Church. We want the Church through the Faith, in the Faith."</blockquote>
<br />
Wouldn't this be the ideal moment to remind people that the "church" which declared Archbishop Lefebvre schismatic is the conciliar church? But no, that distinction is never made. There is no mention, no hint of such a thing as the conciliar church, just "the Church" without any distinction. And yet that is the real reason for the "false dilemma" which he mentions: what is being asked, <span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">what was demanded of Archbishop Lefebvre back in the day, is to put the conciliar church before the Catholic Faith</span></span>. But because Fr. Pagliarani doesn't say this, his point about a false dilemma remains rather unclear.<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"It is very important to understand this, even if those facing us do not wish to understand it. All of this is not a matter of opinion, it is not a matter of personal sensibility, nor an option: it is a necessity."</blockquote>
<br />
Again, what is this "necessity" and what is its cause?<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"We are accused of not loving the Pope, we are accused of not respecting him. But it is precisely because we love the Pope, sincerely, as the Vicar of Christ, as the head of the Church, that we no longer wish to see the Pope humiliated in the company of false shepherds, representatives of false religions. How many times have we seen this throughout all these years?"</blockquote>
<br />
So it's not that we're at war with a conciliar church which hates the Catholic Church and has tried to supplant it? It's that we just love the Pope so much ("Wuv, wuv, wuv!") and don't want to see him humiliated. Not that he himself is the instigator of his own humiliation? Not that his own humiliation is the least of the evils which he personally is inflicting on everyone else?<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"It is because we love the Vicar of Christ that we no longer wish this humiliation for the Pope, a humiliation which falls upon the whole Church, treated on an equal footing with false religions."</blockquote>
<br />
Doesn't this make it sound as though the Pope (Leo, as it happens, but Francis before him, and the other conciliar Popes before him…) is somehow a passive victim of "this humiliation" and not its main instigator? And where does this being treated "on an equal footing with all [false] religions" come from, one wonders? Could it perhaps be that there was an event in the 1960s, say, a Council, for instance, at which a false doctrine was proclaimed, let's call it… oh, I don't know, Ecumenism? Could there be a more obvious elephant in the room?<br />
<br />
He continues:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"But then, we have explained all of this many times. We have explained it in almost every language that exists on the face of the earth. Why are we not understood? Why, fundamentally, do we speak different languages? ... We speak the language of the Faith, the language of Tradition. And, before us, we are dealing with a language which operates at another level, which speaks of other things. It is the language of inclusion, of listening, of dialogue and of accompaniment."</blockquote>
<br />
So the problem in the Church, the cause of the crisis, the justification for the "necessity" of these new consecrations, is that people (who, exactly?) are using "the language of inclusion, of listening, of dialogue"…? If you were a convert new to Tradition, or a potential convert, how clear would you find this? <span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color">Fr. Pagliarani is clearly avoiding naming the problem, the cause of the crisis in the Church: Vatican II</span>. And whilst it is true that the SSPX, for the most part, does still "speak the language of Tradition," what that means in practice is that it still uses lots of "Traditional Catholic" vocabulary. For the most part. But even that is beginning to fall by the wayside. <span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">And I still haven't seen any mention of the conciliar church or even of Vatican II yet.</span></span><br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"We want the Faith. And then, in the Faith, we accompany people. We listen to people in the Faith, in order to bring them to the Faith and to convert them."</blockquote>
<br />
How's that for a new motto, a new mission statement for the modern, liberal SSPX? "We accompany people in the Faith"…!<br />
<br />
After once again lamenting a vague and unspecified "difficulty in understanding one another" because "we speak different languages," Fr. Pagliarani moves on from Faith to Hope.<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">2. Hope! (and Joy!)</span><br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"We also live these consecrations in hope. We do not live them in controversy, nor in tension, nor in bitterness, nor in resentment. We live these consecrations in joy and in hope."</blockquote>
<br />
Oh thank goodness! Don't you just hate controversy and tension! And who doesn't love joy and hope?<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"In 1988, those who condemned the Society foresaw its dissolution. Providence had another plan. Why did Providence have another plan? Your presence here today demonstrates it. God has not abandoned us, and God will not abandon us."</blockquote>
<br />
True. But you can abandon Him: surely that is the more relevant point. You may be the same SSPX in purely worldly, legal, corporate terms, but you are a long way from 1988 in spirit. He then mentions the Incarnation, concerning which he adds:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"Because the supreme law, the law of God, is the salvation of souls. This is why God has not abandoned us and will not abandon us; He will always provide us with means proportionate to our needs. If the work of the Redemption can encounter obstacles on the part of men, it will never encounter obstacles on the part of God. But the more we suffer, the more we struggle, the more we strive to be faithful to Him, the more He is with us, and He shows us this."</blockquote>
<br />
Also true. <span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color">But again, <span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">the question you should be asking is not whether God has whimsically decided to abandon you, but whether you have remained faithful to Him</span>. And I mean institutionally faithful</span>, not merely faithful on a level of personal sin (of which we are all guilty).<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"If we continue to seek the will of God, the good of souls, whatever the cost, we shall never lack anything."</blockquote>
<br />
Was it the will of God that SSPX faithful get the covid vaccines? Was that for the good of their souls? Is declaring that Vatican II "enlightens and deepens" Tradition an example of remaining faithful to him, or that the New Mass and new conciliar rites were "legitimately promulgated by Popes Paul VI and John Paul II"…? We could go on. Fine words do not a faithful servant make. Talk is cheap. Actions speak louder than words. Anyone can preach a sermon about how we need to remain faithful to Almighty God — practicing it is another matter.<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">3. "Charity"</span><br />
<br />
Last of all comes charity.<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"But above all, these consecrations must be understood and lived in a spirit of charity: charity towards souls, and charity above all towards the Church. The more souls are disoriented and confused, the more we must seek them, the more we must support them."</blockquote>
<br />
Charity towards which "church"? The Catholic Church, or the conciliar church? And just why is it that so many souls are confused and disoriented like never before? That elephant is still there!<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"The more the Church is dishonoured, the more the splendour of her divinity is obscured, the more we must love her, we must serve her, and we must be ready to pay any price to serve the Church."</blockquote>
<br />
Dishonoured by whom, and why? What exactly is the problem, what is going on in the Church — is anyone any the wiser so far?<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"The greatest of the sacrifices that God can ask of us is that of being treated as rebels, when we want to serve and love the Church as a Mother."</blockquote>
<br />
Doesn't it sound as though the "Church" which treats us as rebels is the exact same "Church" which we are trying "to serve and love"? To anyone new to the SSPX who is not familiar with Archbishop Lefebvre, this must be so confusing!<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"We want to serve her as a Mother. A Mother in difficulty, overwhelmed, suffering; a Mother who is also sometimes betrayed; a Mother who needs, and deserves, that we help her, that we do something in the name of all that she has given us."</blockquote>
<br />
In difficulty with what? Overwhelmed by what, suffering from what? Betrayed by whom?<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"Everything that we have received, we have received through the Church, in the Church. The Faith which we wish to bear witness to today and by which we wish to live comes to us from the Church. It is in the name of what we have received from her, and it is in the name of what she is — the Spouse of Christ, His Mystical Body — it is in the name of all this that we must do what is possible, as much as possible, to help and support her."</blockquote>
<br />
Help her and support her — it sounds like she's in serious difficulty! Do tell more…<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"Could we remain indifferent, doing nothing? 'It is not our problem'? That is not what is asked of us. Can the Society remain indifferent? No. That would be to betray the Church, that would be to lack charity; we cannot do this."</blockquote>
<br />
Indifferent to what, exactly? Are you getting the picture, dear reader? How very tedious this all is. If you feel frustrated reading it, just imagine how I feel reading it, analysing it and writing about it! The next few minutes of the sermon are standard stuff. The Precious Blood. Sin is evil, evil is sin, and so forth. Then things begin to get a bit more interesting.<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">The Exaltation of Man</span><br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"[There is] one particular sin to which I draw your attention. This sin is always the same, from the beginning of humanity until today: it is the exaltation of man. We are saturated, we are literally saturated everywhere with this exaltation of man. Man who is altogether wonderful, man who is perfect, man who is astonishing, man who supposedly possesses infinite dignity. Well, in reality, all of this leads to pride. And, in the long term, it leads to contempt for God and to apostasy, to silent apostasy. That is where it comes from.<br />
<br />
And the more man is exalted in a mad, fanatical way, the more, ultimately, he is distanced from God, and he is distanced from his perfection and his true good; it is a disaster. Man, full of rights, full of himself, incapable of turning towards God, incapable of recognising that he is wounded by sin and that he needs the Redemption. He needs Our Lord, he needs His Most Precious Blood. This is the great evil of today, of all history: the evil which encompasses all the others. This plague is a scourge, an obsessive idea which, it must be acknowledged, penetrates deeply even into the Church. This plague makes people blind; it paralyses souls. This is not what brings souls back to God."</blockquote>
<br />
<span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color">This is the closest Fr. Pagliarani gets to naming the Council, the errors of Vatican II, the conciliar church and its false teaching, and all the rest.<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b"> And of course, he doesn't name any of those things</span>.</span> As before, one is left wondering whether this "saturation" leading to "silent apostasy" has always been such a big problem, or whether it got worse recently (since the 1960s, for instance?). He does say that it is "the great evil of today" — but then he adds "of all history." So I guess there's nothing particularly bad about how things are today compared with a few hundred years ago, then? If it is such a "plague" and "a scourge" then surely it would be worthwhile naming the sources of this plague, this scourge, especially if it has somehow penetrated "deeply even into the Church" (and how and when did that happen, one wonders?).<br />
<br />
Then comes more about the Incarnation, the Redemption. Nothing wrong with it, but it is unremarkable in itself. The Precious Blood and the Blessed Virgin Mary and the Cross. The new bishops will have a responsibility to preach those things, he says. "<span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">What an honour, and what a responsibility!</span>" <span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color">All very well and good, but <span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">nothing that one might not hear at the FSSP or certain conservative <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Novus Ordo</span> parishes — and if ever there was a time to point out what is unique about the SSPX then surely these episcopal consecrations would be that moment</span>. But that is what he studiously avoids doing.</span><br />
<br />
The Cross, he says, is "<span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">a stumbling block for the Jews and folly for the Gentiles. Folly, especially today, for an apostate world which cannot understand and does not want to understand</span>." Aha, so is the world apostate in a way that it didn't used to be, is that what you're saying? If only he were able to elaborate!<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"This wisdom of the Cross is the only antidote to this humanism which leads to indifference, to apostasy. You must always keep this humanism in your sights."</blockquote>
<br />
Humanism is an easy target, a low hanging fruit. What we all need to hear is who is pushing it and why, and how they have succeeded, and how we can most effectively fight against it. <span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color">Imagine if Archbishop Lefebvre in 1988 had confined himself to preaching against a nameless, amorphous "humanism"! </span>After this there follows more standard and frankly uninspiringly "normal" sermony-type stuff. Our Lord is a lamb, what a beautiful image, the new bishops are like lambs sent amongst wolves (*yawn*), and so forth. Then comes a lot of very fine talk which is the very worst type of hypocrisy.<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">Preaching what none of them practice</span><br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"This means that you must first preach through the innocence of your life; it is the innocence, the purity of your life, of your morals, which will give a moral authority to everything that you will preach."</blockquote>
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b"><span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color">Here is a timely reminder that the man preaching about purity of morals is the very same man who publicly endorsed the taking of covid vaccines less than five years ago.</span></span> <span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color">Every single Traditional Catholic who lost his job over those wretched "vaccines" was <span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">betrayed by Fr. Davide Pagliarani's craven submission</span> to government tyranny and the will of men such as Bill Gates. There was even a group of <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Novus Ordo</span> bishops who said not to get those vaccines! But Fr. Pagliarani, knowing all that, not only put out articles in all the SSPX publications, he even went in person to the Angelus conference and told everyone that it was fine, we can go ahead and have them. Worse, the SSPX openly cited as its justification for this the documents produced by the modernist Vatican whitewashing covid vaccines.</span> What a lot of insincere hypocrisy. Clearly talk really is cheap, and actions really do speak louder than words.<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"To be a lamb also means, and above all, perfect docility, perfect submission to the will of God. Just as Our Lord is constantly subject to the will of His Father, so you, by virtue of an even higher dignity from today onwards, must always seek His will."</blockquote>
<br />
More empty, cheap, insincere and hypocritical talk. Let us not forget: <span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color">when Bishop Fellay was the Superior General he openly admitted to changing the entire stance of the SSPX towards modernist Rome in the March 2012 <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Cor Unum</span> and then on American TV and on youtube in various interviews. This was a monumental act of betrayal, of disobedience to the previous SSPX Chapter which he was bound in conscience to obey and about as far from "perfect docility, perfect submission" as one can imagine. The 2012 General Chapter which met a few weeks later, to its lasting shame, let him off the hook without so much as a slap on the wrist, largely at the instigation of — guess who? — that's right! — Fr. Davide Pagliarani, who was at that point District Superior of Italy.</span> It should be clear by now to anyone who has been paying attention, that in the modern, liberal SSPX of 2026, "perfect docility, perfect submission to the will of God" really means: "Obey your superiors without question at all times, even if they contradict the will of God, even if they contradict what even they themselves were saying not so long ago!"<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"... Our Lord, just as He is perfectly docile to the will of the Father, so He never bends before the spirit of the world. In order to serve the Father perfectly, He necessarily comes into conflict with the spirit of the world, with the spirit of the prince of this world. And likewise the bishop: just as he is docile to the will of God, so he constantly asserts before the world the rights of Our Lord, and not the rights of man. And a lion never flees, a lion does not retreat and, above all, a lion does not bend. Never bend before this spirit of the world, do not move, do not retreat; the consecration will give you an irresistible strength. From today onwards, throughout the whole world, there are people who are watching you, listening to you. In thirty, forty years, they must be able to say: They did not bend. They did not bend the knee before this spirit of the world. They bent the knee only before Our Lord the King."</blockquote>
<br />
<span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color">The irony here, of course, is that that is a pretty good description of Archbishop Lefebvre. It is a laughable description of the inoffensive, politically correct SSPX of 2026, however.</span> When was the last time a priest of the SSPX preached against the rainbow flag movement, or the evils of feminism, or the secret societies and their global conspiracy, or even the errors of the local diocese? <span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color">Given that we are now most of the way through the sermon and there has still been no mention at all of Vatican II, the conciliar church, the New Mass, the new sacramental rites, or any of the errors of the modern conciliar churchmen even once, all this talk of not bending is just yet more cheap hypocrisy. This entire sermon is one giant act of bending! He has carefully crafted the sermon so as to make it look like he's saying the right things to his own people whilst also saying as little as possible to which the modernists in Rome could object. </span>Thirty-seven minutes of bending, and in the middle of it all he tells the new bishops not to bend. Besides which, if they were the sort of men who refuse to bend then they wouldn't have been chosen in the first place! In fact, these days, one suspects, such men wouldn't even manage to get to the end of seminary and be ordained to the priesthood, let alone be selected to become bishops!<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"They did not bend … That is the most beautiful thing that could be said about you at your death, the most beautiful memory that you could leave."</blockquote>
<br />
<span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Tradidi quod et accepi</span> is a fitting motto for Archbishop Lefebvre's tomb. I would suggest as a motto for Fr. Pagliarani and his confreres when the time comes, a more fitting motto would perhaps be <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Prodidimus quod accepimus et aliud tradidimus</span>. They really are no different to the conciliar bishops of the 1970s in that regard.<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"Why must a bishop be like a serpent? It is in order to discern, grasp, and detect the duplicity, ambiguity, and cunning that exist in the world and among the enemies of the Cross. Your worst enemies will not attack you head-on; they will try to make you slide gradually into a perception of the Faith, of the Christian life, and of relations with the world that is a little more up to date. That must be understood."</blockquote>
<br />
Once again — oh the irony, the hypocrisy! Do we really have to point it out? There is a timeless truth here: <span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color">the greatest danger is usually the most subtle. The greatest danger to the SSPX faithful is not the modernism of Pope Francis or Pope Leo, but the far more subtle modernism of the SSPX, of Bishop Fellay, Fr. Pagliarani et al. Just as the modernism of the SSPX was never as dangerous to the Resistance faithful and priests as the modernism of Bishop Williamson. <span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">The more subtle and the closer to home, the greater the danger.</span> The evil modernists in Rome conquered and neutralised the SSPX, as Fr. Pagliarani says, not by attacking it head on, but by sweet words, tasty cashew nuts and flattering gestures.</span> Hence the SSPX of today has indeed slid "into a perception of the Faith, of the Christian life, and of relations with the world that is a little more up to date." He stands condemned from his own mouth.<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"This is what it means to be like a serpent: to grasp the duplicity, the ambiguity, and the cunning that exist in the world, and to speak, to preach like doves: simply, without duplicity and without fear, without equivocation, without ambiguity."</blockquote>
<br />
<span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color">To preach simply, without duplicity or fear or equivocation or ambiguity? What would that look like in practice? It would mean attacking Vatican II, attacking the current modernist authorities, pointing out that their sacraments are doubtful and their intentions evil and not to be trusted. It would mean pointing out that the last seven Popes in a row stand condemned by their predecessors. </span>Once again, this is an accurate description of Archbishop Lefebvre but has nothing in common with the man preaching these fine words in 2026 nor the priestly society of which he is the superior. He is preaching an ambiguous, equivocal and (in all likelihood) duplicitous and fearful sermon, and in the midst of it this is the advice he gives them.<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"And what else does Jesus say, what does Our Lord say? 'The brother shall deliver up his brother, the father his child, and you shall be hated by all because of Me, because of My name. Do not fear all this, for there is nothing hidden that will not be revealed, nothing secret that will not be known.' 'Do not fear all this,' Our Lord tells us. 'Let Me act, let Me judge; I Myself will intervene when necessary.' He has only one concern. What is it? 'Every one therefore that shall confess Me before men, I will also confess him before My Father who is in heaven.' Every man who will acknowledge My rights, My divinity, My Church, My Faith. 'Do not think that I came to send peace upon earth: I came not to send peace, but the sword.'"</blockquote>
<br />
How about the priests expelled in 2012 and 2013 merely for repeating what Archbishop Lefebvre had said, the faithful denied communion and driven out of chapels which were their spiritual homes? How's that for "brother against brother"…? And the others who heroically left before they could be expelled: why did they do that if not to confess Our Lord before men?<br />
<br />
<span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">We are at the end of the sermon now, and at this point comes the one token, throw-away mention of a name which has been conspicuously absent so far: that's right, Archbishop Lefebvre.</span> Have to get that tick in the box, can't have it said that he was never mentioned at all! Naturally, what he says about Archbishop Lefebvre is suitably vague and harmless.</span><br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"Another bishop, who is your model, closer to us, not yet canonised: Archbishop Lefebvre, certainly. Of him also one can say: <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">zelus fidei sollicitus et multa perpessus</span>. He had only one concern: it was the Faith itself, and, for this, he suffered greatly. This Faith, he saw clearly how it is summed up in the Holy Mass, in the defence of the Holy Mass, of the Most Precious Blood of Our Lord. What wisdom! How was he able, so many years ago, to grasp the causes of the crisis with such clarity, such insight, such strength?"</blockquote>
<br />
All of which is true, but notice that no details, no specifics are given. Fr. Pagliarani says that the Archbishop "was able to grasp the cause of the crisis" but he himself still hasn't yet said what this alleged "crisis" is, let alone the cause of it! The closest he came was complaining about a "humanism" which has "penetrated even into the Church" — is that what Archbishop Lefebvre saw and grasped so clearly, or is there a bit more to it than that?<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"It is the wisdom of the Cross; the Cross that he carried was the source of his wisdom. Today, more than ever, his spirit is among us, he encourages us, he prays for us, he prays for you in particular, he shows us the path to follow, guided by this wisdom of the Cross."</blockquote>
<br />
"The path" which Archbishop Lefebvre "shows us to follow" is very simple and easy to understand and it is nowhere to be seen in this sermon, for the simple reason that Fr. Pagliarani is not following it. He is not following it because he doesn't believe in it. The Superior General of the modern, surrendered, compromised SSPX which has betrayed Archbishop Lefebvre is now telling his new bishops that Archbishop Lefebvre is showing them the way. Words fail me. I really can't take much more of this.<br />
<br />
If this has been a slog and you need some refreshment, a "palate cleanser" for your mind, or if on the other hand you are not entirely convinced and think that I may be exaggerating, then I invite you — no I urge you! — to read (or re-read) Archbishop Lefebvre's sermon from the 1988 consecrations. The difference could not be more stark, it is like chalk and cheese, like night and day. That is the example left to Fr. Pagliarani and his confreres which he totally ignores, the way shown by their founder which they departed from some time ago.<br />
<br />
<span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">Archbishop Lefebvre preached clearly and fearlessly. By contrast, Fr. Pagliarani seems to preach equivocally, ambiguously, and with an overpowering fear of offending the modernist enemy</span> which prevents him even from naming them. This is what comes of compromising the Faith, as Archbishop Lefebvre said so well about the Indultists of the late '80s.</span> Surely his words apply equally well to the SSPX today?<br />
<br />
"It is evident that by putting themselves in the hands of the current conciliar authorities, they are implicitly accepting the Council and the ensuing reforms, even if they have [the Traditional Mass] ... Their speech is paralyzed because of this acceptance." — Archbishop Lefebvre, <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Letter to Fr. Couture</span>, 18th March 1989<br />
<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;" class="mycode_align"><img src="https://i.postimg.cc/76S111X9/Two-Sermons-Summary.png" loading="lazy"  width="550" height="800" alt="[Image: Two-Sermons-Summary.png]" class="mycode_img" /></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The following are taken from <a href="https://thecatacombs.org/showthread.php?tid=8580&amp;pid=15950#pid15950" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url"><span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">The Recusant</span> - Issue #66 Summer 2026</a>. As found in this issue, the Analysis of Fr. Pagliarani's sermon is preceded by Archbishop Lefebvre's Consecration sermon of 1988:<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Not the first time we have printed this sermon: but it is certainly worth revisiting. Compare it to the spirit of the modern SSPX and the sermon delivered recently at Écône.</span><br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre:<br />
Episcopal Consecrations Sermon <br />
Écône, 30th June 1988</span><br />
<br />
In the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. Amen.<br />
<br />
Your Excellency, dear Bishop de Castro Mayer, my most dear friends, my dear brethren,<br />
<br />
Behold, here we are gathered for a ceremony which is certainly historic. Let me, first of all, give you some information.<br />
<br />
The first might surprise you a little, as it did me. Yesterday evening, a visitor came, sent from the Nunciature in Berne, with an envelope containing an appeal from our Holy Father the Pope, who was putting at my disposal a car which was supposed to take me to Rome yesterday evening, so that I would not be able to perform these consecrations today. I was told neither for what reason, nor where I had to go! I leave you to judge for yourselves the timeliness and wisdom of such a request.<br />
<br />
I went to Rome for many, many days during the past year, even for weeks; the Holy Father did not invite me to come and see him. I would certainly have been glad to see him if some agreement would have been finalized. So here you have the information. I give it to you simply, as I myself came to know it, through the letter from the Nunciature.<br />
<br />
Now, some indications concerning the ceremony and some relevant documents regarding its significance.<br />
<br />
The future bishops have already sworn in my hands the oath which you find in the little booklet on the ceremony of consecration which some of you have. Thus, this oath has already been pronounced, plus the Anti-Modernist Oath, as it was formerly prescribed for the consecration of bishops, plus the Profession of Faith. They have already taken these oaths and this profession in my hands after the retreat which took place at Sierre during these last days. Do not, therefore, be surprised if the ceremony begins with the interrogations on the Faith, the Faith which the Church asks from those who are to be consecrated.<br />
<br />
I also want to let you know that, after the ceremony, you will be able to ask the blessing of the bishops and kiss their rings. It is not the custom in the Church to kiss the hands of a bishop, as one kisses the hands of a newly-ordained priest, as you did yesterday. But the faithful may ask for their blessing and kiss their ring.<br />
<br />
Lastly, you have at your disposal at the bookstall some books and flyers which contain all the elements necessary to help you better understand why this ceremony, which is apparently done against the will of Rome, is in no way a schism. We are not schismatics! If an excommunication was pronounced against the bishops of China, who separated themselves from Rome and put themselves under the Chinese government, one very easily understands why Pope Pius XII excommunicated them. There is no question of us separating ourselves from Rome, nor of putting ourselves under a foreign government, nor of establishing a sort of parallel church as the Bishops of Palmar de Troya have done in Spain. They have even elected a pope, formed a college of cardinals... It is out of the question for us to do such things. Far from us be this miserable thought of separating ourselves from Rome!<br />
<br />
On the contrary, it is in order to manifest our attachment to Rome that we are performing this ceremony. It is in order to manifest our attachment to Eternal Rome, to the Pope, and to all those who have preceded these last Popes who, unfortunately since the Second Vatican Council, have thought it their duty to adhere to grievous errors which are demolishing the Church and the Catholic Priesthood.<br />
<br />
Thus you will find among these flyers which are put at your disposal, an admirable study done by Professor Georg May, President of the Seminary of Canon Law in the University of Mainz in Germany, who marvellously explains why we are in a case of necessity: necessity to come and help your souls, to help you! Your applause a while ago was, I think, not a purely temporal manifestation; it was rather a spiritual manifestation, expressing your joy to have at last Catholic bishops and priests who are dedicated to the salvation of your souls, to giving to your souls the Life of Our Lord Jesus Christ, through good doctrine, through the Sacraments, through the Faith, through the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. You need this Life of Our Lord Jesus Christ to go to heaven. This Life of Our Lord Jesus Christ is disappearing everywhere in the conciliar church. They are following roads which are not Catholic roads: they simply lead to apostasy.<br />
<br />
This is why we do this ceremony. Far be it from me to set myself up as pope! I am simply a bishop of the Catholic Church who is continuing to transmit Catholic doctrine. I think, and this will certainly not be too far off, that you will be able to engrave on my tombstone these words of St. Paul: tradidi quod et accepi — "I have transmitted to you what I have received," nothing else. I am just the postman bringing you a letter. I did not write the letter, the message, this Word of God. God Himself wrote it; Our Lord Jesus Christ Himself gave it to us. As for us, we just handed it down, through these dear priests here present and through all those who have chosen to resist this wave of apostasy in the Church, by keeping the Eternal Faith and giving it to the faithful. We are just carriers of this Good News, of this Gospel which Our Lord Jesus Christ gave to us, as well as of the means of sanctification: the Holy Mass, the true Holy Mass, the true Sacraments which truly give the spiritual life.<br />
<br />
It seems to me, my dear brethren, that I am hearing the voices of all these Popes since Gregory XVI, Pius IX, Leo XIII, St. Pius X, Benedict XV, Pius XI, Pius XII, telling us: "Please, we beseech you, what are you going to do with our teachings, with our preaching, with the Catholic Faith? Are you going to abandon it? Are you going to let it disappear from this earth? Please, please, continue to keep this treasure which we have given you. Do not abandon the faithful, do not abandon the Church! Continue the Church! Indeed, since the Council, what we condemned in the past the present Roman authorities have embraced and are professing. How is it possible? We have condemned them: Liberalism, Communism, Socialism, Modernism, Sillonism. All the errors which we have condemned are now professed, adopted and supported by the authorities of the Church. Is it possible? Unless you do something to continue this Tradition of the Church which we have given to you, all of it shall disappear. Souls shall be lost."<br />
<br />
Thus, we find ourselves in a case of necessity. We have done all we could, trying to help Rome to understand that they had to come back to the attitudes of the holy Pius XII and of all his predecessors. Bishop de Castro Mayer and myself have gone to Rome, we have spoken, we have sent letters, several times to Rome. We have tried by these talks, by all these means, to succeed in making Rome understand that, since the Council and since aggiornamento, this change which has occurred in the Church is not Catholic, is not in conformity to the doctrine of all times. This ecumenism and all these errors, this collegiality — all this is contrary to the Faith of the Church, and is in the process of destroying the Church.<br />
<br />
This is why we are convinced that, by the act of these consecrations today, we are obeying the call of these Popes and as a consequence the call of God, since they represent Our Lord Jesus Christ in the Church.<br />
<br />
"And why, Archbishop, have you stopped these discussions which seemed to have had a certain degree of success?" Well, precisely because, at the same time that I gave my signature to the Protocol, the envoy of Cardinal Ratzinger gave me a note in which I was asked to beg pardon for my errors. But if I am in error, if I teach error, it is clear that I must be brought back to the truth in the minds of those who sent me this note to sign. "That I might recognize my errors" means that, if you recognize your errors we will help you to return to the truth.<br />
<br />
What is this truth for them if not the truth of Vatican II, the truth of the conciliar church? Consequently, it is clear that the only truth that exists today for the Vatican is the conciliar truth, the spirit of the Council, the spirit of Assisi. That is the truth of today. But we will have nothing to do with this for anything in the world!<br />
<br />
That is why, taking into account the strong will of the present Roman authorities to reduce Tradition to naught, to gather the world to the spirit of Vatican II and the spirit of Assisi, we have preferred to withdraw ourselves and to say that we could not continue. It was not possible. We would have evidently been under the authority of Cardinal Ratzinger, President of the Roman Commission, which would have directed us; we were putting ourselves into his hands, and consequently putting ourselves into the hands of those who wish to draw us into the spirit of the Council and the spirit of Assisi. This was simply not possible.<br />
<br />
This is why I sent a letter to the Pope, saying to him very clearly:<br />
<br />
"We simply cannot accept this spirit and proposals, despite all the desires which we have to be in full union with you. Given this new spirit which now rules in Rome and which you wish to communicate to us, we prefer to continue in Tradition; to keep Tradition while waiting for Tradition to regain its place at Rome, while waiting for Tradition to reassume its place in the Roman authorities, in their minds."<br />
<br />
This will last for as long as the Good Lord has foreseen. It is not for me to know when Tradition will regain its rights at Rome, but I think it is my duty to provide the means of doing that which I shall call "Operation Survival," operation survival for Tradition. Today, this day, is Operation Survival. If I had made this deal with Rome, by continuing with the agreements we had signed, and by putting them into practice, I would have performed "Operation Suicide." There was no choice, we must live! That is why today, by consecrating these bishops, I am convinced that I am continuing to keep Tradition alive, that is to say, the Catholic Church.<br />
<br />
You well know, my dear brethren, that there can be no priests without bishops. When God calls me — no doubt this will be before long — from whom would these seminarians receive the Sacrament of Holy Orders? From conciliar bishops, who, due to their doubtful intentions, confer doubtful sacraments? This is not possible. Who are the bishops who have truly kept Tradition and the Sacraments such as the Church has conferred them for twenty centuries until Vatican II? They are Bishop de Castro Mayer and myself. I cannot change that. That is how it is. Hence, many seminarians have entrusted themselves to us, they sensed that here was the continuity of the Church, the continuity of Tradition. And they came to our seminaries, despite all the difficulties that they have encountered, in order to receive a true ordination to the priesthood, to say the true Sacrifice of Calvary, the true Sacrifice of the Mass, and to give you the true Sacraments, true doctrine, the true catechism. This is the goal of these seminaries.<br />
<br />
So I cannot, in good conscience, leave these seminarians orphaned. Neither can I leave you orphans by dying without providing for the future. That is not possible. It would be contrary to my duty.<br />
<br />
This is why we have chosen, with the grace of God, priests from our Society who have seemed to us to be the most apt, whilst being in circumstances and in functions which permit them more easily to fulfil their episcopal ministry, to give Confirmation to your children, and to be able to confer ordinations in our various seminaries. Thus I believe that — with the grace of God, we, Bishop de Castro Mayer and myself, by these consecrations, will have given to Tradition the means to continue, given the means to Catholics who desire to remain within the Church of their parents, their grandparents, of their ancestors. They built churches with beautiful altars, often destroyed and replaced by a table, thus manifesting the radical change which has come about since the Council regarding the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass which is the heart of the Church and the purpose of the priesthood. Thus we wish to thank you for having come in such numbers to support us in the accomplishment of this ceremony.<br />
<br />
We turn to the Blessed Virgin Mary. You well know, my dear brethren, one must have told you of Leo XIII's prophetic vision revealing that one day "the See of Peter would become the seat of iniquity." He said it in one of his exorcisms, called "The Exorcism of Leo XIII." Has it come about today? Is it tomorrow? I do not know. But in any case it has been foretold. Iniquity may quite simply be error. Error is iniquity: to no longer profess the Faith of all time, the Catholic Faith, is a grave error. If ever there was an iniquity, it is this. And I really believe that there has never been a greater iniquity in the Church than Assisi, which is contrary to the First Commandment of God and the First Article of the Creed. It is incredible that something like that could have ever taken place in the Church, in the eyes of the whole Church — how humiliating! We have never undergone such a humiliation! You will be able to find all of this in [Daniel] Le Roux's booklet ["Peter Lovest-Thou Me?"] which has been especially published in order to give you information on the present situation in Rome.<br />
<br />
It was not only the good Pope Leo XIII who said these things, but Our Lady prophesied them as well. Just recently, the priest who takes care of the Society's priory of Bogota, Colombia, brought me a book concerning the apparition of Our Lady of Buon Suceso, of "Good Success," to whom a large church in Quito, Ecuador, was dedicated. They were received by a nun shortly after the Council of Trent, so you see, quite a few centuries ago. This apparition has been thoroughly recognized by Rome and the ecclesiastical authorities; a magnificent church was built for the Blessed Virgin Mary wherein the faithful of Ecuador venerate with great devotion a picture of Our Lady, whose face was made miraculously. The artist was in the process of painting it when he found the face of the Holy Virgin miraculously formed. And Our Lady prophesied for the twentieth century, saying explicitly that during the nineteenth century and most of the twentieth century, errors would become more and more widespread in Holy Church, placing the Church in a catastrophic situation. Morals would become corrupt and the Faith would disappear. It seems impossible not to see it happening today.<br />
<br />
I excuse myself for continuing this account of the apparition but she speaks of a prelate who will absolutely oppose this wave of apostasy and impiety — saving the priesthood by forming good priests. I do not say that prophecy refers to me. You may draw your own conclusions. I was stupefied when reading these lines but I cannot deny them, since they are recorded and deposited in the archives of this apparition.<br />
<br />
Of course, you well know the apparitions of Our Lady at La Salette, where she says that Rome will lose the Faith, that there will be an "eclipse" at Rome; an eclipse, see what Our Lady means by this.<br />
<br />
And finally, more recently, the secret of Fatima. Without a doubt, the Third Secret of Fatima must have made an allusion to this darkness which has invaded Rome, this darkness which has invaded the world since the Council. And surely it is because of this, without a doubt, that John XXIII judged it better not to publish the Secret: it would have been necessary to take measures, such steps as he possibly felt himself incapable of doing, for example completely changing the orientations which he was beginning to take in view of the Council, and for the Council. These are the facts upon which, I think, we can lean.<br />
<br />
We place ourselves in God's providence. We are convinced that God knows what He is doing. Cardinal Gagnon visited us twelve years after the suspension: after twelve years of being spoken of as outside of the communion of Rome, as rebels and dissenters against the Pope, his visit took place. He himself recognized that what we have been doing is just what is necessary for the reconstruction of the Church. The Cardinal even assisted pontifically at the Mass which I celebrated on December 8, 1987, for the renewal of the promises of our seminarians. I was supposedly suspended and, yet, after twelve years, I was practically given a clean slate. They said we have done well. Thus we did well to resist! I am convinced that we are in the same circumstances today. We are performing an act which apparently — and unfortunately the media will not assist us in the good sense, the headlines will, of course, be "Schism!" "Excommunication!" to their heart's content — and, yet, we are convinced that all these accusations of which we are the object, all penalties of which we are the object, are null, absolutely null and void, and we will take no account of them. Just as I took no account of the suspension, and ended up by being congratulated by the Church and by progressive churchmen, so likewise in several years — I do not know how many, only the Good Lord knows how many years it will take for Tradition to find its rights in Rome — we will be embraced by the Roman authorities, who will thank us for having maintained the Faith in our seminaries, in our families, in civil societies, in our countries, and in our monasteries and our religious houses, for the greater glory of God and the salvation of souls.<br />
<br />
In the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. Amen.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;" class="mycode_align"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">☩ ☩ ☩</span></div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;" class="mycode_align"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">An Analysis of Fr. Pagliarani's Consecrations Sermon</span><br />
Écône — 1st July, 2026</div>
<br />
Source: <a href="https://fsspx.news/en/news/econe-2026-fr-pagliaranis-sermon-episcopal-consecrations-59927" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://fsspx.news/en/news/econe-2026-fr...ions-59927</a><br />
and: <a href="https://youtu.be/5EURjpGfKEA?" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://youtu.be/5EURjpGfKEA?</a><br />
<br />
[Emphasis - <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">The Catacombs</span>]<br />
<br />
<br />
Because it is so long and uninspiring, we will forgo our usual habit of reproducing the entire text at length. I have read it thoroughly, more than once, so that you don't have to! The reader who wishes to read the whole thing for himself will find it without difficulty on several SSPX websites, including those linked above.<br />
<br />
Fr. Pagliarani begins his sermon by posing a rhetorical question:<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"What is the significance of this day, precisely? Why are we here? How are we to understand these consecrations? ... What does this mean for us?"</blockquote>
<br />
...to which he then goes on to provide his own answer. He provides a superficial three part answer whose structure is to talk about Faith, Hope and Charity. <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">"First of all, this ceremony must be a manifestation of [the] faith,"</span> he says. Good, that looks promising.<span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i"> "We cannot modify, reinterpret, or reconsider it,"</span> he adds. This looks very promising. All he has to do now is point out where the attack on the Faith is coming from and the justification for the SSPX disobeying modern Rome will become almost self-evident.<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">1. Faith — no mention of the conciliar elephant in the room</span><br />
<br />
Alas, that second shoe never drops. Fr. Pagliarani never gets around to saying why anyone might risk altering or modifying the Faith. Where is the pressure coming from to alter the Faith? Who has been modifying or reinterpreting the Faith in recent years? He does not say.<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"The more the Faith is attacked, the more it disappears, the more this duty becomes urgent, because, without the Faith, it is impossible to please God, it is impossible to live well, it is impossible to be saved. And today we are taking exceptional measures, proportionate to this necessity."</blockquote>
<br />
Attacked by whom, one wonders? Whence does this "necessity" arise?<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"Now, some might consider that we are faced with a dilemma. We are choosing the integral Faith, but we are separating ourselves from the Church. We would be in the process of choosing between the Faith and the Church. In order to preserve the Faith, are we breaking with the Church? This is a false dilemma. We belong to the Church first of all through the Faith, through the integral profession of the Faith, through the integral profession of the Faith of the Church. ... we belong to the Church because we profess the same Faith. It is therefore a false dilemma into which we cannot enter, because we cannot choose between the Faith and the Church; no one can choose. We want the Faith of the Church in order to remain in the Church. We want the Church through the Faith, in the Faith."</blockquote>
<br />
Wouldn't this be the ideal moment to remind people that the "church" which declared Archbishop Lefebvre schismatic is the conciliar church? But no, that distinction is never made. There is no mention, no hint of such a thing as the conciliar church, just "the Church" without any distinction. And yet that is the real reason for the "false dilemma" which he mentions: what is being asked, <span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">what was demanded of Archbishop Lefebvre back in the day, is to put the conciliar church before the Catholic Faith</span></span>. But because Fr. Pagliarani doesn't say this, his point about a false dilemma remains rather unclear.<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"It is very important to understand this, even if those facing us do not wish to understand it. All of this is not a matter of opinion, it is not a matter of personal sensibility, nor an option: it is a necessity."</blockquote>
<br />
Again, what is this "necessity" and what is its cause?<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"We are accused of not loving the Pope, we are accused of not respecting him. But it is precisely because we love the Pope, sincerely, as the Vicar of Christ, as the head of the Church, that we no longer wish to see the Pope humiliated in the company of false shepherds, representatives of false religions. How many times have we seen this throughout all these years?"</blockquote>
<br />
So it's not that we're at war with a conciliar church which hates the Catholic Church and has tried to supplant it? It's that we just love the Pope so much ("Wuv, wuv, wuv!") and don't want to see him humiliated. Not that he himself is the instigator of his own humiliation? Not that his own humiliation is the least of the evils which he personally is inflicting on everyone else?<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"It is because we love the Vicar of Christ that we no longer wish this humiliation for the Pope, a humiliation which falls upon the whole Church, treated on an equal footing with false religions."</blockquote>
<br />
Doesn't this make it sound as though the Pope (Leo, as it happens, but Francis before him, and the other conciliar Popes before him…) is somehow a passive victim of "this humiliation" and not its main instigator? And where does this being treated "on an equal footing with all [false] religions" come from, one wonders? Could it perhaps be that there was an event in the 1960s, say, a Council, for instance, at which a false doctrine was proclaimed, let's call it… oh, I don't know, Ecumenism? Could there be a more obvious elephant in the room?<br />
<br />
He continues:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"But then, we have explained all of this many times. We have explained it in almost every language that exists on the face of the earth. Why are we not understood? Why, fundamentally, do we speak different languages? ... We speak the language of the Faith, the language of Tradition. And, before us, we are dealing with a language which operates at another level, which speaks of other things. It is the language of inclusion, of listening, of dialogue and of accompaniment."</blockquote>
<br />
So the problem in the Church, the cause of the crisis, the justification for the "necessity" of these new consecrations, is that people (who, exactly?) are using "the language of inclusion, of listening, of dialogue"…? If you were a convert new to Tradition, or a potential convert, how clear would you find this? <span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color">Fr. Pagliarani is clearly avoiding naming the problem, the cause of the crisis in the Church: Vatican II</span>. And whilst it is true that the SSPX, for the most part, does still "speak the language of Tradition," what that means in practice is that it still uses lots of "Traditional Catholic" vocabulary. For the most part. But even that is beginning to fall by the wayside. <span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">And I still haven't seen any mention of the conciliar church or even of Vatican II yet.</span></span><br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"We want the Faith. And then, in the Faith, we accompany people. We listen to people in the Faith, in order to bring them to the Faith and to convert them."</blockquote>
<br />
How's that for a new motto, a new mission statement for the modern, liberal SSPX? "We accompany people in the Faith"…!<br />
<br />
After once again lamenting a vague and unspecified "difficulty in understanding one another" because "we speak different languages," Fr. Pagliarani moves on from Faith to Hope.<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">2. Hope! (and Joy!)</span><br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"We also live these consecrations in hope. We do not live them in controversy, nor in tension, nor in bitterness, nor in resentment. We live these consecrations in joy and in hope."</blockquote>
<br />
Oh thank goodness! Don't you just hate controversy and tension! And who doesn't love joy and hope?<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"In 1988, those who condemned the Society foresaw its dissolution. Providence had another plan. Why did Providence have another plan? Your presence here today demonstrates it. God has not abandoned us, and God will not abandon us."</blockquote>
<br />
True. But you can abandon Him: surely that is the more relevant point. You may be the same SSPX in purely worldly, legal, corporate terms, but you are a long way from 1988 in spirit. He then mentions the Incarnation, concerning which he adds:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"Because the supreme law, the law of God, is the salvation of souls. This is why God has not abandoned us and will not abandon us; He will always provide us with means proportionate to our needs. If the work of the Redemption can encounter obstacles on the part of men, it will never encounter obstacles on the part of God. But the more we suffer, the more we struggle, the more we strive to be faithful to Him, the more He is with us, and He shows us this."</blockquote>
<br />
Also true. <span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color">But again, <span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">the question you should be asking is not whether God has whimsically decided to abandon you, but whether you have remained faithful to Him</span>. And I mean institutionally faithful</span>, not merely faithful on a level of personal sin (of which we are all guilty).<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"If we continue to seek the will of God, the good of souls, whatever the cost, we shall never lack anything."</blockquote>
<br />
Was it the will of God that SSPX faithful get the covid vaccines? Was that for the good of their souls? Is declaring that Vatican II "enlightens and deepens" Tradition an example of remaining faithful to him, or that the New Mass and new conciliar rites were "legitimately promulgated by Popes Paul VI and John Paul II"…? We could go on. Fine words do not a faithful servant make. Talk is cheap. Actions speak louder than words. Anyone can preach a sermon about how we need to remain faithful to Almighty God — practicing it is another matter.<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">3. "Charity"</span><br />
<br />
Last of all comes charity.<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"But above all, these consecrations must be understood and lived in a spirit of charity: charity towards souls, and charity above all towards the Church. The more souls are disoriented and confused, the more we must seek them, the more we must support them."</blockquote>
<br />
Charity towards which "church"? The Catholic Church, or the conciliar church? And just why is it that so many souls are confused and disoriented like never before? That elephant is still there!<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"The more the Church is dishonoured, the more the splendour of her divinity is obscured, the more we must love her, we must serve her, and we must be ready to pay any price to serve the Church."</blockquote>
<br />
Dishonoured by whom, and why? What exactly is the problem, what is going on in the Church — is anyone any the wiser so far?<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"The greatest of the sacrifices that God can ask of us is that of being treated as rebels, when we want to serve and love the Church as a Mother."</blockquote>
<br />
Doesn't it sound as though the "Church" which treats us as rebels is the exact same "Church" which we are trying "to serve and love"? To anyone new to the SSPX who is not familiar with Archbishop Lefebvre, this must be so confusing!<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"We want to serve her as a Mother. A Mother in difficulty, overwhelmed, suffering; a Mother who is also sometimes betrayed; a Mother who needs, and deserves, that we help her, that we do something in the name of all that she has given us."</blockquote>
<br />
In difficulty with what? Overwhelmed by what, suffering from what? Betrayed by whom?<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"Everything that we have received, we have received through the Church, in the Church. The Faith which we wish to bear witness to today and by which we wish to live comes to us from the Church. It is in the name of what we have received from her, and it is in the name of what she is — the Spouse of Christ, His Mystical Body — it is in the name of all this that we must do what is possible, as much as possible, to help and support her."</blockquote>
<br />
Help her and support her — it sounds like she's in serious difficulty! Do tell more…<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"Could we remain indifferent, doing nothing? 'It is not our problem'? That is not what is asked of us. Can the Society remain indifferent? No. That would be to betray the Church, that would be to lack charity; we cannot do this."</blockquote>
<br />
Indifferent to what, exactly? Are you getting the picture, dear reader? How very tedious this all is. If you feel frustrated reading it, just imagine how I feel reading it, analysing it and writing about it! The next few minutes of the sermon are standard stuff. The Precious Blood. Sin is evil, evil is sin, and so forth. Then things begin to get a bit more interesting.<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">The Exaltation of Man</span><br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"[There is] one particular sin to which I draw your attention. This sin is always the same, from the beginning of humanity until today: it is the exaltation of man. We are saturated, we are literally saturated everywhere with this exaltation of man. Man who is altogether wonderful, man who is perfect, man who is astonishing, man who supposedly possesses infinite dignity. Well, in reality, all of this leads to pride. And, in the long term, it leads to contempt for God and to apostasy, to silent apostasy. That is where it comes from.<br />
<br />
And the more man is exalted in a mad, fanatical way, the more, ultimately, he is distanced from God, and he is distanced from his perfection and his true good; it is a disaster. Man, full of rights, full of himself, incapable of turning towards God, incapable of recognising that he is wounded by sin and that he needs the Redemption. He needs Our Lord, he needs His Most Precious Blood. This is the great evil of today, of all history: the evil which encompasses all the others. This plague is a scourge, an obsessive idea which, it must be acknowledged, penetrates deeply even into the Church. This plague makes people blind; it paralyses souls. This is not what brings souls back to God."</blockquote>
<br />
<span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color">This is the closest Fr. Pagliarani gets to naming the Council, the errors of Vatican II, the conciliar church and its false teaching, and all the rest.<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b"> And of course, he doesn't name any of those things</span>.</span> As before, one is left wondering whether this "saturation" leading to "silent apostasy" has always been such a big problem, or whether it got worse recently (since the 1960s, for instance?). He does say that it is "the great evil of today" — but then he adds "of all history." So I guess there's nothing particularly bad about how things are today compared with a few hundred years ago, then? If it is such a "plague" and "a scourge" then surely it would be worthwhile naming the sources of this plague, this scourge, especially if it has somehow penetrated "deeply even into the Church" (and how and when did that happen, one wonders?).<br />
<br />
Then comes more about the Incarnation, the Redemption. Nothing wrong with it, but it is unremarkable in itself. The Precious Blood and the Blessed Virgin Mary and the Cross. The new bishops will have a responsibility to preach those things, he says. "<span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">What an honour, and what a responsibility!</span>" <span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color">All very well and good, but <span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">nothing that one might not hear at the FSSP or certain conservative <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Novus Ordo</span> parishes — and if ever there was a time to point out what is unique about the SSPX then surely these episcopal consecrations would be that moment</span>. But that is what he studiously avoids doing.</span><br />
<br />
The Cross, he says, is "<span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">a stumbling block for the Jews and folly for the Gentiles. Folly, especially today, for an apostate world which cannot understand and does not want to understand</span>." Aha, so is the world apostate in a way that it didn't used to be, is that what you're saying? If only he were able to elaborate!<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"This wisdom of the Cross is the only antidote to this humanism which leads to indifference, to apostasy. You must always keep this humanism in your sights."</blockquote>
<br />
Humanism is an easy target, a low hanging fruit. What we all need to hear is who is pushing it and why, and how they have succeeded, and how we can most effectively fight against it. <span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color">Imagine if Archbishop Lefebvre in 1988 had confined himself to preaching against a nameless, amorphous "humanism"! </span>After this there follows more standard and frankly uninspiringly "normal" sermony-type stuff. Our Lord is a lamb, what a beautiful image, the new bishops are like lambs sent amongst wolves (*yawn*), and so forth. Then comes a lot of very fine talk which is the very worst type of hypocrisy.<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">Preaching what none of them practice</span><br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"This means that you must first preach through the innocence of your life; it is the innocence, the purity of your life, of your morals, which will give a moral authority to everything that you will preach."</blockquote>
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b"><span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color">Here is a timely reminder that the man preaching about purity of morals is the very same man who publicly endorsed the taking of covid vaccines less than five years ago.</span></span> <span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color">Every single Traditional Catholic who lost his job over those wretched "vaccines" was <span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">betrayed by Fr. Davide Pagliarani's craven submission</span> to government tyranny and the will of men such as Bill Gates. There was even a group of <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Novus Ordo</span> bishops who said not to get those vaccines! But Fr. Pagliarani, knowing all that, not only put out articles in all the SSPX publications, he even went in person to the Angelus conference and told everyone that it was fine, we can go ahead and have them. Worse, the SSPX openly cited as its justification for this the documents produced by the modernist Vatican whitewashing covid vaccines.</span> What a lot of insincere hypocrisy. Clearly talk really is cheap, and actions really do speak louder than words.<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"To be a lamb also means, and above all, perfect docility, perfect submission to the will of God. Just as Our Lord is constantly subject to the will of His Father, so you, by virtue of an even higher dignity from today onwards, must always seek His will."</blockquote>
<br />
More empty, cheap, insincere and hypocritical talk. Let us not forget: <span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color">when Bishop Fellay was the Superior General he openly admitted to changing the entire stance of the SSPX towards modernist Rome in the March 2012 <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Cor Unum</span> and then on American TV and on youtube in various interviews. This was a monumental act of betrayal, of disobedience to the previous SSPX Chapter which he was bound in conscience to obey and about as far from "perfect docility, perfect submission" as one can imagine. The 2012 General Chapter which met a few weeks later, to its lasting shame, let him off the hook without so much as a slap on the wrist, largely at the instigation of — guess who? — that's right! — Fr. Davide Pagliarani, who was at that point District Superior of Italy.</span> It should be clear by now to anyone who has been paying attention, that in the modern, liberal SSPX of 2026, "perfect docility, perfect submission to the will of God" really means: "Obey your superiors without question at all times, even if they contradict the will of God, even if they contradict what even they themselves were saying not so long ago!"<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"... Our Lord, just as He is perfectly docile to the will of the Father, so He never bends before the spirit of the world. In order to serve the Father perfectly, He necessarily comes into conflict with the spirit of the world, with the spirit of the prince of this world. And likewise the bishop: just as he is docile to the will of God, so he constantly asserts before the world the rights of Our Lord, and not the rights of man. And a lion never flees, a lion does not retreat and, above all, a lion does not bend. Never bend before this spirit of the world, do not move, do not retreat; the consecration will give you an irresistible strength. From today onwards, throughout the whole world, there are people who are watching you, listening to you. In thirty, forty years, they must be able to say: They did not bend. They did not bend the knee before this spirit of the world. They bent the knee only before Our Lord the King."</blockquote>
<br />
<span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color">The irony here, of course, is that that is a pretty good description of Archbishop Lefebvre. It is a laughable description of the inoffensive, politically correct SSPX of 2026, however.</span> When was the last time a priest of the SSPX preached against the rainbow flag movement, or the evils of feminism, or the secret societies and their global conspiracy, or even the errors of the local diocese? <span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color">Given that we are now most of the way through the sermon and there has still been no mention at all of Vatican II, the conciliar church, the New Mass, the new sacramental rites, or any of the errors of the modern conciliar churchmen even once, all this talk of not bending is just yet more cheap hypocrisy. This entire sermon is one giant act of bending! He has carefully crafted the sermon so as to make it look like he's saying the right things to his own people whilst also saying as little as possible to which the modernists in Rome could object. </span>Thirty-seven minutes of bending, and in the middle of it all he tells the new bishops not to bend. Besides which, if they were the sort of men who refuse to bend then they wouldn't have been chosen in the first place! In fact, these days, one suspects, such men wouldn't even manage to get to the end of seminary and be ordained to the priesthood, let alone be selected to become bishops!<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"They did not bend … That is the most beautiful thing that could be said about you at your death, the most beautiful memory that you could leave."</blockquote>
<br />
<span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Tradidi quod et accepi</span> is a fitting motto for Archbishop Lefebvre's tomb. I would suggest as a motto for Fr. Pagliarani and his confreres when the time comes, a more fitting motto would perhaps be <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Prodidimus quod accepimus et aliud tradidimus</span>. They really are no different to the conciliar bishops of the 1970s in that regard.<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"Why must a bishop be like a serpent? It is in order to discern, grasp, and detect the duplicity, ambiguity, and cunning that exist in the world and among the enemies of the Cross. Your worst enemies will not attack you head-on; they will try to make you slide gradually into a perception of the Faith, of the Christian life, and of relations with the world that is a little more up to date. That must be understood."</blockquote>
<br />
Once again — oh the irony, the hypocrisy! Do we really have to point it out? There is a timeless truth here: <span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color">the greatest danger is usually the most subtle. The greatest danger to the SSPX faithful is not the modernism of Pope Francis or Pope Leo, but the far more subtle modernism of the SSPX, of Bishop Fellay, Fr. Pagliarani et al. Just as the modernism of the SSPX was never as dangerous to the Resistance faithful and priests as the modernism of Bishop Williamson. <span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">The more subtle and the closer to home, the greater the danger.</span> The evil modernists in Rome conquered and neutralised the SSPX, as Fr. Pagliarani says, not by attacking it head on, but by sweet words, tasty cashew nuts and flattering gestures.</span> Hence the SSPX of today has indeed slid "into a perception of the Faith, of the Christian life, and of relations with the world that is a little more up to date." He stands condemned from his own mouth.<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"This is what it means to be like a serpent: to grasp the duplicity, the ambiguity, and the cunning that exist in the world, and to speak, to preach like doves: simply, without duplicity and without fear, without equivocation, without ambiguity."</blockquote>
<br />
<span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color">To preach simply, without duplicity or fear or equivocation or ambiguity? What would that look like in practice? It would mean attacking Vatican II, attacking the current modernist authorities, pointing out that their sacraments are doubtful and their intentions evil and not to be trusted. It would mean pointing out that the last seven Popes in a row stand condemned by their predecessors. </span>Once again, this is an accurate description of Archbishop Lefebvre but has nothing in common with the man preaching these fine words in 2026 nor the priestly society of which he is the superior. He is preaching an ambiguous, equivocal and (in all likelihood) duplicitous and fearful sermon, and in the midst of it this is the advice he gives them.<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"And what else does Jesus say, what does Our Lord say? 'The brother shall deliver up his brother, the father his child, and you shall be hated by all because of Me, because of My name. Do not fear all this, for there is nothing hidden that will not be revealed, nothing secret that will not be known.' 'Do not fear all this,' Our Lord tells us. 'Let Me act, let Me judge; I Myself will intervene when necessary.' He has only one concern. What is it? 'Every one therefore that shall confess Me before men, I will also confess him before My Father who is in heaven.' Every man who will acknowledge My rights, My divinity, My Church, My Faith. 'Do not think that I came to send peace upon earth: I came not to send peace, but the sword.'"</blockquote>
<br />
How about the priests expelled in 2012 and 2013 merely for repeating what Archbishop Lefebvre had said, the faithful denied communion and driven out of chapels which were their spiritual homes? How's that for "brother against brother"…? And the others who heroically left before they could be expelled: why did they do that if not to confess Our Lord before men?<br />
<br />
<span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">We are at the end of the sermon now, and at this point comes the one token, throw-away mention of a name which has been conspicuously absent so far: that's right, Archbishop Lefebvre.</span> Have to get that tick in the box, can't have it said that he was never mentioned at all! Naturally, what he says about Archbishop Lefebvre is suitably vague and harmless.</span><br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"Another bishop, who is your model, closer to us, not yet canonised: Archbishop Lefebvre, certainly. Of him also one can say: <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">zelus fidei sollicitus et multa perpessus</span>. He had only one concern: it was the Faith itself, and, for this, he suffered greatly. This Faith, he saw clearly how it is summed up in the Holy Mass, in the defence of the Holy Mass, of the Most Precious Blood of Our Lord. What wisdom! How was he able, so many years ago, to grasp the causes of the crisis with such clarity, such insight, such strength?"</blockquote>
<br />
All of which is true, but notice that no details, no specifics are given. Fr. Pagliarani says that the Archbishop "was able to grasp the cause of the crisis" but he himself still hasn't yet said what this alleged "crisis" is, let alone the cause of it! The closest he came was complaining about a "humanism" which has "penetrated even into the Church" — is that what Archbishop Lefebvre saw and grasped so clearly, or is there a bit more to it than that?<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>"It is the wisdom of the Cross; the Cross that he carried was the source of his wisdom. Today, more than ever, his spirit is among us, he encourages us, he prays for us, he prays for you in particular, he shows us the path to follow, guided by this wisdom of the Cross."</blockquote>
<br />
"The path" which Archbishop Lefebvre "shows us to follow" is very simple and easy to understand and it is nowhere to be seen in this sermon, for the simple reason that Fr. Pagliarani is not following it. He is not following it because he doesn't believe in it. The Superior General of the modern, surrendered, compromised SSPX which has betrayed Archbishop Lefebvre is now telling his new bishops that Archbishop Lefebvre is showing them the way. Words fail me. I really can't take much more of this.<br />
<br />
If this has been a slog and you need some refreshment, a "palate cleanser" for your mind, or if on the other hand you are not entirely convinced and think that I may be exaggerating, then I invite you — no I urge you! — to read (or re-read) Archbishop Lefebvre's sermon from the 1988 consecrations. The difference could not be more stark, it is like chalk and cheese, like night and day. That is the example left to Fr. Pagliarani and his confreres which he totally ignores, the way shown by their founder which they departed from some time ago.<br />
<br />
<span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">Archbishop Lefebvre preached clearly and fearlessly. By contrast, Fr. Pagliarani seems to preach equivocally, ambiguously, and with an overpowering fear of offending the modernist enemy</span> which prevents him even from naming them. This is what comes of compromising the Faith, as Archbishop Lefebvre said so well about the Indultists of the late '80s.</span> Surely his words apply equally well to the SSPX today?<br />
<br />
"It is evident that by putting themselves in the hands of the current conciliar authorities, they are implicitly accepting the Council and the ensuing reforms, even if they have [the Traditional Mass] ... Their speech is paralyzed because of this acceptance." — Archbishop Lefebvre, <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Letter to Fr. Couture</span>, 18th March 1989<br />
<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;" class="mycode_align"><img src="https://i.postimg.cc/76S111X9/Two-Sermons-Summary.png" loading="lazy"  width="550" height="800" alt="[Image: Two-Sermons-Summary.png]" class="mycode_img" /></div>]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Fr Pagliarani July 19th Letter: “The Unjust Condemnation Is Immense Humiliation”]]></title>
			<link>https://thecatacombs.org/showthread.php?tid=8506</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 12:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://thecatacombs.org/member.php?action=profile&uid=1">Stone</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thecatacombs.org/showthread.php?tid=8506</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<span style="text-decoration: underline;" class="mycode_u">NB</span>: Before reading poor Fr. Pagliarani's Letter of July 19, 2026 which, it is our understanding, was read across most SSPX pulpits on the same day, we offer just a few reminders of how Archbishop Lefebvre and the 'traditional'-SSPX used to respond to a similar circumstance and compare that to the focus on the 'humiliation' expressed and grieved at in the new-SSPX: <ul class="mycode_list"><li>“But the Church against her past and her Tradition is not the Catholic Church; this is why<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b"> <span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color">being excommunicated by a liberal, ecumenical, and revolutionary Church is a matter of indifference to us</span></span>.” (<span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Marcel Lefebvre</span>, Bishop Tissier de Mallerais, p.547)<br />
<br />
</li>
<li>“<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b"><span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color">I should be very happy to be excommunicated from this Conciliar Church</span></span>… It is a Church that I do not recognize. I belong to the Catholic Church.” (Interview July 30 1976, published in <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Minute</span>, no. 747)<br />
<br />
</li>
<li>The following excerpts are taken from an '<a href="http://www.archbishoplefebvre.com/july-6-1988.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">Open Letter to Cardinal Gantin</a>' written by "the Superiors of the Priestly Society of Saint Pius X, gathered around our Superior General" a week or so after the 1988 Consecrations, on this same topic of the Conciliar Church:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>“<span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">To be publicly associated with this sanction [of excommunication] which is inflicted upon the six Catholic Bishops, Defenders of the Faith in its integrity and wholeness, would be for us a mark of honor and a sign of orthodoxy before the faithful.</span></span> They have indeed a strict right to know that the priests who serve them are not in communion with a counterfeit church, promoting evolution, pentecostalism and syncretism.” (Open Letter to Cardinal Gantin, July 6, 1988)<br />
<br />
“We have never wished to belong to this system which calls itself the Conciliar Church, and defines itself with the <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Novus Ordo Missæ</span>, an ecumenism which leads to indifferentism and the laicization of all society. Yes, we have no part, <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">nullam partem habemus</span>, with the pantheon of the religions of Assisi; our own excommunication by a decree of Your Eminence or of another Roman Congregation would only be the irrefutable proof of this. <span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b"><span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color">We ask for nothing better than to be declared out of communion with this adulterous spirit which has been blowing in the Church for the last 25 years; we ask for nothing better than to be declared outside of this impious communion of the ungodly.</span></span>” (Open Letter to Cardinal Gantin, July 6, 1988)</blockquote>
</li>
</ul>
<br />
<div style="text-align: right;" class="mycode_align">-<span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">The Catacombs</span></div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;" class="mycode_align"><span style="text-decoration: underline;" class="mycode_u"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">Fr Pagliarani Letter: “The Unjust Condemnation Is Immense Humiliation”</span></span></div>
<br />
<br />
<a href="https://gloria.tv/post/K6BboqztEcqF3zJkxfeVaYBa9" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">gloria.tv</a> | July 20, 2026<br />
<br />
On 19 July, from Menzingen, Switzerland, Fr Davide Pagliarani, Superior General of the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X (FSSPX), issued another pastoral letter published on LaPorteLatine.org justifying the illicit consecration of bishops against the will of Pope Leo XIV. Key phrases (full letter below).<br />
<br />
- "Until the very last day, I hoped for a gesture of goodwill—or at least of simple understanding—from the Holy See."<br />
<br />
- "This condemnation, wholly unjust, represents an immense humiliation for people whose only desire is to defend the true Faith and to labor for the salvation of souls."<br />
<br />
- " I want you to understand that this profound humiliation, which first affects the members of the Society, has a meaning in the eyes of God that must not escape you."<br />
<br />
- "The sanctions are also intended to strike you in a rather cruel way."<br />
<br />
- "If, in order to ensure for it the teaching of the true Faith and the administration of the true sacraments, it is necessary to pay the price of such humiliation, then it is worth paying."<br />
<br />
- "It is evident that, before God, such a condemnation cannot be valid, for it would condemn what lies at the very heart of the Church's own life."<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;" class="mycode_u">Full Letter</span>:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>Menzingen, July 19, 2026<br />
<br />
Dear Faithful,<br />
<br />
A few days after the ceremony of July 1, I wish to address these few words to you.<br />
<br />
First of all, I would like to thank you. For several years I have prayed to the Blessed Virgin that she would prepare hearts for this historic event. I must confess that I was deeply moved to see how all of you accompanied the episcopal consecrations with your prayers and your gratitude to Divine Providence.<br />
<br />
On July 1, many faithful from all over the world were present at Écône, and they represented all of you. It was a tremendous joy to see them so numerous and so fervent. As you certainly know, a violent storm broke out during the ceremony: "At the brightness of His presence the clouds passed, ... The Lord also thundered from heaven, and the Most High uttered His voice" (Psalm 17 [18]:13–14).<br />
<br />
At that moment, my joy only increased. On the one hand, I was the privileged witness of a liturgy of extraordinary beauty; on the other, before my eyes was another sight no less moving: an immense crowd of faithful remaining in place throughout the storm, praying to Our Lady for the new bishops, for the Church, and for the Pope. Among them were elderly women kneeling in prayer, as well as young mothers carrying their infants in their arms. It was the most beautiful image one could possibly give of the Society: faithful animated by an unshakable faith that nothing could disturb; souls for whom the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass is truly the center of their lives.<br />
<br />
You cannot imagine the consolation I experienced at that moment. The scene has been deeply engraved upon my memory, and I shall never forget it.<br />
<br />
Until the very last day, I hoped for a gesture of goodwill—or at least of simple understanding—from the Holy See. But the consecrations have been condemned, and the severity of the sanctions imposed is without precedent. They are directed first against the bishops, but also against the members of the Society. Even the faithful are affected.<br />
<br />
This condemnation, wholly unjust, represents an immense humiliation for people whose only desire is to defend the true Faith and to labor for the salvation of souls. Yet I want you to understand that this profound humiliation, which first affects the members of the Society, has a meaning in the eyes of God that must not escape you.<br />
<br />
Ultimately, these consecrations were carried out for each one of you, dear faithful. Your souls are the true treasure entrusted to the Society, the treasure it cherishes above all else. A single soul possesses infinite value. If, in order to ensure for it the teaching of the true Faith and the administration of the true sacraments, it is necessary to pay the price of such humiliation, then it is worth paying, because a soul is beyond all price. The feast of the Most Precious Blood of Our Lord—the price of our salvation—powerfully reminded us of this on July 1.<br />
<br />
The sanctions are also intended to strike you in a rather cruel way. That is certainly painful, but do not be overly surprised. In the end, it is Tradition itself—which we cherish above all else—that is being excommunicated in all those who embody it. It is evident that, before God, such a condemnation cannot be valid, for it would condemn what lies at the very heart of the Church's own life.<br />
<br />
But now, in the midst of this new storm, a question arises: what does Our Lord expect of you now?<br />
<br />
It is within the soul of each one of you that the Faith must remain whole and alive. If Providence permits a crisis in which the teaching of the Faith is mysteriously obscured, that same Faith must nevertheless continue to live in souls, despite all the contrary winds that seek to extinguish it. If the outward splendor of the Church's official profession of Faith should disappear, the little candle that each of you received on the day of your baptism must remain burning in your heart and in your mind until your final day. In the end, that is the only thing that truly matters. That little flame is the first thing we received at the beginning of our Christian life, and it is also the only thing we shall keep until the end.<br />
<br />
I entrust all of you to the Blessed Virgin Mary, to whom the Society of Saint Pius X has been consecrated in a very special way. May she always protect you amid every storm and every difficulty, and may she keep alive that little flame burning in your souls whenever all the contrary winds rage against it.<br />
<br />
All graces come to us through her hands. It is she whom we must thank for the grace of these consecrations, and it is she to whom we must pray that the new bishops may become ever more docile instruments of her inspirations and may persevere faithfully until the end.<br />
<br />
The Society will never abandon you. Never will your souls lose their value or their worth in the eyes of its priests.<br />
May God bless you!</blockquote>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<span style="text-decoration: underline;" class="mycode_u">NB</span>: Before reading poor Fr. Pagliarani's Letter of July 19, 2026 which, it is our understanding, was read across most SSPX pulpits on the same day, we offer just a few reminders of how Archbishop Lefebvre and the 'traditional'-SSPX used to respond to a similar circumstance and compare that to the focus on the 'humiliation' expressed and grieved at in the new-SSPX: <ul class="mycode_list"><li>“But the Church against her past and her Tradition is not the Catholic Church; this is why<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b"> <span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color">being excommunicated by a liberal, ecumenical, and revolutionary Church is a matter of indifference to us</span></span>.” (<span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Marcel Lefebvre</span>, Bishop Tissier de Mallerais, p.547)<br />
<br />
</li>
<li>“<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b"><span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color">I should be very happy to be excommunicated from this Conciliar Church</span></span>… It is a Church that I do not recognize. I belong to the Catholic Church.” (Interview July 30 1976, published in <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Minute</span>, no. 747)<br />
<br />
</li>
<li>The following excerpts are taken from an '<a href="http://www.archbishoplefebvre.com/july-6-1988.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">Open Letter to Cardinal Gantin</a>' written by "the Superiors of the Priestly Society of Saint Pius X, gathered around our Superior General" a week or so after the 1988 Consecrations, on this same topic of the Conciliar Church:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>“<span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">To be publicly associated with this sanction [of excommunication] which is inflicted upon the six Catholic Bishops, Defenders of the Faith in its integrity and wholeness, would be for us a mark of honor and a sign of orthodoxy before the faithful.</span></span> They have indeed a strict right to know that the priests who serve them are not in communion with a counterfeit church, promoting evolution, pentecostalism and syncretism.” (Open Letter to Cardinal Gantin, July 6, 1988)<br />
<br />
“We have never wished to belong to this system which calls itself the Conciliar Church, and defines itself with the <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Novus Ordo Missæ</span>, an ecumenism which leads to indifferentism and the laicization of all society. Yes, we have no part, <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">nullam partem habemus</span>, with the pantheon of the religions of Assisi; our own excommunication by a decree of Your Eminence or of another Roman Congregation would only be the irrefutable proof of this. <span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b"><span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color">We ask for nothing better than to be declared out of communion with this adulterous spirit which has been blowing in the Church for the last 25 years; we ask for nothing better than to be declared outside of this impious communion of the ungodly.</span></span>” (Open Letter to Cardinal Gantin, July 6, 1988)</blockquote>
</li>
</ul>
<br />
<div style="text-align: right;" class="mycode_align">-<span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">The Catacombs</span></div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;" class="mycode_align"><span style="text-decoration: underline;" class="mycode_u"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">Fr Pagliarani Letter: “The Unjust Condemnation Is Immense Humiliation”</span></span></div>
<br />
<br />
<a href="https://gloria.tv/post/K6BboqztEcqF3zJkxfeVaYBa9" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">gloria.tv</a> | July 20, 2026<br />
<br />
On 19 July, from Menzingen, Switzerland, Fr Davide Pagliarani, Superior General of the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X (FSSPX), issued another pastoral letter published on LaPorteLatine.org justifying the illicit consecration of bishops against the will of Pope Leo XIV. Key phrases (full letter below).<br />
<br />
- "Until the very last day, I hoped for a gesture of goodwill—or at least of simple understanding—from the Holy See."<br />
<br />
- "This condemnation, wholly unjust, represents an immense humiliation for people whose only desire is to defend the true Faith and to labor for the salvation of souls."<br />
<br />
- " I want you to understand that this profound humiliation, which first affects the members of the Society, has a meaning in the eyes of God that must not escape you."<br />
<br />
- "The sanctions are also intended to strike you in a rather cruel way."<br />
<br />
- "If, in order to ensure for it the teaching of the true Faith and the administration of the true sacraments, it is necessary to pay the price of such humiliation, then it is worth paying."<br />
<br />
- "It is evident that, before God, such a condemnation cannot be valid, for it would condemn what lies at the very heart of the Church's own life."<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;" class="mycode_u">Full Letter</span>:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>Menzingen, July 19, 2026<br />
<br />
Dear Faithful,<br />
<br />
A few days after the ceremony of July 1, I wish to address these few words to you.<br />
<br />
First of all, I would like to thank you. For several years I have prayed to the Blessed Virgin that she would prepare hearts for this historic event. I must confess that I was deeply moved to see how all of you accompanied the episcopal consecrations with your prayers and your gratitude to Divine Providence.<br />
<br />
On July 1, many faithful from all over the world were present at Écône, and they represented all of you. It was a tremendous joy to see them so numerous and so fervent. As you certainly know, a violent storm broke out during the ceremony: "At the brightness of His presence the clouds passed, ... The Lord also thundered from heaven, and the Most High uttered His voice" (Psalm 17 [18]:13–14).<br />
<br />
At that moment, my joy only increased. On the one hand, I was the privileged witness of a liturgy of extraordinary beauty; on the other, before my eyes was another sight no less moving: an immense crowd of faithful remaining in place throughout the storm, praying to Our Lady for the new bishops, for the Church, and for the Pope. Among them were elderly women kneeling in prayer, as well as young mothers carrying their infants in their arms. It was the most beautiful image one could possibly give of the Society: faithful animated by an unshakable faith that nothing could disturb; souls for whom the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass is truly the center of their lives.<br />
<br />
You cannot imagine the consolation I experienced at that moment. The scene has been deeply engraved upon my memory, and I shall never forget it.<br />
<br />
Until the very last day, I hoped for a gesture of goodwill—or at least of simple understanding—from the Holy See. But the consecrations have been condemned, and the severity of the sanctions imposed is without precedent. They are directed first against the bishops, but also against the members of the Society. Even the faithful are affected.<br />
<br />
This condemnation, wholly unjust, represents an immense humiliation for people whose only desire is to defend the true Faith and to labor for the salvation of souls. Yet I want you to understand that this profound humiliation, which first affects the members of the Society, has a meaning in the eyes of God that must not escape you.<br />
<br />
Ultimately, these consecrations were carried out for each one of you, dear faithful. Your souls are the true treasure entrusted to the Society, the treasure it cherishes above all else. A single soul possesses infinite value. If, in order to ensure for it the teaching of the true Faith and the administration of the true sacraments, it is necessary to pay the price of such humiliation, then it is worth paying, because a soul is beyond all price. The feast of the Most Precious Blood of Our Lord—the price of our salvation—powerfully reminded us of this on July 1.<br />
<br />
The sanctions are also intended to strike you in a rather cruel way. That is certainly painful, but do not be overly surprised. In the end, it is Tradition itself—which we cherish above all else—that is being excommunicated in all those who embody it. It is evident that, before God, such a condemnation cannot be valid, for it would condemn what lies at the very heart of the Church's own life.<br />
<br />
But now, in the midst of this new storm, a question arises: what does Our Lord expect of you now?<br />
<br />
It is within the soul of each one of you that the Faith must remain whole and alive. If Providence permits a crisis in which the teaching of the Faith is mysteriously obscured, that same Faith must nevertheless continue to live in souls, despite all the contrary winds that seek to extinguish it. If the outward splendor of the Church's official profession of Faith should disappear, the little candle that each of you received on the day of your baptism must remain burning in your heart and in your mind until your final day. In the end, that is the only thing that truly matters. That little flame is the first thing we received at the beginning of our Christian life, and it is also the only thing we shall keep until the end.<br />
<br />
I entrust all of you to the Blessed Virgin Mary, to whom the Society of Saint Pius X has been consecrated in a very special way. May she always protect you amid every storm and every difficulty, and may she keep alive that little flame burning in your souls whenever all the contrary winds rage against it.<br />
<br />
All graces come to us through her hands. It is she whom we must thank for the grace of these consecrations, and it is she to whom we must pray that the new bishops may become ever more docile instruments of her inspirations and may persevere faithfully until the end.<br />
<br />
The Society will never abandon you. Never will your souls lose their value or their worth in the eyes of its priests.<br />
May God bless you!</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Vatican asks for same concessions for 'reconciliation' that are in the Doctrinal Declaration of 2012]]></title>
			<link>https://thecatacombs.org/showthread.php?tid=8465</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2026 13:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://thecatacombs.org/member.php?action=profile&uid=1">Stone</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thecatacombs.org/showthread.php?tid=8465</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[It is not without amazement that one sees that the Vatican is asking for those members of the SSPX who wish to 'reconcile' with the Vatican after the excommunication of the SSPX's now six bisops by accepting the Vatican's 'Profession of Faith and Formula of Adherence' are nearly identical to the concessions of Bp. Fellay in the Doctrinal Declaration of 2012! <br />
<br />
Firstly... <br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;" class="mycode_align"><span style="text-decoration: underline;" class="mycode_u"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">Vatican issues guidelines for SSPX clergy, laity to return to ‘full communion’</span></span><br />
The DDF has issued two sets of guidelines for SSPX clergy and laity who wish to 'reconcile' <br />
with the Vatican following Thursday's excommunications.</div>
<br />
<br />
Jul 2, 2026<br />
(<a href="https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/breaking-vatican-issues-guidelines-for-sspx-clergy-laity-to-return-to-full-communion/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">LifeSiteNews</a>) — The Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith (DDF) under Cardinal Víctor Manuel Fernández has issued a document “Procedure for the Reconciliation of Priests of the Society of Saint Pius X,” and another for the lay faithful which includes a Profession of Faith and Formula of Adherence.<br />
<br />
The move follows Thursday’s excommunication of the Society after their episcopal consecrations without a papal mandate.<br />
<br />
The <a href="https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2026/07/dicastery-for-doctrine-of-faith.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">procedure</a>, effective July 1 and translated in full by <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Rorate Caeli</span>, requires priests belonging to the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) who have decided to leave the order to:<ul class="mycode_list"><li>find a bishop, a major superior of a clerical pontifical institute or another ordinary who is willing to accept him ad experimentum,<br />
</li>
<li>write a letter to Pope Leo XIV requesting the remission of the censures incurred by receiving priestly ordination from an excommunicated or canonically irregular bishop, and<br />
</li>
<li>attach documentation of his priestly ordination and a <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Profession of Faith and a Formula of Adherence</span>, as well as a letter signed by the ordinary explaining their willingness to accept the priest.<br />
</li>
</ul>
Should the clerics request be accepted, they will enter into a 1-3 year probationary period under their ordinary after which the priest may finally be incardinated.<br />
<br />
Laity who frequently assist at SSPX liturgical celebrations and formally share its doctrinal positions, as well as those who are third-order members of the Society, are considered to have also incurred a canonical penalty and will be required to sign the <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Profession of Faith and Formula of Adherence</span>.<br />
<br />
The <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Profession of Faith</span> begins with affirming that the cleric or layman believes every article in the Nicene Creed then states:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>With firm faith, I also believe everything contained in the word of God, whether written or handed down in Tradition, which the Church proposes as divinely revealed, whether by solemn judgment or by her ordinary and universal Magisterium.<br />
<br />
I likewise firmly accept and hold each and every teaching definitively proposed by the Church regarding faith and morals.<br />
<br />
Moreover, <span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b"><span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color">with religious submission of will and intellect, I adhere to the teachings which either the Roman Pontiff or the College of Bishops proclaim when exercising their authentic Magisterium, even if they do not intend to proclaim them by a definitive act.</span></span></blockquote>
<br />
The <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Formula of Adherence </span>states in part:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite><span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">I accept the doctrine taught in No. 25 of the Dogmatic Constitution Lumen Gentium of the Second Vatican Council concerning the Magisterium of the Church and the adherence owed to it.</span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b"><span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color">With regard to certain doctrines taught by the Second Vatican Council, or subsequent reforms in either the Sacred Liturgy or Canon Law, which may appear to some to be difficult to reconcile with previous declarations of the Magisterium, I undertake to follow a positive approach to their interpretation under the guidance of the Church’s Magisterium, so that none of these teachings may be separated from the remainder of the Church’s sacred doctrinal patrimony.</span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b"><span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color">I further declare that I accept the validity of the Sacrifice of the Mass and of the Sacraments celebrated with the intention of doing what the Church does, and according to the rites contained in the typical editions of the Roman Missal and the ritual books promulgated by the Supreme Pontiffs Paul VI and John Paul II.</span></span><br />
<br />
Finally, <span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">I promise to adhere to the common discipline of the Church and to her laws, especially those contained in the Code of Canon Law promulgated by Pope John Paul II.</span></span></blockquote>
<br />
The question of accepting each document of the Second Vatican Council, including <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Lumen Gentium</span> No. 25, was a sticking point between the SSPX and the Vatican prior to Wednesday’s consecrations.<br />
<br />
A February communiqué from the SSPX General House published after Superior General Fr. Davide Pagliarani’s meeting with Fernández claimed that the cardinal proposed dialogue with the SSPX to clarify the “minimum necessary” for the SSPX’s canonical status. The cardinal had already made clear that the Second Vatican Council documents must be accepted in full by the SSPX to reach such “regular” status.<br />
<br />
“The Cardinal stated orally that, while it would be possible to engage in dialogue about the Council, its texts could not be corrected,” the communiqué said.<br />
<br />
Fernández proposed exchanges with the SSPX that would seek agreement on “the different degrees of adherence required by the various texts of the Second Vatican Ecumenical Council and their interpretation.” [...]<br />
<br />
<br />
+ + +<br />
<br />
<br />
Now here is an excerpt containing the text of the Doctrinal Declaration of 2012 signed by Bishop Fellay, taken from a <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Recusant </span>article<br />
<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;" class="mycode_align"><span style="text-decoration: underline;" class="mycode_u"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">Ten Years Ago…</span></span></div>
<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;" class="mycode_align"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">PART 1</span><br />
Taken from <a href="https://catacombs.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/Recusant/The%20Recusant%2057.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">The Recusant #57 (Lent 2022)</a></div>
<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;" class="mycode_align"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">15th April 2012 - Doctrinal Declaration composed and signed by the Superior<br />
General on behalf of the SSPX and delivered to Rome (but kept secret from<br />
even the SSPX’s own priests for almost a full year).</span></div>
<br />
“I. We promise to be always faithful to the Catholic Church and to the Roman Pontiff, the Supreme Pastor, Vicar of Christ, Successor of Peter, and head of the body of bishops.<br />
<br />
II. <span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">We declare that we accept</span></span> the teachings of the Magisterium of the Church in the substance of Faith and Morals, adhering to each doctrinal affirmation in the required degree, according to the doctrine contained in <span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b"><span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color">No.25 of the dogmatic constitution Lumen Gentium of the Second Vatican Council</span></span>.(1)<br />
<br />
III. <br />
1. <span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b"><span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color">We declare that we accept the doctrine regarding the Roman Pontiff and regarding the college of bishops, with the Pope as its head, which is taught by the dogmatic constitution <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Pastor Aeternus</span> of Vatican I and by the dogmatic constitution <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Lumen Gentium</span> of Vatican II, chapter 3 </span></span>(<span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">deconstitutione hierarchica Ecclesiae et in specie de episcopatu</span>), explained and interpreted by the <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">nota explicativa praevia</span> in this same chapter.<br />
<br />
2. We recognise the authority of the Magisterium to which alone is given the task of authentically interpreting the word of God, in written form or handed down (2) in fidelity to Tradition, recalling that, “the Holy Ghost was not promised to the successors of Peter in order for them to make known, through revelation, a new doctrine, but so that with His assistance they may keep in a holy and expressly faithful manner the revelation transmitted by the Apostles, that is to say, the Faith.”(3)<br />
<br />
3. Tradition is the living transmission of revelation ‘<span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">usque ad nos</span>’(4) and the Church in its doctrine, in its life and in its liturgy perpetuates and transmits to all generations what this is and what She believes. Tradition progresses in the Church with the assistance of the Holy Ghost(5), not as a contrary novelty(6), but through a better understanding of the Deposit of the Faith(7).<br />
<br />
4. The entire tradition of Catholic Faith must be the criterion and guide in understanding the teaching of the Second Vatican Council, which, in turn, enlightens - in other words deepens and subsequently makes explicit - certain aspects of the life and doctrine of the Church implicitly present within itself or not yet conceptually formulated(8).<br />
<br />
5. The affirmations of the Second Vatican Council and of the later Pontifical Magisterium relating to the relationship between the Church and the non-Catholic Christian confessions, as well as the social duty of religion and the right to religious liberty, whose formulation is with difficulty reconcilable with prior doctrinal affirmations from the Magisterium, must be understood in the light of the whole, uninterrupted Tradition, in a manner coherent with the truths previously taught by the Magisterium of the Church, without accepting any interpretation of these affirmations whatsoever that would expose Catholic doctrine to opposition or rupture with Tradition and with this Magisterium.<br />
<br />
6. <span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">That is why it is legitimate to promote through legitimate discussion the study and theological explanations of the expressions and formulations of Vatican II and of the Magisterium which followed it, in the case where they don't appear reconcilable with the previous Magisterium of the Church</span></span>(9).<br />
<br />
7. <span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">We declare that we recognise the validity of the sacrifice of the Mass and the Sacraments celebrated with the intention to do what the Church does according to the rites indicated in the typical editions of the Roman Missal and the Sacramentary Rituals legitimately promulgated by Popes Paul VI and John-Paul II.</span></span><br />
<br />
8. In following the guidelines laid out above (III,5), as well as Canon 21 of the Code of Canon Law,<span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b"> we promise to respect the common discipline of the Church and the ecclesiastical laws, especially those which are contained in the Code of Canon Law promulgated by John-Paul II (1983) </span></span>and in the Code of Canon Law of the Oriental Churches promulgated by the same pontiff (1990), without prejudice to the discipline of the Society of Saint Pius X, by a special law.<br />
<br />
<br />
Notes --<br />
(1) <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Cf</span>. the new formula for the Profession of Faith and the Oath of Fidelity for assuming a charge exercised in the name of the Church, 1989; cf. Code of Canon Law, canon 749,750, §2; 752; CCEO canon 597; 598, 1 &amp; 2; 599.<br />
(2) <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Cf</span>. Pius XII, <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Humani Generis</span> encyclical.<br />
(3) Vatican I, Dogmatic Constitution, <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Pastor Aeternus</span>, Dz. 3070.<br />
(4) Council of Trent, Dz. 1501: “All saving truth and rules of conduct (Matt. 16:15) are contained in the written books and in the unwritten traditions, which, received by the Apostles from the mouth of Christ Himself, or from the Apostles themselves,[3] the Holy Ghost dictating, have come down to us, transmitted as it were from hand to hand.”<br />
(5)<span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i"> Cf</span>. Second Vatican Council, Dogmatic Constitution <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Dei Verbum</span>, 8 &amp; 9, Denz. 4209-4210.<br />
(6) Vatican I, Dogmatic Constitution <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Dei Filius</span>, Dz. 3020: “Hence, also, that understanding of its sacred dogmas must be perpetually retained, which Holy Mother Church has once declared; and there must never be recession from that meaning under the specious name of a deeper understanding “Therefore […] let the understanding, the knowledge, and wisdom of individuals as of all, of one man as of the whole Church, grow and progress strongly with the passage of the ages and the centuries; but let it be solely in its own genus, namely in the same dogma, with the same sense and the same understanding.” [Vincent of Lerins,  <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Commonitorium</span>, 23, 3].”<br />
(7) Vatican I, Dogmatic Constitution <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Dei Filius</span>, Dz. 3011; Anti-modernist Oath, no. 4; Pius XII, Encyclical Letter <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Humani Generis</span>, Dz 3886; Vatican Council II, Dogmatic Constitution <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Dei Verbum</span>, 10, Dz. 4213.<br />
(8) For example, like the teaching on the sacraments and the episcopacy in <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Lumen Gentium</span>, no. 21.<br />
(9) There is a parallel in history in the Decree for the Armenians of the Council of Florence, where the porrection of the instruments was indicated as the matter of the sacrament of Order. Nevertheless theologians legitimately discussed, even after this decree, the accuracy of such an assertion. Pope Pius XII finally resolved the issue in another way.” (See: <a href="https://www.therecusant.com/doctrinalpreamble-15apr2012" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://www.therecusant.com/doctrinalpreamble-15apr2012</a>)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[It is not without amazement that one sees that the Vatican is asking for those members of the SSPX who wish to 'reconcile' with the Vatican after the excommunication of the SSPX's now six bisops by accepting the Vatican's 'Profession of Faith and Formula of Adherence' are nearly identical to the concessions of Bp. Fellay in the Doctrinal Declaration of 2012! <br />
<br />
Firstly... <br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;" class="mycode_align"><span style="text-decoration: underline;" class="mycode_u"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">Vatican issues guidelines for SSPX clergy, laity to return to ‘full communion’</span></span><br />
The DDF has issued two sets of guidelines for SSPX clergy and laity who wish to 'reconcile' <br />
with the Vatican following Thursday's excommunications.</div>
<br />
<br />
Jul 2, 2026<br />
(<a href="https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/breaking-vatican-issues-guidelines-for-sspx-clergy-laity-to-return-to-full-communion/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">LifeSiteNews</a>) — The Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith (DDF) under Cardinal Víctor Manuel Fernández has issued a document “Procedure for the Reconciliation of Priests of the Society of Saint Pius X,” and another for the lay faithful which includes a Profession of Faith and Formula of Adherence.<br />
<br />
The move follows Thursday’s excommunication of the Society after their episcopal consecrations without a papal mandate.<br />
<br />
The <a href="https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2026/07/dicastery-for-doctrine-of-faith.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">procedure</a>, effective July 1 and translated in full by <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Rorate Caeli</span>, requires priests belonging to the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) who have decided to leave the order to:<ul class="mycode_list"><li>find a bishop, a major superior of a clerical pontifical institute or another ordinary who is willing to accept him ad experimentum,<br />
</li>
<li>write a letter to Pope Leo XIV requesting the remission of the censures incurred by receiving priestly ordination from an excommunicated or canonically irregular bishop, and<br />
</li>
<li>attach documentation of his priestly ordination and a <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Profession of Faith and a Formula of Adherence</span>, as well as a letter signed by the ordinary explaining their willingness to accept the priest.<br />
</li>
</ul>
Should the clerics request be accepted, they will enter into a 1-3 year probationary period under their ordinary after which the priest may finally be incardinated.<br />
<br />
Laity who frequently assist at SSPX liturgical celebrations and formally share its doctrinal positions, as well as those who are third-order members of the Society, are considered to have also incurred a canonical penalty and will be required to sign the <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Profession of Faith and Formula of Adherence</span>.<br />
<br />
The <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Profession of Faith</span> begins with affirming that the cleric or layman believes every article in the Nicene Creed then states:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>With firm faith, I also believe everything contained in the word of God, whether written or handed down in Tradition, which the Church proposes as divinely revealed, whether by solemn judgment or by her ordinary and universal Magisterium.<br />
<br />
I likewise firmly accept and hold each and every teaching definitively proposed by the Church regarding faith and morals.<br />
<br />
Moreover, <span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b"><span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color">with religious submission of will and intellect, I adhere to the teachings which either the Roman Pontiff or the College of Bishops proclaim when exercising their authentic Magisterium, even if they do not intend to proclaim them by a definitive act.</span></span></blockquote>
<br />
The <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Formula of Adherence </span>states in part:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite><span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">I accept the doctrine taught in No. 25 of the Dogmatic Constitution Lumen Gentium of the Second Vatican Council concerning the Magisterium of the Church and the adherence owed to it.</span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b"><span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color">With regard to certain doctrines taught by the Second Vatican Council, or subsequent reforms in either the Sacred Liturgy or Canon Law, which may appear to some to be difficult to reconcile with previous declarations of the Magisterium, I undertake to follow a positive approach to their interpretation under the guidance of the Church’s Magisterium, so that none of these teachings may be separated from the remainder of the Church’s sacred doctrinal patrimony.</span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b"><span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color">I further declare that I accept the validity of the Sacrifice of the Mass and of the Sacraments celebrated with the intention of doing what the Church does, and according to the rites contained in the typical editions of the Roman Missal and the ritual books promulgated by the Supreme Pontiffs Paul VI and John Paul II.</span></span><br />
<br />
Finally, <span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">I promise to adhere to the common discipline of the Church and to her laws, especially those contained in the Code of Canon Law promulgated by Pope John Paul II.</span></span></blockquote>
<br />
The question of accepting each document of the Second Vatican Council, including <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Lumen Gentium</span> No. 25, was a sticking point between the SSPX and the Vatican prior to Wednesday’s consecrations.<br />
<br />
A February communiqué from the SSPX General House published after Superior General Fr. Davide Pagliarani’s meeting with Fernández claimed that the cardinal proposed dialogue with the SSPX to clarify the “minimum necessary” for the SSPX’s canonical status. The cardinal had already made clear that the Second Vatican Council documents must be accepted in full by the SSPX to reach such “regular” status.<br />
<br />
“The Cardinal stated orally that, while it would be possible to engage in dialogue about the Council, its texts could not be corrected,” the communiqué said.<br />
<br />
Fernández proposed exchanges with the SSPX that would seek agreement on “the different degrees of adherence required by the various texts of the Second Vatican Ecumenical Council and their interpretation.” [...]<br />
<br />
<br />
+ + +<br />
<br />
<br />
Now here is an excerpt containing the text of the Doctrinal Declaration of 2012 signed by Bishop Fellay, taken from a <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Recusant </span>article<br />
<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;" class="mycode_align"><span style="text-decoration: underline;" class="mycode_u"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">Ten Years Ago…</span></span></div>
<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;" class="mycode_align"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">PART 1</span><br />
Taken from <a href="https://catacombs.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/Recusant/The%20Recusant%2057.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">The Recusant #57 (Lent 2022)</a></div>
<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;" class="mycode_align"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">15th April 2012 - Doctrinal Declaration composed and signed by the Superior<br />
General on behalf of the SSPX and delivered to Rome (but kept secret from<br />
even the SSPX’s own priests for almost a full year).</span></div>
<br />
“I. We promise to be always faithful to the Catholic Church and to the Roman Pontiff, the Supreme Pastor, Vicar of Christ, Successor of Peter, and head of the body of bishops.<br />
<br />
II. <span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">We declare that we accept</span></span> the teachings of the Magisterium of the Church in the substance of Faith and Morals, adhering to each doctrinal affirmation in the required degree, according to the doctrine contained in <span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b"><span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color">No.25 of the dogmatic constitution Lumen Gentium of the Second Vatican Council</span></span>.(1)<br />
<br />
III. <br />
1. <span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b"><span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color">We declare that we accept the doctrine regarding the Roman Pontiff and regarding the college of bishops, with the Pope as its head, which is taught by the dogmatic constitution <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Pastor Aeternus</span> of Vatican I and by the dogmatic constitution <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Lumen Gentium</span> of Vatican II, chapter 3 </span></span>(<span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">deconstitutione hierarchica Ecclesiae et in specie de episcopatu</span>), explained and interpreted by the <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">nota explicativa praevia</span> in this same chapter.<br />
<br />
2. We recognise the authority of the Magisterium to which alone is given the task of authentically interpreting the word of God, in written form or handed down (2) in fidelity to Tradition, recalling that, “the Holy Ghost was not promised to the successors of Peter in order for them to make known, through revelation, a new doctrine, but so that with His assistance they may keep in a holy and expressly faithful manner the revelation transmitted by the Apostles, that is to say, the Faith.”(3)<br />
<br />
3. Tradition is the living transmission of revelation ‘<span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">usque ad nos</span>’(4) and the Church in its doctrine, in its life and in its liturgy perpetuates and transmits to all generations what this is and what She believes. Tradition progresses in the Church with the assistance of the Holy Ghost(5), not as a contrary novelty(6), but through a better understanding of the Deposit of the Faith(7).<br />
<br />
4. The entire tradition of Catholic Faith must be the criterion and guide in understanding the teaching of the Second Vatican Council, which, in turn, enlightens - in other words deepens and subsequently makes explicit - certain aspects of the life and doctrine of the Church implicitly present within itself or not yet conceptually formulated(8).<br />
<br />
5. The affirmations of the Second Vatican Council and of the later Pontifical Magisterium relating to the relationship between the Church and the non-Catholic Christian confessions, as well as the social duty of religion and the right to religious liberty, whose formulation is with difficulty reconcilable with prior doctrinal affirmations from the Magisterium, must be understood in the light of the whole, uninterrupted Tradition, in a manner coherent with the truths previously taught by the Magisterium of the Church, without accepting any interpretation of these affirmations whatsoever that would expose Catholic doctrine to opposition or rupture with Tradition and with this Magisterium.<br />
<br />
6. <span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">That is why it is legitimate to promote through legitimate discussion the study and theological explanations of the expressions and formulations of Vatican II and of the Magisterium which followed it, in the case where they don't appear reconcilable with the previous Magisterium of the Church</span></span>(9).<br />
<br />
7. <span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">We declare that we recognise the validity of the sacrifice of the Mass and the Sacraments celebrated with the intention to do what the Church does according to the rites indicated in the typical editions of the Roman Missal and the Sacramentary Rituals legitimately promulgated by Popes Paul VI and John-Paul II.</span></span><br />
<br />
8. In following the guidelines laid out above (III,5), as well as Canon 21 of the Code of Canon Law,<span style="color: #71101d;" class="mycode_color"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b"> we promise to respect the common discipline of the Church and the ecclesiastical laws, especially those which are contained in the Code of Canon Law promulgated by John-Paul II (1983) </span></span>and in the Code of Canon Law of the Oriental Churches promulgated by the same pontiff (1990), without prejudice to the discipline of the Society of Saint Pius X, by a special law.<br />
<br />
<br />
Notes --<br />
(1) <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Cf</span>. the new formula for the Profession of Faith and the Oath of Fidelity for assuming a charge exercised in the name of the Church, 1989; cf. Code of Canon Law, canon 749,750, §2; 752; CCEO canon 597; 598, 1 &amp; 2; 599.<br />
(2) <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Cf</span>. Pius XII, <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Humani Generis</span> encyclical.<br />
(3) Vatican I, Dogmatic Constitution, <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Pastor Aeternus</span>, Dz. 3070.<br />
(4) Council of Trent, Dz. 1501: “All saving truth and rules of conduct (Matt. 16:15) are contained in the written books and in the unwritten traditions, which, received by the Apostles from the mouth of Christ Himself, or from the Apostles themselves,[3] the Holy Ghost dictating, have come down to us, transmitted as it were from hand to hand.”<br />
(5)<span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i"> Cf</span>. Second Vatican Council, Dogmatic Constitution <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Dei Verbum</span>, 8 &amp; 9, Denz. 4209-4210.<br />
(6) Vatican I, Dogmatic Constitution <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Dei Filius</span>, Dz. 3020: “Hence, also, that understanding of its sacred dogmas must be perpetually retained, which Holy Mother Church has once declared; and there must never be recession from that meaning under the specious name of a deeper understanding “Therefore […] let the understanding, the knowledge, and wisdom of individuals as of all, of one man as of the whole Church, grow and progress strongly with the passage of the ages and the centuries; but let it be solely in its own genus, namely in the same dogma, with the same sense and the same understanding.” [Vincent of Lerins,  <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Commonitorium</span>, 23, 3].”<br />
(7) Vatican I, Dogmatic Constitution <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Dei Filius</span>, Dz. 3011; Anti-modernist Oath, no. 4; Pius XII, Encyclical Letter <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Humani Generis</span>, Dz 3886; Vatican Council II, Dogmatic Constitution <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Dei Verbum</span>, 10, Dz. 4213.<br />
(8) For example, like the teaching on the sacraments and the episcopacy in <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Lumen Gentium</span>, no. 21.<br />
(9) There is a parallel in history in the Decree for the Armenians of the Council of Florence, where the porrection of the instruments was indicated as the matter of the sacrament of Order. Nevertheless theologians legitimately discussed, even after this decree, the accuracy of such an assertion. Pope Pius XII finally resolved the issue in another way.” (See: <a href="https://www.therecusant.com/doctrinalpreamble-15apr2012" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">https://www.therecusant.com/doctrinalpreamble-15apr2012</a>)]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Vatican Cardinal Manuel Fernandez declares six SSPX bishops excommunicated]]></title>
			<link>https://thecatacombs.org/showthread.php?tid=8455</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 11:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://thecatacombs.org/member.php?action=profile&uid=1">Stone</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thecatacombs.org/showthread.php?tid=8455</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;" class="mycode_align"><span style="text-decoration: underline;" class="mycode_u"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">Vatican Cardinal Manuel Fernandez declares six SSPX bishops excommunicated</span></span><br />
The decree labels all SSPX priests as schismatics subject to excommunication and<br />
declares that confessions heard by them and marriages they witness are invalid.<br />
<br />
<img src="https://www.lifesitenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/GettyImages-2212928343.jpg" loading="lazy"  width="400" height="250" alt="[Image: GettyImages-2212928343.jpg]" class="mycode_img" /><br />
<br />
Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernandez<br />
Antonio Masiello/Getty Images</div>
<br />
July 2, 2026<br />
ROME (<a href="https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/breaking-vatican-cardinal-manuel-fernandez-declares-six-sspx-bishops-excommunicated/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">LifeSiteNews</a>)— The Vatican’s Dicastery of the Doctrine of Faith headed by scandal-plagued Cardinal Manuel (“Tucho”) Fernandez released a <a href="https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_ddf_doc_20260702_decreto-scomunica-fsspx_it.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">decree of excommunication</a> this morning declaring the six bishops of the Society of St. Pius X automatically excommunicated following the consecration of four new bishops without papal approval.<br />
<br />
The decree states that the consecrator Bishop Alfonso de Galarreta and the four newly consecrated bishops (Pascal Schreiber, Michael Goldade, Michel Poinsinet de Sivry, and Marc Hanappier) have incurred <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">latae sententiae</span> excommunication. Bishop Bernard Fellay was also declared excommunicated for serving as co-consecrator.<br />
<br />
The document goes further, labeling all SSPX priests as schismatics subject to excommunication and declaring that confessions heard by them and marriages they witness are invalid.<br />
<br />
The decree also warns the faithful who formally adhere to the SSPX could face excommunication. It urges Catholics to remain in full communion with the Pope Leo XIV and to abstain from participating in Masses and activities promoted by the Society.<br />
<br />
The action follows the SSPX’s consecration of the four new bishops yesterday at its seminary in Écône, Switzerland, despite warnings from the Vatican.<br />
<br />
The SSPX has consistently maintained that such consecrations are necessary for the survival of its apostolic work and the state of emergency in the Church and has rejected the validity of penalties imposed on them.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;" class="mycode_align"><span style="text-decoration: underline;" class="mycode_u"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">Vatican Cardinal Manuel Fernandez declares six SSPX bishops excommunicated</span></span><br />
The decree labels all SSPX priests as schismatics subject to excommunication and<br />
declares that confessions heard by them and marriages they witness are invalid.<br />
<br />
<img src="https://www.lifesitenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/GettyImages-2212928343.jpg" loading="lazy"  width="400" height="250" alt="[Image: GettyImages-2212928343.jpg]" class="mycode_img" /><br />
<br />
Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernandez<br />
Antonio Masiello/Getty Images</div>
<br />
July 2, 2026<br />
ROME (<a href="https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/breaking-vatican-cardinal-manuel-fernandez-declares-six-sspx-bishops-excommunicated/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">LifeSiteNews</a>)— The Vatican’s Dicastery of the Doctrine of Faith headed by scandal-plagued Cardinal Manuel (“Tucho”) Fernandez released a <a href="https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_ddf_doc_20260702_decreto-scomunica-fsspx_it.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">decree of excommunication</a> this morning declaring the six bishops of the Society of St. Pius X automatically excommunicated following the consecration of four new bishops without papal approval.<br />
<br />
The decree states that the consecrator Bishop Alfonso de Galarreta and the four newly consecrated bishops (Pascal Schreiber, Michael Goldade, Michel Poinsinet de Sivry, and Marc Hanappier) have incurred <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">latae sententiae</span> excommunication. Bishop Bernard Fellay was also declared excommunicated for serving as co-consecrator.<br />
<br />
The document goes further, labeling all SSPX priests as schismatics subject to excommunication and declaring that confessions heard by them and marriages they witness are invalid.<br />
<br />
The decree also warns the faithful who formally adhere to the SSPX could face excommunication. It urges Catholics to remain in full communion with the Pope Leo XIV and to abstain from participating in Masses and activities promoted by the Society.<br />
<br />
The action follows the SSPX’s consecration of the four new bishops yesterday at its seminary in Écône, Switzerland, despite warnings from the Vatican.<br />
<br />
The SSPX has consistently maintained that such consecrations are necessary for the survival of its apostolic work and the state of emergency in the Church and has rejected the validity of penalties imposed on them.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Society of Saint Pius X consecrates four bishops]]></title>
			<link>https://thecatacombs.org/showthread.php?tid=8447</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 13:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://thecatacombs.org/member.php?action=profile&uid=1">Stone</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thecatacombs.org/showthread.php?tid=8447</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">NB</span>: The Bishops of the SSPX do not have geographical jurisdication. They are auxillary bishops only. This is an error by <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">LifeSiteNews</span>.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;" class="mycode_align"><span style="text-decoration: underline;" class="mycode_u"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">Society of Saint Pius X consecrates four bishops</span></span><br />
SSPX Bishops Bernard Fellay of Switzerland and Alfonso de Galarreta of Argentina will preside.<br />
<br />
<img src="https://www.lifesitenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/shutterstock_2126614781.jpg" loading="lazy"  width="400" height="250" alt="[Image: shutterstock_2126614781.jpg]" class="mycode_img" /><br />
 <br />
Shutterstock</div>
<br />
Jul 1, 2026<br />
ÊCONE, Switzerland (<a href="https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/watch-society-of-saint-pius-x-consecrates-four-bishops/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">LifeSiteNews</a>) — The Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX) is celebrating the consecrations of four new bishops today, July 1.<br />
<br />
Bishops Bernard Fellay of Switzerland and Alfonso de Galarreta of Argentina will preside. The four priests to be consecrated are Fathers Michael Goldade (USA), Pascal Schreiber (Switzerland), Michael Poinsinet de Sivry, and Marc Hanappier (France) to the episcopate.<br />
<br />
Despite many requests from the SSPX, the traditional order of priests founded by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre in 1970, Pope Leo has not granted permission for the consecrations to take place.<br />
<br />
We invite you to watch the ceremonies at the live link below:<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;" class="mycode_align"><iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/SEKnk6mMbpI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">NB</span>: The Bishops of the SSPX do not have geographical jurisdication. They are auxillary bishops only. This is an error by <span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">LifeSiteNews</span>.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;" class="mycode_align"><span style="text-decoration: underline;" class="mycode_u"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">Society of Saint Pius X consecrates four bishops</span></span><br />
SSPX Bishops Bernard Fellay of Switzerland and Alfonso de Galarreta of Argentina will preside.<br />
<br />
<img src="https://www.lifesitenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/shutterstock_2126614781.jpg" loading="lazy"  width="400" height="250" alt="[Image: shutterstock_2126614781.jpg]" class="mycode_img" /><br />
 <br />
Shutterstock</div>
<br />
Jul 1, 2026<br />
ÊCONE, Switzerland (<a href="https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/watch-society-of-saint-pius-x-consecrates-four-bishops/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">LifeSiteNews</a>) — The Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX) is celebrating the consecrations of four new bishops today, July 1.<br />
<br />
Bishops Bernard Fellay of Switzerland and Alfonso de Galarreta of Argentina will preside. The four priests to be consecrated are Fathers Michael Goldade (USA), Pascal Schreiber (Switzerland), Michael Poinsinet de Sivry, and Marc Hanappier (France) to the episcopate.<br />
<br />
Despite many requests from the SSPX, the traditional order of priests founded by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre in 1970, Pope Leo has not granted permission for the consecrations to take place.<br />
<br />
We invite you to watch the ceremonies at the live link below:<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;" class="mycode_align"><iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/SEKnk6mMbpI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div>]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Pope Leo Writes to SSPX - July 29, 2026]]></title>
			<link>https://thecatacombs.org/showthread.php?tid=8443</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 10:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://thecatacombs.org/member.php?action=profile&uid=1">Stone</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thecatacombs.org/showthread.php?tid=8443</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;" class="mycode_align"><span style="text-decoration: underline;" class="mycode_u"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">Leo XIV Writes to FSSPX</span></span><br />
<br />
<img src="https://seedeu3656.gloriatv.net/storage1/l9buvqryegjx0cu3coh2h74yqx8uvl8yw76mgy2?secure=wNU7jsx9zb3CI2i2bftFmg&amp;expires=1782991906" loading="lazy"  width="400" height="250" alt="[Image: l9buvqryegjx0cu3coh2h74yqx8uvl8yw76mgy2?...1782991906]" class="mycode_img" /></div>
<br />
<br />
<a href="https://gloria.tv/share/4Eb3yEksSWBE12XcbQpfMogRH" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">gloria.tv</a> | June 30, 2026<br />
<br />
<span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Yesterday, Leo XIV wrote to the Priestly Fraternity of St. Pius X. He acknowledged the FSSPX's devotion to Tradition, the liturgy, and priestly formation. He begs them to "turn back" from a prospective "schismatic act", warning of its grave consequences while reaffirming the Church's openness to dialogue and reconciliation. The letter:</span><br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>To the Reverend Father Davide Pagliarani<br />
Superior General of the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X<br />
<br />
With a paternal heart, and aware of the responsibility entrusted to me by the Lord as the Successor of the Apostle Peter, I address you and, through you, the bishops, priests, seminarians and faithful connected to the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X.<br />
<br />
The Church recognizes the devotion to liturgical life, commitment to priestly formation, apostolic zeal and desire for fidelity to Tradition that characterize many people and communities connected to your Fraternity. This has motivated the attentive and generous attitude that my Predecessors have consistently shown to you.<br />
<br />
In this spirit, and filled with Christian affection, I plead with you and ask you with all my heart: please turn back! I urge you to consider carefully the spiritual good of the faithful, because the schismatic act you are about to undertake would deprive them of the licit and, in some cases, even valid reception of the Sacraments, which they love and seek for their sanctification.<br />
<br />
The Church is open to a path of dialogue and understanding that the Holy Spirit can make possible and fruitful.<br />
<br />
I pray for you, because to tear the seamless garment of Christ is a sin of extreme gravity. May the Lord enlighten your consciences and awaken your hearts. With a sorrowful yet hopeful heart, I feel it is my duty, through the authority received from Christ, to ask you to desist from your intended act. I entrust these intentions to the Immaculate Heart of Mary, Mother of Good Counsel.<br />
<br />
From the Vatican, 29 June 2026<br />
Solemnity of the Holy Apostles Peter and Paul<br />
<br />
LEO PP. XIV</blockquote>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;" class="mycode_align"><span style="text-decoration: underline;" class="mycode_u"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">Leo XIV Writes to FSSPX</span></span><br />
<br />
<img src="https://seedeu3656.gloriatv.net/storage1/l9buvqryegjx0cu3coh2h74yqx8uvl8yw76mgy2?secure=wNU7jsx9zb3CI2i2bftFmg&amp;expires=1782991906" loading="lazy"  width="400" height="250" alt="[Image: l9buvqryegjx0cu3coh2h74yqx8uvl8yw76mgy2?...1782991906]" class="mycode_img" /></div>
<br />
<br />
<a href="https://gloria.tv/share/4Eb3yEksSWBE12XcbQpfMogRH" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">gloria.tv</a> | June 30, 2026<br />
<br />
<span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Yesterday, Leo XIV wrote to the Priestly Fraternity of St. Pius X. He acknowledged the FSSPX's devotion to Tradition, the liturgy, and priestly formation. He begs them to "turn back" from a prospective "schismatic act", warning of its grave consequences while reaffirming the Church's openness to dialogue and reconciliation. The letter:</span><br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>To the Reverend Father Davide Pagliarani<br />
Superior General of the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X<br />
<br />
With a paternal heart, and aware of the responsibility entrusted to me by the Lord as the Successor of the Apostle Peter, I address you and, through you, the bishops, priests, seminarians and faithful connected to the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X.<br />
<br />
The Church recognizes the devotion to liturgical life, commitment to priestly formation, apostolic zeal and desire for fidelity to Tradition that characterize many people and communities connected to your Fraternity. This has motivated the attentive and generous attitude that my Predecessors have consistently shown to you.<br />
<br />
In this spirit, and filled with Christian affection, I plead with you and ask you with all my heart: please turn back! I urge you to consider carefully the spiritual good of the faithful, because the schismatic act you are about to undertake would deprive them of the licit and, in some cases, even valid reception of the Sacraments, which they love and seek for their sanctification.<br />
<br />
The Church is open to a path of dialogue and understanding that the Holy Spirit can make possible and fruitful.<br />
<br />
I pray for you, because to tear the seamless garment of Christ is a sin of extreme gravity. May the Lord enlighten your consciences and awaken your hearts. With a sorrowful yet hopeful heart, I feel it is my duty, through the authority received from Christ, to ask you to desist from your intended act. I entrust these intentions to the Immaculate Heart of Mary, Mother of Good Counsel.<br />
<br />
From the Vatican, 29 June 2026<br />
Solemnity of the Holy Apostles Peter and Paul<br />
<br />
LEO PP. XIV</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[SSPX: Open Letter to Pope Leo XIV and to the Cardinals of the Holy Church]]></title>
			<link>https://thecatacombs.org/showthread.php?tid=8428</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 12:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://thecatacombs.org/member.php?action=profile&uid=1">Stone</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thecatacombs.org/showthread.php?tid=8428</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;" class="mycode_align"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b"><span style="text-decoration: underline;" class="mycode_u">Open Letter to His Holiness Pope Leo XIV and to the Cardinals of the Holy Church</span><br />
by the SSPX Bishops and Superior General</span> [taken from <a href="https://onepeterfive.com/open-letter-to-his-holiness-pope-leo-xiv-and-to-the-cardinals-of-the-holy-church/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">here</a>]<br />
</div>
<br />
June 24, 2026<br />
<br />
From the <a href="https://fsspx.news/en/news/open-letter-his-holiness-pope-leo-xiv-and-cardinals-holy-church-59815" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">SSPX website</a><br />
<br />
Most Holy Father,<br />
Most Reverend Eminences,<br />
<br />
On the eve of the Consistory at the end of this month, and just days before the episcopal consecrations scheduled for 1 July in Écône, it seems to us that the time has come for the Priestly Society of Saint Pius X to make a full profession of Catholic Faith, which we wish to place in the hands of Your Holiness and each one of the Cardinals. [“<a href="https://fsspx.news/sites/default/files/documents/profession_of_catholic_faith_en.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">Profession of Catholic Faith of the Society of Saint Pius X to Enlighten Souls in the Face of Modern Errors</a>“]<br />
<br />
Today the Church suffers under the pressure of new forces, coming both from within and without, which push her in every possible direction, except – it seems to us – the right one. In the face of such suffering, we cannot remain indifferent.<br />
<br />
It is not for the Society of Saint Pius X to indicate the path to follow, but rather for the two-thousand-year Tradition of the Church, faithfully guarded and transmitted by the Apostolic See through the centuries, and which many now regard, in practice, as an outdated reality, subject to perpetual development.<br />
<br />
It is in the name of this same Tradition, and in its sole light, that we formulate today this profession of Catholic Faith in response to the chief errors and gravest dangers of our time.<br />
<br />
We are convinced that Tradition contains all the remedies for the deepest ills afflicting the Church and the world, for which solutions are sought in vain outside of it. The immutable and integral Faith is the principle, the foundation, and the root of the salvation of souls. This Faith, contained in Tradition and taught by the constant Magisterium, constitutes the true foundation of the unity of the Church and, consequently, the necessary means of establishing union and communion among the members of the Mystical Body of Christ.<br />
<br />
Above the changes and vicissitudes of time stands the immutable Tradition, the echo in history of eternal Truth.<br />
<br />
We can but hope and implore that this Tradition and the purity of Faith be once again placed at the foundation of the life of the Church, so that from them an authentic regeneration may begin. It is with this intention that we pray with urgency.<br />
<br />
We are persuaded that, in the unstable and extremely perilous context that now confronts us, the finest contribution one can offer to the universal Church is that of a sincere and integral profession of Catholic Faith.<br />
<br />
We hope that one day this doctrinal text may serve as a basis for an honest discussion with the Holy See, in a spirit of peace, brotherhood, and charity.<br />
<br />
The text we submit to you is not the sterile repetition of a group of nostalgics, but the necessary expression, peaceful and resolute, of our Faith.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Non enim possumus aliquid adversus veritatem sed pro veritate.</span><br />
“For we can do nothing against the truth; but only for the truth.”<br />
<br />
And according to the Psalmist, taken up by Saint Paul:<br />
<br />
<span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Et nos credimus propter quod et loquimur.</span><br />
“We also believe, for which cause we speak.”<br />
<br />
With thanks for the attention you will deign to give this text, we assure you of our constant prayers, for you and for the universal Church.<br />
<br />
Menzingen, 24 June 2026, the Nativity of Saint John the Baptist<br />
<br />
Davide Pagliarani <br />
Superior General<br />
<br />
+ Alfonso de Galarreta<br />
First Assistant General<br />
<br />
Christian Bouchacourt<br />
Second Assistant General<br />
<br />
+ Bernard Fellay<br />
First Counsellor General<br />
Former Superior General<br />
<br />
Franz Schmidberger<br />
Second Counsellor General<br />
Former Superior General]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;" class="mycode_align"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b"><span style="text-decoration: underline;" class="mycode_u">Open Letter to His Holiness Pope Leo XIV and to the Cardinals of the Holy Church</span><br />
by the SSPX Bishops and Superior General</span> [taken from <a href="https://onepeterfive.com/open-letter-to-his-holiness-pope-leo-xiv-and-to-the-cardinals-of-the-holy-church/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">here</a>]<br />
</div>
<br />
June 24, 2026<br />
<br />
From the <a href="https://fsspx.news/en/news/open-letter-his-holiness-pope-leo-xiv-and-cardinals-holy-church-59815" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">SSPX website</a><br />
<br />
Most Holy Father,<br />
Most Reverend Eminences,<br />
<br />
On the eve of the Consistory at the end of this month, and just days before the episcopal consecrations scheduled for 1 July in Écône, it seems to us that the time has come for the Priestly Society of Saint Pius X to make a full profession of Catholic Faith, which we wish to place in the hands of Your Holiness and each one of the Cardinals. [“<a href="https://fsspx.news/sites/default/files/documents/profession_of_catholic_faith_en.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">Profession of Catholic Faith of the Society of Saint Pius X to Enlighten Souls in the Face of Modern Errors</a>“]<br />
<br />
Today the Church suffers under the pressure of new forces, coming both from within and without, which push her in every possible direction, except – it seems to us – the right one. In the face of such suffering, we cannot remain indifferent.<br />
<br />
It is not for the Society of Saint Pius X to indicate the path to follow, but rather for the two-thousand-year Tradition of the Church, faithfully guarded and transmitted by the Apostolic See through the centuries, and which many now regard, in practice, as an outdated reality, subject to perpetual development.<br />
<br />
It is in the name of this same Tradition, and in its sole light, that we formulate today this profession of Catholic Faith in response to the chief errors and gravest dangers of our time.<br />
<br />
We are convinced that Tradition contains all the remedies for the deepest ills afflicting the Church and the world, for which solutions are sought in vain outside of it. The immutable and integral Faith is the principle, the foundation, and the root of the salvation of souls. This Faith, contained in Tradition and taught by the constant Magisterium, constitutes the true foundation of the unity of the Church and, consequently, the necessary means of establishing union and communion among the members of the Mystical Body of Christ.<br />
<br />
Above the changes and vicissitudes of time stands the immutable Tradition, the echo in history of eternal Truth.<br />
<br />
We can but hope and implore that this Tradition and the purity of Faith be once again placed at the foundation of the life of the Church, so that from them an authentic regeneration may begin. It is with this intention that we pray with urgency.<br />
<br />
We are persuaded that, in the unstable and extremely perilous context that now confronts us, the finest contribution one can offer to the universal Church is that of a sincere and integral profession of Catholic Faith.<br />
<br />
We hope that one day this doctrinal text may serve as a basis for an honest discussion with the Holy See, in a spirit of peace, brotherhood, and charity.<br />
<br />
The text we submit to you is not the sterile repetition of a group of nostalgics, but the necessary expression, peaceful and resolute, of our Faith.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Non enim possumus aliquid adversus veritatem sed pro veritate.</span><br />
“For we can do nothing against the truth; but only for the truth.”<br />
<br />
And according to the Psalmist, taken up by Saint Paul:<br />
<br />
<span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Et nos credimus propter quod et loquimur.</span><br />
“We also believe, for which cause we speak.”<br />
<br />
With thanks for the attention you will deign to give this text, we assure you of our constant prayers, for you and for the universal Church.<br />
<br />
Menzingen, 24 June 2026, the Nativity of Saint John the Baptist<br />
<br />
Davide Pagliarani <br />
Superior General<br />
<br />
+ Alfonso de Galarreta<br />
First Assistant General<br />
<br />
Christian Bouchacourt<br />
Second Assistant General<br />
<br />
+ Bernard Fellay<br />
First Counsellor General<br />
Former Superior General<br />
<br />
Franz Schmidberger<br />
Second Counsellor General<br />
Former Superior General]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[SSPX announces names of bishops-elect]]></title>
			<link>https://thecatacombs.org/showthread.php?tid=8331</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 13:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://thecatacombs.org/member.php?action=profile&uid=1">Stone</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thecatacombs.org/showthread.php?tid=8331</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;" class="mycode_align"><span style="text-decoration: underline;" class="mycode_u"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">SSPX bishops-elect hail from big families</span></span><br />
The announcement comes after months of speculation regarding the names and number of the future bishops of the SSPX.<br />
<br />
<img src="https://www.lifesitenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Untitled-11.png" loading="lazy"  width="400" height="250" alt="[Image: Untitled-11.png]" class="mycode_img" /><br />
<br />
SSPX Superior General Father Davide Pagliarani<br />
SSPX</div>
<br />
May 26, 2026 <br />
(<a href="https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/breaking-sspx-announces-names-of-new-bishops/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">LifeSiteNews</a>) — The Society of Saint Pius X’s General House in Menzingen, Switzerland, has announced the names of the four men to be consecrated to the episcopate on July 1, 2026. Strikingly, they all come from big families.<br />
<br />
The bishops-elect are:<ul class="mycode_list"><li>Father Pascal Schreiber (Swiss)<br />
</li>
<li>Father Michael Goldade (American)<br />
</li>
<li>Father Michel Poinsinet de Sivry (French)<br />
</li>
<li>Father Marc Hanappier (French).<br />
</li>
</ul>
Menzingen issued a communiqué with short biographies of each of the four future bishops, which is reproduced below. The biographies reveal that Fr. Schreiber was one of five children, while Fr. Goldade, Fr. Poinsinet de Sivry, and Fr. Hanappier all come from families with ten siblings. <br />
<br />
The announcement of the names – and the number of future bishops – follows months of speculation since the SSPX’s announcement of their consecration plans on February 2, 2026.<br />
<br />
The announcement comes 13 days after Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernández of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith published a statement warning the SSPX that consecrating bishops without papal mandate would be a “schismatic act” and referred to excommunications.<br />
<br />
[Article continues <a href="https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/breaking-sspx-announces-names-of-new-bishops/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">here</a>.]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;" class="mycode_align"><span style="text-decoration: underline;" class="mycode_u"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">SSPX bishops-elect hail from big families</span></span><br />
The announcement comes after months of speculation regarding the names and number of the future bishops of the SSPX.<br />
<br />
<img src="https://www.lifesitenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Untitled-11.png" loading="lazy"  width="400" height="250" alt="[Image: Untitled-11.png]" class="mycode_img" /><br />
<br />
SSPX Superior General Father Davide Pagliarani<br />
SSPX</div>
<br />
May 26, 2026 <br />
(<a href="https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/breaking-sspx-announces-names-of-new-bishops/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">LifeSiteNews</a>) — The Society of Saint Pius X’s General House in Menzingen, Switzerland, has announced the names of the four men to be consecrated to the episcopate on July 1, 2026. Strikingly, they all come from big families.<br />
<br />
The bishops-elect are:<ul class="mycode_list"><li>Father Pascal Schreiber (Swiss)<br />
</li>
<li>Father Michael Goldade (American)<br />
</li>
<li>Father Michel Poinsinet de Sivry (French)<br />
</li>
<li>Father Marc Hanappier (French).<br />
</li>
</ul>
Menzingen issued a communiqué with short biographies of each of the four future bishops, which is reproduced below. The biographies reveal that Fr. Schreiber was one of five children, while Fr. Goldade, Fr. Poinsinet de Sivry, and Fr. Hanappier all come from families with ten siblings. <br />
<br />
The announcement of the names – and the number of future bishops – follows months of speculation since the SSPX’s announcement of their consecration plans on February 2, 2026.<br />
<br />
The announcement comes 13 days after Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernández of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith published a statement warning the SSPX that consecrating bishops without papal mandate would be a “schismatic act” and referred to excommunications.<br />
<br />
[Article continues <a href="https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/breaking-sspx-announces-names-of-new-bishops/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">here</a>.]]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[BREAKING: SSPX responds to Vatican threats with profession of faith]]></title>
			<link>https://thecatacombs.org/showthread.php?tid=8284</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 10:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://thecatacombs.org/member.php?action=profile&uid=1">Stone</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thecatacombs.org/showthread.php?tid=8284</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[NB: I confess, I hoped that with this new 'Declaration' the SSPX would reestablish itself upon more solid ground as it did so very clearly during the years Archbishop Lefebvre was still at it's helm. But that did not happen. This is a very watered down 'Declaration' with no mention of Vatican II, of the dangers of the New Mass, but rather taking aim at the moral errors and 'climate' errors but failing miserably to address the source of these and the doctrinal errors that emerged from Vatican II. Contrast this with the clear, decisive 1974 Declaration of Archbishop Lefebvre! <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;" class="mycode_align"><span style="text-decoration: underline;" class="mycode_u"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">BREAKING: SSPX responds to Vatican threats with profession of faith</span></span><br />
'There is only one Faith and one Church by which we may be saved,' writes Father Pagliarani of the SSPX.<br />
<br />
<img src="https://www.lifesitenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Screenshot-2023-05-17-133817-e1778764150309.png" loading="lazy"  width="400" height="250" alt="[Image: Screenshot-2023-05-17-133817-e1778764150309.png]" class="mycode_img" /><br />
<br />
SSPX Superior General Fr. Davide Pagliarani<br />
YouTube/Screenshot</div>
<br />
May 14, 2026<br />
(<a href="https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/breaking-sspx-responds-to-vatican-threats-with-profession-of-faith/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">LifeSiteNews</a>) — The Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX) has responded to yesterday’s warning from the Vatican with a <a href="https://sspx.org/sites/default/files/documents/2026-05-14_declaration_of_catholic_faith_en.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">profession of faith</a>.<br />
<br />
This morning, May 14, Father Davide Pagliarani, the Switzerland-based superior general of the traditionalist priestly society, released a letter to Pope Leo XIV. In the letter Fr. Pagliariani addressed yesterday’s accusations of schism and threat of excommunication by expressing the SSPX’s devotion to perennial Catholic doctrine. [...]<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;" class="mycode_u">Full letter published below</span>:<br />
<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>Declaration of Catholic Faith<br />
addressed to His Holiness Pope Leo XIV<br />
by Fr. Davide Pagliarani<br />
Superior General of the Priestly Society of Saint Pius X<br />
<br />
Most Holy Father,<br />
<br />
For more than fifty years, the Society of Saint Pius X has endeavoured to set before the Holy See a matter of conscience in the face of the errors that are destroying Catholic faith and morals. Regrettably, all the discussions entered into have remained without result, and none of the concerns expressed have received any truly satisfactory response.<br />
<br />
For more than fifty years, the only solution truly considered by the Holy See has appeared to be that of canonical sanctions. To our great regret, it seems to us that canon law is thus being used, not to confirm in the faith, but to lead away from it.<br />
<br />
In the text that follows, the Society of Saint Pius X is glad to express to You, filially and sincerely, its devotion to the Catholic faith, concealing nothing, either from Your Holiness or from the universal Church.<br />
<br />
The Society places this simple Declaration of Faith in Your hands. It seems to us to correspond to the minimum indispensable to be in communion with the Church, and to truly call ourselves Catholics and, consequently, your sons.<br />
<br />
We have no other desire than that of living and being confirmed in the Roman Catholic Faith.<br />
<br />
“Thus, remaining firmly rooted and established in the true Catholic Faith,<br />
strive always to be worthy ministers of the divine Sacrifice<br />
and of the Church of God, which is the Body of Christ.<br />
<br />
For, as the Apostle says: ‘all that is not of faith<br />
is sin’,[1] schismatic and outside the unity of the Church.”[2]<br />
<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;" class="mycode_align"><span style="text-decoration: underline;" class="mycode_u">DECLARATION OF CATHOLIC FAITH</span></div>
<br />
In the Name of Our Lord Jesus Christ, divine Wisdom, the Word Incarnate, Who willed one sole religion, Who rendered the Old Covenant definitively null and void, Who founded one sole Church, Who triumphed over Satan, Who conquered the world, Who remains with us until the end of time and Who shall come again to judge the living and the dead.<br />
<br />
He, the perfect Image of the Father, the Son of God made man, was appointed the sole Redeemer and Saviour of the world through the Incarnation and the voluntary offering of the Sacrifice of the Cross. Our Lord satisfied divine justice by shedding His Most Precious Blood, and it is in that Blood that He established the New and Eternal Covenant, abolishing the Old. He is therefore the sole Mediator between God and men and the sole way to come to the Father. Only he who knows Him knows the Father.<br />
<br />
By divine decree, the Most Holy Virgin Mary has been directly and intimately associated with the entire work of Redemption; to deny this association — in the terms received from Tradition — is therefore to alter the very notion of Redemption as willed by divine Providence.<br />
<br />
There is only one Faith and one Church by which we may be saved. Outside the Roman Catholic Church, and without the profession of Faith that she has always taught, there is neither salvation nor remission of sins.<br />
<br />
Consequently, every man must be a member of the Catholic Church in order to save his soul, and there is but one baptism as the means of being incorporated into her. This necessity concerns the whole of humanity without exception and embraces without distinction Christians, Jews, Muslims, pagans, and atheists.<br />
<br />
The mandate received by the Apostles, to preach the Gospel to every man and to convert every man to the Catholic faith, remains binding until the end of time and responds to the most absolute and most pressing necessity in the world. “He that believeth and is baptized, shall be saved: but he that believeth not shall be condemned.”[3] Therefore, to renounce the fulfilment of this mandate constitutes the gravest of crimes against humanity.<br />
<br />
The Roman Church alone possesses simultaneously the four marks that characterize the Church founded by Jesus Christ: Unity, Holiness, Catholicity, and Apostolicity.<br />
<br />
Her unity flows essentially from the adherence of all her members to the one true Faith, faithfully preserved, taught, and handed down by the Catholic hierarchy throughout the centuries.<br />
<br />
The denial of even a single truth of faith destroys faith itself and renders radically impossible all communion with the Catholic Church.<br />
<br />
The only possible path to restoring unity among Christians of different confessions consists in the urgent and charitable appeal addressed to non-Catholics to profess the one true Faith within the one true Church.<br />
<br />
The Catholic Church can in no way be regarded or treated on an equal footing with a false form of worship or a false church.<br />
<br />
The Roman Pontiff, the Vicar of Christ, is the sole possessor of supreme authority over the whole Church. He alone directly confers on the other members of the Catholic hierarchy jurisdiction over souls.<br />
<br />
“The Holy Ghost was not promised to the successors of Peter that they might make known, by His revelation, a new doctrine, but that, by His assistance, they might inviolably keep and faithfully expound the revelation transmitted by the Apostles, that is, the Deposit of the Faith.” [4]<br />
<br />
To a unique Faith there corresponds a unique form of worship, the supreme, authentic, and perfect expression of that same Faith.<br />
<br />
The Holy Mass is the perpetuation in time of the Sacrifice of the Cross, offered for many and renewed upon the altar. Although offered in an unbloody manner, the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass is essentially expiatory and propitiatory. No other form of worship offers perfect adoration. No other form of worship that is not ordered to it is pleasing to God. No other means is sufficient for the sanctification of souls.<br />
<br />
Consequently, the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass can in no way be reduced to a mere commemoration, to a spiritual meal, to a sacred assembly celebrated by the people, to the celebration of the Paschal mystery without sacrifice, without satisfaction of divine justice, without expiation of sins, without propitiation, and without the Cross.<br />
<br />
The help afforded to souls by the Sacraments of the Catholic Church is sufficient in every circumstance and in every age to enable the faithful to live in a state of grace.<br />
<br />
The moral law contained in the Decalogue and perfected in the Sermon on the Mount is the only one practicable for obtaining the salvation of souls. Every other moral code — founded, for example, on respect for creation or on the rights of the human person — is radically insufficient to sanctify and save souls. In no way can it replace the one true moral law.<br />
<br />
Following the example of Saint John the Baptist, true charity obliges us to warn sinners and never to renounce the means necessary to save their souls.<br />
<br />
He who eats the Body of Our Lord and drinks His Blood whilst in a state of sin eats and drinks his own condemnation, and no authority can alter this law contained in the teaching of Saint Paul and in Tradition.<br />
<br />
Sins of impurity that are against nature are of such gravity that they always and in every circumstance cry to God for vengeance, and are radically incompatible with every form of authentic Christian love. Such a ‘lifestyle’ can therefore in no way be recognized as a gift from God. A couple practising this vice must be helped to free themselves from it, and can in no way be blessed — formally or informally — by ministers of the Church.<br />
<br />
The submission of institutions and nations, as such, to the authority of Our Lord Jesus Christ flows directly from the Incarnation and the Redemption. Therefore, secularism of institutions and nations constitutes an implicit denial of the divinity and universal kingship of Our Lord.<br />
<br />
Christendom is not a mere historical phenomenon, but the only order willed by God among men.<br />
<br />
It is not for the Church to conform herself to the world, but for the world to be transformed by the Church.<br />
<br />
It is in this Faith and in these principles that we ask to be instructed and confirmed by Him Who has received the charism to do so. With the help of Our Lord, we would rather die than renounce them. It is in this immutable Faith that we desire to live and die, in the hope that it may give way to the direct vision of the immutable eternal Truth.<br />
<br />
Menzingen, 14 May 2026,<br />
on the Feast of the Ascension of Our Lord<br />
<br />
Davide Pagliarani<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: xx-small;" class="mycode_size">[1] Rom. 14:23<br />
<br />
[2] Roman Pontifical, Admonition to ordinands to the subdiaconate<br />
<br />
[3] Mark 16:16<br />
<br />
[4] Pastor Aeternus, ch. 4</span></blockquote>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[NB: I confess, I hoped that with this new 'Declaration' the SSPX would reestablish itself upon more solid ground as it did so very clearly during the years Archbishop Lefebvre was still at it's helm. But that did not happen. This is a very watered down 'Declaration' with no mention of Vatican II, of the dangers of the New Mass, but rather taking aim at the moral errors and 'climate' errors but failing miserably to address the source of these and the doctrinal errors that emerged from Vatican II. Contrast this with the clear, decisive 1974 Declaration of Archbishop Lefebvre! <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;" class="mycode_align"><span style="text-decoration: underline;" class="mycode_u"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">BREAKING: SSPX responds to Vatican threats with profession of faith</span></span><br />
'There is only one Faith and one Church by which we may be saved,' writes Father Pagliarani of the SSPX.<br />
<br />
<img src="https://www.lifesitenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Screenshot-2023-05-17-133817-e1778764150309.png" loading="lazy"  width="400" height="250" alt="[Image: Screenshot-2023-05-17-133817-e1778764150309.png]" class="mycode_img" /><br />
<br />
SSPX Superior General Fr. Davide Pagliarani<br />
YouTube/Screenshot</div>
<br />
May 14, 2026<br />
(<a href="https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/breaking-sspx-responds-to-vatican-threats-with-profession-of-faith/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">LifeSiteNews</a>) — The Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX) has responded to yesterday’s warning from the Vatican with a <a href="https://sspx.org/sites/default/files/documents/2026-05-14_declaration_of_catholic_faith_en.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">profession of faith</a>.<br />
<br />
This morning, May 14, Father Davide Pagliarani, the Switzerland-based superior general of the traditionalist priestly society, released a letter to Pope Leo XIV. In the letter Fr. Pagliariani addressed yesterday’s accusations of schism and threat of excommunication by expressing the SSPX’s devotion to perennial Catholic doctrine. [...]<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;" class="mycode_u">Full letter published below</span>:<br />
<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="mycode_quote"><cite>Quote:</cite>Declaration of Catholic Faith<br />
addressed to His Holiness Pope Leo XIV<br />
by Fr. Davide Pagliarani<br />
Superior General of the Priestly Society of Saint Pius X<br />
<br />
Most Holy Father,<br />
<br />
For more than fifty years, the Society of Saint Pius X has endeavoured to set before the Holy See a matter of conscience in the face of the errors that are destroying Catholic faith and morals. Regrettably, all the discussions entered into have remained without result, and none of the concerns expressed have received any truly satisfactory response.<br />
<br />
For more than fifty years, the only solution truly considered by the Holy See has appeared to be that of canonical sanctions. To our great regret, it seems to us that canon law is thus being used, not to confirm in the faith, but to lead away from it.<br />
<br />
In the text that follows, the Society of Saint Pius X is glad to express to You, filially and sincerely, its devotion to the Catholic faith, concealing nothing, either from Your Holiness or from the universal Church.<br />
<br />
The Society places this simple Declaration of Faith in Your hands. It seems to us to correspond to the minimum indispensable to be in communion with the Church, and to truly call ourselves Catholics and, consequently, your sons.<br />
<br />
We have no other desire than that of living and being confirmed in the Roman Catholic Faith.<br />
<br />
“Thus, remaining firmly rooted and established in the true Catholic Faith,<br />
strive always to be worthy ministers of the divine Sacrifice<br />
and of the Church of God, which is the Body of Christ.<br />
<br />
For, as the Apostle says: ‘all that is not of faith<br />
is sin’,[1] schismatic and outside the unity of the Church.”[2]<br />
<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;" class="mycode_align"><span style="text-decoration: underline;" class="mycode_u">DECLARATION OF CATHOLIC FAITH</span></div>
<br />
In the Name of Our Lord Jesus Christ, divine Wisdom, the Word Incarnate, Who willed one sole religion, Who rendered the Old Covenant definitively null and void, Who founded one sole Church, Who triumphed over Satan, Who conquered the world, Who remains with us until the end of time and Who shall come again to judge the living and the dead.<br />
<br />
He, the perfect Image of the Father, the Son of God made man, was appointed the sole Redeemer and Saviour of the world through the Incarnation and the voluntary offering of the Sacrifice of the Cross. Our Lord satisfied divine justice by shedding His Most Precious Blood, and it is in that Blood that He established the New and Eternal Covenant, abolishing the Old. He is therefore the sole Mediator between God and men and the sole way to come to the Father. Only he who knows Him knows the Father.<br />
<br />
By divine decree, the Most Holy Virgin Mary has been directly and intimately associated with the entire work of Redemption; to deny this association — in the terms received from Tradition — is therefore to alter the very notion of Redemption as willed by divine Providence.<br />
<br />
There is only one Faith and one Church by which we may be saved. Outside the Roman Catholic Church, and without the profession of Faith that she has always taught, there is neither salvation nor remission of sins.<br />
<br />
Consequently, every man must be a member of the Catholic Church in order to save his soul, and there is but one baptism as the means of being incorporated into her. This necessity concerns the whole of humanity without exception and embraces without distinction Christians, Jews, Muslims, pagans, and atheists.<br />
<br />
The mandate received by the Apostles, to preach the Gospel to every man and to convert every man to the Catholic faith, remains binding until the end of time and responds to the most absolute and most pressing necessity in the world. “He that believeth and is baptized, shall be saved: but he that believeth not shall be condemned.”[3] Therefore, to renounce the fulfilment of this mandate constitutes the gravest of crimes against humanity.<br />
<br />
The Roman Church alone possesses simultaneously the four marks that characterize the Church founded by Jesus Christ: Unity, Holiness, Catholicity, and Apostolicity.<br />
<br />
Her unity flows essentially from the adherence of all her members to the one true Faith, faithfully preserved, taught, and handed down by the Catholic hierarchy throughout the centuries.<br />
<br />
The denial of even a single truth of faith destroys faith itself and renders radically impossible all communion with the Catholic Church.<br />
<br />
The only possible path to restoring unity among Christians of different confessions consists in the urgent and charitable appeal addressed to non-Catholics to profess the one true Faith within the one true Church.<br />
<br />
The Catholic Church can in no way be regarded or treated on an equal footing with a false form of worship or a false church.<br />
<br />
The Roman Pontiff, the Vicar of Christ, is the sole possessor of supreme authority over the whole Church. He alone directly confers on the other members of the Catholic hierarchy jurisdiction over souls.<br />
<br />
“The Holy Ghost was not promised to the successors of Peter that they might make known, by His revelation, a new doctrine, but that, by His assistance, they might inviolably keep and faithfully expound the revelation transmitted by the Apostles, that is, the Deposit of the Faith.” [4]<br />
<br />
To a unique Faith there corresponds a unique form of worship, the supreme, authentic, and perfect expression of that same Faith.<br />
<br />
The Holy Mass is the perpetuation in time of the Sacrifice of the Cross, offered for many and renewed upon the altar. Although offered in an unbloody manner, the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass is essentially expiatory and propitiatory. No other form of worship offers perfect adoration. No other form of worship that is not ordered to it is pleasing to God. No other means is sufficient for the sanctification of souls.<br />
<br />
Consequently, the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass can in no way be reduced to a mere commemoration, to a spiritual meal, to a sacred assembly celebrated by the people, to the celebration of the Paschal mystery without sacrifice, without satisfaction of divine justice, without expiation of sins, without propitiation, and without the Cross.<br />
<br />
The help afforded to souls by the Sacraments of the Catholic Church is sufficient in every circumstance and in every age to enable the faithful to live in a state of grace.<br />
<br />
The moral law contained in the Decalogue and perfected in the Sermon on the Mount is the only one practicable for obtaining the salvation of souls. Every other moral code — founded, for example, on respect for creation or on the rights of the human person — is radically insufficient to sanctify and save souls. In no way can it replace the one true moral law.<br />
<br />
Following the example of Saint John the Baptist, true charity obliges us to warn sinners and never to renounce the means necessary to save their souls.<br />
<br />
He who eats the Body of Our Lord and drinks His Blood whilst in a state of sin eats and drinks his own condemnation, and no authority can alter this law contained in the teaching of Saint Paul and in Tradition.<br />
<br />
Sins of impurity that are against nature are of such gravity that they always and in every circumstance cry to God for vengeance, and are radically incompatible with every form of authentic Christian love. Such a ‘lifestyle’ can therefore in no way be recognized as a gift from God. A couple practising this vice must be helped to free themselves from it, and can in no way be blessed — formally or informally — by ministers of the Church.<br />
<br />
The submission of institutions and nations, as such, to the authority of Our Lord Jesus Christ flows directly from the Incarnation and the Redemption. Therefore, secularism of institutions and nations constitutes an implicit denial of the divinity and universal kingship of Our Lord.<br />
<br />
Christendom is not a mere historical phenomenon, but the only order willed by God among men.<br />
<br />
It is not for the Church to conform herself to the world, but for the world to be transformed by the Church.<br />
<br />
It is in this Faith and in these principles that we ask to be instructed and confirmed by Him Who has received the charism to do so. With the help of Our Lord, we would rather die than renounce them. It is in this immutable Faith that we desire to live and die, in the hope that it may give way to the direct vision of the immutable eternal Truth.<br />
<br />
Menzingen, 14 May 2026,<br />
on the Feast of the Ascension of Our Lord<br />
<br />
Davide Pagliarani<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: xx-small;" class="mycode_size">[1] Rom. 14:23<br />
<br />
[2] Roman Pontifical, Admonition to ordinands to the subdiaconate<br />
<br />
[3] Mark 16:16<br />
<br />
[4] Pastor Aeternus, ch. 4</span></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Leo XIV Asks FSSPX to Reconsider Episcopal Ordinations - Schismatic Act]]></title>
			<link>https://thecatacombs.org/showthread.php?tid=8281</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 21:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://thecatacombs.org/member.php?action=profile&uid=1">Stone</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thecatacombs.org/showthread.php?tid=8281</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;" class="mycode_align"><span style="text-decoration: underline;" class="mycode_u"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">Leo XIV Asks FSSPX to Reconsider Episcopal Ordinations - Schismatic Act</span></span><br />
<br />
<img src="https://seedus0275.gloriatv.net/storage1/wdn4euv73gwp6ej6da0aa2rjm2mog37zn3epxan?secure=0T6iKjindbtahof67sgUzA&amp;expires=1778809099" loading="lazy"  width="400" height="225" alt="[Image: wdn4euv73gwp6ej6da0aa2rjm2mog37zn3epxan?...1778809099]" class="mycode_img" /></div>
<br />
<br />
<a href="https://gloria.tv/post/sBuCkAZtzWmE6MshvgbVtnUeV" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">gloria.tv</a> | May 13, 2026<br />
<br />
Today, Cardinal Tucho Fernández, soft porn author and Prefect of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, issued a statement on the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X. The text reads:<br />
<br />
“Regarding the Priestly Fraternity of St. Pius X, we reiterate what has already been communicated.<br />
<br />
The episcopal ordinations announced by the Priestly Fraternity of St. Pius X do not have the corresponding papal mandate. This act constitutes ‘a schismatic act’ (John Paul II, Ecclesia Dei, n. 3) and ‘formal adherence to schism constitutes a grave offense against God and entails the excommunication established by the law of the Church’ (ibid., 5c; cf. Pontifical Council for Legislative Texts, Explanatory Note, August 24, 1996).<br />
<br />
The Holy Father continues to pray that the Holy Spirit will enlighten those responsible for the Priestly Fraternity of Sts Pius X so that they may reconsider the their grave decision.”]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;" class="mycode_align"><span style="text-decoration: underline;" class="mycode_u"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">Leo XIV Asks FSSPX to Reconsider Episcopal Ordinations - Schismatic Act</span></span><br />
<br />
<img src="https://seedus0275.gloriatv.net/storage1/wdn4euv73gwp6ej6da0aa2rjm2mog37zn3epxan?secure=0T6iKjindbtahof67sgUzA&amp;expires=1778809099" loading="lazy"  width="400" height="225" alt="[Image: wdn4euv73gwp6ej6da0aa2rjm2mog37zn3epxan?...1778809099]" class="mycode_img" /></div>
<br />
<br />
<a href="https://gloria.tv/post/sBuCkAZtzWmE6MshvgbVtnUeV" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">gloria.tv</a> | May 13, 2026<br />
<br />
Today, Cardinal Tucho Fernández, soft porn author and Prefect of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, issued a statement on the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X. The text reads:<br />
<br />
“Regarding the Priestly Fraternity of St. Pius X, we reiterate what has already been communicated.<br />
<br />
The episcopal ordinations announced by the Priestly Fraternity of St. Pius X do not have the corresponding papal mandate. This act constitutes ‘a schismatic act’ (John Paul II, Ecclesia Dei, n. 3) and ‘formal adherence to schism constitutes a grave offense against God and entails the excommunication established by the law of the Church’ (ibid., 5c; cf. Pontifical Council for Legislative Texts, Explanatory Note, August 24, 1996).<br />
<br />
The Holy Father continues to pray that the Holy Spirit will enlighten those responsible for the Priestly Fraternity of Sts Pius X so that they may reconsider the their grave decision.”]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Bishop Fellay: Excommunication Highly Probable]]></title>
			<link>https://thecatacombs.org/showthread.php?tid=8236</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 11:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://thecatacombs.org/member.php?action=profile&uid=1">Stone</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thecatacombs.org/showthread.php?tid=8236</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;" class="mycode_align"><span style="text-decoration: underline;" class="mycode_u"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">Bishop Fellay: Excommunication Highly Probable</span></span><br />
<br />
<img src="https://seedus4268.gloriatv.net/storage1/u0ju2qh8vis18hvqobq520lgmep00e8pivcjuaz?secure=7sR4w6bu7ws9BCVyCmqqxA&amp;expires=1777617861" loading="lazy"  width="400" height="250" alt="[Image: u0ju2qh8vis18hvqobq520lgmep00e8pivcjuaz?...1777617861]" class="mycode_img" /></div>
<br />
<br />
<a href="https://gloria.tv/post/VDpBwoYqLFpF2nxKtSkuFhgQG" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">gloria.tv</a> | April 28, 2026<br />
<br />
Bishop Bernard Fellay has warned members of the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X (FSSPX) that they could face excommunication after the episcopal consecrations planned for July 1.<br />
<br />
He made these remarks during a sermon at a confirmation on April 19 in St. Marys, Kansas, USA, as reported by AdVaticanum.com.<br />
<br />
Monsignor Fellay called it “enormously probable” that the FSSPX would be declared excommunicated and schismatic. He repeated: “There is a very high probability.” [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;" class="mycode_align"><span style="text-decoration: underline;" class="mycode_u"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">Bishop Fellay: Excommunication Highly Probable</span></span><br />
<br />
<img src="https://seedus4268.gloriatv.net/storage1/u0ju2qh8vis18hvqobq520lgmep00e8pivcjuaz?secure=7sR4w6bu7ws9BCVyCmqqxA&amp;expires=1777617861" loading="lazy"  width="400" height="250" alt="[Image: u0ju2qh8vis18hvqobq520lgmep00e8pivcjuaz?...1777617861]" class="mycode_img" /></div>
<br />
<br />
<a href="https://gloria.tv/post/VDpBwoYqLFpF2nxKtSkuFhgQG" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">gloria.tv</a> | April 28, 2026<br />
<br />
Bishop Bernard Fellay has warned members of the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X (FSSPX) that they could face excommunication after the episcopal consecrations planned for July 1.<br />
<br />
He made these remarks during a sermon at a confirmation on April 19 in St. Marys, Kansas, USA, as reported by AdVaticanum.com.<br />
<br />
Monsignor Fellay called it “enormously probable” that the FSSPX would be declared excommunicated and schismatic. He repeated: “There is a very high probability.” [...]]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Leo XIV Rumored to Prepare Excommunication of FSSPX]]></title>
			<link>https://thecatacombs.org/showthread.php?tid=8222</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 10:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://thecatacombs.org/member.php?action=profile&uid=1">Stone</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thecatacombs.org/showthread.php?tid=8222</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[It's all rumor and conjecture, from anonymous sources at this point. We must wait and see...<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;" class="mycode_align"><span style="text-decoration: underline;" class="mycode_u"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">Leo XIV Rumored to Prepare Excommunication of FSSPX</span></span></div>
<br />
<br />
<a href="https://gloria.tv/post/NePG1QQPWBxF49weG7TSQXtwF" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">gloria.tv</a> | April 26, 2026<br />
<br />
Pope Leo XIV has "decided to follow the '1988 jurisprudence'" with regard to the episcopal consecrations of the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X (FSSPX) on 1 July, reports <a href="https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2026/04/exclusive-society-of-saint-pius-x-sspx.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">Rorate-Caeli.Blogspot.com</a> on 25 April, referring to anonymous Roman sources.<br />
<br />
This means: "He is said to have already had a decree prepared that is similar in tone and content to the one promulgated by Pope John Paul II through Cardinal Bernardin Gantin, Prefect of the Congregation for Bishops, on 1 July 1988."<br />
<br />
The decree would declare the excommunication of the bishops involved, denouncing these episcopal consecrations as a "schismatic act".<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">Excommunication of entire FSSPX ?</span><br />
<br />
Other Vaticanists have confirmed the core of the rumour.<br />
<br />
Niwa Limbu (<span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Catholic Herald</span>) reported on X.com that the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith is "preparing for the possibility of excommunicating the entire FSSPX, not just the bishops".<br />
<br />
Nico Spuntoni (<span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Il Giornale</span>) wrote that the Dicastery is "preparing for the possibility of a schism following the ordinations in the FSSPX".]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[It's all rumor and conjecture, from anonymous sources at this point. We must wait and see...<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;" class="mycode_align"><span style="text-decoration: underline;" class="mycode_u"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">Leo XIV Rumored to Prepare Excommunication of FSSPX</span></span></div>
<br />
<br />
<a href="https://gloria.tv/post/NePG1QQPWBxF49weG7TSQXtwF" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">gloria.tv</a> | April 26, 2026<br />
<br />
Pope Leo XIV has "decided to follow the '1988 jurisprudence'" with regard to the episcopal consecrations of the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X (FSSPX) on 1 July, reports <a href="https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2026/04/exclusive-society-of-saint-pius-x-sspx.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">Rorate-Caeli.Blogspot.com</a> on 25 April, referring to anonymous Roman sources.<br />
<br />
This means: "He is said to have already had a decree prepared that is similar in tone and content to the one promulgated by Pope John Paul II through Cardinal Bernardin Gantin, Prefect of the Congregation for Bishops, on 1 July 1988."<br />
<br />
The decree would declare the excommunication of the bishops involved, denouncing these episcopal consecrations as a "schismatic act".<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">Excommunication of entire FSSPX ?</span><br />
<br />
Other Vaticanists have confirmed the core of the rumour.<br />
<br />
Niwa Limbu (<span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Catholic Herald</span>) reported on X.com that the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith is "preparing for the possibility of excommunicating the entire FSSPX, not just the bishops".<br />
<br />
Nico Spuntoni (<span style="font-style: italic;" class="mycode_i">Il Giornale</span>) wrote that the Dicastery is "preparing for the possibility of a schism following the ordinations in the FSSPX".]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[SSPX Announcement of New Bishops Confirmed for June]]></title>
			<link>https://thecatacombs.org/showthread.php?tid=8196</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 13:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[<a href="https://thecatacombs.org/member.php?action=profile&uid=1">Stone</a>]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thecatacombs.org/showthread.php?tid=8196</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;" class="mycode_align"><span style="text-decoration: underline;" class="mycode_u"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">BREAKING: SSPX Announcement of New Bishops Confirmed for June</span></span><br />
<br />
<img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEiCFHUF2JmVSiY4D4fpPFy_QDUTY-pvOFOewRu2vqNzi0_AvfB2kD7gdj1tALQBWwKfbHFmu4LCqKRP0L3Q1UUT5PSCKjHVTmlTwpVM5EQ8fYCHsGUwM9yg2TZf8UzePhq3ZqplA30hlMZSDF2AJuwRKDWzIn8SslbouC_SCNg7_0PdMu5RNCcmgg" loading="lazy"  width="225" height="250" alt="[Image: AVvXsEiCFHUF2JmVSiY4D4fpPFy_QDUTY-pvOFOe...Mu5RNCcmgg]" class="mycode_img" /><br />
<br />
Don Davide Pagliarani, (Source: The Fatima Center)</div>
<br />
<br />
<a href="https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2026/04/breaking-announcement-of-new-bishops.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">Rorate Caeli</a> | April 21, 2026<br />
<br />
Via the most reliable of sources, confirming agreement by both Don Davide Pagliarani, Superior General of the Priestly Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX), and Father Fullerton, District Superior for the US, the names of the new bishops to be consecrated for the Society on July 1st at Econe will be announced in June.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;" class="mycode_align"><span style="text-decoration: underline;" class="mycode_u"><span style="font-weight: bold;" class="mycode_b">BREAKING: SSPX Announcement of New Bishops Confirmed for June</span></span><br />
<br />
<img src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/a/AVvXsEiCFHUF2JmVSiY4D4fpPFy_QDUTY-pvOFOewRu2vqNzi0_AvfB2kD7gdj1tALQBWwKfbHFmu4LCqKRP0L3Q1UUT5PSCKjHVTmlTwpVM5EQ8fYCHsGUwM9yg2TZf8UzePhq3ZqplA30hlMZSDF2AJuwRKDWzIn8SslbouC_SCNg7_0PdMu5RNCcmgg" loading="lazy"  width="225" height="250" alt="[Image: AVvXsEiCFHUF2JmVSiY4D4fpPFy_QDUTY-pvOFOe...Mu5RNCcmgg]" class="mycode_img" /><br />
<br />
Don Davide Pagliarani, (Source: The Fatima Center)</div>
<br />
<br />
<a href="https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2026/04/breaking-announcement-of-new-bishops.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener" class="mycode_url">Rorate Caeli</a> | April 21, 2026<br />
<br />
Via the most reliable of sources, confirming agreement by both Don Davide Pagliarani, Superior General of the Priestly Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX), and Father Fullerton, District Superior for the US, the names of the new bishops to be consecrated for the Society on July 1st at Econe will be announced in June.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>