9 hours ago
There are so many ways to deceive and the SSPX has gottin real good at it.
Fr. Robinson only mentions the word valid. What we were instructed by the the SSPX Priests in the 1990's and early 2000's that the new mass, novus ordo priests and the novus ordo sacraments were illegitimate!! Thats what Archbishop Lefebvre said.
Read his books for yourself, because there's some deceiving going on.
What good is a "valid" priest if he's not legitimate?
It was from the many SSPX priests on retreats and in their sermons that we learned what the Archbishop said.
From my retreat notes- we were told: read the OPEN LETTER TO CONFUSED CATHOLICS
read THEY HAVE UNCROWNED HIM
Archbishop Lefebvre wrote:
"The rite of the new Mass is a bastard rite, the sacraments are bastard sacraments. the priests coming out of (Novus ordo) seminaries are bastard priests."
Fr. Robinson leaves out about whether the new mass, N.O. priests and sacraments are legitimate. Archbishop Lefebvre said very clearly they are illegitimate!
The eastern orthodox have a valid Mass and some have valid priests but Catholics cannot go there because they are not legitimate. Super important that word, but Fr. Robinson and the SSPX omit those all important words, and focus the trusting faithful on what the New, Conciliar SSPX want you to think and not realize there is more.
Be vigilant when it comes to the faith.
Archbishop Lefebvre: "Catholics in this latter part of the Twentieth century have a duty to be more vigilant than their fathers were." (referring to our "fathers" who let Modernism take over the Church via Vat II under false obedience and that the clergy knew better than the lay people)
Who led the faithful to accepting the changes in the Church at the time of Vat II? THE LOCAL PRIESTS.
Please Fr. Robinson, stop talking down to lay people who simply want valid and legitimate priests who do not compromise with modernists.
Fr. Robinson only mentions the word valid. What we were instructed by the the SSPX Priests in the 1990's and early 2000's that the new mass, novus ordo priests and the novus ordo sacraments were illegitimate!! Thats what Archbishop Lefebvre said.
Read his books for yourself, because there's some deceiving going on.
What good is a "valid" priest if he's not legitimate?
It was from the many SSPX priests on retreats and in their sermons that we learned what the Archbishop said.
From my retreat notes- we were told: read the OPEN LETTER TO CONFUSED CATHOLICS
read THEY HAVE UNCROWNED HIM
Archbishop Lefebvre wrote:
"The rite of the new Mass is a bastard rite, the sacraments are bastard sacraments. the priests coming out of (Novus ordo) seminaries are bastard priests."
Fr. Robinson leaves out about whether the new mass, N.O. priests and sacraments are legitimate. Archbishop Lefebvre said very clearly they are illegitimate!
The eastern orthodox have a valid Mass and some have valid priests but Catholics cannot go there because they are not legitimate. Super important that word, but Fr. Robinson and the SSPX omit those all important words, and focus the trusting faithful on what the New, Conciliar SSPX want you to think and not realize there is more.
Be vigilant when it comes to the faith.
Archbishop Lefebvre: "Catholics in this latter part of the Twentieth century have a duty to be more vigilant than their fathers were." (referring to our "fathers" who let Modernism take over the Church via Vat II under false obedience and that the clergy knew better than the lay people)
Who led the faithful to accepting the changes in the Church at the time of Vat II? THE LOCAL PRIESTS.
Please Fr. Robinson, stop talking down to lay people who simply want valid and legitimate priests who do not compromise with modernists.