Wristbands and dining cards: New Army policies exclude, isolate unvaccinated - Printable Version +- The Catacombs (https://thecatacombs.org) +-- Forum: General Discussion (https://thecatacombs.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=12) +--- Forum: Health (https://thecatacombs.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=78) +---- Forum: Pandemic 2020 [Secular] (https://thecatacombs.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=80) +----- Forum: COVID Passports (https://thecatacombs.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=143) +----- Thread: Wristbands and dining cards: New Army policies exclude, isolate unvaccinated (/showthread.php?tid=1483) |
Wristbands and dining cards: New Army policies exclude, isolate unvaccinated - Stone - 03-31-2021 Wristbands and dining cards: New Army policies exclude, isolate unvaccinated
The US Army can’t legally mandate COVID vaccines, but restrictive policies like those at Fort Drum and Fort Bragg make it increasingly difficult for service members to refuse.
March 31, 2020 (Children’s Health Defense) – “Liberty is always dangerous but it is the safest thing we have.” — Henry Emerson Fosdick A March 17 memorandum from the commander at the U.S. Army’s Fort Drum reservation in New York lists privileges withheld from service members who refuse to get the COVID-19 vaccine — an experimental Emergency Use Authorization product not proven to prevent infection or transmission of the COVID virus. The memo, “Prohibited Activities for Personnel Within the Authority of the Commander, 10th Mountain Division and Fort Drum,” states:
What’s happening at Fort Drum is bad enough, but maybe not as bad as the civil rights violation occurring against the unvaccinated at Fort Bragg in North Carolina, where the commander of the 82nd Airborne Division has made a vaccination card mandatory to enter a dining facility. Because a majority of lower enlisted soldiers don’t have access to kitchens in the barracks, they are dependent on the dining facilities for most, if not all of their meals while on duty or in training rotations which don’t provide access to public restaurants. This mandate will disproportionately affect lower-income personnel who may have to trade accepting an experimental vaccine in order to have food. These policies at Fort Drum and Fort Bragg are reminiscent of the fear and prejudice that led to policies of exclusion, removal and detention of loyal Japanese Americans to internment camps — or concentration camps, in corrected historical terminology, as the targeted people of Japanese descent were not enemies of the state. The Commission on Wartime Relocation and Internment of Civilians concluded that U.S. government policies toward Japanese Americans were based on “race prejudice, war hysteria and a failure of political leadership” — not military necessity. That conclusion led to the Civil Liberties Act of 1988. Likewise, the Army’s COVID policies are based on prejudice against the unvaccinated (personnel who do not put the vaccinated at risk) and hysteria concerning a virus with a 99.9% survival rate for most military service members. Has the U.S. Army forgotten its historical role in facilitating most of the internment camps that caused loss of income, lack of access to healthcare, psychological trauma and public hostility for thousands of Japanese Americans? As COVID policies force quarantines upon healthy people and their entire families, have leaders deserted the Ex parte Endo U.S. Supreme Court decision of 1944 that declared loyal citizens of the U.S. cannot be detained without cause? The policies at Fort Drum and Fort Bragg set the stage for a sequel to the shameful chapter in U.S. Army history detailed in the Commission on Wartime Relocation report, “Personal Justice Denied.” It is urgent that service members file complaints to the inspector general to halt this momentum towards medical fascism. [Emphasis mine.] RELATED It’s ‘entirely possible’ vaccine campaigns ‘will be used for massive-scale depopulation’: Former Pfizer VP 31 reasons why I won’t take a COVID vaccine |